Why do so many women support open borders?

Because they are very naive indeed and have lived very sheltered lives. Also they appear to be very susceptible to propaganda.

"Festivals are a really important place to have this conversation." It's mere coincidence that she and her chums now have to go to various festivals on expenses to have these conversations.

A lot of women don't want to be kind, they want to be "seen" as being kind.

Stinks of #astroturf. You'll like this video:

The choose love slogans are reminiscent of the hippy era of the 60s.

A man literally cannot answer that question.

And not one of them will leave their front door open all day!

Most women don't. It's just that people keep reporting on the other lot. They get more clicks.

Hmm. Might change their minds if they meet one who hasn’t read the leaflet…

Have fun and board the gravy train to deconstruction of the nation.

Did you see Simon Elmer’s related tweet Charlotte

Agreeableness.

They want hard cock?

Perhaps we should talk about the funders too so we can boycott their products.

Misplaced empathy. It’s a female disease. If a woman is violently raped and injured, men sympathize with her even when an angry crowd catches the rapist and beats him badly. Women transfer their sympathy to the rapist and may ignore the victim. Men’s sympathy remains with the rape victim. Hence backing Palestine, etc.

Feeling accepted and trendy? Sounds good for people who have low self-esteem, who feel inferior. Helping (because "I'm superior") those in need ("they're inferior, not me"). That's what it's all about really..

Women are naturally more empathetic than men.

Women and self destruction 👇👇

Their brains?. ried.

They love giving away that sweet British pusskins

Stupidity?

It’s a problem with so called progressive ideology, it takes a women’s natural maternal instincts turns it into a weaponized paternalism that treats 3rd world dangerous idiots so called minority’s like children in order to protect them from the feminist boogie man… “white men” and their “white supremacist civilized society”… they’ve been so mentally conditioned that they think white supremacy oppressed and stole all their opportunities just like 3rd wave feminism convinced them they are oppressed… likely the most destructive psyop in history done to young girls right in our own education system!

they are been paid... that's why

@jollyheretic knows

There seems to be a rise of people who lack any sense of self preservation and simply believe people will be kind while ignoring facts. Also with their wording "choose love", you sound like a mean person if you're against it. This is an uphill battle.

The new Bimbo's?

It's the same suicide empathy some woman have for mass murderers, Richard Ramirez , Jeffrey Dahmer, Christopher Watts. The phenomenon has a clinical name: hybristophilia. They think they can fix them with love! 🫣

There are several factors. Bureaucracy is a graduate class, there are far too many graduates with degrees of little professional function and more of them are female. Education practices relativism and not pluralism, the ideologues appeal to pluralistic utopianism, but deliver relativism. Hence the reductive arguments they make, for example, "that Somalian is as British as you…" collapsing nuance on a multitude of fonts when it doesn’t suit but using them the other way. It comes out of the good old oppressed/oppressor binary which is a very clean arbiter for those who ‘believe’ in it. It isn’t just a framework for theory it is practised as moral. That dynamic then maps onto politics, and the left has stolen the ‘optics’ of ‘rights’, often worthless qualified and competing rights, but people believe they have them. The ‘right’ is cast as patriarchy and a threat to women, which some of the online right conveniently supply the evidence for. The social status follows, is insulated, and never faces real debate. If someone tries, well "what do you have against love?" They will cast the person trying to present an argument as morally defective. Evidence isn’t tested, it’s morally weighted.

There is likely a variety of reasons: Being part of the in-group (progressives) Childless women redirecting innate empathy to migrants Submission to the current obsession with white guilt Women believing in the oppression of women/people of colour

SO THEY MUST BE PAID VERY WELL TO IGNORE A DEBATE 🤔. I THINK THEY NEED TO BE IN TOUCH WITH SOME OF THE VICTIMS.

Global villager extremists tend to be women as do people with suicidal empathy.

What do you think of the theory that's it's to do with fitting in, not wanting to be cast out of a group when you may need their help to protect and raise children? As a survival mechanism that makes sense to me.

"Open-border babe"? Don’t start giving it a name. They’ll start wearing it as a badge of honour. It’s retarded.