正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨🌍 WHO WILL THE WEST PUT IN UNIFORM? I started investigating Britain's proposed Homeland Force. Then people in Canada told me: “JIM — LOOK AT WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE.” So I did. And the investigation suddenly became much bigger. Across the West, governments are preparing for war while struggling to...

38,678 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

35 条评论

T0NY 🇬🇧🤝🇺🇸 的头像
T0NY 🇬🇧🤝🇺🇸1 个月前

A conscription will fail in the UK. Once announced, mass civil unrest will start. I will not fight Russia. Not our war!

stillgoing paul 的头像
stillgoing paul1 个月前

Yes Jim! It all been prophesied and planned since 1954, when the Rothschild/Rockefeller-khazarian Mafia decided that they would Own and Control the World! Through Globalist Groups like Bilderberg, WHO, WEF, The Trilateral Commission, Fabians, and the Round Table! ONE WORLD ARMY ONE WORLD POLICE FORCE

Julie Armstrong 的头像
Julie Armstrong1 个月前

The convergence of self destructive policies across Western countries should be obvious to everyone by now. We are entering the most dangerous phase with the engineering of a war with Russia and the possible arming of hostile immigrants.

jane bellamy 的头像
jane bellamy1 个月前

Recruiting people like from Africa the far east Muslims etc is going to be problematical..give them guns and they can easily turn on the country they are meant to be protecting..recipe for disaster.

Gideon Jacobs 的头像
Gideon Jacobs1 个月前

Jim, would it be insane to propose the following hypothesis? The plan to herd all nations in under a global government has hit some roadblocks. The main one, the rise of national populists, aka the Right. How do you ensure that you don't loose your grip on power and save a rapidly failing plan? What do you do if the populists start rising in large numbers demanding your resignation, or elections, or .... ? 1st you start beating the war drums. You claim you need people to "protect the nation" against an enemy they created. You know your local lads serving would probably not be willing to use deadly force to oppress populist uprising, so you need people with no connection to the land or communities. Would this be too wild a conspiracy theory? Russia should never have been left out in the cold after the Soviet Union collapsed. White Russians are predominantly Orthodox Christian. If Russia was allowed to join Nato as Putin requested, Russia would have aligned with the West, instead of with Communist China. Our governments forced their hand. Pressed them inch by inch into a smaller corner. Russia is not the enemy of Western nation's populations, but the globalists needed their bogey man. If Russia joined Nato, the actual need for Nato evaporated. They could not allow that to happen. We are all in great peril. GB, America, Canada, Australia, NZ, Germany, France, .... The only way I see us countering their plan is by building active networks, while we still can, across nations. A coalition of people who can spread awareness, support one another and counter the propaganda. If you believe that such effort has merit, please get in contact with me.

Jim Ferguson 的头像
Jim Ferguson1 个月前

Gideon, thank you. I think you raise some very interesting questions, and some of them are remarkably close to the questions I've been asking myself as I've gone deeper into this investigation. What particularly interests me is that when you start looking beyond Britain and compare what is happening across Canada, Australia, Europe and elsewhere, a much bigger picture begins to emerge. I'm always careful to distinguish between what we can prove, what the evidence suggests and what still remains a hypothesis. There are still important pieces of this puzzle that we simply don't have yet — particularly around Britain's proposed Homeland Force and exactly who will ultimately be eligible to serve in it. But I completely agree with your wider point about building relationships across borders. Independent journalists, researchers and commentators sharing information, comparing developments and supporting one another could become increasingly important. I would certainly be interested in hearing more about what you have in mind. Please DM me and let's have a conversation. Jim

Muzzy 的头像
Muzzy1 个月前

Several cases in America where Muslims joined the military and when the time was right for them they killed fellow soldiers in terrorist attacks on the bases…..sleeper cells infiltrating the forces….

DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY 的头像
DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY1 个月前

In Canada, we don't require police officers to be citizens. How about that? That police officer arresting you might have arrived a few months ago and knows nothing of Canadian culture - probably less about our laws too.

ian norfolk 的头像
ian norfolk1 个月前

Happy to join dads army but not going to bloody Ukraine.

Groucho4Marx 的头像
Groucho4Marx1 个月前

FYI 🥸😵🙄

Victor B Greenwood 的头像
Victor B Greenwood1 个月前

Churchill's mother was Jewish!! Bolsheviks (JEWS) slaughtered over 30 million Russian Christians !! A real documentary of German history. This one was NOT done by Robert Maxwell (Jewish) (Mossad) For educational purposes only www. europathelastbattle. net Please share. The world, the sheep need to be woken!!

Anne 的头像
Anne1 个月前

The immigrants are UN military trained in Turkey & deployed ready for civil war. The globalists are killing people with bioweapon shots, poison in food, chemtrails, and murder when civil war breaks out. The UN2030 agenda describes it very well. Now they plan to steal savings.

Chris al 的头像
Chris al1 个月前

You have a point. The globalists want war. And to wage it, they need to send people to the front. In France, the military programming law signed by Macron stipulates the requisitioning of assets and individuals. We are fast approaching that point.

Theresa Bates 🚜 🌏 的头像
Theresa Bates 🚜 🌏1 个月前

@RickArmstrong11 I suspected this was coming when you have fighting age illegally trafficked men protected, housed and fed in accommodation.

Chris Smith 的头像
Chris Smith1 个月前

Did you notice how the EU all comes out with the same Russia narrative, whats different is USA does not anymore like biden era. Whats more interesting is the cia in russia Nato , EU cant touch Russia without USA , i doubt very much they can afford it

Porl Francois 的头像
Porl Francois1 个月前

Never mind recruits, who's the enemy?

Jens-Jørgen Jensen-Hansen Nielsen 的头像
Jens-Jørgen Jensen-Hansen Nielsen1 个月前

Forget it bitches! We will not fight for you

Talk to me Goose 的头像
Talk to me Goose1 个月前

The politicians children.

Tony Penson 的头像
Tony Penson1 个月前

Well with Canada and Australia they will be able to put down an uprising with foreign troops.

Let Freedom Ring 的头像
Let Freedom Ring1 个月前

The UK is lost!

WASP69 的头像
WASP691 个月前

This is alarming! Stage is set for nations and civility to fall: ✅Weak & Globalist leadership ✅Open borders ✅Non-assimilation ✅Recruitment with access to military assets ✅Digital money 👉Full control of citizens 👉New world order…”might” over “right” for citizens

Learn the truth, follow the good guys. 的头像
Learn the truth, follow the good guys.1 个月前

They cannot possibly expect white, British males to go to a war that is not necessary and leave their women and children defenseless against invading economic migrants!! 🤡

Alberto castro 的头像
Alberto castro1 个月前

They are always determined to bring the world to chaos so that they can always remain in control; otherwise, as they say, the far right will ruin their plans.

katcher 的头像
katcher1 个月前

This is a global agenda they serve, so we cannot put anything past them. Conspiracies have been undermined as theories for far too long.

Arend Bols 的头像
Arend Bols1 个月前

In Germany the REPLACEMENT is a bit further ahead and Chancellor Merz said this:

Sandy Kaye 的头像
Sandy Kaye1 个月前

Maybe this is what inspired Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and a few other billionaires to build underground homes/luxurious bunkers

Qanadian Anon 的头像
Qanadian Anon1 个月前

Why do you think Canada is dead last in paying it's NATO bill! Our armed forces are a meme and a laughing stock.

deskeena 的头像
deskeena1 个月前

Sounds like more of clauses lockstep to me,be very aware. Folks

Rallie 的头像
Rallie1 个月前

Nothing like recruiting the fox to guard the hen house

michael cluer 的头像
michael cluer1 个月前

Everything but everything everywhere is orchestrated I’m beginning to think.

Jackie 11:11 的头像
Jackie 11:111 个月前

Don't panic captain mannering 🙄 #dadsarmy

Naranjadespierta 的头像
Naranjadespierta1 个月前

Well we can all guess and I bet we are right 🙄

Alicia Vernon 的头像
Alicia Vernon26 天前

Our government will either use these immigrants for war fodder but these men will not be corralled. They will either self depot or use the guns if in the hands of radical extremists to control the native population, according to their skill sets and morals.

AdamMK 的头像
AdamMK1 个月前

US sees what the world is doing up here in Can'tada.... and there will be only one outcome......

Marco 的头像
Marco1 个月前

🚨🌍 QUI L'OCCIDENT METTRA-T-IL EN UNIFORME ? J'ai commencé à enquêter sur le projet britannique Homeland Force. Ensuite, les gens au Canada m'ont dit : « JIM, REGARDEZ CE QUI SE PASSE ICI. » Alors je l'ai fait. Et l’enquête est soudain devenue bien plus vaste. Partout en Occident,

相关视频

🚨🇬🇧 ILLEGAL MIGRANTS IN BRITAIN'S NEW HOMELAND FORCE? Something significant is being developed inside Britain's defence planning. A new force. LOCALLY RECRUITED. ARMY-LED. Potentially equipped with: DRONES. And: WEAPONS. Plans are due to the Defence Secretary by: DECEMBER 2026. The stated purpose is to protect military bases and critical national infrastructure during crisis or war — freeing Regular forces and Reserves to concentrate on warfighting. But there is an enormous question: WHO WILL THEY RECRUIT? British citizens only? Foreign nationals? People granted refugee status? Could someone who entered Britain illegally but subsequently obtained lawful status ever qualify? And while these questions remain unanswered, migrant men — including men who entered Britain through illegal routes — are already being accommodated on former military sites. Does that mean the policies are connected? NO. WE HAVE NOT ESTABLISHED THAT.....YET. But before Britain creates a new potentially armed force operating on the home front, we have every right to demand answers. WHO GETS THE UNIFORM? WHO GETS THE WEAPON? WHO GIVES THE ORDERS? WHO ARE THEY LOYAL TO? And if Britain's Regular forces are fighting overseas... COULD THIS FORCE EVER EXERCISE POWER OVER BRITISH CITIZENS AT HOME? I've investigated what the Government is actually proposing — and the questions it still hasn't answered. WATCH THE FULL PTC. Then read the evidence and make up your own mind. FULL INVESTIGATION LINKED BELOW. ↓

Jim Ferguson

57,288 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 UK MILITARY CRISIS: CONSCRIPTION & HOMELAND FORCE FEARS Britain keeps talking about war, readiness, resilience and rebuilding military strength. But there is one question that keeps getting pushed aside: WHO WILL THEY PUT IN UNIFORM? If Britain is dragged into a major conflict and the Armed Forces do not have enough personnel, where does the extra manpower come from? Conscription? A new homeland force? People with no historic connection or loyalty to the communities they may one day be asked to police or control? These are uncomfortable questions — but they are questions that deserve to be asked. I am not claiming this is current government policy. I am asking where the direction of travel could lead if Britain finds itself needing tens of thousands more people for defence, internal security and national mobilisation. For nearly two years, the language has been changing. War readiness. National resilience. Military expansion. Preparing society. The conversation is moving. And once governments decide they need significantly more manpower, the question becomes unavoidable: Where are they going to get it? That question sits at the heart of my new book: WHO WILL THEY PUT IN UNIFORM? Britain’s military manpower problem is no longer an abstract debate. If the pressure for mobilisation keeps growing, the public deserves to know what comes next. 📕 WHO WILL THEY PUT IN UNIFORM? Available now. ORDER YOUR COPY HERE: If you serve in the Armed Forces—or your husband, wife, son or daughter does—I particularly want you to see this. Don't be scared. Be prepared. Mike Fairclough

Jim Ferguson

18,386 次观看 • 11 天前

🚨🇬🇧 TWO YEARS AGO, JOHN O'LOONEY AND I WERE ASKING QUESTIONS THAT ARE BACK ON THE TABLE TODAY In May 2024, I sat down with John O'Looney for a remarkable conversation about Britain's future, military preparedness, migration and what could happen at home if British forces were increasingly committed overseas. John raised some extremely serious concerns and shared information that he believed the British public needed to hear. Now fast-forward to 2026. Britain is developing proposals for a new Army-led Homeland Force designed to protect military bases and critical national infrastructure while Regular forces and Reserves concentrate on warfighting. Parliament's own Library has now put those plans on the record. And yet some of the most important questions remain unanswered. WHO WILL BE ELIGIBLE TO JOIN? What nationality and residency requirements will apply? What vetting will take place? What oath will members swear? Who could be authorised to carry weapons? And what authority could this force ultimately exercise here at home? I am not saying that today's Homeland Force proposal proves everything discussed in this 2024 interview. It doesn't. But when I watched this conversation again nearly two and a half years later, I was struck by how relevant some of the questions have become. So I think you should hear the original conversation for yourself. Watch it. Listen carefully. Then look at what is being proposed today and make up your own mind. My latest investigation: John Olooney

Jim Ferguson

13,737 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨🇬🇧 IS BRITAIN PREPARING FOR WORLD WAR III? 95,000 FORMER TROOPS. RECALL TO AGE 65. “WARLIKE PREPARATIONS.” A 2027 NATO MOBILISATION TEST. A NEW DIGITAL MOBILISATION SYSTEM. Those words sound dramatic. But look at what the British Government is actually doing. Britain is changing the rules governing its Strategic Reserve. The maximum recall age is being increased from 55 to 65. The threshold for recalling former personnel is being expanded to include: “WARLIKE PREPARATIONS.” And in 2027, Britain's Armed Forces intend to use NATO's Steadfast Defender exercise to practise calling up elements of the Strategic Reserve and getting former personnel back into uniform. Now there's another development. The MOD has confirmed funding for a new digital system covering: Communications. Data handling. The mobilisation process itself. And it goes considerably further. The Government is developing Defence Readiness legislation intended to prepare Britain for crisis or war — including industry, infrastructure, resources and the mobilisation of wider defence capacity. The Strategic Defence Review itself discusses Britain's ability to make a “transition to war” if required. Let's be absolutely clear. This does NOT mean 95,000 veterans are about to be called up. Britain has NOT announced civilian conscription. And this does NOT prove World War III is coming. But Britain is rebuilding the legal, digital, military and industrial machinery it would need if a major conflict came. So the questions are unavoidable: WHY NOW? WHAT DOES “WARLIKE PREPARATIONS” ACTUALLY MEAN? AND IS BRITAIN PREPARING FOR A WAR MUCH BIGGER THAN THE PUBLIC REALISES? I've gone through the Government documents, legislation and parliamentary evidence. Here's what I found. BRITAIN ON A WAR FOOTING WATCH BELOW Full investigation:

Jim Ferguson

74,627 次观看 • 25 天前

🚨🇬🇧WHAT IS THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT PREPARING FOR? Then: The War Books are being rewritten. The National Risk Register has been expanded. Britain is preparing the largest UK home-defence exercise in decades. Government departments are planning for hybrid attacks, cyber disruption and threats to critical infrastructure. And now ordinary households are being encouraged to prepare for emergencies themselves. Why now? I spent days examining the Government's own documents. What they reveal is not evidence that an attack on Britain is imminent. But neither should what is happening be dismissed. Britain is preparing for a world in which war, cyberattack, energy disruption, supply-chain failure and threats to critical infrastructure can increasingly intersect. And there is already evidence of the threat moving beyond planning exercises. A cyberattack recently knocked a small British electricity generator offline for several days. The wider grid was never at risk. But the incident demonstrated that attacks on Britain's critical infrastructure are no longer merely hypothetical. So I went through: Exercise ALBISTON SHADOW. Britain's classified War Books. The National Risk Register 2026. The Government's Resilience Action Plan. And its advice to British households. In this PTC, I show you what the documents actually say — and separate what we know from what people are merely speculating. Watch the investigation. Then read the full X Article attached below and examine the evidence yourself. The conclusion isn't that we should panic. It's that we should pay attention. Because governments prepare before emergencies happen. Families should think the same way.

Jim Ferguson

1,290,072 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇦 A Ukrainian Armed Forces fighter asks Russia to stop the fighting so that their military could go to Kiev to overthrow the government. The military man (on the photo) says that deputies in the Verkhovna Rada, when Russia wins, will board their helicopters and fly abroad with the stolen millions with impunity. Therefore, he calls on the Ukrainian and Russian military to stop the fighting so that they, the Ukrainian military, can overthrow the Verkhovna Rada, which contains only thieves and pidarases (fucking fagots-gays). He calls for the property of thieving deputies to be taken away, sold off and the money returned to the budget of Ukraine. As for these scoundrels from Verkhovna Rada, he wants to put them not even in jail but in a common hole. The military man says: “They will ban me again, they will come after me to talk to me again, but I have a gun. Come! What am I doing wrong? I am telling the truth!" He says that Ukraine itself does not produce anything for military needs, there is not a single bullets factory, and they are sent for slaughter, into a meat grinder. At the same time, funding for the military is zero, payments to military wounded are zero, he himself waited for 6 months after being wounded for an investigation to prove that he was wounded by a mine in battle, and did not just go out into the field for a walk. "Fuck, we are holding on just only thanks to support of the volunteers!" he says. His interlocutor says, “The most interesting thing is that you are holding on, but I don’t understand for what? Where Russia comes, pensions are higher, gasoline is cheaper, everything is being built, and men can easily travel abroad. But in Ukraine there is nothing, and they don’t let men out.” “This is the most offensive thing! Previously, I still doubted it, but now I see how the state treats us, the military. And I hate my state. I have a question for all the military: what did our state give you when you returned home? What?"

Zlatti71

188,646 次观看 • 2 年前

After the strikes on Iran, the US received the most massive response: missiles were fired at US bases in various countries. Now, the US is faced with a choice: to defend its bases and ships or to help its partners, of which there are many in the region, who are counting on protection and assistance. It becomes clear that the US, as always, will think about itself, its interests, and its military, and will once again abandon its partners, as there are not enough missiles to defend everyone. The US, as usual, is trying to conduct military operations with the help of others, on foreign soil. There's nothing new here. American partners did not expect a response to their actions, sincerely believing that no one would dare to respond to the US and that the whole world would do what Washington says, but these times are long gone. This is shown by the events of recent years. Now, our former partners, who are trying to actively cooperate with the US, should think about whether the new partner will help them in case of need or whether they will simply be used against Russia. Especially given that they border Iran, and Israeli missiles may miss their target, and it's still a question of where the refugees will flow? Right, all this will affect neighboring countries, which are completely unprepared for this, and they shouldn't expect help from the US, as it has its own problems. The US continues to impose its own truth on the world. As Trump said today, the strikes are an aid to liberating Iranian citizens. Who asked them to do this? It's not clear. Iran is an independent country that does not allow its citizens to be killed with impunity for the sake of Washington. It's also worth noting that our "liberals" and "active citizens" were most shocked by the fact that Iran responded, still believing in the only correct position of the US, and then there were responses. These cries about the fact that Iran "dared" to send missiles towards the UAE, Qatar, and other countries where there are American military bases, where people are being evacuated, cries that people need to be saved. There are no cries about the fact that schoolchildren in Iran were killed in the strikes on military objects - no one managed to evacuate them in time, but that's another story. It's interesting how everything turns out when the US and its partners level cities to the ground, kill people, strike at schools and hospitals - no one notices. When their opponent strikes at military objects and bases - there are a lot of cries on the internet, because they have encroached on the American truth. Any military action is big politics. In addition to military actions, an information war is being waged. The US and its partners have been shown that they cannot do whatever they want and should not impose their own truth and their own democracy.

🇷🇺 STANISLAV KRAPIVNIK 🇷🇺

175,334 次观看 • 7 个月前