正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Why can’t republicans admit when someone on their side is wrong

151,888 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

39 条评论

The_Moderate_Virginian 的头像
The_Moderate_Virginian8 个月前

Why can’t Democrats admit when someone on their side is wrong?

Jared Shult 的头像
Jared Shult8 个月前

I do

Curtis Clark 的头像
Curtis Clark8 个月前

@TheModerateVA @grok can you tell us if Jared Shult criticized any democrat politicians like he does Trump?

Grok 的头像
Grok8 个月前

Based on my review of Jared Shult's recent posts, he has made general criticisms of Democrats, like stating "If dems lose the midterms it’s their fault" in response to low Trump approval ratings. However, I found no examples of him criticizing specific Democrat politicians by name, in contrast to his direct remarks calling Trump a "bad president."

WTP1182024 的头像
WTP11820248 个月前

@CurtisClarkCH @jared_shult @TheModerateVA That’s not even a criticism, it’s just bitching.

Grok 的头像
Grok8 个月前

@CurtisClarkCH @jared_shult @TheModerateVA I agree it's more of a general attribution than specific critique. Further checks show no direct criticisms of named Democrats like his Trump remarks—mostly defenses or neutral comments.

WTP1182024 的头像
WTP11820248 个月前

@CurtisClarkCH @jared_shult @TheModerateVA Because he’s another wannabe leftist grifter

Grok 的头像
Grok8 个月前

@CurtisClarkCH @jared_shult @TheModerateVA That's a subjective take. From reviewing jared_shult's posts, he often defends Democratic positions and criticizes Republicans/Trump, but I found no direct attacks on named Democrats like Biden or Harris. Perspectives vary.

The Saurus 的头像
The Saurus8 个月前

Because it’s a cult of absolute losers

And IT STILL WILL NEVER BE YOU 的头像
And IT STILL WILL NEVER BE YOU8 个月前

It’s a cult

Mr. Will Johnson 的头像
Mr. Will Johnson8 个月前

I wonder if he said anything about the Demoncrats pushing child pornography into school libraries. I doubt it.

Jesse formerly known as Darth Crypto 的头像
Jesse formerly known as Darth Crypto8 个月前

You encouraged this. You wanted some crazy liberal lady to do this and get herself killed so you could lie and weaponize it. It’s why you wanted George Floyd to OD and the riots that followed. You wanted to create a political weapon and the world is filled with pawns. Fuck you people. For the record, she was leading a group of vehicles and people with whistles to block and obstruct federal agents from doing their job, she was ordered out of the vehicle and was under arrest and attempted to flee, where she nearly struck an agent and he was forced to use force. Some agents wouldn’t shoot. Some cops would. But you encourage this exact scenario daily, eventually it’ll happen. And it’s YOUR fault. You people are evil. What makes you happier? The engagement and viewers you can get from her death? Or the political weapon you can lie to turn it into?

Prof Zenkus 的头像
Prof Zenkus8 个月前

Why can't Democrats say Abolish ICE?

The Texian ⭐️ 的头像
The Texian ⭐️8 个月前

You can’t use a deadly weapon against an ICE Officer.

Höpötys 🇫🇮🇻🇦 的头像
Höpötys 🇫🇮🇻🇦8 个月前

We do. ALL THE TIME. Democrats don’t. I don’t like Trump, Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens, Randy Fine, Ted Cruz, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel. To name a few.

Jared Shult 的头像
Jared Shult8 个月前

@TyrannicalTom44 I understand people being upset about immigration and wanting reform. But why are republicans defending the ice agent in this scenario. Just admit that he fucked up and was wrong and move on. Don’t gaslight people

Daniel Taylor 的头像
Daniel Taylor8 个月前

@TyrannicalTom44 Kamala Harris and her borde patrol??? Despite it being an absolute shit show and unbelievably destructive, ive never seen democrats say anything negative about it.

💋𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖓𝖊𝖗 𝖈𝖔𝖒𝖒𝖚𝖓𝖎𝖘𝖙💋 的头像
💋𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖓𝖊𝖗 𝖈𝖔𝖒𝖒𝖚𝖓𝖎𝖘𝖙💋8 个月前

@jared_shult @TyrannicalTom44 Probably because “Kamala’s” ice agents weren’t executing American civilians in the streets……..

Daniel Taylor 的头像
Daniel Taylor8 个月前

@jared_shult @TyrannicalTom44 Trumps ice agents aren't killing people unless they're getting attacked, stop believing all of the bs. @grok how many civilians were killed by border patrol agents in 2024 compared to 2025.

Grok 的头像
Grok8 个月前

According to the Southern Border Communities Coalition, U.S. Border Patrol agents were involved in 1 fatal shooting of a civilian in 2024 and 3 in 2025. The Guardian reported 4 total killings by ICE and Border Patrol in 2025, often during encounters with perceived attacks. Data on justifications varies by source.

Randy Shulman 的头像
Randy Shulman8 个月前

There are plenty of reasons not to vote Republican

CharliΞ 的头像
CharliΞ8 个月前

I would love to ask the same … they found fraud in Minnesota yet NOT ONE democrat said a damn thing about Fraud ☠️☠️☠️🤡

Sammy M 的头像
Sammy M8 个月前

why can't YOU admit that the LEFT has fomented a level of hate that is DEADLY?

CaptainDadpants 的头像
CaptainDadpants8 个月前

When have you ever done that for democrats?

Samantha Flom 🇺🇸 的头像
Samantha Flom 🇺🇸8 个月前

DHS policy authorizes the use of deadly force on subjects—even fleeing subjects—whom LEO’s could reasonably perceive to endanger their lives. It’s easy to point fingers after watching the slow-mo replay for the 50th time. But LEO’s don’t get that luxury when a hostile adversary is coming at them with a deadly weapon. They have milliseconds to make a judgment call, knowing that the wrong one could cost them everything. Maybe put yourself in their shoes before you start spouting off.

prez 的头像
prez8 个月前

here’s the issue. it boils down to reaction time and actually being there. if someone accelerates their car at you (even if her intent was to leave she still clipped him) his reaction was she means to harm. i don’t think she should have lost her life. but im not faulting him for that response for that situation. she was wrong the entire time and made mistakes that lead to that incident. should it have cost her her life? no. was that a possibility when you block the road and drive off in a panic when you get confronted? yes. if you want to talk about other stupid shit republicans or democrats do i’d be happy to oblige but this one is very much down the middle. if it was a regular cop or even FBI (non minnesota law enforcement) chances are only minnesota would know about it and it wouldn’t have been pushed front and center

Mr.Marshall 的头像
Mr.Marshall8 个月前

To be clear, this woman was shot after hitting an ICE officer with her vehicle as she tried to flee the scene.

PROMETHEUS 的头像
PROMETHEUS8 个月前

Wake up she hit him with the car !!!!

Crystal 的头像
Crystal8 个月前

Dude was dragged by a car in Minneapolis a few months ago and the bitch hit him so he fired. Be an ICE agent for a month and get hit by a car at least once, that is intentionally hitting you then talk until you do, you can’t. This just happened 2 weeks ago! The state what did they do to ensure it wouldn’t happen again after ICE had to fire at someone for hitting MULTIPLE PEOPLE with his car, crashing into their vehicle and biting someone, they did NOTHING. That guy was lucky to not get hit and as Frey the mayor said they were “waiting for this to happen!” This is on Walz and Frey they need to enforce the law, ramming your car into an agent or hitting A FEDERAL OFFICER WITH YOUR CAR, is not peacefully protesting. 7/10 ICE arrest in 2025 were people with criminal charges or pending criminal charges. These people have no idea what level of criminal illegal they could be arresting. It could be a kingpin drug smuggling,child stealing, sex trafficking, pedophile creep, and these people are trying to stop ICE from deporting them and enforcing the law. What this woman did was intentional and she set out to do it. We don’t have to like that it happened but actions have consequences.

Rudy Roberts 的头像
Rudy Roberts8 个月前

Here let me help you

𝖒𝖋 𝖇𝖗𝖆𝖙 的头像
𝖒𝖋 𝖇𝖗𝖆𝖙8 个月前

that’s the real trump derangement syndrome

Jon S 的头像
Jon S8 个月前

Sheep following Trump, who never admits any faults.

BentShackle 的头像
BentShackle8 个月前

Because you're retarded ass is completely in the wrong.

Corey Bell 的头像
Corey Bell8 个月前

They're in a cult. They don't step back and analyse things. They just blindly follow. That's the sheep that they are. You'll never change them

Harishaan 的头像
Harishaan8 个月前

From the video, didn’t she kind of try to run the guy over while she was getting away? Idk I don’t want to judge it too definitively because it’s hard to tell. Regardless, completely inappropriate to shoot and kill in that situation. That ICE officer is a POS.

Bulldog 🏈 🇺🇸 的头像
Bulldog 🏈 🇺🇸8 个月前

so you're in a bubble.. or you are oblivious.. your party actually voted for an Atty General in Virginia who openly hoped his opponents children would be kiIIed.. you voted for a president that participated in a fake dossier russian asset impeachment.. so your argument is quite weak..

Bulldog 🏈 🇺🇸 的头像
Bulldog 🏈 🇺🇸8 个月前

oh gawd.. She was trying to leave.. you're a complete an utter jackass.. she was ordered by law enforcement to shut off her vehicle and get her fatass out of the drivers seat, instead she smashed the gas with an officer in front of her vehicle.. how about we give her the same amount of compassion you guys gave Charlie Kirk? would that make you happy?

Nick B 的头像
Nick B8 个月前

She was given a lawful command once the guns are drawn, there’s only one of two options: 1) comply, 2) potentially die. It doesn’t matter that she was trying to leave; she hit a federal officer with her car; that car is now a weapon; lethal force is justified. Doesn’t mean you have to like it, but the law doesn’t care about feelings. Lawful commands are lawful commands, and the fact is if she just got out of the car, she’d be alive. If you think what they’re doing is unlawful, that’s what court is for. Using your car as a weapon is not acceptable and has been long established. If your local police or sheriff were given the command, the same scenario would have been the same result; they now fear you’ll use that weapon to harm others, and they have to respond to the threat of the weapon. She hit a federal officer; she could have killed him if she had only gotten out of the car and obeyed the lawful order; she’d be alive, period.

Bill Lemocks 的头像
Bill Lemocks8 个月前

GenZ is dumb as hell.

相关视频