Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Why did it take so long to invent Bitcoin?

21,803 views • 8 days ago •via X (Twitter)

17 Comments

₿itcoin-GUS🧡's profile picture
₿itcoin-GUS🧡8 days ago

(TRUE)Money has 6 carachteristics: 1. Durability 2. Portability 3. Divisibility 4. Fungeability 5. Scarcity 6. Acceptability #Bitcoin  is so perfect that it adds a 7th property; IMMUTABILITY Uninflatable by banksters, Unmanipulable by politicians, Incorruptible by anyone. Available 24/7 For anyone, anywhere, forever. Just like gunpowder, civilizations who dont adopt it, perish to the ones who do adopt it. 🪦

Harry's profile picture
Harry8 days ago

every piece existed by the late 90s. hashcash was 1997, b-money 1998, and 3 of the 8 refs in the whitepaper are haber and stornetta's timestamping papers. the missing bit was the idea itself: let the chain with the most work be the truth, no trusted server needed

ApeInTesla 🇦🇺's profile picture
ApeInTesla 🇦🇺8 days ago

Needed the internet, cheap hardware and a 2008 crisis to light the fuse. Took us Aussies long enough to get decent internet too

₿rian | builds AI agents's profile picture
₿rian | builds AI agents8 days ago

It needed 2008. Nobody trusts banks until they watch one fail.

Draeb's profile picture
Draeb8 days ago

Because it needed cheap energy and the internet to collide!! Proof of work turns electricity into money nobody can print. Energy is the new money ⚡ What took longer, the math or the trust?

CryptoZehsor's profile picture
CryptoZehsor8 days ago

tech was ready years earlier, the mood wasn't. it took a bank bailout for people to care about money nobody can print. satoshi even timestamped it, the genesis block quotes the times headline about a second bailout. bitcoin isn't a late invention, it's a reaction

Eye Doc Greg's profile picture
Eye Doc Greg8 days ago

Hindsight is 20/20, but the pieces were blurry until the 2008 crisis brought them into focus. 👓

Quantview's profile picture
Quantview8 days ago

It needed several pieces to line up: public key cryptography, proof of work, a mature internet and a trust crisis that made people want an alternative. Earlier digital cash attempts supplied parts of the puzzle, and the real novelty was combining them with an incentive system that solves double spending without a central party.

BENNY FRANCO's profile picture
BENNY FRANCO8 days ago

The parts were on the shelf for years. The whitepaper's own references go back to Merkle (1980), Haber & Stornetta's timestamping (1991), b-money (1998) and Hashcash (2002). Satoshi's job was stitching them into peer-to-peer electronic cash. BSV's job is keeping it cash. 🧱

0x币圈情报局's profile picture
0x币圈情报局8 days ago

guess the pieces just weren't ready before 2008

Mr. X's profile picture
Mr. X8 days ago

Because the internet, cryptography and a 2008 crash all had to show up at once

Zaid Riaz's profile picture
Zaid Riaz8 days ago

someone had to get anoyed at banks enough first

Mohasin's profile picture
Mohasin8 days ago

Such a valuable info should never have had such a BGM (Background Music). that is distracting. Please repost excluding BGM.

vøv △'s profile picture
vøv △8 days ago

$BTC 2009 genesis still early...

Forecast Quant's profile picture
Forecast Quant8 days ago

My bet: incentive design, not code. What do you think was the missing piece?

파찌니's profile picture
파찌니8 days ago

Sound money needed the internet, cryptography, and a crisis to meet at the same time.

Bitty Coinware's profile picture
Bitty Coinware8 days ago

Because every piece existed, just never together: DigiCash (1989) was centralized, Hashcash (1997) had proof-of-work but no money, b-money (1998) and Bit Gold had no working way to agree on one ledger. Satoshi's 2008 trick: make PoW the referee for a single shared ledger.

Related Videos