Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

75,354 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von 🅓🅔🅡🅘🅣🅞🇰🇪
🅓🅔🅡🅘🅣🅞🇰🇪vor 1 Jahr

😅😂

Profilbild von 𝐌𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐀 B𝐲 𝐋𝐄𝐕𝐈
𝐌𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐀 B𝐲 𝐋𝐄𝐕𝐈vor 1 Jahr

So because they are sent they can't ignore when the orders are shiet,, are the police inhuman such that they follow orders whether good or bad ? And if so then it means police ain't human beings and they work without reasoning.

Profilbild von Onejar☘️
Onejar☘️vor 1 Jahr

Ni sawa they Follow Orders bt @kibeandy unataka kuniambia Pia Hii ni Kufollow Order??? ##EndPoliceBrutality

Profilbild von Louis Berry, Writer, Task Force Vigilante
Louis Berry, Writer, Task Force Vigilantevor 2 Jahren

John and Mayme Surrency were murdered the day before Thanksgiving 1936. Garland Headley was tasked with prosecuting the three men involved. What he uncovered sent him and his family fleeing the United States. What did John and Mayme know that led to their murder?

Profilbild von Korir Edward
Korir Edwardvor 1 Jahr

Who let the dogs out.. who who?

Profilbild von Jymie
Jymievor 1 Jahr

Kibe used to champion accountability but lately he's championing impunity. I understand; he's securing his retirement fund.

Profilbild von stephor
stephorvor 1 Jahr

when I hear this mukefe talk politics, naonanga the male version of Karen nyamu and passaris. Matters politics unakuwanga nje kuruka. Mwisho utajipata huna a single audience. Can't forget ukiwa USA ukisupport Ruto kama fala.

Profilbild von Ken Aseka
Ken Asekavor 1 Jahr

The police only follow orders. In the case of Albert Ojwang, who sent the police? That's the guy who should be lynched - Andrew Kibe

Profilbild von 𝐉𝐚𝐡𝐏𝐰𝐨𝐧𝐣
𝐉𝐚𝐡𝐏𝐰𝐨𝐧𝐣vor 1 Jahr

sit back and learn. Individual Criminal Responsibility: A police officer who carries out an unlawful killing, even under orders, is criminally liable for their actions. The National Police Service Act, Section 61 and Sixth Schedule stipulate that lethal force is only justified when strictly necessary to protect life (e.g., in self-defense or to prevent imminent threat of death or serious injury). If the officer’s actions exceed what is lawful, they are responsible for the offense (e.g., murder or manslaughter) under the Penal Code (Cap 63). The defense of “following orders” is generally not accepted for grave crimes, as officers are expected to exercise judgment and adhere to the law.

Profilbild von Mejja Sahar
Mejja Saharvor 1 Jahr

Wee mafiiii saa hii ndio umeanza ku reason after umefirwa

Profilbild von Kevin Orango
Kevin Orangovor 1 Jahr

You're partly right, orders are orders. BUT whenever an order is given, it should be LAWFUL, and it is incumbent upon the person carrying out the order to make this determination because at the point of strangling someone to death, you take PERSONAL responsibility.

Ähnliche Videos