Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Who sent the Police?

75,354 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

🅓🅔🅡🅘🅣🅞🇰🇪's profile picture
🅓🅔🅡🅘🅣🅞🇰🇪1 year ago

😅😂

𝐌𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐀 B𝐲 𝐋𝐄𝐕𝐈's profile picture
𝐌𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐀 B𝐲 𝐋𝐄𝐕𝐈1 year ago

So because they are sent they can't ignore when the orders are shiet,, are the police inhuman such that they follow orders whether good or bad ? And if so then it means police ain't human beings and they work without reasoning.

Onejar☘️'s profile picture
Onejar☘️1 year ago

Ni sawa they Follow Orders bt @kibeandy unataka kuniambia Pia Hii ni Kufollow Order??? ##EndPoliceBrutality

Louis Berry, Writer, Task Force Vigilante's profile picture
Louis Berry, Writer, Task Force Vigilante2 years ago

John and Mayme Surrency were murdered the day before Thanksgiving 1936. Garland Headley was tasked with prosecuting the three men involved. What he uncovered sent him and his family fleeing the United States. What did John and Mayme know that led to their murder?

Korir Edward's profile picture
Korir Edward1 year ago

Who let the dogs out.. who who?

Jymie's profile picture
Jymie1 year ago

Kibe used to champion accountability but lately he's championing impunity. I understand; he's securing his retirement fund.

stephor's profile picture
stephor1 year ago

when I hear this mukefe talk politics, naonanga the male version of Karen nyamu and passaris. Matters politics unakuwanga nje kuruka. Mwisho utajipata huna a single audience. Can't forget ukiwa USA ukisupport Ruto kama fala.

Ken Aseka's profile picture
Ken Aseka1 year ago

The police only follow orders. In the case of Albert Ojwang, who sent the police? That's the guy who should be lynched - Andrew Kibe

𝐉𝐚𝐡𝐏𝐰𝐨𝐧𝐣's profile picture
𝐉𝐚𝐡𝐏𝐰𝐨𝐧𝐣1 year ago

sit back and learn. Individual Criminal Responsibility: A police officer who carries out an unlawful killing, even under orders, is criminally liable for their actions. The National Police Service Act, Section 61 and Sixth Schedule stipulate that lethal force is only justified when strictly necessary to protect life (e.g., in self-defense or to prevent imminent threat of death or serious injury). If the officer’s actions exceed what is lawful, they are responsible for the offense (e.g., murder or manslaughter) under the Penal Code (Cap 63). The defense of “following orders” is generally not accepted for grave crimes, as officers are expected to exercise judgment and adhere to the law.

Mejja Sahar's profile picture
Mejja Sahar1 year ago

Wee mafiiii saa hii ndio umeanza ku reason after umefirwa

Kevin Orango's profile picture
Kevin Orango1 year ago

You're partly right, orders are orders. BUT whenever an order is given, it should be LAWFUL, and it is incumbent upon the person carrying out the order to make this determination because at the point of strangling someone to death, you take PERSONAL responsibility.

Related Videos