Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Why CO2 Correlation Does Not Cause Temperature Increase | Dr. Patrick Moore Patrick Moore
92,895 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)
35 Kommentare

@EcoSenseNow Patrick Moore lies. The 'greenhouse' effect and the role of CO2 is well understood Physics, confirmed by observations. Read ANY Atmospheric Physics textbook

@EcoSenseNow Patrick Moore misleads as shown by evidence from every national science academy, NASA, NOAA, JMA and ESA.

@EcoSenseNow Not a single climate model for the past 40 years has proven accurate. Climate models are propaganda not science.

@EcoSenseNow CO2 is only .04% of the total atmospheric gases. Water vapor is far higher. Water vapor does more to influence temperature than CO2 can.

@EcoSenseNow Patrick Moore lies about the correlation between CO2 and temperature in earth's geological history 1/2 Mills, Scotese et al 2018 "We find a strong relationship between CO2 forcing and temperature from the proxy data"

@EcoSenseNow Advocacy didn't know he's a physicist. He has a degree from the Forestry department. I take my advice on this, from scientists that performed experiments; what papers has he written? If none, you just might be the most pathetic losers on the face of the earth.

@EcoSenseNow Correlation is not necessarily causation. No evidence that high CO2 and high temperatures are related. Look at Mars, 95% CO2 atmosphere yet the basic temperature is -80f.

@EcoSenseNow There is zero correlation between anything Patrick Moore or the fossil industry propaganda group CO2 Coalition says, and the truth. eg

@EcoSenseNow Exactly. Warming started in 1850, the end of the Little Ice Age, long before the car was invented, and continues, as it has for thousands of years, cooling, warming. We know this from ice cores drilled out Greenland ice and analyzed by ACTUAL scientists.

@EcoSenseNow Interesting... 25 SIMPLE BULLET POINTS PROVING CO2 DOES NOT CAUSE GLOBAL WARMING: BY A GEOLOGIST DR ROGER HIGGS

@EcoSenseNow I KNEW Ben and Jerry's was in league with the Great Whites! 🦈 Which technically makes them racist as well...

@EcoSenseNow The most important question is, "Why do people keep eating ice cream knowing that it causes shark attacks?" 😀

@EcoSenseNow Why do you cite someone who is denying the laws of physics? Why do none of the handful of contrarian climate scientists (Lindzen, Curry, Christy, Spencer…) ever use this argument? Why do the “1100 eminent scientists” in the “Great Climate Declaration” use it?

@EcoSenseNow

@EcoSenseNow Plus people are very suggestive and after being told the samething over and over they believe as truth. The more that believe confirms the belief.

@EcoSenseNow For years, lobbyist Patrick Moore @EcoSenseNow has been using a fraudulent graph from a non-scientist crank blogger who misrepresented the work of the scientists it cited. He KNOWS it's fraudulent, but still uses it. See thread:

@EcoSenseNow You would think that they weren’t teaching photosynthesis.

@EcoSenseNow We all know it’s cow farts

@EcoSenseNow My bro has told me that for years and I thought he was cray cray…now I’ve read studies that conclude the same thing. I suck at science BUT I always question who is being paid to tell me what they conclude. Thanks to the pandemic my eyes are open.

@EcoSenseNow When solar radiation increases, as it has recently as measured by the temperature increase on Mars, the oceans warm. Warm water cannot absorb gas as well as cold and it out-gasses... just like water starts to bubble out dissolved air well below the boiling temperature. CO2 rises.

@EcoSenseNow 👇

@EcoSenseNow It’s called trees. Plants. Green growing stuff

@fisney_duck @EcoSenseNow Great point! I’m not buying the bs. Too many lies. Don’t trees & plants need CO2? Why aren’t we planting more? What happens if we reduce CO2? Is there a depop agenda? Hummmm🤔

@EcoSenseNow I heard that our current CO2 level is exactly the same as the level used by science to determine if life is possible on other planets. Is this true?

@EcoSenseNow I've seen an interview with this guy they're very intelligent man he blows the climate change narrative out of the water with facts

@EcoSenseNow Yes. I’ve used various correlations to banana crop yields in Columbia. !!!

@EcoSenseNow That was funny, maybe 30 years ago. I’m not sure why some think this is somehow astonishing. It’s really not. And if people think that this is all built on correlations, you’re seriously deluding yourselves. Do better.

@EcoSenseNow

@EcoSenseNow Brillant...

@EcoSenseNow 3rd Independent factor would be people who saw a Nicolas Cage movie? 🤔🤔🤔

@EcoSenseNow Hummm

@EcoSenseNow I like the Nicolas Cage reference.

@EcoSenseNow Exactly

@EcoSenseNow The other problem is they are correlating two statistics, not observed data. For example, you correlate height and weight by using actual measurements. Global average temperature is a statistic, especially when you incorporate different data sets like tree rings and ice sheets.

@EcoSenseNow Nice! 🤣😂🙏🌎
