Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Why CO2 Correlation Does Not Cause Temperature Increase | Dr. Patrick Moore Patrick Moore

92,895 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

35 Comments

C e i s t (Climate Change)'s profile picture
C e i s t (Climate Change)3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Patrick Moore lies. The 'greenhouse' effect and the role of CO2 is well understood Physics, confirmed by observations. Read ANY Atmospheric Physics textbook

BONUS🌍's profile picture
BONUS🌍3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Patrick Moore misleads as shown by evidence from every national science academy, NASA, NOAA, JMA and ESA.

Al Kern's profile picture
Al Kern3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Not a single climate model for the past 40 years has proven accurate. Climate models are propaganda not science.

Thom Bradley's profile picture
Thom Bradley3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow CO2 is only .04% of the total atmospheric gases. Water vapor is far higher. Water vapor does more to influence temperature than CO2 can.

C e i s t (Climate Change)'s profile picture
C e i s t (Climate Change)3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Patrick Moore lies about the correlation between CO2 and temperature in earth's geological history 1/2 Mills, Scotese et al 2018 "We find a strong relationship between CO2 forcing and temperature from the proxy data"

Really_Bad_At_Names, Good at Science🦎's profile picture
Really_Bad_At_Names, Good at Science🦎3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Advocacy didn't know he's a physicist. He has a degree from the Forestry department. I take my advice on this, from scientists that performed experiments; what papers has he written? If none, you just might be the most pathetic losers on the face of the earth.

Thom Bradley's profile picture
Thom Bradley3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Correlation is not necessarily causation. No evidence that high CO2 and high temperatures are related. Look at Mars, 95% CO2 atmosphere yet the basic temperature is -80f.

C e i s t (Climate Change)'s profile picture
C e i s t (Climate Change)3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow There is zero correlation between anything Patrick Moore or the fossil industry propaganda group CO2 Coalition says, and the truth. eg

duramudaiti's profile picture
duramudaiti3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Exactly. Warming started in 1850, the end of the Little Ice Age, long before the car was invented, and continues, as it has for thousands of years, cooling, warming. We know this from ice cores drilled out Greenland ice and analyzed by ACTUAL scientists.

Wayne Dunlap's profile picture
Wayne Dunlap3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Interesting... 25 SIMPLE BULLET POINTS PROVING CO2 DOES NOT CAUSE GLOBAL WARMING: BY A GEOLOGIST DR ROGER HIGGS

Doc Farmer's profile picture
Doc Farmer3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow I KNEW Ben and Jerry's was in league with the Great Whites! 🦈 Which technically makes them racist as well...

wherryj's profile picture
wherryj3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow The most important question is, "Why do people keep eating ice cream knowing that it causes shark attacks?" 😀

James West's profile picture
James West3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Why do you cite someone who is denying the laws of physics? Why do none of the handful of contrarian climate scientists (Lindzen, Curry, Christy, Spencer…) ever use this argument? Why do the “1100 eminent scientists” in the “Great Climate Declaration” use it?

Liberty And Justice For ALL 🇺🇸⭐️⭐️⭐️🇺🇸's profile picture
Liberty And Justice For ALL 🇺🇸⭐️⭐️⭐️🇺🇸3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow

MIchael Ford's profile picture
MIchael Ford3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Plus people are very suggestive and after being told the samething over and over they believe as truth. The more that believe confirms the belief.

C e i s t (Climate Change)'s profile picture
C e i s t (Climate Change)3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow For years, lobbyist Patrick Moore @EcoSenseNow has been using a fraudulent graph from a non-scientist crank blogger who misrepresented the work of the scientists it cited. He KNOWS it's fraudulent, but still uses it. See thread:

Kerry O RN.MBA 🐭🦝's profile picture
Kerry O RN.MBA 🐭🦝3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow You would think that they weren’t teaching photosynthesis.

Skunk Ape VII's profile picture
Skunk Ape VII3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow We all know it’s cow farts

Mybrosays's profile picture
Mybrosays3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow My bro has told me that for years and I thought he was cray cray…now I’ve read studies that conclude the same thing. I suck at science BUT I always question who is being paid to tell me what they conclude. Thanks to the pandemic my eyes are open.

野薔薇神武's profile picture
野薔薇神武3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow When solar radiation increases, as it has recently as measured by the temperature increase on Mars, the oceans warm. Warm water cannot absorb gas as well as cold and it out-gasses... just like water starts to bubble out dissolved air well below the boiling temperature. CO2 rises.

Speechless (but not silent)'s profile picture
Speechless (but not silent)3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow 👇

Eliza Blu's profile picture
Eliza Blu3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow It’s called trees. Plants. Green growing stuff

Flash☄️💥💥's profile picture
Flash☄️💥💥3 years ago

@fisney_duck @EcoSenseNow Great point! I’m not buying the bs. Too many lies. Don’t trees & plants need CO2? Why aren’t we planting more? What happens if we reduce CO2? Is there a depop agenda? Hummmm🤔

Donny Jepp's profile picture
Donny Jepp3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow I heard that our current CO2 level is exactly the same as the level used by science to determine if life is possible on other planets. Is this true?

James Fuller's profile picture
James Fuller3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow I've seen an interview with this guy they're very intelligent man he blows the climate change narrative out of the water with facts

Dianasugar's profile picture
Dianasugar3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Yes. I’ve used various correlations to banana crop yields in Columbia. !!!

MiteHakUrAccnt's profile picture
MiteHakUrAccnt3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow That was funny, maybe 30 years ago. I’m not sure why some think this is somehow astonishing. It’s really not. And if people think that this is all built on correlations, you’re seriously deluding yourselves. Do better.

Gutboybarrelhouse's profile picture
Gutboybarrelhouse3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow

Ing. Wolverine19710816's profile picture
Ing. Wolverine197108163 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Brillant...

James Shinn's profile picture
James Shinn3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow 3rd Independent factor would be people who saw a Nicolas Cage movie? 🤔🤔🤔

Robert Mayo's profile picture
Robert Mayo3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Hummm

Kathleen's profile picture
Kathleen3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow I like the Nicolas Cage reference.

Kathlene Roquet's profile picture
Kathlene Roquet3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Exactly

Jonesy's profile picture
Jonesy3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow The other problem is they are correlating two statistics, not observed data. For example, you correlate height and weight by using actual measurements. Global average temperature is a statistic, especially when you incorporate different data sets like tree rings and ice sheets.

jac's profile picture
jac3 years ago

@EcoSenseNow Nice! 🤣😂🙏🌎

Related Videos