正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

WHY ARE AI DEVELOPERS STILL PAYING FOR 5+ DIFFERENT APIs? GPT -> Claude -> Gemini -> DeepSeek -> Grok. Different providers. Different keys. Different integrations. And a growing API bill. DIT ai changes that. → One API gives you access to 50+ leading AI models with a single key....

45,428 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)

30 条评论

Bober_smart 的头像
Bober_smart3 天前

Having everything in one place is truly convenient

MAX 的头像
MAX3 天前

No more juggling around It helps a lot

starmex 的头像
starmex3 天前

great post max, saved!

MAX 的头像
MAX3 天前

Thanks starmex

venus 的头像
venus3 天前

it's the thing to apply in my workflow

MAX 的头像
MAX3 天前

It saved me a lot of unnecessary bills You gonna like it fr

hitu 的头像
hitu3 天前

one key for 50+ models instead of juggling five apis sounds nice

MAX 的头像
MAX3 天前

That y like the platform It saves me the stress

Jurly 的头像
Jurly3 天前

The hard part is keeping latency and output consistency predictable across all those routes.

MAX 的头像
MAX3 天前

It handles both well

Nahid 的头像
Nahid3 天前

one key instead 5 bills? im in

MAX 的头像
MAX3 天前

Go for it champ You gonna like it

hityyhz 的头像
hityyhz3 天前

one openai compatible key plus failover is a convenient way to stop juggling providers

MAX 的头像
MAX3 天前

Honestly I don’t know y developers are not using it

Frank 的头像
Frank3 天前

That 30–70% discount looks wild. Are the cheaper routes running on quantized open-source instances, or is this dynamic pricing arbitrage on original full-precision models?

The AI Therapist 的头像
The AI Therapist3 天前

Five APIs. Five keys. One bill that costs more than their combined compute efficiency. Stop collecting SaaS subscriptions and start using function calling. You aren’t diversified; you’re just inefficiently subscribed

Dekos 的头像
Dekos3 天前

I really don't understand why they're still doing this

MAX 的头像
MAX3 天前

They are missing out fr

EugBass 的头像
EugBass3 天前

the service looks wild

MAX 的头像
MAX3 天前

You just have to try it out to see how good and cheap it is

EugBass 的头像
EugBass3 天前

yeah bro sure

Slonski 的头像
Slonski3 天前

failover is useful i'd still keep the review outside the router

VANTERRA 的头像
VANTERRA3 天前

Thanks for sharing max

ajackm 的头像
ajackm3 天前

The cost claim is easy to sell; the harder proof is workload-level quality parity. Which metric decides routing for you—cost per successful task, latency, or eval win-rate—and how often does the cheapest route lose?

LX™ 的头像
LX™3 天前

Clean drop-in DX is exactly what the developer ecosystem needs. Excited to test DeepSeek routing alongside Claude through our existing OpenAI-configured client!

Polykinder 的头像
Polykinder3 天前

It looks cool, thanks for the link

MAX 的头像
MAX3 天前

You welcome 🤗 Glad it helps

Yakubu David block 的头像
Yakubu David block3 天前

Wow Can’t wait to try this out

Riza Ingalls 的头像
Riza Ingalls2 天前

Wasn't this what openrouter solved?

Marko Koman 的头像
Marko Koman3 天前

"Automatic failover" is the line worth checking before switching a whole stack over — rerouting to a different provider mid-workflow can mean a different model answering the same prompt with no warning, and that's a silent behavior change dressed up as a reliability feature.

相关视频