Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Why did Dr. Ambedkar use the same Manusmriti while framing the Hindu Code Bill, which he had burnt in 1927? Why, even today, do the Supreme Court and High Courts refer to Manusmriti in their judgments? Those who burn Manusmriti for leftist validation may not like this truth. Ritika... show more

OpIndia.com

745,128 subscribers

55,047 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

When there’s nothing substantive left to say, “patriarchy” often enters the conversation. Add “Brahmin” before it and apparently the argument is complete. J Sai Deepak challenges this familiar playbook. Why is #Manusmriti repeatedly pulled into political attacks on Hindu society, while the Quran, the Old Testament and other religious texts rarely face the same public examination? Watch the full video: #SangamTalks #Manusmriti #BrahminPatriarchy Sai Deepak J

When there’s nothing substantive left to say, “patriarchy” often enters the conversation. Add “Brahmin” before it and apparently the argument is complete. J Sai Deepak challenges this familiar playbook. Why is #Manusmriti repeatedly pulled into political attacks on Hindu society, while the Quran, the Old Testament and other religious texts rarely face the same public examination? Watch the full video: #SangamTalks #Manusmriti #BrahminPatriarchy Sai Deepak J

Sangam Talks

10,906 views • 1 month ago

What does Manusmriti have to do with students? Are students being taught Manusmriti in schools? In the name of “Chhatro Ki Goonj,” Rahul Gandhi is pushing his anti-Hindu narrative. Why doesn’t Rahul Gandhi talk about Quran 4:34, which says, “Men are qawwāmūn over women,” and is taught in madrasas?

What does Manusmriti have to do with students? Are students being taught Manusmriti in schools? In the name of “Chhatro Ki Goonj,” Rahul Gandhi is pushing his anti-Hindu narrative. Why doesn’t Rahul Gandhi talk about Quran 4:34, which says, “Men are qawwāmūn over women,” and is taught in madrasas?

Facts

59,800 views • 1 month ago

Why does Rahul Ghandy target Manusmriti? Simple! Manusmriti tells us about strengthening Family System to strengthen society. RaGa is attacking this very base. Why? To create anarchy. Broken Family System=Immoral Society No commitment, No responsibilities, No Ethics, No Values, No character which means totally broken society... a perfect breeding ground for Anarchy. No Nationalist Sentiment, Only Selfish Goals.... and Communists can rise to power ONLY in SUCH anarchy. And do I need to explain how CONgress is infiltrated with Communist "Divisive" mindset! This's why, RaGa attacks Manusmriti. It's not about Hindu-hate, it's about breaking the bond of commitment & faith within different sections of society which is made up of different sets of families. "India is not a Nation, it's Union of States"- who had said this? Answer to "Why Attack on Manusmriti" lies in above statement which a Gyani had said. Who's that Gyani.... you know it.

Why does Rahul Ghandy target Manusmriti? Simple! Manusmriti tells us about strengthening Family System to strengthen society. RaGa is attacking this very base. Why? To create anarchy. Broken Family System=Immoral Society No commitment, No responsibilities, No Ethics, No Values, No character which means totally broken society... a perfect breeding ground for Anarchy. No Nationalist Sentiment, Only Selfish Goals.... and Communists can rise to power ONLY in SUCH anarchy. And do I need to explain how CONgress is infiltrated with Communist "Divisive" mindset! This's why, RaGa attacks Manusmriti. It's not about Hindu-hate, it's about breaking the bond of commitment & faith within different sections of society which is made up of different sets of families. "India is not a Nation, it's Union of States"- who had said this? Answer to "Why Attack on Manusmriti" lies in above statement which a Gyani had said. Who's that Gyani.... you know it.

BhikuMhatre

21,845 views • 1 month ago

This is why Manusmriti is so important for Hindus👇 To just escape Ambedkarites or unite them against Shantidoots, we can't allow them to burn our ancient Dharmashashtras. Ambedkar was not a god. At one moment, he was requesting Britishers to stay in India. Listen to the words of Pujya Shri Shankaracharya ji.

This is why Manusmriti is so important for Hindus👇 To just escape Ambedkarites or unite them against Shantidoots, we can't allow them to burn our ancient Dharmashashtras. Ambedkar was not a god. At one moment, he was requesting Britishers to stay in India. Listen to the words of Pujya Shri Shankaracharya ji.

Shubham Sharma

18,028 views • 1 year ago

Statements of Prakash Raj on Ambedkar Jayanti in Kerala: "We were a country which was barbaric, that was decided by Manusmriti." "Even today the caste system exists due to thousands and thousands of years of conditioning. This is the reason for Hathras and Islamophobia." "On this day, let's take an oath that this country would be neither Hindi Rashtra nor Hindu Rashtra."

Statements of Prakash Raj on Ambedkar Jayanti in Kerala: "We were a country which was barbaric, that was decided by Manusmriti." "Even today the caste system exists due to thousands and thousands of years of conditioning. This is the reason for Hathras and Islamophobia." "On this day, let's take an oath that this country would be neither Hindi Rashtra nor Hindu Rashtra."

Āyudhika

15,608 views • 5 months ago

Anand Ranganathan has taken on Rahul Gandhi’s Manusmriti argument. He accepts that the passage describing women’s dependence on father, husband and sons is patriarchal. But he says Rahul Gandhi is using one verse as a political weapon while ignoring the wider Hindu tradition. Ranganathan argues that Manusmriti is an ancient collection, a Smriti and not the Vedas. He says critics are “cherry-picking” a harsh passage while overlooking verses and traditions that honour women. He also insists that patriarchy and misogyny must be condemned wherever they appear. The debate is not about denying the verse. It is about whether one text, one passage or one interpretation can define Hindu thought. This report separates the verse, the history and Ranganathan’s political argument, while asking whether the same standard is applied to every religious tradition in India. Anand Ranganathan Aditi Prasad #rahulgandhi #manusmriti #womensrights #smashpatriarchy #anandranganathan #hindutva #hindutradition #indianpolitics #religiousdebate #politicaldebate #hinduism #scrutiny #timesaxis #toi

Anand Ranganathan has taken on Rahul Gandhi’s Manusmriti argument. He accepts that the passage describing women’s dependence on father, husband and sons is patriarchal. But he says Rahul Gandhi is using one verse as a political weapon while ignoring the wider Hindu tradition. Ranganathan argues that Manusmriti is an ancient collection, a Smriti and not the Vedas. He says critics are “cherry-picking” a harsh passage while overlooking verses and traditions that honour women. He also insists that patriarchy and misogyny must be condemned wherever they appear. The debate is not about denying the verse. It is about whether one text, one passage or one interpretation can define Hindu thought. This report separates the verse, the history and Ranganathan’s political argument, while asking whether the same standard is applied to every religious tradition in India. Anand Ranganathan Aditi Prasad #rahulgandhi #manusmriti #womensrights #smashpatriarchy #anandranganathan #hindutva #hindutradition #indianpolitics #religiousdebate #politicaldebate #hinduism #scrutiny #timesaxis #toi

The Times Of India

49,213 views • 29 days ago

Josh Hawley calls out Democrats for attacking the Supreme Court: “If you stand in their way, they will burn you to the ground, which is why we’ve got to defend the court and we’ve got to stand up for the Constitution!”

Josh Hawley calls out Democrats for attacking the Supreme Court: “If you stand in their way, they will burn you to the ground, which is why we’ve got to defend the court and we’ve got to stand up for the Constitution!”

Steve Guest

23,615 views • 1 month ago

This trump is not the same as in the video yesterday. Is this why they had to use AI? Did trump have a stroke? Is that why he went missing for seven days?

This trump is not the same as in the video yesterday. Is this why they had to use AI? Did trump have a stroke? Is that why he went missing for seven days?

Tim

178,904 views • 1 year ago

“Supreme Court is watching, the highest courts are watching, we are doing it in front of Indian media, it’s their data..” Rahul Gandhi Ji meant to that why SC is not taking suo moto? And, this is the right question, not why is Congress not going to the courts…

“Supreme Court is watching, the highest courts are watching, we are doing it in front of Indian media, it’s their data..” Rahul Gandhi Ji meant to that why SC is not taking suo moto? And, this is the right question, not why is Congress not going to the courts…

Shantanu

71,348 views • 10 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court asking High Courts to decide contempt petitions over the alleged violation of bulldozer action guidelines, Advocate Anas Tanweer says, “After the bulldozer guidelines were issued, there were certain states that did not follow those guidelines… Today, the Supreme Court, taking into account that there could be questions of fact—and the Supreme Court will not go into questions of fact—has remanded those matters to the jurisdictional High Courts. It has given them the power to entertain it as contempt of this Court, as well as asked them to take help from the sessions judge or the district judge concerned in case of fact-finding. The grievance must be addressed in the High Courts first, and obviously, a Special Leave Petition (SLP) against their order can be filed before the Supreme Court if the state or the parties are not satisfied.”

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court asking High Courts to decide contempt petitions over the alleged violation of bulldozer action guidelines, Advocate Anas Tanweer says, “After the bulldozer guidelines were issued, there were certain states that did not follow those guidelines… Today, the Supreme Court, taking into account that there could be questions of fact—and the Supreme Court will not go into questions of fact—has remanded those matters to the jurisdictional High Courts. It has given them the power to entertain it as contempt of this Court, as well as asked them to take help from the sessions judge or the district judge concerned in case of fact-finding. The grievance must be addressed in the High Courts first, and obviously, a Special Leave Petition (SLP) against their order can be filed before the Supreme Court if the state or the parties are not satisfied.”

ANI

31,780 views • 2 months ago

VIDEO | Delhi: On the Supreme Court hearing on a petition alleging contempt of its order in connection with bulldozer actions, advocate Anas Tanwir said, "After the Supreme Court issued the bulldozer guidelines, certain states did not follow them. In some cases, the High Courts observed that they had not been informed of the judgment. There was one such specific case. Bulldozer action was taken against monuments, places of worship and private properties in what we allege was a complete violation of the Supreme Court's guidelines. Today, while noting that these matters may involve disputed questions of fact, the Supreme Court said it would not examine those factual issues itself. Instead, it remanded the matters to the respective jurisdictional High Courts, empowering them to hear them as cases of alleged contempt of the Supreme Court's order. The High Courts have also been asked to seek assistance from the concerned district or sessions judge, wherever necessary, for fact-finding." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Delhi: On the Supreme Court hearing on a petition alleging contempt of its order in connection with bulldozer actions, advocate Anas Tanwir said, "After the Supreme Court issued the bulldozer guidelines, certain states did not follow them. In some cases, the High Courts observed that they had not been informed of the judgment. There was one such specific case. Bulldozer action was taken against monuments, places of worship and private properties in what we allege was a complete violation of the Supreme Court's guidelines. Today, while noting that these matters may involve disputed questions of fact, the Supreme Court said it would not examine those factual issues itself. Instead, it remanded the matters to the respective jurisdictional High Courts, empowering them to hear them as cases of alleged contempt of the Supreme Court's order. The High Courts have also been asked to seek assistance from the concerned district or sessions judge, wherever necessary, for fact-finding." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

10,889 views • 2 months ago

I want to start my speech by quoting your Supreme Leader Savarkar and his ideas on the Constitution of India and how he thought India should be run. Savarkar writes: ''The worst thing about the Constitution of India is that there is nothing Indian about it. Manusmriti is that scripture that is most worshippable after the Vedas, and which, from ancient times, had begun the basis of our culture, customs, thought, and practices. This book for centuries has codified the spiritual and divine march of our nation. Today, Manusmriti is law.'' These are the words of Savarkar. Those in the ruling side are defending the Constitution, but I want to ask you, do you stand by your leader's words? But when you defend the Constitution, you are ridiculing Savarkar and defaming him. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in the Lok Sabha

I want to start my speech by quoting your Supreme Leader Savarkar and his ideas on the Constitution of India and how he thought India should be run. Savarkar writes: ''The worst thing about the Constitution of India is that there is nothing Indian about it. Manusmriti is that scripture that is most worshippable after the Vedas, and which, from ancient times, had begun the basis of our culture, customs, thought, and practices. This book for centuries has codified the spiritual and divine march of our nation. Today, Manusmriti is law.'' These are the words of Savarkar. Those in the ruling side are defending the Constitution, but I want to ask you, do you stand by your leader's words? But when you defend the Constitution, you are ridiculing Savarkar and defaming him. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in the Lok Sabha

Congress

14,011 views • 1 year ago

कांग्रेस जितना अविमुक्तेश्वरानंद को सपोर्ट करती है उतना ही वो वापस आकर डसता है। 🤣 Priyanka Gandhi was crying over the Indian hockey team’s saffron jersey. Avimukteshwaranand asked why they have a problem with a colour that is part of the Indian tricolour. This is why Hindus have abandoned Congress. He said Congress’ dislike for Hindu symbols is nothing new, Kharge even abused the Manusmriti in Parliament.

कांग्रेस जितना अविमुक्तेश्वरानंद को सपोर्ट करती है उतना ही वो वापस आकर डसता है। 🤣 Priyanka Gandhi was crying over the Indian hockey team’s saffron jersey. Avimukteshwaranand asked why they have a problem with a colour that is part of the Indian tricolour. This is why Hindus have abandoned Congress. He said Congress’ dislike for Hindu symbols is nothing new, Kharge even abused the Manusmriti in Parliament.

Lala

39,757 views • 2 months ago

Sneako on why he thinks you can’t trust leftist Muslims like Mehdi Hasan & Hasan Piker "These leftist Muslims are not actually Muslim..they use it in the same way ppl like Erika Kirk use Christianity..same populist slop..they use Islam in order to push leftism and the thing is, leftism & Islam, they have nothing to do w each other"

Sneako on why he thinks you can’t trust leftist Muslims like Mehdi Hasan & Hasan Piker "These leftist Muslims are not actually Muslim..they use it in the same way ppl like Erika Kirk use Christianity..same populist slop..they use Islam in order to push leftism and the thing is, leftism & Islam, they have nothing to do w each other"

yeet

46,401 views • 4 months ago

In a temple in Gujarat, Dalit women were prevented from entering by women from the upper-caste community. This is happening in Gujarat, in Modi’s Gujarat, in Amit Shah's Gujarat. First of all, I want to ask the Dalit community: why do you want to go to these temples? Where you are beaten, where you’re treated as untouchable, where even your daughters face violence. Look at the priest who raped a young girl in Delhi and is now in prison. So, why do you want to go to these temples? Secondly, this is the beginning of the so-called Hindu Rashtra. This is the start of what they call a Hindu nation; they want to drive certain people out of the country, bring back the Varna system, and reimpose Manusmriti.

In a temple in Gujarat, Dalit women were prevented from entering by women from the upper-caste community. This is happening in Gujarat, in Modi’s Gujarat, in Amit Shah's Gujarat. First of all, I want to ask the Dalit community: why do you want to go to these temples? Where you are beaten, where you’re treated as untouchable, where even your daughters face violence. Look at the priest who raped a young girl in Delhi and is now in prison. So, why do you want to go to these temples? Secondly, this is the beginning of the so-called Hindu Rashtra. This is the start of what they call a Hindu nation; they want to drive certain people out of the country, bring back the Varna system, and reimpose Manusmriti.

The Pluralist Pulse

105,859 views • 1 year ago