正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Who benefits from Starmer following the same script as the Tories before him on small boats? It isn’t refugees, and it isn’t you and me, but someone does benefit. And if we’re ever going to change it, we have to shine a light on who benefits from the status quo.

71,870 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Zoe Gardner 的头像
Zoe Gardner1 年前

Full clip from @iancollinsuk show on Talk is, as ever, on my YouTube (always appreciate likes, comments and shares on there 😊😊)

EuropeanPowell 的头像
EuropeanPowell1 年前

🎯💯👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

H.Hazel 💙 的头像
H.Hazel 💙1 年前

The government need to take a bold stance & stop kowtowing to the right wing, racists & bigots. The gangs won’t stop until you stop the need for them & that means offering safe & legal routes to claim asylum & speeding up processing of the claims.

aalyta4192💙🧡💛 的头像
aalyta4192💙🧡💛1 年前

Until the UK realises that refugees policies written to appease Daily Mail readers is going to benefit a limited audience the further we move from the real issue. Safe, legal routes. Also came across this recently as sometimes words are not enough

Maurice Morgan 的头像
Maurice Morgan1 年前

First thing that came into my thoughts was are any MPs shareholders in these companies?!.

Zoe Gardner 的头像
Zoe Gardner1 年前

👀

HughMannWright 的头像
HughMannWright1 年前

Well said.

Zoe Gardner 的头像
Zoe Gardner1 年前

Thank you

Duncan Bamford 的头像
Duncan Bamford1 年前

They're framing it as if smugglers themselves are DRIVING migration. Forget the refugees from famine, war and climate-induced migration. If @UKLabour could put up a 'Trump wall' around Britain, they would absolutely do that. Safe legal routes? No, just the same Tory rhetoric.

Carl’s Lexicon 的头像
Carl’s Lexicon1 年前

Simple question, yes it has to be set up & cost money no doubt less than Rwanda scheme, but why can’t UK Govt trial safe & legal routes/access for refugees (approx 12 mths) to see if it works reducing crossings. If it doesn’t it can be ruled out as does not work so fair enough.

相关视频