正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Who sent the Police?

75,420 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

🅓🅔🅡🅘🅣🅞🇰🇪 的头像
🅓🅔🅡🅘🅣🅞🇰🇪1 年前

😅😂

𝐌𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐀 B𝐲 𝐋𝐄𝐕𝐈 的头像
𝐌𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐀 B𝐲 𝐋𝐄𝐕𝐈1 年前

So because they are sent they can't ignore when the orders are shiet,, are the police inhuman such that they follow orders whether good or bad ? And if so then it means police ain't human beings and they work without reasoning.

Onejar☘️ 的头像
Onejar☘️1 年前

Ni sawa they Follow Orders bt @kibeandy unataka kuniambia Pia Hii ni Kufollow Order??? ##EndPoliceBrutality

Louis Berry, Writer, Task Force Vigilante 的头像
Louis Berry, Writer, Task Force Vigilante2 年前

John and Mayme Surrency were murdered the day before Thanksgiving 1936. Garland Headley was tasked with prosecuting the three men involved. What he uncovered sent him and his family fleeing the United States. What did John and Mayme know that led to their murder?

Korir Edward 的头像
Korir Edward1 年前

Who let the dogs out.. who who?

Jymie 的头像
Jymie1 年前

Kibe used to champion accountability but lately he's championing impunity. I understand; he's securing his retirement fund.

stephor 的头像
stephor1 年前

when I hear this mukefe talk politics, naonanga the male version of Karen nyamu and passaris. Matters politics unakuwanga nje kuruka. Mwisho utajipata huna a single audience. Can't forget ukiwa USA ukisupport Ruto kama fala.

Ken Aseka 的头像
Ken Aseka1 年前

The police only follow orders. In the case of Albert Ojwang, who sent the police? That's the guy who should be lynched - Andrew Kibe

𝐉𝐚𝐡𝐏𝐰𝐨𝐧𝐣 的头像
𝐉𝐚𝐡𝐏𝐰𝐨𝐧𝐣1 年前

sit back and learn. Individual Criminal Responsibility: A police officer who carries out an unlawful killing, even under orders, is criminally liable for their actions. The National Police Service Act, Section 61 and Sixth Schedule stipulate that lethal force is only justified when strictly necessary to protect life (e.g., in self-defense or to prevent imminent threat of death or serious injury). If the officer’s actions exceed what is lawful, they are responsible for the offense (e.g., murder or manslaughter) under the Penal Code (Cap 63). The defense of “following orders” is generally not accepted for grave crimes, as officers are expected to exercise judgment and adhere to the law.

Mejja Sahar 的头像
Mejja Sahar1 年前

Wee mafiiii saa hii ndio umeanza ku reason after umefirwa

Kevin Orango 的头像
Kevin Orango1 年前

You're partly right, orders are orders. BUT whenever an order is given, it should be LAWFUL, and it is incumbent upon the person carrying out the order to make this determination because at the point of strangling someone to death, you take PERSONAL responsibility.

相关视频