Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Why aren't more people talking about how difficult it is to turn documents into structured data? This is literally a problem that every single company I talk to is trying to solve. They have a buttload of documents with forms and tables, and they want to turn them into...

46,413 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Santiago's profile picture
Santiago1 year ago

There are two awesome things here: First, you can use @tensorlake's Document Ingestion API to process all your files. They tell me they have a 98% - 99% accuracy processing insurance and bank documents, which are usually a nightmare. Second (and this is what I love the most), you can turn those tables and forms into structured data. You start with the image of a form and end with a JSON file containing the information you wanted to extract. You should definitely try this out: 1. Go to 2. Sign up 3. Try your documents in the playground No credit card required for any of this, and you have plenty of credits to try.

ibexdream's profile picture
ibexdream1 year ago

Companies sit on goldmines of PDFs, scans, and form, but can’t extract value without serious effort. Tools like @tensorlake are game-changers for operational intelligence.

OJ's profile picture
OJ1 year ago

My guesstimation is because most people in/around AI seem to have very little experience, in general, working at/with (big) companies. Therefore they know very little about the biz reality and the main challenges/how things actually work.

Santiago's profile picture
Santiago1 year ago

Yeah, this is accurate.

Santiago's profile picture
Santiago1 year ago

Not even close. I'm curious, why do you think this is solved by calling a model?

Piyush's profile picture
Piyush1 year ago

I work with clients on large volume of documents in high stake fields (healthcare, real estate, finance, etc) and where AWS textract wins is explicit provision of confidence scores which helps to ensure only high-reliability data is used in downstream processes. Will check out tensorlake too for low-stake documents if the pricing makes sense.

λthugg-huh?'s profile picture
λthugg-huh?1 year ago

do you do much besides shilling stuff? seriously all i see is you recommending a tool thats gonna change the whole game and obsolete the tool you shilled last week

Santiago's profile picture
Santiago1 year ago

I'd suggest you stop following me if my posts bother you too much.

Neel Das's profile picture
Neel Das1 year ago

This problem is more or less solved now with a simple API call to any of the reasoning models

Michael | Æ's profile picture
Michael | Æ1 year ago

So true. This is such a huge challenge for so many teams. Thanks for sharing a solution that works.

Related Videos

Here is how you can install an open-source, enterprise-grade RAG system on your server (with the best document understanding I've seen.) First, something obvious to anyone trying to sell RAG in the market: You are crazy if you think companies will let their data travel to a hosted model. No one wants to send their data anywhere (those who do haven't found an alternative.) Every single company would rather have an air-gapped system with no internet access. GroundX is an open-source RAG system that you can run on your servers (or any cloud provider, as long as you have access to GPUs) and works without a network. (If the military wants to do RAG, this is precisely what they will be looking for.) I installed GroundX on my AWS account and recorded a video to show you how to use it. There are two services you can use: 1. Ingest: This service uses a pretrained vision model to ingest and understand your knowledge base. 2. Search: This service combines text and vector search with a fine-tuned re-ranker model to retrieve information from your knowledge base. A quick note about the Ingest service: 99% of people think they need better "retrieval" mechanisms. I think they need better "ingestion." That's where this service comes in! Ingest "understands" your documents in a way I haven't seen before. After you try it, you'll realize why showing your LLM your raw documents is a bad idea. In the video, I use a free tool called X-Ray to test a document and understand how the Ingest service breaks it down. You can access this tool by signing up for a free GroundX cloud account and uploading your documents. You'll see a bit more about this in the video.

Santiago

89,664 views • 1 year ago

Q: How will I know when it’s the right time to go full-time on a startup idea? Tony Fadell is the co-creator of the iPod, iPhone, and Nest. As he puts it in the clip below: “Great ideas chase you.” He continues: “In this world, there are so many people who have more ideas than they have time to implement… I used to be like that. But the best ideas are the ones that you can really focus on… Now I try to run away from a great idea. And then it stalks me. It hunts you down because you’re like: ‘Ah, that’s going to have this problem, I’m going to put it aside.’ And then a few days later, you’re like: ‘Actually I think I know how to solve that problem.’ At some point it just becomes this black hole that sucks you in and you can’t think about anything else but this.” Mark Zuckerberg gave similar advice in a previous Startup Archive answer: “I always think the most important thing entrepreneurs should do is pick something they care about and work on it, but don’t actually commit to turning it into a company until it’s working. If you look at the data of the very best companies, I think a tremendous percentage of them have been built that way and not from people who decided upfront that they wanted to start a company because you just get locked into a local maxima a lot of the time.” Let great ideas chase you and don’t turn it into a company until it’s working. There’s almost always a ton of work you you can do upfront to de-risk an idea before turning it into a company. And perhaps just as important: you want to make sure you’re still excited about the idea after a few months and the novelty has worn off—it should be all you can think about. Companies are almost always a 10 year project if they work and a 2-3 year project if they fail. It’s worth it to be patient before jumping in with two feet.

Michael McGuiness

62,662 views • 2 years ago