正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Why Chamath's perspective matters: He's built multiple billion-dollar companies and was an early Facebook executive. He understands global capital flows better than most policy makers. And he sees something in Trump's tariff plan that most are missing:

726,964 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

43 条评论

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

First, some context on what's really happening. Trump's tariffs aren't just about punishing China. They represent the most significant economic reshuffling in modern American history. This is wealth redistribution on a massive scale - but not in the way most people think.

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

Billionaire investor Chamath Palihapitiya’s interview with Andrew Schulz just went viral. He exposed the truth about Trump’s tariffs: It's more than a trade war...he's completely redistributing American wealth. Here are the untold secrets of the President's $750B gamble: 🧵

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

"This isn't about a trade war. This is about completely rebuilding American industrial capacity." Chamath points to a critical fact: Since 2000, we've lost over 5 million manufacturing jobs. But there's a deeper story here:

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

The trade relationship with China has been fundamentally unbalanced for decades. American products faced steep tariffs in China (often 25%+) while Chinese goods entered the US with minimal barriers (usually under 3%). This created a one-way flow of manufacturing capacity.

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

The result? Our industrial heartland hollowed out. Communities collapsed. The middle class saw their economic security vanish. All while corporate profits soared to record highs. The question is: who actually benefited?

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

According to Chamath, the main beneficiaries weren't the average citizen: "The way that we set up trade has benefited corporations at the expense of people." They captured profits by: Paying minimal taxes, avoiding environmental regulations, and cutting labor costs.

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

America became reliant on foreign nations for critical goods. The pandemic exposed this when we couldn't produce basic PPE. Ukraine revealed our energy dependence. Taiwan highlighted our semiconductor reliance. This isn't just economics - it's national security.

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

Trump's strategy targets three layers: 1. Basic consumer goods (10% tariff) 2. Industrial components (20% tariff) 3. Strategic technologies (25-60% tariffs) "He's building a carrot and stick approach," Chamath explains. "The stick is tariffs, the carrot is tax breaks."

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

These tariffs could generate up to $750B annually - enough to offset a significant portion of income taxes for middle-class Americans. Companies face a choice: pay tariffs or bring production home. The implications are massive:

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

"This is a massive wealth redistribution mechanism from corporations back to the middle class." If companies reshore manufacturing: • Communities revive • National security improves • Supply chains become resilient • New factories create high-paying jobs

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

The most fascinating part of Chamath's analysis? How this transforms global trade alliances. Trump's approach isn't isolation - it's leverage. Countries aligning with American interests gain preferential trade terms. Chamath calls this "economic NATO":

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

"We need an economic NATO as much as we need a military NATO." Nations cooperating on security, supply chains, and fair trade would form a new bloc. Creating incentives for countries to side with America. Those that don't face tariffs. It's using economic power as leverage.

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

The challenges are substantial: • Potential WTO violations • Short-term inflation as costs rise • Disruption to global supply chains • Retaliation from affected countries But Chamath sees beyond these concerns to the long-term structural realignment.

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

"The system we built over 30 years has hollowed out the middle class. It wasn't a trade war, it was a trade massacre." If successful, this creates: • Middle-class revival • Balanced global trade • Stronger national security • A manufacturing renaissance

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

This strategy is bold, disruptive, and risky. As someone with decades in oil, I recognize the pattern. Sometimes you must disrupt systems to create something better. The status quo wasn't working for everyday Americans. This $750B gamble might just pay off.

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

Our economic security is tied to resource independence. "Energy independence gave America enormous leverage. Manufacturing independence will do the same." When America became energy independent, we gained geopolitical power. We witnessed this firsthand:

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

Energy independence changed everything for America. It freed us to make decisions based on national interest rather than foreign dependency. The same applies to manufacturing and supply chains. Countries controlling essential resources control their destiny.

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

For over 35+ years, our family E&P company has been sending monthly revenue payments to oil & gas owners and investors. Now I'm sharing everything I've learned about building wealth in energy. Join 10,000+ investors getting my free weekly insights:

Adam Oxsen 的头像
Adam Oxsen1 年前

Video/Image Credits: - Youtube: "My fellow Americans, this is Liberation Day. April 2, 2025..." –President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸🦅 - The White House - Youtube: Trump's Tariff Gamble EXPLAINED w/ Chamath | Bonus Ep - FLAGRANT - Getty Images AFP - Brendan Smialowski

Lessa Ruatha 的头像
Lessa Ruatha1 年前

Chamath is self serving. Always take his observations with a grain of salt. If he's talking about something it's because he's positioning for and a wealth transfer to himself.

Josh G 的头像
Josh G1 年前

Chamath Pineappleportapottyplatypus 🤣

DIPcantSTANdya 的头像
DIPcantSTANdya1 年前

Chamaths been wrong about everything for the past 6 years, what he says or thinks does not Matter . Ya dumb fuck

sillyasian88 的头像
sillyasian881 年前

Are you retarded? Scamath made billions ripping off retail investors through his SPACs

Rave 7 的头像
Rave 71 年前

Does he work for a CIA venture capital firm ?

JamOne 的头像
JamOne1 年前

Nothing was said in this video that has any substance of actual information to back up what you are stating is true.

Chris Beyer 的头像
Chris Beyer1 年前

And you forgot, he roasted a bunch of wet behind the ear investors with impossible to understand SPAC’s

cavs 的头像
cavs1 年前

And he ripped people off with SPACs

Alexzander Karlsson 的头像
Alexzander Karlsson1 年前

And created a lot of SPACS got a lot of money as the collapsed. Smart but a grifter.

American 4 Life 的头像
American 4 Life1 年前

You lost me at Facebook

Jetowl 的头像
Jetowl1 年前

Pineapple porta-potty platypus 🤣🤣

Mahungue 的头像
Mahungue1 年前

And he wouldn't tell us what he wished instead of doing a proper analysis, right? 😏

Tash 的头像
Tash1 年前

He didn't build any companies, he used to invest people's money. He is also serial liar and a fraud.

Sun g 的头像
Sun g1 年前

Chamath the pump and dumper.

Frank Zappa 的头像
Frank Zappa1 年前

Funny as hell. America's greatest export is comedians.

RoxPentland 的头像
RoxPentland1 年前

he has also been convicted of securities fraud and is known to push lies.

Ciatta Thompson 的头像
Ciatta Thompson1 年前

Ty for this breakdown. It makes me so excited for the future. It'll be a rough go at the start, but if everything works out, it'll be a revival. I pray every day for this administration. I pray for their safety and that God give them wisdom.

Thomas Pytel 的头像
Thomas Pytel1 年前

Bullshit, con artist

Angry_Bengal 的头像
Angry_Bengal1 年前

I'm thinking Ben Stiller in Dodge Ball, yes???

andrewpnf 的头像
andrewpnf1 年前

Spac Spacsterson is a crook

Ric 的头像
Ric1 年前

Dick sucker. Did you squeeze his balls too?

kelvin 🌷 的头像
kelvin 🌷1 年前

He is not that bright chamath still thinks #BTC is #Bitcoin

Lessa Ruatha 的头像
Lessa Ruatha1 年前

Adam what are you doing? Pumpin' chamath biddy

The Washington Post 的头像
The Washington Post1 年前

Here’s what could get more expensive with Trump’s new tariffs.

相关视频

Jensen Huang just called out every CEO who’s been firing people “because of AI.” Jim Cramer asked him why companies are laying people off if AI is supposed to make everyone MORE productive. Jensen's answer: "For companies with imagination, you will do more with more. For companies where the leadership is just out of ideas, they have nothing else to do. They have no reason to imagine greater than they are. When they have more capability, they don't do more." Read that again. The man who built the most important tech company on Earth just told you that if your CEO is using AI to cut headcount, it means one thing: They have no imagination. They have no vision for what comes next. They got handed the most powerful tool in human history and their FIRST instinct was to fire people. This is the CEO of NVIDIA. The company whose chips power every AI system on the planet. If anyone on Earth has the right to say "AI replaces workers," it's Jensen Huang. And he said the OPPOSITE. He said every carpenter could become an architect. Every plumber could become an architect. AI elevates capability. It doesn't eliminate it. But here's where it gets really interesting... During the same interview, Jensen revealed something nobody's talking about: He said AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic are seeing their revenues increase by one to two billion dollars a WEEK. And he wishes these companies were public so the world could see what he sees. One to two billion per week. That's a $50 to $100 BILLION annualized run rate. For companies that most people think are burning cash and making nothing. The entire Wall Street narrative that "AI companies aren't profitable" might be completely wrong. Jensen sees their numbers. He sees their compute orders. He sees their growth. And he's saying the revenue is real. So if the money IS real, why are other companies firing people? Because they're not building AI products. They're not creating new revenue streams. They're not using AI to expand into new markets. They're using AI as an EXCUSE to cut costs because they ran out of ideas 3 years ago and need something to tell the board. Jensen's company added $500 billion in new orders in 5 months. He expects $1 trillion in cumulative revenue through 2027 from just two product lines. That number doesn't include the new chips, systems, or partnerships announced this week. And he's not cutting people. He's hiring. Because when you have imagination, more capability means MORE opportunity. Not less headcount. Meanwhile Salesforce cut thousands. Meta cut thousands. Amazon cut thousands. All blaming "AI efficiency." Jensen's response: You're out of imagination. He also said something that stuck with me. Cramer asked if he ever thought he'd build a $10 to $20 trillion company while waiting tables at Denny's. His answer: "I was just trying to make it through the shift." Biggest tip he ever got? Two, three dollars. Now he's building tech that increased computing demand by one million times in two years. He announced OpenClaw, which he says is as big as ChatGPT. And he's got 21 months of new business that isn't even counted in the trillion dollar figure yet. When asked how long he plans to keep working? "I'm hoping to die on the job. And I'm not hoping to die anytime soon." This is a man who believes every single thing he's building. And his message to every CEO using AI to justify layoffs is simple... You're not innovating. You're surrendering. The technology wasn't built to shrink companies. It was built to make them limitless. If your leadership can't see that, the problem isn't AI. It's THEM.

Ricardo

1,390,871 次观看 • 5 个月前