Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Why do many of our credentialed elite live one way while preaching something totally different? That’s what Rob Henderson wanted to understand when he got to Yale University and saw the well-to-do students at Yale—most of whom grew up in stable, two-parent homes that valued hard work and crime-free,...

73,749 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

In addition to my own experiences with social mobility, my luxury beliefs idea stems from Thorstein Veblen’s work, particularly his 1899 book, The Theory of the Leisure Class. Veblen, a sociologist and economist, described how the elites of his era displayed their status through conspicuous consumption, such as wearing delicate, expensive clothing, carrying pocket watches, or attending lavish ballroom events. While material possessions still play a role in signaling status today, I argue that they have become a noisier indicator of wealth. A century ago, one could easily distinguish the rich from the poor based on appearance alone. However, in our wealthier modern society, where access to goods is more widespread, it’s harder to gauge someone’s wealth at a glance. Instead, status is increasingly expressed through what I call luxury beliefs, which have largely replaced luxury goods. These beliefs reflect what sociologist Pierre Bourdieu termed cultural capital. Elites invest in attending prestigious schools and universities, where they adopt the mannerisms, vocabulary, habits, and fashionable opinions of the upper class. This process enculturates them into the elite and sets them apart from the broader population. For example, while the conventional view might support law enforcement, someone seeking to signal their elite status might advocate for abolishing the police or reimagining law enforcement with ideas like hiring “violence interrupters.” Such unconventional or avant-garde views serve as a way to distinguish oneself from the masses and signal a superior social position.

Rob Henderson

34,058 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Negative social judgments are not always cruel. Sometimes they are guardrails. Sometimes the most compassionate thing you can do is tell the truth about which choices lead to suffering and which ones do not. Single parenthood is harder. Substance abuse is destructive. Crime corrodes communities. Pretending otherwise, wrapping these realities in a language of non-judgment and normalization, is not kindness. It is a luxury. It’s what you believe when you are insulated from the consequences. The people who pay the price for luxury beliefs are seldom the people who hold them. Sometimes when I speak about luxury beliefs, critics will reply, “But Rob, you’re talking about elite hypocrisy. That’s nothing new. Elites have always been hypocrites.” And that is correct. Still, I prefer what I call the “John F. Kennedy model of hypocrisy” to what we have now. As many of us now know, JFK was a flawed man, but the image he presented to the American public was that he was a good husband, a good father. In his private life, though, he was a philanderer and often an absentee father and had other shortcomings. But he thought it was important to set an ideal for the general public, even if he fell short of it. And now we have the opposite. Today, our elites get married, they have kids, and for the most part, they live stable, conventional lives. But if you ask them their opinions and attitudes around family, around marriage, around law abidingness, hard work, punctuality, integrity, honesty, and so on, they take a very relaxed attitude. Elites used to pay lip service to conventional values but privately strayed. Now, they are publicly indifferent to or actively support straying, but privately behave in a more conventional way.

Rob Henderson

25,715 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The sharpest observers of class and status in the early and mid–20th century were left-wing intellectuals. In part, this is because they saw themselves as critics of the established order. To challenge a system, you first have to understand it. That outsider perspective often made them unusually perceptive about how status and hierarchy actually worked. A good example is Pierre Bourdieu. In his book Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, he introduced the idea of “cultural capital.” Most people are familiar with economic capital, which refers to money and material resources. Bourdieu’s insight was that elites do not just accumulate wealth. They also convert it into signals of taste and status. In his time, this meant knowledge of fine wine, art, music, and travel. These were not random preferences. They functioned as markers. When someone displayed this kind of knowledge, they were quietly signaling that they belonged to an educated and refined social class, one shaped by elite institutions and social networks. Reading Bourdieu today, the parallels are hard to miss. The specific signals have changed, but the underlying logic remains. This is where the idea of “luxury beliefs” emerges. Many of these beliefs operate as a modern form of cultural capital. They signal membership in a certain class, not through taste in art or wine, but through the right opinions. Those opinions are often shaped in similar ways. People move through private schools and elite universities. They enter professional environments that reward certain viewpoints. They consume particular media and adopt the language and assumptions that circulate within those circles. Over time, their beliefs drift further from those of the broader public. What looks like a set of moral or political commitments can also function as a status signal. In that sense, the mechanism Bourdieu described has not disappeared. It has simply taken on a new form.

Rob Henderson

25,769 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten