Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Who is better: Aunt Cass or Elastigirl (Helen Parr)? 😈🍑💦 #elastigirl #auntcass #hellenparr #cartoonporn #hentai #theincredibles18 #milf

210,270 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

This week I debated Dr Helen Webberley (she/her), a pro trans doctor who supports transitioning kids, and who runs a clinic that does it. Now Helen’s expanding her clinic to 🇺🇸. What you’re about to see is total lunacy. Here’s our full, uncut debate on transgenderism. Timestamps ⬇️ But first, I have to say, after talking with Helen, I believe that Helen is not only evil but of a significantly inferior intelligence. For a doctor* to not know simple brain science and biology is mind boggling. Her disconnect from reality is both frightening & fascinating. How she talks about Riley Gaines, rape victims, detransitioners and kids is just absolutely vile. I put an asterisk* after "doctor" because number one I don’t think Helen deserves to be called a doctor and #2: After lots of pressure Helen relinquished a license to practice medicine in the UK but Helen still owns GenderGP where the clinic treat kids. Cut & share this interview however you want. 00:00 – Intro - Helen Webberley debate 02:37 – Why is she expanding to the US? 03:38 – Are critics of child transition “bigots”? + Riley Gaines dispute 05:44 – Men in women’s locker rooms 08:09 – “Some women have a penis” and clash over science, consent + language 10:21 – Do trans identities really exist? 12:00 – Is being transracial or trans species really different from transgender? 13:50 – Gender dysphoria vs. changing sex; chromosomes discussion 15:21 – Addressing Detransitioners 18:35 – Brain development for kids who decide to transition, impulse control and more 19:44 – Orgasm, fertility & other side effects 23:55 – Helen claims Robby’s views are harming trans people 🥴🙄 25:36 – Free speech vs. “hate” and should such views be banned? 28:31 – How can a child consent to this? 30:11 – Cass Review discussion and countries restricting or banning transitions for kids 35:16 – Can a Brazilian butt lift be gender affirming care? Where is the line drawn? 36:15 – Helen attempts elitist talking point 38:30 – Helen argues we must validate trans experiences, Robby asks how she applies that to 45 yr old men who identify as 6 years old 42:00 – What a a male/What is a woman? 45:46 – Biological differences and Helen compliments Robby’s appearance… 😳😬 47:34 – Are trans identifying people disadvantaged by society? + social contagions 53:15 – Why does this bother Robby so much? 54:19 – Protecting daughters, bathroom assaults at schools and the bathroom issue 58:10 – Autogynephelia 1:01:43 – How quickly does she believe drugs should be given and how parents should deal with a confused child… 1:05:13 – Argument over conversion therapy 1:07:00 – Debate over World Health Org, “mental illness” classifications, and COVID 1:08:18 – Helen’s stated goal for the US and Robby’s closing critique 1:09:18 – Robby’s final words on risk, evidence, and “protecting kids”

Robby Starbuck

824,048 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

President Donald Trump is destroying the global economy, according to the media, Democrats, Europeans, and libertarians. The stock market is crashing. His administration is randomly and arbitrarily imposing tariffs, they say. And his tariffs are on the verge of causing a self-destructive global trade war. But policy should not be based on the daily movement of the stock market. The tariffs are not random or arbitrary but instead are based on a publicly released formula. And a trade war will lead to a much better outcome than the path Americans have been on. So says Oren Cass , founder of the think tank American Compass and one of the leading advocates of Trump’s nationalist economic policy. Based on Cass’s resume, one would predict him to be a Never Trump Republican, not a MAGA Republican. He is a Harvard Law graduate who worked at Bain & Company and became the Domestic Policy Director for Mitt Romney at the shockingly young age of 29. Romney, one of the most high-profile Never Trump Republicans, was also highly concerned with China. “I was working on trade policy for him and brought him the very standard, ‘Here's what a Republican says about trade’ starting point. And he said, ‘This is all fine. But what are we gonna do about China?’ “I remember the other economist was like, ‘What kind of question is that? We don't do anything about China.’ Romney was a very non-ideological, pragmatic guy with a business background. He said, ‘That's ridiculous. This is completely broken. What are we gonna do?’ “And I had the privilege of being sent off to find an answer for the candidate, at which point I discovered that the entire right-of-center ideological orthodoxy and the entire economics profession refused to engage with or think about this at all, even though it was a very real problem.” In our conversation, Cass debunked claims that Trump’s tariffs were arbitrary and said they demonstrated bad faith on the part of the people claiming to have debunked them. “My sense is that a deputy press secretary gave a confusing answer to a question,” Cass said. “The US Trade Representative's office has put out a whole detailed explanation of this, with the formula they used and the sources that they used. It's a PDF you can download from the US Trade Representative's website. “If you're somebody whose goal is to just embarrass the administration and confuse people, then you find a confusing statement from a Deputy Press Secretary and say, ‘Oh, see, nobody knows what they're doing.’” Cass pointed to people claiming it was strange for there to be tariffs on small nations. “I think there has been a lot of very bad faith criticism and intentional pretend confusion for the sake of fomenting a narrative among people who should know a lot better,” he said. “One example of this is whatever random island that only has penguins on it that people are upset about. Like, ‘Oh, like why do they have a tariff rate for this island with these penguins on it?’ “The answer is because US trade policy is done through a very formal mechanism called the harmonized tariff schedule, which defines the exact set of territory for which you have to have tariff rates and the exact set of products for which you have to have tariff rates. And it's a very granular set of territories and it does have random islands and so forth as entries on the list. And so if you're going to then announce what the tariffs are by territory, you're gonna have something for the islands on the list, right?” Another piece of misunderstanding Cass was on the idea of “reciprocal tariffs. “There was certainly a communication challenge in calling them reciprocal tariffs,” said Cass, “which people understand to mean ‘Whatever they do to us, we do to them.’ We're sort of holding up a mirror. But there was plenty of messaging for a couple of months leading up to this that what they meant by reciprocal was more like proportional, that it was going to be in relation to the size of the imbalance that we have with the other countries. I wrote a long thing in February walking through what they seem to mean and how it might look.” People are playing dumb, in other words. “They did a like, ‘We just can't figure this out. This must be some crazy mistake.’ It’s people who, politely, are not trying very hard to figure it out and are well-served by claiming it can't be figured out when, in, when in fact it can.” Trump’s tariffs will likely bring back high-wage manufacturing jobs just like Reagan did when he demanded Japanese car companies manufacture in the U.S., explains Cass... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

505,112 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sam Parr made a video about us hanging out and what he learned from it: “The people who are the best in the world at what they do, they're not two or three times better than the second or third place, they're a 100 or a 1,000 times better. And I've seen this a bunch of times. The most recent example was the other day with my friend David Senra. He has this podcast called Founders. It's one of the biggest, best podcasts I've ever listened to. It's very popular. Tycoons listen to it and he's become friends with all these amazing people because of it. I was at his studio and he had four (five!) very high-end fancy cameras and the most beautiful, fancy set that I've ever seen. And most podcasters they record with just two DSLR cameras. And I was like, David did these four (five!) fancy cameras actually matter compared to the two normal cameras that everyone like me uses. And without skipping a beat he said: “I'm trying to be the best in the world. Everything matters.” And then he just carried on with the conversation. He wasn't performing. That wasn't a performative answer. And the second thing that I learned the other day with David, when you're around these people who have this energy where they just feel like they're going to take over the world: That's contagious. I know that’s contagious because I still feel that way after hanging out with David. It's Sunday now. I was with him on Friday. And so this is a reminder to go and hang out with the best people you can. It wears off on you.”

David Senra

34,703 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I’m afraid I have some terrible news. The governor of America’s largest and richest state has just signed a law that puts 10 million children and adolescents in grave danger of medical mistreatment. The media headlines have it wrong. They claim that California Governor Gavin Newsom’s new law protects children by stopping public schools from outing their new gender to their parents. It does just the opposite. It makes children vulnerable to irreversible and lifelong medical abuse and mistreatment. And it is all based on the pseudoscientific idea that some children are born into the wrong bodies and that we can change a person’s sex through drugs and surgery. For any of this to make sense, you have to understand what’s happening in Britain. Several years ago, the government appointed a well-respected pediatrician named Hillary Cass to investigate whether it was ethical to block the puberty of children, give them opposite-sex hormones, and perform surgeries on their bodies to make them feel better about their gender. Dr. Cass came back a few weeks ago and said no, absolutely not. Around the same time, the British government banned puberty blockers nationwide. And, just a few days ago, the new Labor Party government affirmed that it would maintain the former government’s ban. In her report, Cass said that the so-called “social transition,” whereby a child adopts the identity of the opposite sex, is not a neutral act and has psychological consequences. This means it is the first step toward medical intervention. What Gavin Newsom has done is actively prevented schools from informing parents that their children have been put on a medical pathway. This is an outrageous attack on the rights of children and parents. Children have a right to go through puberty. No adult should be able to block their puberty. And parents have a right to know if their child thinks that they are the opposite sex or were born into the wrong body. We have seen with leaked internal documents of the leading gender medicine group, WPATH, that these medical interventions, namely puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery, are not only irreversible but result in sterilization and loss of sexual function. Children or adolescents are simply not mature enough to understand the effects of so-called “gender-affirming care.” They cannot, in other words, give their informed consent. The new law creates the grave risk that activist teachers, students, and outside groups will convince their children that they were born into the wrong body, and hide their “social transition” from parents, which will lead to harmful medical mistreatment. As such, the law that Newsom just signed is the opposite of what both children and their parents need. We need schools to immediately warn parents if their children think they are the opposite sex. After all, this is a diagnosable psychiatric condition known as “gender dysphoria.” And if your child has a psychiatric disorder, whether anxiety, depression, an eating disorder, or gender dysphoria, you have a right to know. And schools must stop teaching children, or allowing other people to teach children, the pseudoscientific and dehumanizing ideas that it’s possible to be born into the wrong body and possible to change one’s sex. As such, either the legislature, the courts, or a ballot initiative will be required to nullify Newsom’s law. Until then, it is important to spread the word to parents that California public schools are fundamentally unsafe for the millions of children who attend them.

Michael Shellenberger

28,546,185 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

ALL ROADS LEAD TO OBAMA & SOROS. In order to understand Samantha Power & the USAID connection we need to understand where she comes from and her husband Cass Sunstein. Sunstein also went to Harvard Law School like Obama. They were both Law professors and met at The University of Chicago. Obama made Sunstein the Czar of information in the Obama Administration from 2009-2012. Obama's "regulatory czar," Cass Sunstein, drew up a "First Amendment New Deal" - a new "Fairness Doctrine" that would include the establishment of a panel of "nonpartisan experts" to ensure “diversity of view" on the airwaves. He was in favor of the “Chilling effect” which wanted to create guard rails to “hateful speech” and even looked to impose fines to create a “Chilling effect” which would create pause in people exercising the first amendment. He wrote the book “ Nudge” which is essentially a new age communist manifesto meaning government should nudge people to do better behavior..OR ELSE. Sunstein has been a speaker at ACS events, and ACS has received funding from Soros's Open Society Institute. For example, ACS received over $2.2 million from Open Society since 2002. His wife Samantha Power took control of USAID conveniently during the COVID 19 Pandemic. If you watch her on Maddow last night she is discussing the importance of funding for “independent journalists” to report on events that are enduring social unrest. In reality it is training and paying journalists to promote their propaganda and participate in regime change and has NOTHING to do with feeding hungry mouths. We have witnessed these practices permeate our own media institutions and tech companies with censorship since Obama took office. That’s why they fear Elon looking at the books and seeing the payments. Obama appointed Mark Lloyd as his “Diversity Czar” of the FCC and is on tape stating that Chavez did a great job by taking CONTROL OF THE MEDIA. These people are Bolsheviks and them and their minions have been entrenched in our government & media since 2009. Any attempt to pretend they are worried about feeding hungry mouths globally is morale high ground misdirection. And like Elon Musk said, “I care about the reality of goodness, not the perception of it. And what I see all over the place is people who care about looking good while doing evil. FUCK THEM!!” They were so close to complete tyranny and Obama’s 4th term would have finally ushered it in and that was the end game all along. President Trump winning in 2024 and all of America coming to together prevented that from becoming our reality.

Johnny St.Pete

254,111 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.RTE WON'T TELL YOU THIS SHOCKING TRUTH, BUT WE IrishInquiry WILL On the 17th of December 2025, the following elected representatives voted to ban foxhunting but they ALSO voted in favour of reintroducing the Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy - Amendment Bill 2023), which would (if the yes voters were successful) effectively have led to legalised abortion to term (9 months/full gestation). The media was, of course, quiet about the vote, and the vote itself was held one week before Christmas, seemingly in an attempt to surreptitiously pass it under the noses of a distracted and busy public. MOST OF THE NATION IS UNAWARE THIS VOTE TOOK PLACE. The attempt to reintroduce the bill was defeated by just two votes (and no doubt those who voted yes won't accept permanent or indefinite defeat). Over 70 TDs and Government Ministers voted in favour of the bill. Including Minister Jack Chambers and Minister Helen McEntee. Members of Sinn Fein, Fianna Fail, Fine Gael and some independents voted in favour (as well as the parties and independents listed in the video). We will post a screenshot of all 70 TDs voted in favour of the bill. Those who abstained or didn't show to vote are no better and we will include them also. REMEMBER many of these politicians also voted AGAINST The Foetal Pain Relief Bill 2021 which means they are ALSO AGAINST babies receiving pain relief during or after the abortion process (President Catherine Connolly also voted against it). So far in Ireland it is known (through Freedom Of Information) that at least 12 babies have survived the abortion process and have been left to die alone in sluice rooms without any medication to ease them through the transition from life to death. Please SHARE this video. Don't just hit like. Be courageous for these have the power to make others aware of the barbaric and nightmarish nature of what our so called elected representatives wish to make legal. Next time you see a newborn baby, ask yourself are you OK with making it legal to end its life in a painful and protracted way. The only difference between a fully developed baby in the womb and a newborn is the time it takes to be birthed into the world.

Susanne Delaney

25,329 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

When I was 8 years old, growing up in Taipei, I called my aunt in San Francisco and asked: What is the best science and technology school in the world? She said MIT. I went on the internet, found it, and decided that was where I was going. All because of a Steven Spielberg movie about a little robot boy who wanted to find his mom. I grew up as an only child. What stayed with me from that movie was not just the technology. It was the possibility that one day, an artificial companion could understand how I felt. That was the first time I remember being moved by a technology that could change how humans experience reality. Years later, I did get to MIT. I studied AI before it became obvious. I became a machine learning engineer, built my first company, joined a $3.5B VC fund, left to build again, failed, started again, moved to New York alone, and built through one of the hardest crypto markets as a solo founder after the collapse of FTX. I kept going because I have always been drawn to technologies that change how humans understand the world. AI was the first version of that. Crypto and prediction markets are the next. I believe the future I am building toward is inevitable. The only question is whether I get to be one of the people who helps realize it. That future is a world where markets become information-first. The old model of trading was asset-first. It rewarded people with capital, financial education, institutional access, and better tools. But the next generation of markets will be shaped by information flow, narrative, attention, politics, culture, sentiment, and collective belief. Prediction markets make this shift obvious. They are one of the first asset classes where the value is informational, not purely financial in the traditional sense. Your edge does not have to come from technical analysis or a traditional finance background. Your edge can come from knowing something before it becomes consensus. From seeing reality shift before the market prices it in. Someone with firsthand knowledge of an unfolding event can have more alpha than an institution with a much bigger balance sheet. They turn belief into price. But price alone is not enough. Polymarket shows what the market thinks will happen. ARES is built to understand why the market is changing. We are building an information-first trading platform for prediction markets and other narrative-driven assets. One that does not just show traders what is moving, but helps them understand why odds are shifting, why narratives are forming, and why the future is moving in a certain direction. But the bigger vision is not just a better trading terminal. We want to turn every trade into an information object. Every position can become a piece of content. Every market view can become a signal. Every trader can build a reputation around conviction and accuracy. Most feeds rank information by engagement. Who got the most likes. Who already has the biggest audience. Markets allow us to rank information differently. How much are you willing to stake on what you believe? How often have you been right? That creates a fundamentally different kind of media feed. One powered by conviction, track record, and market incentives. One that becomes harder to fake. One that can help people understand not just what the market thinks will happen, but why reality is changing. I also believe prediction markets are one of the few markets where humans can still have a real edge over AI. AI knows what is already on the internet. But humans experience reality before it becomes data. We see things before they become headlines. We hear things before they become reports. We feel shifts before they become consensus. If those signals can be priced, organized, and made legible, then more people can gain access to financial opportunity, information agency, and power. That is what Ares is building toward. I spent years watching founders from the VC side of the table, always thinking: I wish that was me. Now it is. I talked about this journey and the thesis behind Ares in my conversation with Dmitry on Predict Time If you are building, trading, investing, or thinking deeply about prediction markets and information markets, I would love for you to watch it. And if you want to collaborate on what we are building, contribute to the vision, or join the team, we are always open to exceptional people across functions. DMs are open.

Morgan Lai

302,663 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

ออกงานใหญ่ทั้งที เจ๊เอ๋ไม่มีคำว่าเกรงใจใคร เพราะภารกิจหลักของเจ๊คือ “หม่ำทุกคน!” 😋💥 (#KNPLandEngagementJourney) สิ้นสุดการรอคอยของพี่ ๆ โอ๋ ๆ ทุกท่าน! วันนี้เจ๊เอ๋ หรือ น้องโอ๋เอ๋ OhAe มาสคอตสุดน่ารักเบบี๋คนเก่งของปะป๊าเก่ง Harit_keng (DuckMan 🦆) และปะปี๊น้ำปิง Namping บุกสร้างเสียงหัวเราะและรอยยิ้มกระจายทั่วงาน ICONSIAM THAICONIC SONGKRAN 2026 แบบไม่มีพัก! และด้วยดีกรี “นักหม่ำมืออาชีพ” เจ๊เอ๋กวาดทั้งเอนเกจเมนต์ ทั้งยอดแบบปังไม่ไหว ได้ยอดรวมทั้งคีย์เวิร์ดและแฮชแท็กไปกว่า 1.08 M สมมงดาราเด็กของปะป๊าปะปี๊ ใครเจอก็ต้องยอมใจในความน่ารักเกินต้านของเจ๊! ขอขอบคุณ ICONSIAM ที่ให้เกียรติเชิญน้องโอ๋เอ๋ของพวกเราอีกครั้งนะคะ 💖 งานหน้าขอรวมตัวแบบครบครอบครัวไปเลยนะพี่ไอค่อน~ แต่แอบกระซิบไว้ก่อน ระวังตัวกันให้ดี 👀 เพราะเจ๊เอ๋กำลังเล็งจะหม่ำพี่ไอค่อนจริงแล้วน้าาา! 😈🍽️ Making a grand appearance, J‘Ae isn’t here to play nice because his main mission is to “nom nom everyone!” 😋💥 (#KNPLandEngagementJourney) The wait is finally over for all our lovely grand Ohohs! Today, J’Ae (or little OhAe OhAe), the adorable baby mascot and beloved child of Papa Keng Harit_keng (DuckMan 🦆) and Papi Namping Namping , brought endless laughter and smiles throughout the ICONSIAM THAICONIC SONGKRAN 2026 event! With his title as a “professional muncher,” OhAe absolutely slayed racking up engagement and reaching over 1.08M in total keywords and hashtags! Truly living up to his superstar baby status 🦹🏻 everyone who met him couldn’t resist his irresistible cuteness! A big thank you to ICONSIAM for kindly inviting our little OhAe once again 💖 We hope next time the whole family gets to reunite at the event! But just a little warning ‼️ better watch out 👀 Because OhAe might just be eyeing ICONSIAM as his next “snack”! 😈🍽️ OHAE SONGKRAN26 ICONSIAM #OHAExICONSIAM

KengNampingLand

137,122 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨🚨🚨 I want to ask you guys this question, because nothing else makes sense to me : Is the military currently attacking the public? Before you get butthurt, please read the post and understand that I’m just trying to figure out what’s going on. It’s a very serious question that we should all be considering, because nothing else makes much sense, if you really think about it. If you have a better explanation, PLEASE TELL ME. No one else has the capability to covertly cause such damage to the world. Anyone who would dare try would simply get caught BY THE MILITARY. Imagine China or Japan or whoever you wanna imagine, used a DEW to destroy a large part of the USA, you really think the military wouldn’t know what happened? You guys obviously know by now that the USA military created and distributed the COVID vaccines, right? I’ll post the clip where Robert F. Kennedy Jr explains this in the thread. You guys also know that South Africa 🇿🇦 released their COVID vaccine contract with Pfizer, right? The same vaccine everyone around the world took btw - The contract literally states : (1) Long term side effects = UNKNOWN (2) Efficacy = UNKNOWN (3) Adverse events = UNKNOWN Check out page 21, section 5.5 - You can see the contract right here : Imagine your entire country got injected with something that could put every single person at risk……WHY WOULDN’T YOU DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS? AT LEAST GIVE AN EXPLANATION ABOUT YOUR ROLE IN CREATING AND DISTRIBUTING THIS VACCINE TO THE WORLD? Imagine your country being invaded by illegal immigrants - WHY WOULDN’T YOU DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS? Imagine LARGE parts of your country being set on fire, like MAUI and now CALI, while you let people claim “climate change” is the cause. WHY WOULDN’T YOU COME OUT AND OFFER THE PUBLIC A CLEAR AND LOGICAL ANSWER BASED ON THE BEST TECHNOLOGY AND EXPERTS THE COUNTRY HAS TO OFFER? Do you know guys know that a depopulation program was set to be triggered when the human population reached a certain point? It’s literally written by Henry Kissinger in this report : Who is suppose to carry out the depopulation, if it’s not the military? My aunt and uncle? 🤔 If the military is not attacking humanity, then why are they not protecting us? Why are they not telling us what’s going on? You guys honestly think that they don’t know about all the intentional destruction being caused around the world? Why have I not heard one single high level military officer come out and speak to the public about the continuous and ongoing catastrophes? WHY NOT? isn’t the military supposed to protect us during extreme circumstances? At least offer us an explanation? Prove to us why these fires can not possible be caused by military DEWs? What DEWs do you even possess? What do your military experts think about these ongoing catastrophes happening? What do the satellites and radars show before the fires? Did you spot any anomalies? Don’t you have the best experts and technology in the country? Isn’t the military supposed to be the ultimate protection for a country? Why are they always nowhere to be found during a crisis? Enlighten me or please explain why my thought process is wrong, because I don’t get it.

Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE🦁

25,013 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

COACHES ONLY: THIS IS WHY COACHING EXPERIENCE MATTERS This post is primarily for coaches. Before I get into my own analysis, I want to give Venom Reacts (VENOM 😈) full credit for the film breakdown that prompted this post. He did an excellent job slowing the possession down, identifying where the defensive action actually breaks, and explaining why the final matchup at the rim does not tell the whole story. If you have not watched his video yet, watch it first. His explanation is worth your time. What I want to add is another coaching perspective. If you have spent years completing USA Basketball education, PGC training, NABC development, certification requirements, clinics, continuing education, film study and the thousand other things serious coaches do to become better teachers of the game, watch this possession and tell me what you see. Because I see a coaching problem. Mercedes Russell navigates the low-post screen incorrectly. She goes over it when the coverage requires her to get underneath. That single mistake changes the geometry of the possession and leaves Caitlin Clark forced into an emergency switch against a center at the rim. By then, the defense is already compromised. Clark did not create the mismatch. She inherited it. Could Clark have handled the emergency differently? Coaches can debate that. Maybe there is a late communication, front, dig, foul or emergency rotation January wanted. But none of those possibilities change the first breakdown. Russell loses the coverage. Clark is left trying to survive it. Then watch the timeout. Briann January appears to direct an extremely animated correction toward Clark. Clark clearly disagrees. Stephanie White stands between them and allows the exchange to continue. Now forget personalities for a moment and evaluate this strictly as coaches. What are we trying to accomplish during that timeout? Indiana is protecting a double-digit lead with roughly four minutes remaining. Clark is having a career-level night. This is closing time. My timeout priorities are clock, score, personnel, foul situation, remaining timeouts, offensive organization, defensive coverage, anticipated counters and making absolutely certain my five players leave that huddle composed and connected. The previous possession gets corrected only to the extent necessary to prevent it from happening again: Mercedes, get under it. Caitlin, stay home unless she gets caught. Communicate it. Next play. That takes seconds. Everything else belongs in film. And even if Clark had been completely responsible for the breakdown... I don't believe she was... I still cannot understand using precious late-game timeout bandwidth to publicly unload on a player who is carrying your offense and playing one of the best games of her season. Experienced coaches understand the difference between correction and emotional discharge. We also understand the difference between being a great defender and teaching great team defense. Briann January was an outstanding individual defensive player. Seven All-Defensive selections deserve respect. But playing credentials are not coaching credentials. Her publicly documented coaching résumé remains remarkably thin for the responsibility she now carries: brief college assistant experience while still playing, a long gap, two seasons under Stephanie White in Connecticut, one G League season, and back to White in Indiana. No head-coaching experience. No associate head-coaching experience. No independently established defensive program. And I have found no publicly documented USA Basketball, PGC, NABC or comparable formal coaching credential attached to her résumé. That does not prove she has never completed additional training. It does raise a fair question experienced coaches will immediately understand: Where was the apprenticeship that taught the transition from elite individual defender to elite teacher of five-player defense? Because those are very different jobs. A great defender can solve problems with athleticism, anticipation, toughness and individual technique. A defensive coach has to diagnose the first breakdown, establish five-player rules, teach screen navigation, define switch triggers, organize help behind the action and communicate corrections in a way players can immediately execute. That is why this possession bothers me. It is not because a coach raised her voice. It is because the film appears to show the coach directing the most intense correction at the player who was cleaning up somebody else's mistake. Coaches: watch the play, not the personalities. Then watch the timeout. I would genuinely like to know what you see. X Video analysis credit: VENOM 😈 YouTube: @VenomReacts3

Sports Patriot

20,754 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

What is better, billionaire and trillionaire private citizens who don’t pay taxes while millions can’t afford their medical bills, or a “trillionaire” Gaddafi whose people had the following benefits ⬇️ 💠 Rent & Housing: Rent and homelessness were practically eliminated for many families. Gaddafi declared housing a human right and launched large state construction programs. 💧 Utilities: Electricity and water bills were heavily subsidized or completely free. 🏥 Healthcare: Libya had one of the best healthcare systems in Africa during the 1980s and early 2000s. 🩺 All citizens received free medical treatment, including surgeries abroad if necessary, paid by the state. 👶 Child mortality dropped dramatically, and life expectancy rose from about 54 years in 1969 to over 74 by 2010. 🎓 Education: Free from primary school to university level. 📚 Literacy rates rose from ~25% in 1969 to over 80% by 2010. ✈️ Students studying abroad had all expenses covered by the government (tuition, accommodation, stipends). 💰 Economy & Finance: 💵 Libya had no external debt and held over $150 billion in reserves. 🏦 The government provided interest-free loans to start small businesses or buy homes. 💍 Newlyweds received grants (up to $50,000) to help start families. 🛢️ Oil profits were nationalized and shared through state programs rather than private elites. ⛽ Energy: Fuel prices were among the lowest in the world — around $0.14 per liter. 🚗 Car ownership and mobility were encouraged by low taxes and subsidies. 🌾 Agriculture & Food: Gaddafi’s “Great Man-Made River Project,” one of the largest irrigation systems ever built, turned desert regions fertile. 🥖 Basic foods were subsidized, and agricultural workers received state support. 🕊️ Stability & Security: Before 2011, Libya had no major wars or internal terrorism. 🚔 Violent crime was rare due to strong internal security and generous social welfare. 🌍 Pan-African Development: Gaddafi invested heavily in African development — creating the African Investment Bank, African Gold Dinar project, and telecom satellites for the continent. ⚖️ His push for an independent African currency and defense union threatened Western financial dominance. 🏗️ Infrastructure: Roads, hospitals, schools, and housing expanded rapidly under oil-funded projects. 💦 The Great Man-Made River supplied most of Libya’s water needs — a feat UNESCO called “the eighth wonder of the world.” ✨ In short: free housing, free healthcare, free education, cheap fuel, social welfare, national sovereignty, and no foreign debt.

Open Minded Approach

23,055 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten