Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Why did Atlantic editor Jeffery Goldberg sit on Yemen chat group transcripts when he might have saved 53 lives and changed government policy by publishing when it was most impactful—before the bombing started? Goldberg clearly knew the group was real based on valid Signal usernames, as is also shown... show more

WikiLeaks

5,790,966 subscribers

438,031 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Did Trump just break his bail agreement? Trump is heard on this video saying he wants to buy this Glock. The owner of the store hung up on reporters when they called. Trump’s campaign aide specifically said that Trump did buy the Glock, before he deleted his post making that claim. An employee at the gun shop said that Trump did not buy it. So what’s the truth, and was he allowed to do it?

Did Trump just break his bail agreement? Trump is heard on this video saying he wants to buy this Glock. The owner of the store hung up on reporters when they called. Trump’s campaign aide specifically said that Trump did buy the Glock, before he deleted his post making that claim. An employee at the gun shop said that Trump did not buy it. So what’s the truth, and was he allowed to do it?

Ed Krassenstein

4,111,116 views • 2 years ago

On June 1st, Romeo was arriving at work when he was wrongfully taken by ICE. They did not ask his name, did not provide any documentation, and would not give information as to why he was being arrested. According to one of the ICE workers, after the fact, he was not who they were looking for, and despite his having no criminal history, he is still being detained somewhere. The GoFundMe is to help his family be able to afford a lawyer so that he can get the legal help that he deserves and needs. 👉

On June 1st, Romeo was arriving at work when he was wrongfully taken by ICE. They did not ask his name, did not provide any documentation, and would not give information as to why he was being arrested. According to one of the ICE workers, after the fact, he was not who they were looking for, and despite his having no criminal history, he is still being detained somewhere. The GoFundMe is to help his family be able to afford a lawyer so that he can get the legal help that he deserves and needs. 👉

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

95,749 views • 1 year ago

As you know, Trump and the U.S. administration tried to lie about the elementary school bombing, very clumsily attempting to pin it on Iran. It was incredibly foolish, he clearly has no idea who actually has what weapons and how they are used🤦🏻‍♀️ Give this guy a prize for the journalism he showed here. It was a strong response, he pushed back, stood his ground, and kept his voice firm, while implying that Trump was full of shit. :)))) Iran does not have tomahawk missiles neither does Israel. It was us of course.

As you know, Trump and the U.S. administration tried to lie about the elementary school bombing, very clumsily attempting to pin it on Iran. It was incredibly foolish, he clearly has no idea who actually has what weapons and how they are used🤦🏻‍♀️ Give this guy a prize for the journalism he showed here. It was a strong response, he pushed back, stood his ground, and kept his voice firm, while implying that Trump was full of shit. :)))) Iran does not have tomahawk missiles neither does Israel. It was us of course.

ELIZABETH LANE

31,367 views • 4 months ago

A mob in Surdulica, Serbia is targeting an innocent Albanian bakery owner, his wife, and their children day and night, after his young cousin was involved in an accident for which he has already been arrested. The mob is mobilizing, sharing anti-Albanian messages and calling for the family’s expulsion through social media and a large group chat. A Serbian government minister is part of the group chat. The bakery owner stated that his children are traumatized. They constantly ask him why they can't go to school. The mob is also stalking the bakery’s Serbian customers and publishing their photos within the group to intimidate them.

A mob in Surdulica, Serbia is targeting an innocent Albanian bakery owner, his wife, and their children day and night, after his young cousin was involved in an accident for which he has already been arrested. The mob is mobilizing, sharing anti-Albanian messages and calling for the family’s expulsion through social media and a large group chat. A Serbian government minister is part of the group chat. The bakery owner stated that his children are traumatized. They constantly ask him why they can't go to school. The mob is also stalking the bakery’s Serbian customers and publishing their photos within the group to intimidate them.

Admirim

71,935 views • 5 months ago

He is a real hero. Afroz and Imran were kidnapping a girl named Ayesha. A boy named Harshvardhan was passing by. To save her, he risked his life and saved the girl whom he did not even know. This is the eternal Hindu tradition. Harshvardhan is injured but out of danger. Salute.

He is a real hero. Afroz and Imran were kidnapping a girl named Ayesha. A boy named Harshvardhan was passing by. To save her, he risked his life and saved the girl whom he did not even know. This is the eternal Hindu tradition. Harshvardhan is injured but out of danger. Salute.

Baba Banaras™

1,888,990 views • 10 months ago

How is it possible that Liam was still online when he was unconscious? How is it possible that Liam was still online after he had already passed away? How is it possible that in December someone was responding on a Snapchat account associated with his number? That person was sending and responding to messages. If this was the number supposedly used to contact escorts, why was it reassigned so quickly? Why isn’t the line under police custody in the case? How is it possible that if they claim Liam was using his phone, he didn’t even know what was being posted on his accounts? So, in life, he chose not to use his phone or social media, but in the afterlife, he’s texting non-stop. What kind of WiFi does Saint Peter have? Or should we ask Rogelio instead? #LauraBruniard #ExposeRogerNores #JusticeForLiam #LiamPayneForever #LiamPayne #CloseCasaSur #WeWillNotBeSilence #FiscalesGobAr #RogerNores #Justiciaparaliampayne #ExposeRogerNores #ArrowWarriors

How is it possible that Liam was still online when he was unconscious? How is it possible that Liam was still online after he had already passed away? How is it possible that in December someone was responding on a Snapchat account associated with his number? That person was sending and responding to messages. If this was the number supposedly used to contact escorts, why was it reassigned so quickly? Why isn’t the line under police custody in the case? How is it possible that if they claim Liam was using his phone, he didn’t even know what was being posted on his accounts? So, in life, he chose not to use his phone or social media, but in the afterlife, he’s texting non-stop. What kind of WiFi does Saint Peter have? Or should we ask Rogelio instead? #LauraBruniard #ExposeRogerNores #JusticeForLiam #LiamPayneForever #LiamPayne #CloseCasaSur #WeWillNotBeSilence #FiscalesGobAr #RogerNores #Justiciaparaliampayne #ExposeRogerNores #ArrowWarriors

Blue Payne ❯❯❯❯❯

20,664 views • 1 year ago

I'm now convinced based on this video that the second and third shots were just as justified as the first. We can see that the ICE agent is being hit by the car throughout the series of shots. The leftist argument that "we are seeing the front grill of the car, therefore he was not in front of the car" does not hold. A front bumper can absolutely side-bash you. The agent at this point does not have his eyes on the wheels, he does not know where they are headed. All he knows is that there is a car striking his body and he could get swallowed under the wheels, lose a leg, or die. There is no doubt that he was correct in his belief that he was in the process of being assaulted by a potentially deadly car attack.

I'm now convinced based on this video that the second and third shots were just as justified as the first. We can see that the ICE agent is being hit by the car throughout the series of shots. The leftist argument that "we are seeing the front grill of the car, therefore he was not in front of the car" does not hold. A front bumper can absolutely side-bash you. The agent at this point does not have his eyes on the wheels, he does not know where they are headed. All he knows is that there is a car striking his body and he could get swallowed under the wheels, lose a leg, or die. There is no doubt that he was correct in his belief that he was in the process of being assaulted by a potentially deadly car attack.

Jean-François Gariépy 🧬

25,343 views • 6 months ago

The most retarded thing about Zack's Pixel Fold battery explosion is his claim (and people repeating it) that this is the first time ever that this happened. Well YEAH because it was also the FIRST TIME that he pushed it way beyond his usual destruction and kept trying to fold it over at the breaking point (the antenna) way after it already got destroyed On all his other ""tests"" he always stops when the phone breaks. Not to much here. After it broke he tried to completely fold it and THAT was the point that damaged the battery which resulted in it starting to smoke. Don't blame fucking Google, blame his retarded ""testing"" It's literally the FIRST time he did this to a phone. Not the first time this happening in his tests". It would happen almost every single time if he did this to all his phones and foldables. For comparison on the Fold 7 he just stopped after a quick bent. On the Pixel he didn't.

The most retarded thing about Zack's Pixel Fold battery explosion is his claim (and people repeating it) that this is the first time ever that this happened. Well YEAH because it was also the FIRST TIME that he pushed it way beyond his usual destruction and kept trying to fold it over at the breaking point (the antenna) way after it already got destroyed On all his other ""tests"" he always stops when the phone breaks. Not to much here. After it broke he tried to completely fold it and THAT was the point that damaged the battery which resulted in it starting to smoke. Don't blame fucking Google, blame his retarded ""testing"" It's literally the FIRST time he did this to a phone. Not the first time this happening in his tests". It would happen almost every single time if he did this to all his phones and foldables. For comparison on the Fold 7 he just stopped after a quick bent. On the Pixel he didn't.

Tim 🏳️‍🌈

59,445 views • 9 months ago

Four policemen were injured and one lost his life when the outer wall of the Jhangi check-post was targeted by an explosive laden vehicle in Dera Ghazi Khan Punjab. According to the police the vehicle was full of wood. It’s not immediately clear if it was a suicide bombing, the rubble of the vehicle is under the debris, rescue operations are continuing . [This is a developing story]

Four policemen were injured and one lost his life when the outer wall of the Jhangi check-post was targeted by an explosive laden vehicle in Dera Ghazi Khan Punjab. According to the police the vehicle was full of wood. It’s not immediately clear if it was a suicide bombing, the rubble of the vehicle is under the debris, rescue operations are continuing . [This is a developing story]

Iftikhar Firdous

25,039 views • 1 month ago

I'm trying to explain what's going on to some friends on FB- "Rumor is that Netanyahu is dead. A bomb hit his house. His brother is dead. The head of Mossad also died. Bibi hasn't been seen in days. Then this video was posted to his official account on Twitter....until people in the comments pointed out that it was AI generated. Then it was removed. Also, Scott Bessent (Secretary of the Treasury) was in the middle of an interview....interrupted for an emergency call from Trump that lasted two hours, and when he returned he was clearly shaken. Oh, and apparently Rabbi Menachem Schneerson told Netanyahu years ago that there's a prophecy that he will be the last leader of Israel before the "jewish messiah" (antichrist) comes. This MAY be propaganda, but it's unclear who benefits from PRETENDING that Netanyahu is dead." Did I miss anything?

I'm trying to explain what's going on to some friends on FB- "Rumor is that Netanyahu is dead. A bomb hit his house. His brother is dead. The head of Mossad also died. Bibi hasn't been seen in days. Then this video was posted to his official account on Twitter....until people in the comments pointed out that it was AI generated. Then it was removed. Also, Scott Bessent (Secretary of the Treasury) was in the middle of an interview....interrupted for an emergency call from Trump that lasted two hours, and when he returned he was clearly shaken. Oh, and apparently Rabbi Menachem Schneerson told Netanyahu years ago that there's a prophecy that he will be the last leader of Israel before the "jewish messiah" (antichrist) comes. This MAY be propaganda, but it's unclear who benefits from PRETENDING that Netanyahu is dead." Did I miss anything?

Molly Davis

50,938 views • 4 months ago

Regarding the Eric Trump / Daniel Cormier “text scandal”, I am open to being convinced otherwise, but I do not believe for one second that Eric Trump would text something so stupid to Daniel Cormier. It’s laughably stupid on its face to think that Eric Trump would ask a UFC commentator if any of the fights are “rigged”. That he would ask it in writing. And that he would not, for example, just pick up the phone and call Dana White or Joe Rogan himself. That said, I just want to understand what happened. Daniel Cormier said he was hacked. Is that to say he was hacked at the text level, or the X post level? Did he in fact make the post, and delete it? If he made the post, did he do it as a joke to illustrate how absurd the text hack was, but realized how the post could be misinterpreted as real? Or did someone make the post from his X account he subsequently deleted it. I know there are some who are going to say he made the post in earnest, thinking the text messages were real, intending to call out the “corruption”, and he has since been threatened, deleted the post, and claimed “hack”, etc. I can tell you exactly why I do not believe, even if he made the post, he did it believing the text message was real, intending to call out the “corruption”. If Cormier seriously thought the text messages were real, he would understand that by posting it publicly, it would literally destroy the UFC, his livelihood and his legacy - in addition to the legacy of everyone who has ever competed in the UFC. There is no realm of the universe in which even if it were in fact a real text that he actually received from Eric Trump, he would post it publicly. Because it would mean the end of the UFC. I just want to know if he actually made the post from his X account, or if the entire post was the result of a hack (hence the subsequent deleting of the post). Serious and sincere questions for clarity that would benefit everyone Eric Trump

Regarding the Eric Trump / Daniel Cormier “text scandal”, I am open to being convinced otherwise, but I do not believe for one second that Eric Trump would text something so stupid to Daniel Cormier. It’s laughably stupid on its face to think that Eric Trump would ask a UFC commentator if any of the fights are “rigged”. That he would ask it in writing. And that he would not, for example, just pick up the phone and call Dana White or Joe Rogan himself. That said, I just want to understand what happened. Daniel Cormier said he was hacked. Is that to say he was hacked at the text level, or the X post level? Did he in fact make the post, and delete it? If he made the post, did he do it as a joke to illustrate how absurd the text hack was, but realized how the post could be misinterpreted as real? Or did someone make the post from his X account he subsequently deleted it. I know there are some who are going to say he made the post in earnest, thinking the text messages were real, intending to call out the “corruption”, and he has since been threatened, deleted the post, and claimed “hack”, etc. I can tell you exactly why I do not believe, even if he made the post, he did it believing the text message was real, intending to call out the “corruption”. If Cormier seriously thought the text messages were real, he would understand that by posting it publicly, it would literally destroy the UFC, his livelihood and his legacy - in addition to the legacy of everyone who has ever competed in the UFC. There is no realm of the universe in which even if it were in fact a real text that he actually received from Eric Trump, he would post it publicly. Because it would mean the end of the UFC. I just want to know if he actually made the post from his X account, or if the entire post was the result of a hack (hence the subsequent deleting of the post). Serious and sincere questions for clarity that would benefit everyone Eric Trump

Viva Frei

30,167 views • 1 month ago

A 42 year old man, #Deepak, died by suicide in #Kerala after a video posted by #Shimjitha accusing him of inappropriate behaviour (#SexualHarassment) on a bus went viral. What followed was not justice, it was a digital lynching. The video that Shimjitha uploaded does not clearly show any deliberate sexual act. It shows a crowded bus, a man standing at a distance, and a fleeting moment where his elbow appears to brush past her as he gets down. Multiple viewers and eyewitnesses, including those quoted on television debates, have said the contact appeared unintentional, a consequence of overcrowding. Despite this ambiguity, Shimjitha chose to upload the video publicly, frame it as intentional harassment, allow it to spread unchecked to nearly 2 million views, only after the damage was done did she delete the video. This is where accountability comes in. If the act was intentional, the law was available. Kerala has clear legal mechanisms for dealing with harassment in public transport. Filing a police complaint would have ensured investigation, evidence, and due process. Instead, she chose social media as a courtroom. When you publicly accuse someone of a serious offence, You take responsibility for the consequences. You cannot later claim neutrality You cannot undo reputational damage by deleting a post. Deepak did not get a chance to defend himself. He did not get a fair inquiry. He got humiliation, abuse, and public branding as a criminal. And he paid with his life. This is not about silencing women. Women must speak up against harassment, and real offenders must be punished. But reckless accusations without verification harm genuine victims too. When ambiguous incidents are projected as crimes for online validation, trust in real complaints erodes. Social media outrage is not justice. Viral videos are not verdicts. Public shaming is not accountability. Shimjitha may stand by her allegation. That is her rig. But society has the right, and duty to question the method, the timing, and the consequences of her actions. One life is already lost. If this case doesn’t make us rethink how casually we destroy people online, then the next tragedy is only a post away.

A 42 year old man, #Deepak, died by suicide in #Kerala after a video posted by #Shimjitha accusing him of inappropriate behaviour (#SexualHarassment) on a bus went viral. What followed was not justice, it was a digital lynching. The video that Shimjitha uploaded does not clearly show any deliberate sexual act. It shows a crowded bus, a man standing at a distance, and a fleeting moment where his elbow appears to brush past her as he gets down. Multiple viewers and eyewitnesses, including those quoted on television debates, have said the contact appeared unintentional, a consequence of overcrowding. Despite this ambiguity, Shimjitha chose to upload the video publicly, frame it as intentional harassment, allow it to spread unchecked to nearly 2 million views, only after the damage was done did she delete the video. This is where accountability comes in. If the act was intentional, the law was available. Kerala has clear legal mechanisms for dealing with harassment in public transport. Filing a police complaint would have ensured investigation, evidence, and due process. Instead, she chose social media as a courtroom. When you publicly accuse someone of a serious offence, You take responsibility for the consequences. You cannot later claim neutrality You cannot undo reputational damage by deleting a post. Deepak did not get a chance to defend himself. He did not get a fair inquiry. He got humiliation, abuse, and public branding as a criminal. And he paid with his life. This is not about silencing women. Women must speak up against harassment, and real offenders must be punished. But reckless accusations without verification harm genuine victims too. When ambiguous incidents are projected as crimes for online validation, trust in real complaints erodes. Social media outrage is not justice. Viral videos are not verdicts. Public shaming is not accountability. Shimjitha may stand by her allegation. That is her rig. But society has the right, and duty to question the method, the timing, and the consequences of her actions. One life is already lost. If this case doesn’t make us rethink how casually we destroy people online, then the next tragedy is only a post away.

Harish M

57,812 views • 6 months ago

Deep always wanted Homelander to love and appreciate him, he loved him like a brother but Homelander hated his guts and was disgusted by him. I find it ironic because Homelander wanted people in his life who genuinely like/love him and the Deep actually did, this was not an act by him like Firecracker or Stillwell did. He was most of the time honest and loyal to him as well. in the end he always wanted Homelander to see him as his Bro, it was genuine

Deep always wanted Homelander to love and appreciate him, he loved him like a brother but Homelander hated his guts and was disgusted by him. I find it ironic because Homelander wanted people in his life who genuinely like/love him and the Deep actually did, this was not an act by him like Firecracker or Stillwell did. He was most of the time honest and loyal to him as well. in the end he always wanted Homelander to see him as his Bro, it was genuine

SOLEX

287,032 views • 1 month ago

Last night on the @fourensicroom, we broke down what happened on Sunday, September 17, 2023, at 8 a.m.—when Karen Read and Alan Jackson sat in a blacked-out SUV while a “private investigator” knocked on Brian Higgins’ door to “talk,” if he was willing. His response: “Not Interested.” 👉Higgins had legal representation—If you are represented, the defense must go through your attorney. 👉If you have counsel, defense attorneys cannot bypass your lawyer. 👉This is governed by ethical rules (Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct Why did they not go through his lawyer? And if we’re supposed to believe he killed John O’Keefe, why approach him at his home at all? Where’s the fear? Why try to sit down with him? Why Higgins—and not the McCabes or the Alberts? Why a non-family member? This was before they retooled their story. Before Aidan Kearney started targeting Higgins. Back when they were trying to see if he’d play ball and point the finger at the “McAlberts.” So why did he suddenly become one of the alleged “killers” only after he declined to talk? We all know, Steve. Link to last nights show: Link to donate to the Witnesses Defense Fund:

Last night on the @fourensicroom, we broke down what happened on Sunday, September 17, 2023, at 8 a.m.—when Karen Read and Alan Jackson sat in a blacked-out SUV while a “private investigator” knocked on Brian Higgins’ door to “talk,” if he was willing. His response: “Not Interested.” 👉Higgins had legal representation—If you are represented, the defense must go through your attorney. 👉If you have counsel, defense attorneys cannot bypass your lawyer. 👉This is governed by ethical rules (Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct Why did they not go through his lawyer? And if we’re supposed to believe he killed John O’Keefe, why approach him at his home at all? Where’s the fear? Why try to sit down with him? Why Higgins—and not the McCabes or the Alberts? Why a non-family member? This was before they retooled their story. Before Aidan Kearney started targeting Higgins. Back when they were trying to see if he’d play ball and point the finger at the “McAlberts.” So why did he suddenly become one of the alleged “killers” only after he declined to talk? We all know, Steve. Link to last nights show: Link to donate to the Witnesses Defense Fund:

Mama Llama

26,619 views • 3 months ago

Cthulhu is NOT an aquatic entity. August Derleth infamously tried to categorize Cthulhu this way. And of course, Cthulhu does have feelers on his head. But he is not from the sea. He is imprisoned under the sea, and it's a prison partly because of the sea. In his million-year war against the Elder Things, both sides were amphibious. Cthulhu seized the land, and forced the Elder Things to retreat to the water against their will. The land was clearly the more desirable possession. (video by AI Playground) 1/2

Cthulhu is NOT an aquatic entity. August Derleth infamously tried to categorize Cthulhu this way. And of course, Cthulhu does have feelers on his head. But he is not from the sea. He is imprisoned under the sea, and it's a prison partly because of the sea. In his million-year war against the Elder Things, both sides were amphibious. Cthulhu seized the land, and forced the Elder Things to retreat to the water against their will. The land was clearly the more desirable possession. (video by AI Playground) 1/2

Sandy Petersen 🪔

30,508 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸‼️🚨 IMPORTANT: The ICE agent clearly was not scared or overly stressed … after shooting the woman he said “FUCKING BITCH”. He seems fine. I have to add, that the women were out of their minds too. They provoked ICE, but seemed to wanted to drive away … anyway. So, radical liberals met an ICE agent who has no temper after he was dragged by an illegal the last time. -> The question is not if she hit him, or how much. That was always visible. The question is, was he in danger when he fired? And he fired after jumping out of the way.

🇺🇸‼️🚨 IMPORTANT: The ICE agent clearly was not scared or overly stressed … after shooting the woman he said “FUCKING BITCH”. He seems fine. I have to add, that the women were out of their minds too. They provoked ICE, but seemed to wanted to drive away … anyway. So, radical liberals met an ICE agent who has no temper after he was dragged by an illegal the last time. -> The question is not if she hit him, or how much. That was always visible. The question is, was he in danger when he fired? And he fired after jumping out of the way.

Lord Bebo

64,784 views • 6 months ago

AIDAN KEARNEY SHARES IMPOUNDED INFORMATION WITH HIS AUDIENCE On Sept 17th, while going through his motion to dismiss, Aidan Kearney shared with his audience information impounded by the court. In reference to a text message Jen McCabe sent to her daughter after Karen Read's arraignment, Aidan Kearney clearly states the name of the recipient of the text, Jen McCabe's daughter, information that had been NOT for public consumption as it was part of impounded materials. This is the same daughter that Kearney and his followers have relentlessly attacked and harassed for 2 years. Given this fact, it does not appear he did so by accident but rather to once again to provoke harassment of the young woman. Bederow Law maybe you should have a discussion with your client as to the meaning of such words as redaction and inpoundment. He seems to cross the line with sharing as you well know since he's shared screenshots of his discussions with you recently. Unlike those, what he shared here was protected by court order. Ruh roh.

AIDAN KEARNEY SHARES IMPOUNDED INFORMATION WITH HIS AUDIENCE On Sept 17th, while going through his motion to dismiss, Aidan Kearney shared with his audience information impounded by the court. In reference to a text message Jen McCabe sent to her daughter after Karen Read's arraignment, Aidan Kearney clearly states the name of the recipient of the text, Jen McCabe's daughter, information that had been NOT for public consumption as it was part of impounded materials. This is the same daughter that Kearney and his followers have relentlessly attacked and harassed for 2 years. Given this fact, it does not appear he did so by accident but rather to once again to provoke harassment of the young woman. Bederow Law maybe you should have a discussion with your client as to the meaning of such words as redaction and inpoundment. He seems to cross the line with sharing as you well know since he's shared screenshots of his discussions with you recently. Unlike those, what he shared here was protected by court order. Ruh roh.

Julie Carpenter

20,785 views • 7 months ago

Two things. First I should finish watching a video before I make comments on it. I didn’t realize Candace herself says the camera was on the inside of his shirt in 2025. Candace Charlie wasn’t an idiot. He knew why they were putting it on the inside of the shirt. Don’t you think he’d be a part of the change on how it was worn? He was Not a frog. Smh. And second. If her followers still believe her after the second video here where the demonstrator puts it on the way Charlie has it on there’s no helping them. But did you guys see her face. She knew her team had F’d up and put too much info out there. Lmao. Candace that sucked for you but your face was priceless. You were so pissed they let it run that long. When she does the little sniff it’s a sign she’s mad, happens every time. Remember she did it when Elizebeth said she had a dream about Charlie? Is someone getting fired?

Two things. First I should finish watching a video before I make comments on it. I didn’t realize Candace herself says the camera was on the inside of his shirt in 2025. Candace Charlie wasn’t an idiot. He knew why they were putting it on the inside of the shirt. Don’t you think he’d be a part of the change on how it was worn? He was Not a frog. Smh. And second. If her followers still believe her after the second video here where the demonstrator puts it on the way Charlie has it on there’s no helping them. But did you guys see her face. She knew her team had F’d up and put too much info out there. Lmao. Candace that sucked for you but your face was priceless. You were so pissed they let it run that long. When she does the little sniff it’s a sign she’s mad, happens every time. Remember she did it when Elizebeth said she had a dream about Charlie? Is someone getting fired?

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

17,916 views • 1 month ago

I’ve seen a lot of people accuse Saudi Arabia of fabricating the moon sighting. Below is proof that it wasn’t. The first video is the exact moment the moon was sighted. The second video is the official testifying before a judge about the set up and what he saw exactly. He says "At 6:11pm (precisely) we saw an opening in the sky, and we all saw the moon and around the opening was all clouds" There is also a picture but it is against the Sunnah to share proof when a testimony is given by a Muslim so I refuse to share it in case we set a precedent to always share a picture and that would be a big error. A testimony of a Muslim is enough as we see from the Hadith of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم It was narrated that Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه said: A Bedouin came to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم and said, I have seen the new moon tonight. He said, "Do you bear witness that there is no god except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah?" He said, Yes. He said, "Get up, O Bilaal, and announce to the people that they should fast tomorrow." [at Tirmidhi: 691 Abu Dawood: [2340], an Nasaa'i: [2112] Ibn Maajah: [1652]. Shaykh al Albaani رحمه الله said: So we see from the Hadith that he, صلى الله عليه وسلم، instructed Bilaal to announce to the people that they would fast the next day. So the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم was content with the testimony of this man, whom he did not know, on the basis that he bore witness that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, i.e. he knew that he was a Muslim, but he did not check on him any further and he did not try to find out how intelligent and smart he was, as was the case in the first Hadith in which the witness was 'Abd Allah ibn 'Umar ibn al Khattab رضي الله عنه. Yet despite that he accepted his testimony. This Hadith makes things easier for people, and what this means is that the judge should be content with the witness as he appears to be, without needing to find people who know this man and can testify that he is of good character, as was the habit of judges since time immemorial. Rather it is sufficient to know that he is a Muslim. This man was a Bedouin of whom the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم had no prior knowledge and he was content that he uttered the Shahaadatayn before him. So he was a Muslim with the same rights and duties as any other, and based on his testimony and the fact that he was a Muslim he said: O Bilaal, announced to the people that they should fast tomorrow. [At Ta laaq 'ala Kitaab Bulugh al Maraam, (audio tape), Hadith 5, Kitaab al Siyaam] This Hadith is evidence for the principle that a Muslim is to be regarded as being of good character unless proven otherwise. Al San'aani رحمه الله said concerning what we learn from the hadeeth of Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه: It indicates that the basic principle with regard to the Muslims is that they are of good character, because the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم did not ask the Bedouin for anything except the Shahaadah. [Subul as Salaam by as San'aani: 2/153] And Allah knows best.

I’ve seen a lot of people accuse Saudi Arabia of fabricating the moon sighting. Below is proof that it wasn’t. The first video is the exact moment the moon was sighted. The second video is the official testifying before a judge about the set up and what he saw exactly. He says "At 6:11pm (precisely) we saw an opening in the sky, and we all saw the moon and around the opening was all clouds" There is also a picture but it is against the Sunnah to share proof when a testimony is given by a Muslim so I refuse to share it in case we set a precedent to always share a picture and that would be a big error. A testimony of a Muslim is enough as we see from the Hadith of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم It was narrated that Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه said: A Bedouin came to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم and said, I have seen the new moon tonight. He said, "Do you bear witness that there is no god except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah?" He said, Yes. He said, "Get up, O Bilaal, and announce to the people that they should fast tomorrow." [at Tirmidhi: 691 Abu Dawood: [2340], an Nasaa'i: [2112] Ibn Maajah: [1652]. Shaykh al Albaani رحمه الله said: So we see from the Hadith that he, صلى الله عليه وسلم، instructed Bilaal to announce to the people that they would fast the next day. So the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم was content with the testimony of this man, whom he did not know, on the basis that he bore witness that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, i.e. he knew that he was a Muslim, but he did not check on him any further and he did not try to find out how intelligent and smart he was, as was the case in the first Hadith in which the witness was 'Abd Allah ibn 'Umar ibn al Khattab رضي الله عنه. Yet despite that he accepted his testimony. This Hadith makes things easier for people, and what this means is that the judge should be content with the witness as he appears to be, without needing to find people who know this man and can testify that he is of good character, as was the habit of judges since time immemorial. Rather it is sufficient to know that he is a Muslim. This man was a Bedouin of whom the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم had no prior knowledge and he was content that he uttered the Shahaadatayn before him. So he was a Muslim with the same rights and duties as any other, and based on his testimony and the fact that he was a Muslim he said: O Bilaal, announced to the people that they should fast tomorrow. [At Ta laaq 'ala Kitaab Bulugh al Maraam, (audio tape), Hadith 5, Kitaab al Siyaam] This Hadith is evidence for the principle that a Muslim is to be regarded as being of good character unless proven otherwise. Al San'aani رحمه الله said concerning what we learn from the hadeeth of Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه: It indicates that the basic principle with regard to the Muslims is that they are of good character, because the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم did not ask the Bedouin for anything except the Shahaadah. [Subul as Salaam by as San'aani: 2/153] And Allah knows best.

ابن البخاري

245,087 views • 1 year ago