Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Why didn’t we do the most basic study when we had the chance? When these vaccines were being developed, why didn’t we run a proper controlled trial with one group receiving the vaccine, one group receiving a saline placebo, and then follow both groups long enough to see what... actually happens? Long enough to observe autoimmune disease. Long enough to see neurological outcomes. Long enough to capture the kinds of injuries people are now reporting. That is just the way foundational science is done. And what’s striking is that this concern is no longer coming from the "fringes." More and more doctors are waking up to this reality, and the conversation is suddenly everywhere. It’s not being driven by anonymous bloggers or so-called “conspiracy theorists.” It’s being raised by some of the most credentialed physicians and scientists in the world. When the inventor of mRNA technology says we don’t have proper placebo trials, that matters. When the most published cardiologist on the planet says the absence of placebo trials is a serious problem, that matters. When one of the most published ICU doctors in the world raises the same concern, that matters. They cannot keep saying vaccines are safe with the kind of bravado they’ve been using for decades. We are changing that. Dr. Drewshow more

Del Bigtree

387,059 subscribers

55,424 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнес Новости и политика Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

"Never a Placebo-Controlled Group": How Our Children's Vaccines Were Licensed on a Foundation of Flimsy Science. We are told the vaccine schedule is the most tested and safest in medical history. But what if that claim collapses under the weight of the actual data? Attorney Aaron Siri delivers a stunning fact that should halt every parent and citizen in their tracks: "Almost all childhood vaccines were licensed based on trials in which safety was reviewed for days or weeks after injection, underpowered, not enough kids, and there was never a placebo-controlled group for a single of the routine childhood vaccines injected into children, not one of them." Let that sink in. Not one. The gold standard of scientific research—the placebo-controlled trial—was abandoned for the entire routine childhood vaccine schedule. Why the Double Standard? For prescription drugs, companies run years-long, placebo-controlled trials. Why? Not ethics—economics. They are liable for damages. A harmful drug means financial ruin. For vaccines, the incentive is perversely flipped. With liability removed, the corporate boardroom's bottom-line calculus is simple: do the absolute minimum required for licensure. The Hep B Example is Jaw-Dropping Proof. The Combovax HB vaccine, given to babies on their first day of life, was licensed based on a "trial" that: - Monitored safety for just FIVE DAYS. - Included only 147 children. - Had NO control group whatsoever. This isn't just inadequate; it's scientifically indefensible. The recent COVID vaccine trials, often criticized as rushed, were vastly more comprehensive than this. The Root Cause? The Liability Shield. There is no doubt: if vaccine manufacturers were financially liable for injuries, the safety science would be exhaustive. They would never risk their profits on such flimsy data. The absence of liability created an absence of scientific rigor. This isn't conspiracy. It's cold, hard corporate calculus, and our children are the ones living in the experiment. It's long past time to demand the same gold-standard safety proof for vaccines that we demand for every pill we swallow.

"Never a Placebo-Controlled Group": How Our Children's Vaccines Were Licensed on a Foundation of Flimsy Science. We are told the vaccine schedule is the most tested and safest in medical history. But what if that claim collapses under the weight of the actual data? Attorney Aaron Siri delivers a stunning fact that should halt every parent and citizen in their tracks: "Almost all childhood vaccines were licensed based on trials in which safety was reviewed for days or weeks after injection, underpowered, not enough kids, and there was never a placebo-controlled group for a single of the routine childhood vaccines injected into children, not one of them." Let that sink in. Not one. The gold standard of scientific research—the placebo-controlled trial—was abandoned for the entire routine childhood vaccine schedule. Why the Double Standard? For prescription drugs, companies run years-long, placebo-controlled trials. Why? Not ethics—economics. They are liable for damages. A harmful drug means financial ruin. For vaccines, the incentive is perversely flipped. With liability removed, the corporate boardroom's bottom-line calculus is simple: do the absolute minimum required for licensure. The Hep B Example is Jaw-Dropping Proof. The Combovax HB vaccine, given to babies on their first day of life, was licensed based on a "trial" that: - Monitored safety for just FIVE DAYS. - Included only 147 children. - Had NO control group whatsoever. This isn't just inadequate; it's scientifically indefensible. The recent COVID vaccine trials, often criticized as rushed, were vastly more comprehensive than this. The Root Cause? The Liability Shield. There is no doubt: if vaccine manufacturers were financially liable for injuries, the safety science would be exhaustive. They would never risk their profits on such flimsy data. The absence of liability created an absence of scientific rigor. This isn't conspiracy. It's cold, hard corporate calculus, and our children are the ones living in the experiment. It's long past time to demand the same gold-standard safety proof for vaccines that we demand for every pill we swallow.

Camus

38,809 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

This isn't a debate. This is a confession. Australian Senator Alex Antic just asked a regulator a simple question: How many gold-standard, placebo-controlled trials are behind the childhood vaccine schedule? The answer will leave you speechless. They admitted they can't provide a number. The justification? It's "ethically questionable" to test vaccines against a true placebo once a treatment is "established." Let's be clear: They are injecting millions of our children with products that have never been tested against an inert saline placebo in long-term trials. Their defense is that the science is "contextual" and the "real-world" evidence is enough. But without that gold-standard comparison, how can we ever truly know the long-term safety profile? How can we quantify the risk vs. benefit without the most basic scientific benchmark? They've replaced the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine—the placebo-controlled trial—with an appeal to authority and decades of "we just know it works." This is a staggering admission that the entire foundation of childhood vaccination relies on a different, lower standard of proof than what is demanded for every other medicine. This isn't conspiracy. This is what they said, under oath. Demand better science.

Camus

223,484 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨 “There are NO saline placebo-controlled studies looking at the hepatitis B vaccine risk given to day-old newborns.” “Why?” “Here’s what you’ll be told by the… so-called authorities.” Dr. Suzanne Humphries exposes the excuses for why vaccines can’t be properly safety tested: “We’re told that it’s unethical to do a saline placebo study now because the safety was long ago established.” “Hepatitis B vaccines that we’re using today were licensed based on immunogenicity.” “[They’ve done] some short-term safety monitoring for a few days in some uber-healthy infants and a small group of premature, low birth weight infants for sure.” “[They’ve done] comparisons that sometimes used aluminum-containing placebos or other controls rather than pure saline.” “And we know that this is a common practice… by supposed vaccine scientists to use another vaccine that contains an inflammatory agent.” “They say because it will make it less obvious who received the placebo.” “And the other reason is ‘we don’t want to deprive the placebo group from something beneficial.’” “What a riot.” Dr Suzanne Humphries CHDTV Live

🚨 “There are NO saline placebo-controlled studies looking at the hepatitis B vaccine risk given to day-old newborns.” “Why?” “Here’s what you’ll be told by the… so-called authorities.” Dr. Suzanne Humphries exposes the excuses for why vaccines can’t be properly safety tested: “We’re told that it’s unethical to do a saline placebo study now because the safety was long ago established.” “Hepatitis B vaccines that we’re using today were licensed based on immunogenicity.” “[They’ve done] some short-term safety monitoring for a few days in some uber-healthy infants and a small group of premature, low birth weight infants for sure.” “[They’ve done] comparisons that sometimes used aluminum-containing placebos or other controls rather than pure saline.” “And we know that this is a common practice… by supposed vaccine scientists to use another vaccine that contains an inflammatory agent.” “They say because it will make it less obvious who received the placebo.” “And the other reason is ‘we don’t want to deprive the placebo group from something beneficial.’” “What a riot.” Dr Suzanne Humphries CHDTV Live

Children’s Health Defense

30,321 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Obama: I am not immune to anger or doubt. But I do know this when we lose faith in each other, when we stop believing that voting matters… we open the door to the most ruthless or the most careless, or the most fearful among us who see some groups and some people as more equal than others and see government as nothing more than a way to divvy up the spoils and punish enemies, and keep those who are different in their place. I do not believe that is the story of America that prevails in the end.

Obama: I am not immune to anger or doubt. But I do know this when we lose faith in each other, when we stop believing that voting matters… we open the door to the most ruthless or the most careless, or the most fearful among us who see some groups and some people as more equal than others and see government as nothing more than a way to divvy up the spoils and punish enemies, and keep those who are different in their place. I do not believe that is the story of America that prevails in the end.

Acyn

154,960 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“Unless you're comparing a vaccine against saline, how can you say it’s safe?” Dr. Sherri Tenpenny just exposed Pharma’s “safe and effective” narrative as a complete sham. “There has never been—on any one of the vaccines that are currently given—a truly placebo-controlled trial where in one set of children they were given the new vaccine, and then the other set of children it was a true saline placebo.” “All of the vaccine trials are a vaccine compared to another vaccine,” Alex Clark: “How long were the majority of the safety trials done on the vaccines on the childhood schedule?” Dr. Tenpenny: “The average length of time is probably somewhere between 15 and 30 days.” “It’s been as short as 4 days.” “When they brought the first hepatitis B vaccine to market, they followed to see if there were any side effects for 5 days.” “The second hepatitis B vaccine that came to market, they followed side effects for 4 days.” “That is not a safety trial.” “It can take months to years to develop autoimmune diseases, neurological complications, other types of things like [gastrointestinal] disorders.” “Encephalitis can start right away, but it can be slow brewing for a long period of time.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny Alex Clark

“Unless you're comparing a vaccine against saline, how can you say it’s safe?” Dr. Sherri Tenpenny just exposed Pharma’s “safe and effective” narrative as a complete sham. “There has never been—on any one of the vaccines that are currently given—a truly placebo-controlled trial where in one set of children they were given the new vaccine, and then the other set of children it was a true saline placebo.” “All of the vaccine trials are a vaccine compared to another vaccine,” Alex Clark: “How long were the majority of the safety trials done on the vaccines on the childhood schedule?” Dr. Tenpenny: “The average length of time is probably somewhere between 15 and 30 days.” “It’s been as short as 4 days.” “When they brought the first hepatitis B vaccine to market, they followed to see if there were any side effects for 5 days.” “The second hepatitis B vaccine that came to market, they followed side effects for 4 days.” “That is not a safety trial.” “It can take months to years to develop autoimmune diseases, neurological complications, other types of things like [gastrointestinal] disorders.” “Encephalitis can start right away, but it can be slow brewing for a long period of time.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny Alex Clark

Children’s Health Defense

49,818 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Powerful testimony by Del Bigtree "I just wanna state the obvious, which is just this past week, news headlines described a massive study of ninety nine million people who received the COVID vaccine. The Daily Mail headline says it all. Largest COVID vaccine study ever finds shots are linked to small, increased risk of neurological blood and heart disorders." "And it adds on to the title, but they are still extremely rare. Every article about the study went out of its way, described injuries as rare. But what does rare actually mean? First slide. This is the graph that was in the Daily Mail's article. In terms of this study, what they're saying is rare includes a 3.78 times risk of swelling in the brain and spinal cord." "This means you are increasing your risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% over someone who didn't get the vaccine. There was also a 2.86 times risk of Guillain Barre syndrome, which is a paralysis, 6.10 times risk of myocarditis, and a 6.91 x risk of pericarditis, swelling of the heart issues. The question no one in the media seems to be asking, I think, is if each of these potential injuries is rare, is it still rare when you add them all together?" "Take the Moderna vaccine, for example. In the standard three shot regimen, based on this study, a person is increasing their risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% with the first shot. They're also adding a 348% risk of myocarditis with that same first shot, a 610% increase of myocarditis with the second shot, and another 201% increased risk of myocarditis with the third shot." "And these are just the adverse events that were the focus of the study. We're talking about cancer and all sorts of other things that we should be looking at. When the CDC was creating the v safe app, app to track the health outcomes of the first ten million people who received the COVID vaccine, they had a list of adverse events of special interest." "These were injuries that the CDC had reason to believe could be caused by the COVID vaccine. That list includes acute myocardial infarction, anaphylaxis, coagulopathy, death, Guillain Barre syndrome, Kawasaki disease, multisystem inflammatory disease, narcolepsy, seizures, convulsions, stroke, and transverse myelitis. Now let's just assume that all these issues are rare." "And since we know that the rare is currently being being described, at least in this study, as anything between a two hundred percent increase to a nearly seven hundred percent increased risk, then what is the actual risk when you add all these potential adverse outcomes together? Further still, how high is the risk when you multiply all of these risks by five doses of the COVID vaccine?" "Are we still in the ballpark of rare? Now imagine multiplying all of these known risks by 72 doses. Now you've just considered the amount of risk that every child is facing with the CDC recommended schedule. The CDC childhood schedule has been the focus of my nonprofit, ICANS, work since the February when it was founded. Through FOIA requests and lawsuits against our regulatory agencies, we've uncovered many inconvenient truths." "Perhaps the most significant finding is that none of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC recommended schedule, which are delivered in approximately 72, was ever put through a long term, double blind, placebo based safety trial prior to licensure. Since this type of trial is really the only way to establish that a pharmaceutical product is safe, it is misinformation to state that the vaccines are safe." "We have skipped the study that would allow you to make that statement scientifically. Most people don't realize that there's a list of known side effects on the information sheet provided with every vaccine that is shipped. Here is just a partial list of printed adverse events for just one of the hepatitis b vaccines, Engerix b." "Here are the side effects. Herp b zoster, meningitis, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity syndrome, arthralgia, arthritis, urticaria, erythema multiforme, encephalopathy, swelling of the brain just like the COVID vaccine, multiple sclerosis, neuritis, hypoesthesia, paresthesia, Guillain Barre syndrome, paralysis, Bell's palsy, optic neuritis, paralysis, paresis, seizures, syncope, transverse myelitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, tinnitus, vertigo, tachycardia, apnea, bronchospasms, including asthma like symptoms, dyspepsia, alopecia, angioedema, eczema, and Stevens Johnson Syndrome. That's just one vaccine." "That vaccine manufacturer has all these side effects in the warning list because why? It is stipulated by the FDA that there is a reasonable belief that they are causally related to the vaccine. That's why they're there. They're not adding them just because they think they should, because they have to. The warning label lists nearly 50 potential side effects, many of them serious, and that is just the first vaccine given to a baby on their first day of life. By the way, the safety study for that hepatitis b vaccine was only four days long and had no placebo comparator. That is not science." "That's insanity. We currently have a lawsuit trying to have that vaccine removed until they do proper safety testing. Every one of the childhood vaccines has a similar list of side effects. And though they are considered rare, how rare is it when you multiply roughly 50 potential side effects 72 times, which is the total number of doses given to a child by the time they're 18? The revelations from the recent study of the COVID vaccine explains what we've been saying for years." "Vaccines are not completely safe. And those side effects are rare. What happens when you add them all together? Perhaps it looks like this. Last slide. This is what Brian Hooker is talking about. In the nineteen eighties, when we were giving 11 of about three vaccines, the chronic illness rate, which includes neurological and autoimmune disease, was twelve point eight percent." "Once we passed the 1986 act and we had the gold rush of vaccines, it exploded to 53. As I said, seventy two that's fifty three shots, seventy two doses. You watch the chronic illness rate, neurological and autoimmune disease skyrocket to fifty four percent of our children. And by the way, that study was finished up in 2011, 2012. We had have no idea since then how bad this has gotten." "But what you were looking right at there is the greatest decline in public health in human history. Never have we watched that many children in just a few decades have their immune systems start fighting their own bodies and swelling brains. And when you look at the numbers that Brian Hooker just showed you, they match exactly what we're seeing them call rare in this COVID study." "Five times rate of neurological disorders. Vaxxed versus unvaxxed showing about four times rate of autism in people that got the vaccine compared to those that don't. So it's rare, but it's possible, and it's real. And when we look at those rare numbers stacked up, especially with autism, we're now at one in forty five. That's conservative. Many say one in thirty five children is being diagnosed with autism. Roughly one in twenty to twenty four boys. Is that still rare? Sure. Sure." "It's just a couple per one hundred. But what we can never say again after this study and what we all now know is that vaccine injury isn't happening. That's a lie. It is. And we all have a threshold, and we should figure out what that threshold is because millions of children are being injured all around the world. Nothing to see here. Right? Nothing to see here."

Powerful testimony by Del Bigtree "I just wanna state the obvious, which is just this past week, news headlines described a massive study of ninety nine million people who received the COVID vaccine. The Daily Mail headline says it all. Largest COVID vaccine study ever finds shots are linked to small, increased risk of neurological blood and heart disorders." "And it adds on to the title, but they are still extremely rare. Every article about the study went out of its way, described injuries as rare. But what does rare actually mean? First slide. This is the graph that was in the Daily Mail's article. In terms of this study, what they're saying is rare includes a 3.78 times risk of swelling in the brain and spinal cord." "This means you are increasing your risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% over someone who didn't get the vaccine. There was also a 2.86 times risk of Guillain Barre syndrome, which is a paralysis, 6.10 times risk of myocarditis, and a 6.91 x risk of pericarditis, swelling of the heart issues. The question no one in the media seems to be asking, I think, is if each of these potential injuries is rare, is it still rare when you add them all together?" "Take the Moderna vaccine, for example. In the standard three shot regimen, based on this study, a person is increasing their risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% with the first shot. They're also adding a 348% risk of myocarditis with that same first shot, a 610% increase of myocarditis with the second shot, and another 201% increased risk of myocarditis with the third shot." "And these are just the adverse events that were the focus of the study. We're talking about cancer and all sorts of other things that we should be looking at. When the CDC was creating the v safe app, app to track the health outcomes of the first ten million people who received the COVID vaccine, they had a list of adverse events of special interest." "These were injuries that the CDC had reason to believe could be caused by the COVID vaccine. That list includes acute myocardial infarction, anaphylaxis, coagulopathy, death, Guillain Barre syndrome, Kawasaki disease, multisystem inflammatory disease, narcolepsy, seizures, convulsions, stroke, and transverse myelitis. Now let's just assume that all these issues are rare." "And since we know that the rare is currently being being described, at least in this study, as anything between a two hundred percent increase to a nearly seven hundred percent increased risk, then what is the actual risk when you add all these potential adverse outcomes together? Further still, how high is the risk when you multiply all of these risks by five doses of the COVID vaccine?" "Are we still in the ballpark of rare? Now imagine multiplying all of these known risks by 72 doses. Now you've just considered the amount of risk that every child is facing with the CDC recommended schedule. The CDC childhood schedule has been the focus of my nonprofit, ICANS, work since the February when it was founded. Through FOIA requests and lawsuits against our regulatory agencies, we've uncovered many inconvenient truths." "Perhaps the most significant finding is that none of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC recommended schedule, which are delivered in approximately 72, was ever put through a long term, double blind, placebo based safety trial prior to licensure. Since this type of trial is really the only way to establish that a pharmaceutical product is safe, it is misinformation to state that the vaccines are safe." "We have skipped the study that would allow you to make that statement scientifically. Most people don't realize that there's a list of known side effects on the information sheet provided with every vaccine that is shipped. Here is just a partial list of printed adverse events for just one of the hepatitis b vaccines, Engerix b." "Here are the side effects. Herp b zoster, meningitis, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity syndrome, arthralgia, arthritis, urticaria, erythema multiforme, encephalopathy, swelling of the brain just like the COVID vaccine, multiple sclerosis, neuritis, hypoesthesia, paresthesia, Guillain Barre syndrome, paralysis, Bell's palsy, optic neuritis, paralysis, paresis, seizures, syncope, transverse myelitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, tinnitus, vertigo, tachycardia, apnea, bronchospasms, including asthma like symptoms, dyspepsia, alopecia, angioedema, eczema, and Stevens Johnson Syndrome. That's just one vaccine." "That vaccine manufacturer has all these side effects in the warning list because why? It is stipulated by the FDA that there is a reasonable belief that they are causally related to the vaccine. That's why they're there. They're not adding them just because they think they should, because they have to. The warning label lists nearly 50 potential side effects, many of them serious, and that is just the first vaccine given to a baby on their first day of life. By the way, the safety study for that hepatitis b vaccine was only four days long and had no placebo comparator. That is not science." "That's insanity. We currently have a lawsuit trying to have that vaccine removed until they do proper safety testing. Every one of the childhood vaccines has a similar list of side effects. And though they are considered rare, how rare is it when you multiply roughly 50 potential side effects 72 times, which is the total number of doses given to a child by the time they're 18? The revelations from the recent study of the COVID vaccine explains what we've been saying for years." "Vaccines are not completely safe. And those side effects are rare. What happens when you add them all together? Perhaps it looks like this. Last slide. This is what Brian Hooker is talking about. In the nineteen eighties, when we were giving 11 of about three vaccines, the chronic illness rate, which includes neurological and autoimmune disease, was twelve point eight percent." "Once we passed the 1986 act and we had the gold rush of vaccines, it exploded to 53. As I said, seventy two that's fifty three shots, seventy two doses. You watch the chronic illness rate, neurological and autoimmune disease skyrocket to fifty four percent of our children. And by the way, that study was finished up in 2011, 2012. We had have no idea since then how bad this has gotten." "But what you were looking right at there is the greatest decline in public health in human history. Never have we watched that many children in just a few decades have their immune systems start fighting their own bodies and swelling brains. And when you look at the numbers that Brian Hooker just showed you, they match exactly what we're seeing them call rare in this COVID study." "Five times rate of neurological disorders. Vaxxed versus unvaxxed showing about four times rate of autism in people that got the vaccine compared to those that don't. So it's rare, but it's possible, and it's real. And when we look at those rare numbers stacked up, especially with autism, we're now at one in forty five. That's conservative. Many say one in thirty five children is being diagnosed with autism. Roughly one in twenty to twenty four boys. Is that still rare? Sure. Sure." "It's just a couple per one hundred. But what we can never say again after this study and what we all now know is that vaccine injury isn't happening. That's a lie. It is. And we all have a threshold, and we should figure out what that threshold is because millions of children are being injured all around the world. Nothing to see here. Right? Nothing to see here."

Camus

46,394 просмотров • 1 год назад

Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots. These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism. And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability. That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why. Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far. I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of Aaron Siri, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none. Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations. So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero. There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with." And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.

Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots. These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism. And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability. That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why. Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far. I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of Aaron Siri, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none. Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations. So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero. There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with." And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.

Del Bigtree

29,919 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

RFK Jr. sets argumentative journalist straight on the topic of vaccines: "My position on vaccines... is that vaccines should be tested, like other medicines." "Of the 72 vaccine doses now mandated... for American children, none of them—not one—has ever been subject to a pre-licensing, placebo-controlled trial." "Other medicines are required to do that, and we should have to do that for vaccines. If I'm wrong, show me the test. Show me the study. You won't be able to, because there are none." "That means that we don't know what the long-term risks are."

RFK Jr. sets argumentative journalist straight on the topic of vaccines: "My position on vaccines... is that vaccines should be tested, like other medicines." "Of the 72 vaccine doses now mandated... for American children, none of them—not one—has ever been subject to a pre-licensing, placebo-controlled trial." "Other medicines are required to do that, and we should have to do that for vaccines. If I'm wrong, show me the test. Show me the study. You won't be able to, because there are none." "That means that we don't know what the long-term risks are."

Wide Awake Media

4,620,200 просмотров • 1 год назад

My deep concern is that there is a coverup of vaccine injuries in the Department of Defense, and that they are playing games with the data so that we can’t actually assess whether it’s the vaccine or the ailment that is causing these acute conditions. Wouldn’t it be a tragic thing to discover that we hurt people with the vaccine more so than the virus did?

My deep concern is that there is a coverup of vaccine injuries in the Department of Defense, and that they are playing games with the data so that we can’t actually assess whether it’s the vaccine or the ailment that is causing these acute conditions. Wouldn’t it be a tragic thing to discover that we hurt people with the vaccine more so than the virus did?

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

946,814 просмотров • 2 лет назад

When I visited with Dr. Pompa to talk about “An Inconvenient Study” he presented me with a something I get a lot: “We know that there’s some small percentage of vaccine injury, but look at all of the lives they save - the benefit outweighs the risk.” My reply is always the same - we need science to prove that, and that should be a double blind placebo controlled trial, because it’s the only one that can show cause. But one has never been done…They stress the safety of novel cancer drugs - and those people are at the end of their options. But for healthy kids? Vaccines that have never been rigorously safety tested. Why?

When I visited with Dr. Pompa to talk about “An Inconvenient Study” he presented me with a something I get a lot: “We know that there’s some small percentage of vaccine injury, but look at all of the lives they save - the benefit outweighs the risk.” My reply is always the same - we need science to prove that, and that should be a double blind placebo controlled trial, because it’s the only one that can show cause. But one has never been done…They stress the safety of novel cancer drugs - and those people are at the end of their options. But for healthy kids? Vaccines that have never been rigorously safety tested. Why?

Del Bigtree

24,883 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

RFK Jr. Reveals: Gardasil Vaccine 37x More Lethal Than Cervical Cancer It Prevents "Gardasil is probably the single worst mass vaccine that we've ever seen. Vaccine targets millions of pre-teens and teens, for whom the risk of dying from cervical cancer is zero. Nobody in their right mind would ever take this vaccine if they actually read the clinical literature." "Death rates in the Gardasil trial were 37 times the death rates for cervical cancer. Children who take that vaccine, the Gardasil vaccine, are 37 times more likely to die from the vaccine than they are to die from cervical cancer." "So the problem with Gardasil, like most vaccines, is it was never tested against a true placebo, an inert placebo. And the CDC and HHS say... If you don't test it against a true placebo, it's not science. You have no way of gauging whether the injuries you're seeing from the product are being caused by that product or whether they're just bad, sad coincidences." "The entity that is actually performing the study is, and paying for the study, is Merck. Merck got to decide which injuries were being caused by Gardasil and which were just bad coincidences and because it had that power it just wrote them all off as bad coincidences." "You can do that when there's no placebo because the injuries they were seeing in the control group which where the girls were getting aluminum neurotoxins were identical to the injuries they were getting in the Gardasil group so they said well we don't have to report any of these as vaccine injuries. So they were able to license something that is insanely dangerous."

RFK Jr. Reveals: Gardasil Vaccine 37x More Lethal Than Cervical Cancer It Prevents "Gardasil is probably the single worst mass vaccine that we've ever seen. Vaccine targets millions of pre-teens and teens, for whom the risk of dying from cervical cancer is zero. Nobody in their right mind would ever take this vaccine if they actually read the clinical literature." "Death rates in the Gardasil trial were 37 times the death rates for cervical cancer. Children who take that vaccine, the Gardasil vaccine, are 37 times more likely to die from the vaccine than they are to die from cervical cancer." "So the problem with Gardasil, like most vaccines, is it was never tested against a true placebo, an inert placebo. And the CDC and HHS say... If you don't test it against a true placebo, it's not science. You have no way of gauging whether the injuries you're seeing from the product are being caused by that product or whether they're just bad, sad coincidences." "The entity that is actually performing the study is, and paying for the study, is Merck. Merck got to decide which injuries were being caused by Gardasil and which were just bad coincidences and because it had that power it just wrote them all off as bad coincidences." "You can do that when there's no placebo because the injuries they were seeing in the control group which where the girls were getting aluminum neurotoxins were identical to the injuries they were getting in the Gardasil group so they said well we don't have to report any of these as vaccine injuries. So they were able to license something that is insanely dangerous."

Camus

1,463,131 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

There are no double-blind, placebo-based randomized controlled trials for the safety of childhood vaccines. They don't exist because the people responsible for them decided not to do them. I know this because in 2017 Robert F. Kennedy Jr and I sat down at the NIH with Francis Collins and Tony Fauci and asked them. We said, we can't find a single placebo-based safety trial for any vaccine on the childhood schedule. Are you doing them, or are we just not seeing them? They told us they don't do those trials because they believe it is unethical to withhold what they consider a beneficial product from a control group. That is the logic. The faith that the product is so valuable that studying it rigorously would be unfair to the people in the trial not getting it. So they never study it. Every vaccine given to every child in America rests on an assumption of safety and nothing more. Marcello Foa

There are no double-blind, placebo-based randomized controlled trials for the safety of childhood vaccines. They don't exist because the people responsible for them decided not to do them. I know this because in 2017 Robert F. Kennedy Jr and I sat down at the NIH with Francis Collins and Tony Fauci and asked them. We said, we can't find a single placebo-based safety trial for any vaccine on the childhood schedule. Are you doing them, or are we just not seeing them? They told us they don't do those trials because they believe it is unethical to withhold what they consider a beneficial product from a control group. That is the logic. The faith that the product is so valuable that studying it rigorously would be unfair to the people in the trial not getting it. So they never study it. Every vaccine given to every child in America rests on an assumption of safety and nothing more. Marcello Foa

Del Bigtree

116,973 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 She absolutely nails it! “I will remind you that evangelicals donate the most money to charity every year, that we volunteer the most service hours, that we adopt the most children out of foster care. And so when you say that evangelicals are a cancer, you are saying that the most generous, charitable people in this country are cancerous. What you're actually saying is that this group is cancerous because you don't like our politics. We are also the most conservative group in the country, and you don't like that we don't outsource our compassion to the government like you do.”

🚨 She absolutely nails it! “I will remind you that evangelicals donate the most money to charity every year, that we volunteer the most service hours, that we adopt the most children out of foster care. And so when you say that evangelicals are a cancer, you are saying that the most generous, charitable people in this country are cancerous. What you're actually saying is that this group is cancerous because you don't like our politics. We are also the most conservative group in the country, and you don't like that we don't outsource our compassion to the government like you do.”

Gunther Eagleman™

268,905 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The foundational narrative of vaccine safety is crumbling under the weight of a single, inconvenient question: "Where are the placebo-controlled trials?" A recent Australian Senate hearing exposed the shocking truth that the public health establishment has worked tirelessly to conceal. When asked how many placebo-controlled studies support the childhood vaccine schedule, regulators were left stammering, unable to provide a single example. Their defense? A convoluted, ethically-based excuse: once a vaccine is on the market, it is considered "unethical" to test new ones against a true saline placebo. Why? Because you would be "denying" children an "established" effective product. But this is a circular logic trap of the highest order. As revealed in the powerful new documentary An Inconvenient Study, this creates a perpetual "bait-and-switch." New vaccines are only tested against older vaccines, which themselves were never tested against a true placebo. The entire schedule is built upon a house of cards, with each new product leaning on the safety assumption of a prior, equally un-validated one. The film brilliantly illustrates this with the "Whiskey Study" analogy: - To test if whiskey causes car accidents, the gold standard is a trial against water. - The vaccine industry's method? Test whiskey against vodka, and when both groups crash, declare whiskey "safe" because it was no worse than vodka. They have never done the water test. This is the "gold standard" that isn't. This is the "mountain of science" with a gaping, placebo-shaped hole at its core. For decades, the public has been told a story of absolute safety and rigorous testing. Now, as officials struggle to answer basic scientific questions, that story is being exposed as a carefully constructed myth. The questions are finally being asked. The answers, or the stunning lack thereof, are changing everything.

The foundational narrative of vaccine safety is crumbling under the weight of a single, inconvenient question: "Where are the placebo-controlled trials?" A recent Australian Senate hearing exposed the shocking truth that the public health establishment has worked tirelessly to conceal. When asked how many placebo-controlled studies support the childhood vaccine schedule, regulators were left stammering, unable to provide a single example. Their defense? A convoluted, ethically-based excuse: once a vaccine is on the market, it is considered "unethical" to test new ones against a true saline placebo. Why? Because you would be "denying" children an "established" effective product. But this is a circular logic trap of the highest order. As revealed in the powerful new documentary An Inconvenient Study, this creates a perpetual "bait-and-switch." New vaccines are only tested against older vaccines, which themselves were never tested against a true placebo. The entire schedule is built upon a house of cards, with each new product leaning on the safety assumption of a prior, equally un-validated one. The film brilliantly illustrates this with the "Whiskey Study" analogy: - To test if whiskey causes car accidents, the gold standard is a trial against water. - The vaccine industry's method? Test whiskey against vodka, and when both groups crash, declare whiskey "safe" because it was no worse than vodka. They have never done the water test. This is the "gold standard" that isn't. This is the "mountain of science" with a gaping, placebo-shaped hole at its core. For decades, the public has been told a story of absolute safety and rigorous testing. Now, as officials struggle to answer basic scientific questions, that story is being exposed as a carefully constructed myth. The questions are finally being asked. The answers, or the stunning lack thereof, are changing everything.

Camus

14,485 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🔥 “WHY ARE ARE WE NOT DOING MORE ABOUT THE DEEPSTATE? WHY ARENT WE NAMING NAMES?” - Bannon says the MAGA base is blowing him up. Steve says the SCALPS aren’t enough because we aren’t getting to the CENTRAL APPARATUS. He tells Tucker essentially that the Uniparty thinks TRUMP IS A PASSING STORM. Bannon is right when he says we aren’t facing enough of the issues domestically and Israel/Gaza & the Middle East are a SIDE SHOW. Steve is right..we are burning daylight and there needs to be more of a sense of urgency.

🔥 “WHY ARE ARE WE NOT DOING MORE ABOUT THE DEEPSTATE? WHY ARENT WE NAMING NAMES?” - Bannon says the MAGA base is blowing him up. Steve says the SCALPS aren’t enough because we aren’t getting to the CENTRAL APPARATUS. He tells Tucker essentially that the Uniparty thinks TRUMP IS A PASSING STORM. Bannon is right when he says we aren’t facing enough of the issues domestically and Israel/Gaza & the Middle East are a SIDE SHOW. Steve is right..we are burning daylight and there needs to be more of a sense of urgency.

Johnny St.Pete

57,862 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

“The most demonic and terroristic group of people on planet earth, are liberal leftists.” “We have enough results in today’s society to prove that true.” Where is the lie? When people show you who they really are, believe them!

“The most demonic and terroristic group of people on planet earth, are liberal leftists.” “We have enough results in today’s society to prove that true.” Where is the lie? When people show you who they really are, believe them!

AmericanPapaBear™

19,493 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: "It's a 200-year multi-generational indoctrination that vaccines are safe, effective, necessary, and harmless." "And every one of those statements I just made are lies." "Vaccines are not safe. Not one vaccine has ever been proven to be safe because they don't use true placebos, number one, and they don't follow them long enough to see. All they're looking for is, did it make you die? And if you didn't die, they call it safe." "They never talk about asthma, allergies, eczema, ADD, ADHD, the long list of neurological problems, the autoimmune diseases that take a long time to develop." "None of that is followed because if it's more than 72 hours later that you develop a side effect, it says, well, that didn't have anything to do with the vaccine, which is an arbitrary line that was drawn in the sand in the early 1990s by the FDA." Credit: Dr Sherri Tenpenny D. Alec Zeck

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: "It's a 200-year multi-generational indoctrination that vaccines are safe, effective, necessary, and harmless." "And every one of those statements I just made are lies." "Vaccines are not safe. Not one vaccine has ever been proven to be safe because they don't use true placebos, number one, and they don't follow them long enough to see. All they're looking for is, did it make you die? And if you didn't die, they call it safe." "They never talk about asthma, allergies, eczema, ADD, ADHD, the long list of neurological problems, the autoimmune diseases that take a long time to develop." "None of that is followed because if it's more than 72 hours later that you develop a side effect, it says, well, that didn't have anything to do with the vaccine, which is an arbitrary line that was drawn in the sand in the early 1990s by the FDA." Credit: Dr Sherri Tenpenny D. Alec Zeck

Wide Awake Media

70,498 просмотров • 1 год назад

This is the most important video on 𝕏 today. RFK Jr. just revealed the CDC may REMOVE the Covid-19 shot from the childhood schedule. 🔥 “We’ve seen huge associations with myocarditis and pericarditis, strokes, neurological injuries.” “Why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine has profound risks?” “This was clear even in the clinical data that came out of Pfizer. There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group.” “We shouldn’t be making recommendations that are not good for the population.” Secretary Kennedy Robert F. Kennedy Jr

This is the most important video on 𝕏 today. RFK Jr. just revealed the CDC may REMOVE the Covid-19 shot from the childhood schedule. 🔥 “We’ve seen huge associations with myocarditis and pericarditis, strokes, neurological injuries.” “Why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine has profound risks?” “This was clear even in the clinical data that came out of Pfizer. There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group.” “We shouldn’t be making recommendations that are not good for the population.” Secretary Kennedy Robert F. Kennedy Jr

Holden Culotta

111,610 просмотров • 1 год назад