正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨WHY DOES EVERYONE HATE TURKEY? Does 🇹🇷 jail journalists? Does 🇹🇷 jail politicians? Does 🇹🇷 invade countries? Does 🇹🇷 violate UNSC resolutions? Does 🇹🇷 abuse human rights? Does 🇹🇷 support terror groups? Why so much hate? Hmm… Lucky for🇹🇷 Indian Major General Bakshi is retired

Harry Theocharous

19,171 subscribers

28,181 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生喜剧新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🇹🇷 Türkiye does not sleep even at night - protests continue.

🇹🇷 Türkiye does not sleep even at night - protests continue.

Sprinter Express

52,014 次观看 • 1 年前

It does NOT get any better 👏 @denizoncu53 gets the first #Moto2 victory for him and for Turkey 🇹🇷 #AragonGP 🏁

It does NOT get any better 👏 @denizoncu53 gets the first #Moto2 victory for him and for Turkey 🇹🇷 #AragonGP 🏁

MotoGP™🏁

24,988 次观看 • 1 年前

🇳🇱🇹🇷🚨‼️ “You are no Europeans and you will never be! An Islamic state like Turkey does not belong to Europe.” — Geert Wilders

🇳🇱🇹🇷🚨‼️ “You are no Europeans and you will never be! An Islamic state like Turkey does not belong to Europe.” — Geert Wilders

Lord Bebo

2,262,679 次观看 • 2 年前

🇹🇷 Turkish President Erdogan has sent CHILLING WARNING indirectly to Netanyahu 🇮🇱 🔥 🇹🇷 He said — Any country that dares to target Türkiye’s independence and future will face severe consequences. I repeat: don’t ever try in your dream also. We have the strength to break anyone who does. 🔥🔥 Netanyahu will get heartburn listening to this 🤣

🇹🇷 Turkish President Erdogan has sent CHILLING WARNING indirectly to Netanyahu 🇮🇱 🔥 🇹🇷 He said — Any country that dares to target Türkiye’s independence and future will face severe consequences. I repeat: don’t ever try in your dream also. We have the strength to break anyone who does. 🔥🔥 Netanyahu will get heartburn listening to this 🤣

InfoGram

57,619 次观看 • 2 个月前

Dear world, Happy New Year! 🇹🇷 These bombs are Christmas 🎄 gifts from Turkey for civilians in #Rojava, the land of #WomanLifeFreedom, where women defeated ISIS! Does anyone care? No, as it pertains to Kurdistan, not Gaza or Ukraine. 🇺🇦 Be their voice Best wishes

Dear world, Happy New Year! 🇹🇷 These bombs are Christmas 🎄 gifts from Turkey for civilians in #Rojava, the land of #WomanLifeFreedom, where women defeated ISIS! Does anyone care? No, as it pertains to Kurdistan, not Gaza or Ukraine. 🇺🇦 Be their voice Best wishes

Simko

13,159 次观看 • 2 年前

SNUB: Trump refused to shake RINO Chip Roy’s hand. Why does everyone hate Chip? Why did Paxton fire him? Why is he leaving Congress? Chip is all for Chip. Vote Aaron Reitz for TX AG.

SNUB: Trump refused to shake RINO Chip Roy’s hand. Why does everyone hate Chip? Why did Paxton fire him? Why is he leaving Congress? Chip is all for Chip. Vote Aaron Reitz for TX AG.

@amuse

282,914 次观看 • 5 个月前

Is it just me or is produce and food in general so much better in other countries than in the USA? Why does the USA mess with our food smh

Is it just me or is produce and food in general so much better in other countries than in the USA? Why does the USA mess with our food smh

Nina-Marie Daniele

104,149 次观看 • 1 年前

Did You know: More than 6000+ artists have Christmas Music in their catalogs, but not one of them get as much hate as Mariah does for hers the only reason why they hate her is because her Christmas music is superior and untouchable

Did You know: More than 6000+ artists have Christmas Music in their catalogs, but not one of them get as much hate as Mariah does for hers the only reason why they hate her is because her Christmas music is superior and untouchable

Skyla †

50,834 次观看 • 1 年前

⚠️ALERT ISRAEL: “MIGHTY” TURKEY PREPARING TO STRIKE🚨 🇹🇷 FM Hakan Fidan flexes tough talk: Severing all ties with Israel, shutting airspace to 🇮🇱planes and hinting at preemptive strikes beyond borders. Does Turkey have what it takes or is it classic macho posturing just to look strong? Turkey has been threatening Israel ישראל for many years but just big talk. They only attack small defenseless nations like Cyprus, with the help of other countries of course. When it comes to the “big boys”, it’s only sabre-rattling because they know what FAFO means and surely don’t want to really find out.

⚠️ALERT ISRAEL: “MIGHTY” TURKEY PREPARING TO STRIKE🚨 🇹🇷 FM Hakan Fidan flexes tough talk: Severing all ties with Israel, shutting airspace to 🇮🇱planes and hinting at preemptive strikes beyond borders. Does Turkey have what it takes or is it classic macho posturing just to look strong? Turkey has been threatening Israel ישראל for many years but just big talk. They only attack small defenseless nations like Cyprus, with the help of other countries of course. When it comes to the “big boys”, it’s only sabre-rattling because they know what FAFO means and surely don’t want to really find out.

Harry Theocharous

27,983 次观看 • 11 个月前

Turkey 🇹🇷 has issued a final warning to Israel. What follows will be a retaliatory response! President Erdoğan stated: "The attacks by Netanyahu and his criminal network against Syria and Lebanon have reached a stage where they threaten not only these two sister nations, but Turkey as well. Turkey’s security does not begin at Hatay alone, but extends to Aleppo, Damascus, and Beirut. We are fully aware of the ultimate goal of the ‘Greater Israel’ delusion. And we will never allow that to happen.”

Turkey 🇹🇷 has issued a final warning to Israel. What follows will be a retaliatory response! President Erdoğan stated: "The attacks by Netanyahu and his criminal network against Syria and Lebanon have reached a stage where they threaten not only these two sister nations, but Turkey as well. Turkey’s security does not begin at Hatay alone, but extends to Aleppo, Damascus, and Beirut. We are fully aware of the ultimate goal of the ‘Greater Israel’ delusion. And we will never allow that to happen.”

🇸🇦Abdulsalam Saleh

682,729 次观看 • 1 个月前

I did it! ✅ Done! 🆗 I reached level 80 in Pokemon GO! 🔥 I worked really hard to get here. 💪 It was so much fun, and I enjoyed sharing this journey with you! 🥰 The first Turkish 🇹🇷 person to reach level 80 in Pokemon GO! 🥇 Perhaps the first, and even one of the first, fully legit level 80 players in Turkey. 🇹🇷 I know I'm a few weeks behind the hardcore players, but I'm proud of my own efforts. One of those goals that truly feels well-deserved. 💪 Thank you everyone who is following the journey. 🤗 Many thanks to Shinyred40 for all the support. Shinyred40 TL80 2.4B XP 🇫🇮 😘💪🔥🫶🙏 #PokemonGO #ポケモンGO #PokemonGoLevel80

I did it! ✅ Done! 🆗 I reached level 80 in Pokemon GO! 🔥 I worked really hard to get here. 💪 It was so much fun, and I enjoyed sharing this journey with you! 🥰 The first Turkish 🇹🇷 person to reach level 80 in Pokemon GO! 🥇 Perhaps the first, and even one of the first, fully legit level 80 players in Turkey. 🇹🇷 I know I'm a few weeks behind the hardcore players, but I'm proud of my own efforts. One of those goals that truly feels well-deserved. 💪 Thank you everyone who is following the journey. 🤗 Many thanks to Shinyred40 for all the support. Shinyred40 TL80 2.4B XP 🇫🇮 😘💪🔥🫶🙏 #PokemonGO #ポケモンGO #PokemonGoLevel80

KingDeoxys TL80 2B XP

35,726 次观看 • 8 个月前

Israeli NBA rising star does not understand why people hate Israel —— Deni Avdija, the Israeli NBA Portland Trail Blazers player who has been endorsed by LeBron James for an All-Star position, said in a New York Times profile published this week that he does not understand why people hate him, despite repeatedly expressing his love for and support of Israel. “I obviously stand for my country, because that’s where I’m from. It’s frustrating to see all the hate ... I’m from there, and I respect my country, and I stand behind it. I’m a proud Israeli because that’s where I grew up. I wouldn’t be where I am today if it weren’t for Israel." Avdija said. NBA fans have speculated on social media that Avdija, who is currently ranked 5th in fan All-Star voting and 7th in overall NBA All-Star voting for the Western Conference, is receiving votes primarily because he is Jewish. Some fans even questioned how ex-Portland Trail Blazers star Damian Lillard struggled to garner votes last season with the Milwaukee Bucks.

The Cradle

24,351 次观看 • 6 个月前

NEW: Nancy Pelosi admits that Kamala Harris does nothing and says the reason for this is because that’s the role of the Vice President, to literally do nothing. Remarkable. “She's the vice president of the United States. So when people say to me: ‘well, why isn't she doing this or that?’ I said, because she's the vice president.” “That's the job description. You don't do that much. Mm-hmm, you know, you, you know?”

NEW: Nancy Pelosi admits that Kamala Harris does nothing and says the reason for this is because that’s the role of the Vice President, to literally do nothing. Remarkable. “She's the vice president of the United States. So when people say to me: ‘well, why isn't she doing this or that?’ I said, because she's the vice president.” “That's the job description. You don't do that much. Mm-hmm, you know, you, you know?”

Collin Rugg

3,222,803 次观看 • 2 年前

Dear Premier League Tottenham Hotspur This is just outrageous. This is a football journalist with media accreditation openly promoting support for Islamic terrorism inside the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium. He says he stands with 'Palestinian resistance' 'heart and soul'. We all know that if this was a white supremacist promoting support for violence - you would have publicly made an example of him and 'got rid' in a day. But because it is a Muslim promoting support for radical Islamic violence you just don't seem to care. So why the double standards? Also - Metropolitan Police - is it lawful to support proscribed terrorist groups. Or does media accreditation give him a free pass to do so? Asking for a friend.

Dear Premier League Tottenham Hotspur This is just outrageous. This is a football journalist with media accreditation openly promoting support for Islamic terrorism inside the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium. He says he stands with 'Palestinian resistance' 'heart and soul'. We all know that if this was a white supremacist promoting support for violence - you would have publicly made an example of him and 'got rid' in a day. But because it is a Muslim promoting support for radical Islamic violence you just don't seem to care. So why the double standards? Also - Metropolitan Police - is it lawful to support proscribed terrorist groups. Or does media accreditation give him a free pass to do so? Asking for a friend.

David Collier

25,925 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 This is BRUTAL 🔥🔥 🇵🇰 Pakistan's Prime Minister: "Why the double standards when it comes to Iran?⚠️ If certain countries are allowed to possess ballistic missiles, then Iran cannot be denied the same right. Such hypocrisy is unacceptable. It will only create more tensions, cause unnecessary delays, and raise serious questions.⚠️ Does Iran not have the right to develop missiles for its own national security?🤔 There are forces attempting to disrupt the peace process and derail any potential agreement." No names were mentioned, but everyone understood who the message was aimed at. 🔥

🚨 This is BRUTAL 🔥🔥 🇵🇰 Pakistan's Prime Minister: "Why the double standards when it comes to Iran?⚠️ If certain countries are allowed to possess ballistic missiles, then Iran cannot be denied the same right. Such hypocrisy is unacceptable. It will only create more tensions, cause unnecessary delays, and raise serious questions.⚠️ Does Iran not have the right to develop missiles for its own national security?🤔 There are forces attempting to disrupt the peace process and derail any potential agreement." No names were mentioned, but everyone understood who the message was aimed at. 🔥

Mojtaba Khamenei Commentary

56,487 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨🚨BREAKING NEWS 🚨 🇹🇷 Footage Shows Armed Robbery Attempt Thwarted by Rocket Launcher in Turkey A group of armed motorcyclists attempting to rob a vehicle on a road in Turkey quickly fled when the driver retrieved a rocket launcher from the trunk and pointed it toward them, according to widely shared video footage. The clip shows the attackers approaching the stopped car with rifles before one occupant responds by pulling out the heavy anti-tank weapon. The would-be robbers retreated without shots fired, and the incident has drawn massive online attention as one of the year’s most unusual events. While the video highlights a dramatic reversal, it also reflects broader challenges with armed crime and the proliferation of powerful weapons in certain regions, where individuals increasingly resort to extreme measures for self-defense amid concerns over public safety and law enforcement effectiveness. Such cases underscore ongoing debates about security, personal protection, and the risks of heavily armed societies. What does this incident reveal about everyday security in high-risk areas?

🚨🚨BREAKING NEWS 🚨 🇹🇷 Footage Shows Armed Robbery Attempt Thwarted by Rocket Launcher in Turkey A group of armed motorcyclists attempting to rob a vehicle on a road in Turkey quickly fled when the driver retrieved a rocket launcher from the trunk and pointed it toward them, according to widely shared video footage. The clip shows the attackers approaching the stopped car with rifles before one occupant responds by pulling out the heavy anti-tank weapon. The would-be robbers retreated without shots fired, and the incident has drawn massive online attention as one of the year’s most unusual events. While the video highlights a dramatic reversal, it also reflects broader challenges with armed crime and the proliferation of powerful weapons in certain regions, where individuals increasingly resort to extreme measures for self-defense amid concerns over public safety and law enforcement effectiveness. Such cases underscore ongoing debates about security, personal protection, and the risks of heavily armed societies. What does this incident reveal about everyday security in high-risk areas?

Corefrontline

720,415 次观看 • 18 天前

This absolute tool bag went to 1 Meadows Ave and danced outside for some reason. I have no idea who she is or why she did this, but to be very clear I condemn her. Not just condemn her, I actually hate her. I hate her more than I hate Brian Tully and Jennifer McCabe. I wish the absolute worst things upon her. She is a worthless maggot who can rot in hell where she belongs. And when I find out who she is I am going to name and shame her worse than I’ve ever done to anyone . Let it be known - if you’re a Karen Read supporter who does shit like this I will treat you MUCH worse than I ever treated the McAlberts. Just shut the fuck up, read the blogs, and watch the show. That’s it.

This absolute tool bag went to 1 Meadows Ave and danced outside for some reason. I have no idea who she is or why she did this, but to be very clear I condemn her. Not just condemn her, I actually hate her. I hate her more than I hate Brian Tully and Jennifer McCabe. I wish the absolute worst things upon her. She is a worthless maggot who can rot in hell where she belongs. And when I find out who she is I am going to name and shame her worse than I’ve ever done to anyone . Let it be known - if you’re a Karen Read supporter who does shit like this I will treat you MUCH worse than I ever treated the McAlberts. Just shut the fuck up, read the blogs, and watch the show. That’s it.

Aidan Kearney

895,374 次观看 • 1 年前

‼️An interesting interview with Lavrov Sergey Lavrov regularly gives interviews, and almost every one of them is an information operation designed to create an alternative reality. The March 26 interview with France Télévisions is no exception. Let's break it down and point out where there are lies and where there is manipulation. 1. Lavrov claims that Russia is supposedly defending international law while speaking in the "language of principles" regarding Iran. What's wrong: it's basic role reversal. Moscow is trying to speak from the position of a "guardian of the law," even though it is waging an aggressive war against Ukraine. In the case of Iran, Lavrov is also deliberately omitting half the picture: yes, the US withdrew from the nuclear deal, but Iran also faced non-proliferation concerns raised by the IAEA. Why it matters: It is an attempt to whitewash Russia's crimes through someone else's crisis and to present the aggressor (Russia) as the judge. 2. Russia does not provide Iran with intelligence; the coordinates of US bases are "already known to everyone." What's wrong: it's an evasive statement, not a complete refutation. There is no independently verified evidence of specific target marking data transfers in open sources, nor can there be, but the Kremlin's "we have nothing to do with it" claim has no basis for being automatically considered true. Why it matters: A typical Kremlin tactic - to deny anything that does not align with Russia's interests and to continue operating in a gray area. 3. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have denied the US access to their airspace, so Russia is right about the "American venture." What's wrong: The caution of Gulf countries is real, but Lavrov turns it into a crude anti-Western caricature. Regional politics are more complex than the Kremlin's narrative that "everyone understands everything, only the US is pushing the world into chaos." Why it matters: The Kremlin takes a partial truth and builds a convenient political myth around it. 4. Russia isn't waging wars for its own gain; it's the US that wants to control the energy sector, the Strait of Hormuz, and the markets. What's wrong: It's pure projection. It is Russia that has used energy as a weapon for years, and after 2022, turned petrodollars into fuel for war. Why it matters: Moscow accuses others of doing what it does systematically - this is one of the central techniques of its propaganda. 5. Since 2014, Ukraine has been ruled by a "Nazi regime" that came to power through a coup. What's wrong: After Yanukovych fled, Ukraine held snap presidential elections, which the OSCE recognized as meeting international standards and being competitive. The claim of a "Nazi regime" is a political label, not a description of reality. Why it matters: "Nazism" in Kremlin rhetoric is a tool for dehumanizing Ukraine and justifying the war. 6. The Russian language is allegedly completely banned in Ukraine. What's wrong: Ukraine has strengthened the role of the state language, but this does not mean a total ban on Russian. The law does not apply to private communication and does not criminalize the everyday use of the language. Why it matters: The Kremlin is exaggerating language policy to the level of a "linguistic apocalypse" to sell the war as a supposed humanitarian mission. 7. Ukraine is allegedly at war with Orthodoxy and has "banned the canonical church." What's wrong: This is not about "banning a faith," but about a law regarding religious organizations linked to the Russian Orthodox Church. Even criticism from human rights activists does not support the Kremlin's claim of "persecution of Orthodoxy." Why it matters: Moscow is using the language of religious protection to cover up its network of influence in Ukraine. 8. The West allegedly cynically exploited the Minsk agreements as a respite to arm Ukraine. What's wrong: The Minsk process was collapsing because of the Kremlin's desire to use the agreements to establish de facto control over Ukraine, not because of some "cunning plot" by Paris and Berlin. Why it matters: The Kremlin is rewriting history retroactively to portray its own aggression as a supposedly forced response to "universal betrayal." 9. Russia does not attack civilians; its targets are solely facilities associated with the AFU. What's wrong: It's an outright lie. For years, the UN and independent sources have documented systematic Russian strikes on cities, residential areas, energy facilities, and civilian infrastructure. Why it matters: This is no longer just propaganda, but a cynical denial of documented terror against civilians. 10. The Bucha massacre is allegedly "not proven": there are no names, no evidence, and journalists haven't shown anything. What's wrong: This is one of the most mendacious claims. There are UN documents, testimonies, criminal investigations, identified suspects, and evidence of executions and killings of civilians. Why it matters: The Kremlin is not trying to refute the crime, but to wear down the audience with doubt and turn mass murder into "one of the versions." 11. Russia wants peace and negotiations. What's wrong: In the Kremlin's vocabulary, "peace" does not mean an end to aggression, but rather acceptance of its results. "Realities on the ground" means occupation; "root causes" means demanding recognition of Russia's right to punish neighbors for their political choices. Why it matters: Lavrov isn't offering peace. He's dressing up surrender in softer language. 12. Europe is supposedly dragging out the war, while Russia is looking for a solution. What's wrong: Russia started this war itself. European aid to Ukraine is a response to the aggression, not its cause. Why it matters: This is the main inversion of Kremlin logic - to make the audience forget who attacked first and shift the discussion from aggression to a "conflict that has dragged on too long." 13. RT and Sputnik are victims of censorship, and France has no right to speak about freedom of speech. What's wrong: RT and Sputnik were banned not as "ordinary media," but as state-run tools of disinformation. Their role as propaganda channels has been publicly acknowledged both in the EU and in France. Why it matters: The Kremlin wants to portray the defense of democracies against malicious information operations as a restriction of free speech. 14. France and Europe have made Russia an enemy; Moscow is merely reacting. What's wrong: The cause of the rift is not "Russophobia," but Russia's invasion, war crimes, blackmail, and influence operations against Europe. Why it matters: The Kremlin is systematically trying to reverse the cause-and-effect relationship: it is not that "Russia destroyed relations," but that "the West rejected Russia." 15. Individual real episodes - the tanker, incidents in France, disputes among allies - allegedly prove Western hypocrisy and justify Russia. What's wrong: Lavrov takes a real but local fact and uses it as a smokescreen. None of these incidents erases Russia's crimes or the very fact of its aggression. Why it matters: This is a favorite Kremlin method - using others' difficulties and whataboutism to cover up its own crimes.

‼️An interesting interview with Lavrov Sergey Lavrov regularly gives interviews, and almost every one of them is an information operation designed to create an alternative reality. The March 26 interview with France Télévisions is no exception. Let's break it down and point out where there are lies and where there is manipulation. 1. Lavrov claims that Russia is supposedly defending international law while speaking in the "language of principles" regarding Iran. What's wrong: it's basic role reversal. Moscow is trying to speak from the position of a "guardian of the law," even though it is waging an aggressive war against Ukraine. In the case of Iran, Lavrov is also deliberately omitting half the picture: yes, the US withdrew from the nuclear deal, but Iran also faced non-proliferation concerns raised by the IAEA. Why it matters: It is an attempt to whitewash Russia's crimes through someone else's crisis and to present the aggressor (Russia) as the judge. 2. Russia does not provide Iran with intelligence; the coordinates of US bases are "already known to everyone." What's wrong: it's an evasive statement, not a complete refutation. There is no independently verified evidence of specific target marking data transfers in open sources, nor can there be, but the Kremlin's "we have nothing to do with it" claim has no basis for being automatically considered true. Why it matters: A typical Kremlin tactic - to deny anything that does not align with Russia's interests and to continue operating in a gray area. 3. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have denied the US access to their airspace, so Russia is right about the "American venture." What's wrong: The caution of Gulf countries is real, but Lavrov turns it into a crude anti-Western caricature. Regional politics are more complex than the Kremlin's narrative that "everyone understands everything, only the US is pushing the world into chaos." Why it matters: The Kremlin takes a partial truth and builds a convenient political myth around it. 4. Russia isn't waging wars for its own gain; it's the US that wants to control the energy sector, the Strait of Hormuz, and the markets. What's wrong: It's pure projection. It is Russia that has used energy as a weapon for years, and after 2022, turned petrodollars into fuel for war. Why it matters: Moscow accuses others of doing what it does systematically - this is one of the central techniques of its propaganda. 5. Since 2014, Ukraine has been ruled by a "Nazi regime" that came to power through a coup. What's wrong: After Yanukovych fled, Ukraine held snap presidential elections, which the OSCE recognized as meeting international standards and being competitive. The claim of a "Nazi regime" is a political label, not a description of reality. Why it matters: "Nazism" in Kremlin rhetoric is a tool for dehumanizing Ukraine and justifying the war. 6. The Russian language is allegedly completely banned in Ukraine. What's wrong: Ukraine has strengthened the role of the state language, but this does not mean a total ban on Russian. The law does not apply to private communication and does not criminalize the everyday use of the language. Why it matters: The Kremlin is exaggerating language policy to the level of a "linguistic apocalypse" to sell the war as a supposed humanitarian mission. 7. Ukraine is allegedly at war with Orthodoxy and has "banned the canonical church." What's wrong: This is not about "banning a faith," but about a law regarding religious organizations linked to the Russian Orthodox Church. Even criticism from human rights activists does not support the Kremlin's claim of "persecution of Orthodoxy." Why it matters: Moscow is using the language of religious protection to cover up its network of influence in Ukraine. 8. The West allegedly cynically exploited the Minsk agreements as a respite to arm Ukraine. What's wrong: The Minsk process was collapsing because of the Kremlin's desire to use the agreements to establish de facto control over Ukraine, not because of some "cunning plot" by Paris and Berlin. Why it matters: The Kremlin is rewriting history retroactively to portray its own aggression as a supposedly forced response to "universal betrayal." 9. Russia does not attack civilians; its targets are solely facilities associated with the AFU. What's wrong: It's an outright lie. For years, the UN and independent sources have documented systematic Russian strikes on cities, residential areas, energy facilities, and civilian infrastructure. Why it matters: This is no longer just propaganda, but a cynical denial of documented terror against civilians. 10. The Bucha massacre is allegedly "not proven": there are no names, no evidence, and journalists haven't shown anything. What's wrong: This is one of the most mendacious claims. There are UN documents, testimonies, criminal investigations, identified suspects, and evidence of executions and killings of civilians. Why it matters: The Kremlin is not trying to refute the crime, but to wear down the audience with doubt and turn mass murder into "one of the versions." 11. Russia wants peace and negotiations. What's wrong: In the Kremlin's vocabulary, "peace" does not mean an end to aggression, but rather acceptance of its results. "Realities on the ground" means occupation; "root causes" means demanding recognition of Russia's right to punish neighbors for their political choices. Why it matters: Lavrov isn't offering peace. He's dressing up surrender in softer language. 12. Europe is supposedly dragging out the war, while Russia is looking for a solution. What's wrong: Russia started this war itself. European aid to Ukraine is a response to the aggression, not its cause. Why it matters: This is the main inversion of Kremlin logic - to make the audience forget who attacked first and shift the discussion from aggression to a "conflict that has dragged on too long." 13. RT and Sputnik are victims of censorship, and France has no right to speak about freedom of speech. What's wrong: RT and Sputnik were banned not as "ordinary media," but as state-run tools of disinformation. Their role as propaganda channels has been publicly acknowledged both in the EU and in France. Why it matters: The Kremlin wants to portray the defense of democracies against malicious information operations as a restriction of free speech. 14. France and Europe have made Russia an enemy; Moscow is merely reacting. What's wrong: The cause of the rift is not "Russophobia," but Russia's invasion, war crimes, blackmail, and influence operations against Europe. Why it matters: The Kremlin is systematically trying to reverse the cause-and-effect relationship: it is not that "Russia destroyed relations," but that "the West rejected Russia." 15. Individual real episodes - the tanker, incidents in France, disputes among allies - allegedly prove Western hypocrisy and justify Russia. What's wrong: Lavrov takes a real but local fact and uses it as a smokescreen. None of these incidents erases Russia's crimes or the very fact of its aggression. Why it matters: This is a favorite Kremlin method - using others' difficulties and whataboutism to cover up its own crimes.

Anton Gerashchenko

88,596 次观看 • 4 个月前