Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Why CO2 Correlation Does Not Cause Temperature Increase | Dr. Patrick Moore Patrick Moore

92,895 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

35 Kommentare

Profilbild von C e i s t (Climate Change)
C e i s t (Climate Change)vor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Patrick Moore lies. The 'greenhouse' effect and the role of CO2 is well understood Physics, confirmed by observations. Read ANY Atmospheric Physics textbook

Profilbild von BONUS🌍
BONUS🌍vor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Patrick Moore misleads as shown by evidence from every national science academy, NASA, NOAA, JMA and ESA.

Profilbild von Al Kern
Al Kernvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Not a single climate model for the past 40 years has proven accurate. Climate models are propaganda not science.

Profilbild von Thom Bradley
Thom Bradleyvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow CO2 is only .04% of the total atmospheric gases. Water vapor is far higher. Water vapor does more to influence temperature than CO2 can.

Profilbild von C e i s t (Climate Change)
C e i s t (Climate Change)vor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Patrick Moore lies about the correlation between CO2 and temperature in earth's geological history 1/2 Mills, Scotese et al 2018 "We find a strong relationship between CO2 forcing and temperature from the proxy data"

Profilbild von Really_Bad_At_Names, Good at Science🦎
Really_Bad_At_Names, Good at Science🦎vor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Advocacy didn't know he's a physicist. He has a degree from the Forestry department. I take my advice on this, from scientists that performed experiments; what papers has he written? If none, you just might be the most pathetic losers on the face of the earth.

Profilbild von Thom Bradley
Thom Bradleyvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Correlation is not necessarily causation. No evidence that high CO2 and high temperatures are related. Look at Mars, 95% CO2 atmosphere yet the basic temperature is -80f.

Profilbild von C e i s t (Climate Change)
C e i s t (Climate Change)vor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow There is zero correlation between anything Patrick Moore or the fossil industry propaganda group CO2 Coalition says, and the truth. eg

Profilbild von duramudaiti
duramudaitivor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Exactly. Warming started in 1850, the end of the Little Ice Age, long before the car was invented, and continues, as it has for thousands of years, cooling, warming. We know this from ice cores drilled out Greenland ice and analyzed by ACTUAL scientists.

Profilbild von Wayne Dunlap
Wayne Dunlapvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Interesting... 25 SIMPLE BULLET POINTS PROVING CO2 DOES NOT CAUSE GLOBAL WARMING: BY A GEOLOGIST DR ROGER HIGGS

Profilbild von Doc Farmer
Doc Farmervor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow I KNEW Ben and Jerry's was in league with the Great Whites! 🦈 Which technically makes them racist as well...

Profilbild von wherryj
wherryjvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow The most important question is, "Why do people keep eating ice cream knowing that it causes shark attacks?" 😀

Profilbild von James West
James Westvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Why do you cite someone who is denying the laws of physics? Why do none of the handful of contrarian climate scientists (Lindzen, Curry, Christy, Spencer…) ever use this argument? Why do the “1100 eminent scientists” in the “Great Climate Declaration” use it?

Profilbild von Liberty And Justice For ALL 🇺🇸⭐️⭐️⭐️🇺🇸
Liberty And Justice For ALL 🇺🇸⭐️⭐️⭐️🇺🇸vor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow

Profilbild von MIchael Ford
MIchael Fordvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Plus people are very suggestive and after being told the samething over and over they believe as truth. The more that believe confirms the belief.

Profilbild von C e i s t (Climate Change)
C e i s t (Climate Change)vor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow For years, lobbyist Patrick Moore @EcoSenseNow has been using a fraudulent graph from a non-scientist crank blogger who misrepresented the work of the scientists it cited. He KNOWS it's fraudulent, but still uses it. See thread:

Profilbild von Kerry O RN.MBA 🐭🦝
Kerry O RN.MBA 🐭🦝vor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow You would think that they weren’t teaching photosynthesis.

Profilbild von Skunk Ape VII
Skunk Ape VIIvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow We all know it’s cow farts

Profilbild von Mybrosays
Mybrosaysvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow My bro has told me that for years and I thought he was cray cray…now I’ve read studies that conclude the same thing. I suck at science BUT I always question who is being paid to tell me what they conclude. Thanks to the pandemic my eyes are open.

Profilbild von 野薔薇神武
野薔薇神武vor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow When solar radiation increases, as it has recently as measured by the temperature increase on Mars, the oceans warm. Warm water cannot absorb gas as well as cold and it out-gasses... just like water starts to bubble out dissolved air well below the boiling temperature. CO2 rises.

Profilbild von Speechless (but not silent)
Speechless (but not silent)vor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow 👇

Profilbild von Eliza Blu
Eliza Bluvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow It’s called trees. Plants. Green growing stuff

Profilbild von Flash☄️💥💥
Flash☄️💥💥vor 3 Jahren

@fisney_duck @EcoSenseNow Great point! I’m not buying the bs. Too many lies. Don’t trees & plants need CO2? Why aren’t we planting more? What happens if we reduce CO2? Is there a depop agenda? Hummmm🤔

Profilbild von Donny Jepp
Donny Jeppvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow I heard that our current CO2 level is exactly the same as the level used by science to determine if life is possible on other planets. Is this true?

Profilbild von James Fuller
James Fullervor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow I've seen an interview with this guy they're very intelligent man he blows the climate change narrative out of the water with facts

Profilbild von Dianasugar
Dianasugarvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Yes. I’ve used various correlations to banana crop yields in Columbia. !!!

Profilbild von MiteHakUrAccnt
MiteHakUrAccntvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow That was funny, maybe 30 years ago. I’m not sure why some think this is somehow astonishing. It’s really not. And if people think that this is all built on correlations, you’re seriously deluding yourselves. Do better.

Profilbild von Gutboybarrelhouse
Gutboybarrelhousevor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow

Profilbild von Ing. Wolverine19710816
Ing. Wolverine19710816vor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Brillant...

Profilbild von James Shinn
James Shinnvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow 3rd Independent factor would be people who saw a Nicolas Cage movie? 🤔🤔🤔

Profilbild von Robert Mayo
Robert Mayovor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Hummm

Profilbild von Kathleen
Kathleenvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow I like the Nicolas Cage reference.

Profilbild von Kathlene Roquet
Kathlene Roquetvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Exactly

Profilbild von Jonesy
Jonesyvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow The other problem is they are correlating two statistics, not observed data. For example, you correlate height and weight by using actual measurements. Global average temperature is a statistic, especially when you incorporate different data sets like tree rings and ice sheets.

Profilbild von jac
jacvor 3 Jahren

@EcoSenseNow Nice! 🤣😂🙏🌎

Ähnliche Videos