Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Why didn’t Sir Alex sign Carlos Tevez permanently? 🤔
301,153 Aufrufe • vor 9 Stunden •via X (Twitter)
38 Kommentare

He played his best football in Manchester United

Character wise

Heard he wanted more money

Definitely was a mistake

A big one at that!!

We used him for the best part of his career

I think the complications came from the agents owning his rights.The arrival of Berna the following season limited his involvement and then he decided to go to City.

City used the cheat money to get him

The best front three, in the history of Utd 🫡

he sold him to city

He didn’t

Attitude

Thought as much

Kia Joorabchian & Tevez tried to play smart & exploit the successful loan deal. Tevez was already on £100k x 2 seasons (loan) with a pre contract to sign him for about £10M. Towards the end of tbe loan kia Joorabchian & Tevez started making ridiculous demands. Fergy opted out

Attitude problem

One Argentine we should have kept. The rest haven’t treated the club with respect.

Because of his agent and ownership rights yada yada

Thought he was signed permanently

No he left for city

These guys were once so good. Just look at that attack 😳. No wonder their fanbase cries themselves to sleep over how shit they’ve become in the last decade. 💉😆

Must have been an internal issue

Attitude problem

Berbatov happened

No idea why but Carlos Tevez, Rooney and Cristiano were the deadly trio almost unplayable, they had pace, power and devastating, #MUFC

テベスとクリロナは当然だけど、10番上手いな。 誰だっけ?

Wish united can get back to this level of play and passion

Didn’t he?

Kia jootabchian

@grok why was tevez not signed permanently by united

We was too good

Il faut mettre la vidéo à la bonne vitesse déjà

He May have his reason

Was ge on loan?

Cos he was a disloyal rat

🔥
Its because City offered Tevez double the salary that #MUFC did. He was on loan at Utd, and they offered £100k and City offered him almost £200k.

Maybe he didn't perform well

£


