Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Why are studies of Old Testament books important? As Alistair explains, it's because they point forward to a Savior. All of Scripture is telling the story of Jesus. Hear more from this study of 1 and 2 Samuel at

30,912 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Pastor Simon - Power Word Bible Ministries's profile picture
Pastor Simon - Power Word Bible Ministries3 years ago

The Old Testament is the New Testament concealed, and the New Testament is the Old Testament revealed. The Old Testament points at the coming Messiah and the New Testament is Messiah has come and is coming again to take away His bride -the Church, before the great tribulation.

Believe Jesus Christ's profile picture
Believe Jesus Christ3 years ago

@OurSavior_Jesus Even in Job Christ's second coming is expected as He is in Revelation. Jesus Himself said the Old Testament is about Him.

It is WELL's profile picture
It is WELL3 years ago

Praise God.

Leslie Brown ✝️🇺🇲's profile picture
Leslie Brown ✝️🇺🇲3 years ago

That was an excellent study of 1 and 2 Samuel.

Joan's profile picture
Joan3 years ago

That was the most inspired study! I started following on YouTube during the pandemic and could hardly wait until each following Sunday! So rich. Thank you for your time spent studying the Word and explaining to us.

Sophisticated Fido.'s profile picture
Sophisticated Fido.3 years ago

It's way more than that The New Testament interprets the Old Testament.. How can you fully understand the interpretation if you don't know what's being interpreted.

Cdawin's profile picture
Cdawin3 years ago

Great biblical teachings from Alistair

Cartwright's profile picture
Cartwright3 years ago

The old testament was a lesson but we live by the New Testament. Love, Hope and Faith.

Stephen Van Eck's profile picture
Stephen Van Eck3 years ago

What did the fig tree in Mark 11 do to deserve it?

Related Videos

Love when the Green Pill and Orthobros get a chance to interact Karak lol "Jesus was born of the descent of Abraham as a Jew, lived as a Jew and was circumcised...that is the beginning of the fulfillment of the right of circumcision" Jesus had to be a Jew in order to fulfill the prophecies of conquering the Nations in the name of the God of Israel bro... Also why this gay “fulfillment” mental gymnastics? Oh I know why, you can't completely ditch the OT as stupid, primitive and tribal because Christians claim the entire Bible is God’s Word So they invented the fulfillment framework instead: The Old Testament laws were never wrong - they were shadows, types, and preparations. - Circumcision → fulfilled in baptism (spiritual circumcision of the heart). - Animal sacrifices → fulfilled in Jesus’ once-for-all sacrifice. - Food laws → fulfilled in Jesus declaring all foods clean (Mark 7) or Peter’s vision. - The whole sacrificial/temple system → fulfilled in Jesus as the true Temple and High Priest. Lets keep the Old Testament as holy scripture while quietly ditching 80-90% of its actual commandments "So Jesus had to be a Jew to fulfill the promises to Abraham that this would extend beyond the Jews to the Gentiles so that they could be included into the covenant." "So that's what it means to be a quote servant to the circumcision" "Jesus came as a Jew to fulfill all the promises in the Old Testament to Abraham and his seed, That's the Jews." And then once Dyer figures out he's dealing with an Adam Green fan he immediately goes into TAG mode🤣 "OK, on what basis is it wrong to follow Jesus if you're agnostic?" "So that's just demonically possessed weirdos is that's all they have" "That was an Adam Green Pagan LARPer"

Seethroughitall

10,242 views • 4 months ago

“The church no more gave us the New Testament canon than Sir Isaac Newton gave us the force of gravity… Newton did not create gravity but recognized it” - J.I Packer (As cited in Kenneth J. Collins and Jerry L. Walls, Roman but not Catholic: what remains at stake 500 years after the Reformation (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2017), 21). By the time the church was having discussions of canon lists and what books did or didn’t possess the mark of inspiration. The books of inspired scripture had already been written, read, copied, passed around, and disseminated for some time. Paul is already being recognized as scripture within the 1st century by Peter in 2 Pet. 3:16, and Paul himself is quoting Luke as scriptural alongside Deuteronomy in 1 Timothy 5. And let’s not forget that the Christians in the first century had a Bible: we call it the Old Testament. When Paul says “all scripture is God breathed” in 2 Timothy, no one is confused about what Paul means when he uses the term “scripture.” Just because books existed as independent documents in the form of physical scrolls and books separate from one another prior to the fourth century with them being codified all in one single unit then, doesn’t mean that they weren’t the Bible prior to that point. We need to be careful not to read back an anachronistic perspective due to our modern privilege of being able to easily have all the biblical books in a single-bound-volume. This is largely due to the amazing and streamlined process of publishing today.

Wes Huff

372,508 views • 1 year ago