Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Why does the Sun look so much different when you actually zoom in on it with a camera...than the flaming fireball of death cartoon version NASA taught all of us as kids? ☀️🤔 It's not just the Sun btw...literally every image of stars and planets NASA shows us is...

benwehrman's profile picture

Ben Wehrman

123,651 subscribers

33,019 views • 23 days ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

We've all seen the flaming fireball depiction of the Sun that NASA has been showing us since we were kids. But have you ever actually seen what it looks like to ZOOM into the Sun with a powerful camera, to analyze it yourself? Turns out, it looks a LOT different than what we were told... [Video: FLAT OUT TRUTH]
5:28

We've all seen the flaming fireball depiction of the Sun that NASA has been showing us since we were kids. But have you ever actually seen what it looks like to ZOOM into the Sun with a powerful camera, to analyze it yourself? Turns out, it looks a LOT different than what we were told... [Video: FLAT OUT TRUTH]

₿en Wehrman

130,860 views • 5 months ago

A couple of weeks ago I was up at 4am to take a photo of 3I/ATLAS, it was low in the sky and there was a haze which meant lots of scattered light. But I took an image except that because the telescope tracks the stars the comet is blurred, after all it's the fastest thing (in terms of it's total energy). The image is actually made up of a sequence of hundreds of 4 second exposures, that's what the video shows, you can even see satellites zipping through the frame. So now with a bit of work in astronomy processing software I've managed to restack the comet and stars separately to make a non distorted image of the comet. Still working to make this better, but glad to have got this far.
0:59

A couple of weeks ago I was up at 4am to take a photo of 3I/ATLAS, it was low in the sky and there was a haze which meant lots of scattered light. But I took an image except that because the telescope tracks the stars the comet is blurred, after all it's the fastest thing (in terms of it's total energy). The image is actually made up of a sequence of hundreds of 4 second exposures, that's what the video shows, you can even see satellites zipping through the frame. So now with a bit of work in astronomy processing software I've managed to restack the comet and stars separately to make a non distorted image of the comet. Still working to make this better, but glad to have got this far.

Scott Manley

36,041 views • 8 months ago

The release of the P900 camera with infinite zoom is why there are so many flat earthers now btw. I’ve done it myself. There is no curve. Snipers don’t factor in the spin neither do pilots. Light houses wouldn’t work at 8 in/mi2. And nasa has lied about all of it. There is zero evidence we are on a ball. Zero evidence of spin. I don’t know what the earth is but someone has some explaining to do. And no everyone isn’t in on it. Without this tech it does look like boats are going over a curve. They aren’t. We aren’t just dumb crazy people. We actually know the heliocentric model more than 99% of the people calling us dumb. It is what it is. And social shame doesn’t work on me.
1:11

The release of the P900 camera with infinite zoom is why there are so many flat earthers now btw. I’ve done it myself. There is no curve. Snipers don’t factor in the spin neither do pilots. Light houses wouldn’t work at 8 in/mi2. And nasa has lied about all of it. There is zero evidence we are on a ball. Zero evidence of spin. I don’t know what the earth is but someone has some explaining to do. And no everyone isn’t in on it. Without this tech it does look like boats are going over a curve. They aren’t. We aren’t just dumb crazy people. We actually know the heliocentric model more than 99% of the people calling us dumb. It is what it is. And social shame doesn’t work on me.

Owen Benjamin 🐻

4,890,865 views • 3 years ago

The 7 astrological bodies affect us and life on this planet more than you think. The gravitational interactions between the planets, the Moon, and the Sun create the axial and apsidal precessions, and these directly affect Earth's climate and life on the planet. In other words, the Geophysical Event is caused by this interplanetary interplay. If the planets, the Sun, and the Moon govern the short and long cycles, then they also have an immense influence on our individual lives. Just as the Moon causes the ocean tides, it also affects us. Even a small change in the size or distance of a planet like Mars would completely change life on Earth. So now do you understand why the planets have long been associated with gods and regarded as the rulers of the aeons?
0:20

The 7 astrological bodies affect us and life on this planet more than you think. The gravitational interactions between the planets, the Moon, and the Sun create the axial and apsidal precessions, and these directly affect Earth's climate and life on the planet. In other words, the Geophysical Event is caused by this interplanetary interplay. If the planets, the Sun, and the Moon govern the short and long cycles, then they also have an immense influence on our individual lives. Just as the Moon causes the ocean tides, it also affects us. Even a small change in the size or distance of a planet like Mars would completely change life on Earth. So now do you understand why the planets have long been associated with gods and regarded as the rulers of the aeons?

Open Minded Approach

10,874 views • 17 days ago

There's a whole laundry list of proofs that I find independently convincing, but if I had to pick just one single argument to hang my hat on for why I believe the Earth is flat and stationary, it is the STARS & PLANETS, and their paths in the sky from Earth's POV. How do you explain in the heliocentric model, how every star traces perfect circles around the North Star, and every PLANET traces perfect sacred geometrical patterns around the North Star as well? According to the heliocentric model of the solar system (1st video) all of these spinning ball planets in the Milky Way are orbiting the SUN, at different speeds and path circumferences, at distance ranges from 36 million to 2.8 billion miles away from us. The North Star, NASA tells us, is 2.5 QUADRILLION miles away. Now tell me how all of these independent Sun-orbiting planets would trace PERFECT patterns around the North Star for 6,000+ years of recorded history? Venus literally creates a PERFECT flower of life pattern, which we see appear in nature here on Earth as well. Get the f*ck out of here if you think that's just a fluke cosmic accident. Not to mention, EVERY SINGLE CONSTELLATION has remained the exact same in our sky for 6,000 years? Not a single one has appeared or disappeared, while the universe is supposedly expanding at countless millions of miles per hour? Remember, these are all of Earth's movement vectors we are supposedly experiencing as we soar through the infinitely-expanding void of space 👇 🫨 1,000 MPH spinning around Earth's axis 🫨 66,600 MPH flying around Sun 🫨 500,000 MPH flying through the galaxy 🫨 1,300,000 MPH entire galaxy flying through space 🫨 All while the entire universe is EXPANDING, speeding all of these vectors up and warping the directions in different/random ways 🫨 ALL OF THE STARS we see are flying in different directions too, at their own incomprehensible speeds And yet, the stars we see in the night sky have never changed. Ever. I'm sorry but the "it's parallax" response from the globers doesn't cut it for me - that sounds like a glaring example of starting with a pre-determined conclusion in mind, and making anything up in the middle in order to get to that conclusion. (I WILL GRANT HOWEVER, that at least the parallax effect is something we can visibly see and experience on the micro level—unlike "gravity"—so I will concede that it obviously exists. I just don't believe that it explains all of the above motions, distances, and perfection of consistency in the patterns created by the cosmology we observe). Every ounce of my common sense-trusting brain tells me that all of these insanely huge numbers are just brain-numbing nonsense to obfuscate away from the far-simpler truth: that NONE of these incomprehensible speeds/distances are even happening at all, and rather, the Earth is flat and stationary, and these unchanging constellations and planetary movements are indeed revolving around US. The North Star (Polaris) lies directly above the North Pole, and does not move. The stars and planets rotate around the North Star, above Earth. Just as it looks and feels. I dove into way more nuance on all of these concepts in the first 3 Parts of the 5-Part Flat Earth video series I made for my podcast, which I will link below. WATCH THOSE VIDEOS. And as always, if you have refuting points to share, please drop them in the comments below so we can discuss! #FlatEarth
0:33

There's a whole laundry list of proofs that I find independently convincing, but if I had to pick just one single argument to hang my hat on for why I believe the Earth is flat and stationary, it is the STARS & PLANETS, and their paths in the sky from Earth's POV. How do you explain in the heliocentric model, how every star traces perfect circles around the North Star, and every PLANET traces perfect sacred geometrical patterns around the North Star as well? According to the heliocentric model of the solar system (1st video) all of these spinning ball planets in the Milky Way are orbiting the SUN, at different speeds and path circumferences, at distance ranges from 36 million to 2.8 billion miles away from us. The North Star, NASA tells us, is 2.5 QUADRILLION miles away. Now tell me how all of these independent Sun-orbiting planets would trace PERFECT patterns around the North Star for 6,000+ years of recorded history? Venus literally creates a PERFECT flower of life pattern, which we see appear in nature here on Earth as well. Get the f*ck out of here if you think that's just a fluke cosmic accident. Not to mention, EVERY SINGLE CONSTELLATION has remained the exact same in our sky for 6,000 years? Not a single one has appeared or disappeared, while the universe is supposedly expanding at countless millions of miles per hour? Remember, these are all of Earth's movement vectors we are supposedly experiencing as we soar through the infinitely-expanding void of space 👇 🫨 1,000 MPH spinning around Earth's axis 🫨 66,600 MPH flying around Sun 🫨 500,000 MPH flying through the galaxy 🫨 1,300,000 MPH entire galaxy flying through space 🫨 All while the entire universe is EXPANDING, speeding all of these vectors up and warping the directions in different/random ways 🫨 ALL OF THE STARS we see are flying in different directions too, at their own incomprehensible speeds And yet, the stars we see in the night sky have never changed. Ever. I'm sorry but the "it's parallax" response from the globers doesn't cut it for me - that sounds like a glaring example of starting with a pre-determined conclusion in mind, and making anything up in the middle in order to get to that conclusion. (I WILL GRANT HOWEVER, that at least the parallax effect is something we can visibly see and experience on the micro level—unlike "gravity"—so I will concede that it obviously exists. I just don't believe that it explains all of the above motions, distances, and perfection of consistency in the patterns created by the cosmology we observe). Every ounce of my common sense-trusting brain tells me that all of these insanely huge numbers are just brain-numbing nonsense to obfuscate away from the far-simpler truth: that NONE of these incomprehensible speeds/distances are even happening at all, and rather, the Earth is flat and stationary, and these unchanging constellations and planetary movements are indeed revolving around US. The North Star (Polaris) lies directly above the North Pole, and does not move. The stars and planets rotate around the North Star, above Earth. Just as it looks and feels. I dove into way more nuance on all of these concepts in the first 3 Parts of the 5-Part Flat Earth video series I made for my podcast, which I will link below. WATCH THOSE VIDEOS. And as always, if you have refuting points to share, please drop them in the comments below so we can discuss! #FlatEarth

Ben Wehrman

12,019 views • 4 months ago

The Sun tells us the time of day 🌞 The Moon tells us the time of month 🌝 The Stars tell us the time of year ✨️ All of these luminaries revolve perfectly around Polaris, which has NEVER moved in 6,000+ years of recorded history. None of this would be possible if we were spinning on a ball, careening 6 million miles per hour in 5 different directions, constantly, for all of time. I know this is a very difficult one for many to swallow...but ask yourself: Is it really a coincidence that the first thing we were ALL taught in school (which I hope we can all now agree is a cesspool of mass-deception)...is NASA's Science™ model of the universe? The mobile of planets dangling above our head in the crib, the space pajamas, the globe on the teacher's desk, the beginning of every Hollywood movie... Is it really spammed in our faces so constantly since birth, to remind us the truth? Or is it to prevent us from realizing that this world, and our place in it is NOT random, and in fact we are at the center of all creation? What if Flat Earth isn't "a psyop to make truthers look stupid" like so many believe by default...and in fact, it truly is the greatest deception of all time? Keep an open mind. And as always... Question everything.
1:23

The Sun tells us the time of day 🌞 The Moon tells us the time of month 🌝 The Stars tell us the time of year ✨️ All of these luminaries revolve perfectly around Polaris, which has NEVER moved in 6,000+ years of recorded history. None of this would be possible if we were spinning on a ball, careening 6 million miles per hour in 5 different directions, constantly, for all of time. I know this is a very difficult one for many to swallow...but ask yourself: Is it really a coincidence that the first thing we were ALL taught in school (which I hope we can all now agree is a cesspool of mass-deception)...is NASA's Science™ model of the universe? The mobile of planets dangling above our head in the crib, the space pajamas, the globe on the teacher's desk, the beginning of every Hollywood movie... Is it really spammed in our faces so constantly since birth, to remind us the truth? Or is it to prevent us from realizing that this world, and our place in it is NOT random, and in fact we are at the center of all creation? What if Flat Earth isn't "a psyop to make truthers look stupid" like so many believe by default...and in fact, it truly is the greatest deception of all time? Keep an open mind. And as always... Question everything.

₿en Wehrman

86,618 views • 5 months ago

Is the entire concept of "outer space" we were taught through school, NASA missions on TV, and Hollywood movies FAKE? This conspiracy theory has been blowing up in recent weeks. Of course, if you haven't given it a fair shake yet, it sounds completely ridiculous. Of course outer space is real...we look up at the night sky every night and can see the stars ourselves, so that confirms space is real, right? Well...it's not quite that simple. Buckle up for this short documentary which explores the deep questions the most powerful entities on Earth do NOT want us to know 👇
20:32

Is the entire concept of "outer space" we were taught through school, NASA missions on TV, and Hollywood movies FAKE? This conspiracy theory has been blowing up in recent weeks. Of course, if you haven't given it a fair shake yet, it sounds completely ridiculous. Of course outer space is real...we look up at the night sky every night and can see the stars ourselves, so that confirms space is real, right? Well...it's not quite that simple. Buckle up for this short documentary which explores the deep questions the most powerful entities on Earth do NOT want us to know 👇

Ben Wehrman

142,377 views • 3 months ago

Earth is an enclosed system, covered by a firmament dome that separates us from the waters above. The Sun and Moon are local, following an electromagnetic circular track around Polaris. Next time you watch a sunset, note how the Sun drifts to the right as it approaches the horizon. This is because from our perspective on the ground, the Sun's clockwise motion (if looking DOWN on the system from above), appears from a ground observer to be a rightward drift. When you look at stars through a traditional, powerful zoom lens (NOT the new A.I.-manipulated telescopes that literally falsify cosmic imagery to show you what NASA wants), you can actually see the stars shimmering, exactly like light does in water. Because that's what stars are...lights in water. "Sun dogs" and rainbows take the shape they do due to the crystalline dome acting as a prism that refracts the Sun's light. This is easy to test at home - you can see the exact same phenomenon if you shine a light into a glass dome-shaped bowl. You will also only ever see rainbows creating a dome shape outdoors, not indoors, as that shape is a direct result of the firmament's prism encapsulating the entire outdoor environment on Earth.
1:02

Earth is an enclosed system, covered by a firmament dome that separates us from the waters above. The Sun and Moon are local, following an electromagnetic circular track around Polaris. Next time you watch a sunset, note how the Sun drifts to the right as it approaches the horizon. This is because from our perspective on the ground, the Sun's clockwise motion (if looking DOWN on the system from above), appears from a ground observer to be a rightward drift. When you look at stars through a traditional, powerful zoom lens (NOT the new A.I.-manipulated telescopes that literally falsify cosmic imagery to show you what NASA wants), you can actually see the stars shimmering, exactly like light does in water. Because that's what stars are...lights in water. "Sun dogs" and rainbows take the shape they do due to the crystalline dome acting as a prism that refracts the Sun's light. This is easy to test at home - you can see the exact same phenomenon if you shine a light into a glass dome-shaped bowl. You will also only ever see rainbows creating a dome shape outdoors, not indoors, as that shape is a direct result of the firmament's prism encapsulating the entire outdoor environment on Earth.

Ben Wehrman

37,989 views • 29 days ago

Mike Benz reveals NASA isn’t really a space agency, it’s an intelligence agency “NASA was always a spy agency. It was a military and intelligence agency with a civilian front. It always was from day one” NASA has also been formally classified as an intelligence organization “NASA, the Trump administration in August 2025, formally classified NASA as a national security and intelligence organization rather than as a civilian organization. And so when you look at $20 billion in the context of these space wars happening right now because of satellite wars and the idea that war is now moving into space”
0:51

Mike Benz reveals NASA isn’t really a space agency, it’s an intelligence agency “NASA was always a spy agency. It was a military and intelligence agency with a civilian front. It always was from day one” NASA has also been formally classified as an intelligence organization “NASA, the Trump administration in August 2025, formally classified NASA as a national security and intelligence organization rather than as a civilian organization. And so when you look at $20 billion in the context of these space wars happening right now because of satellite wars and the idea that war is now moving into space”

Wall Street Apes

81,784 views • 4 months ago

The North Star NEVER moves. Earth and Polaris are both stationary. It's all of the other stars that move, rotating in a perfect circle around Polaris. This goes completely against what NASA tells us, but completely FOR what we actually observe with our own eyes and senses. If you trust the former more than the latter, they've got you right where they want you.
3:23

The North Star NEVER moves. Earth and Polaris are both stationary. It's all of the other stars that move, rotating in a perfect circle around Polaris. This goes completely against what NASA tells us, but completely FOR what we actually observe with our own eyes and senses. If you trust the former more than the latter, they've got you right where they want you.

₿en Wehrman

76,909 views • 5 months ago

“Why do you care so much? You don’t even have kids.” The thing is, many of us WERE the kids. And those of us who grew up before this, would have been the kids. And some of us in GAG actually are parents as well, which many might not know. But to be completely honest, you need not have any of these apply to you to know that children’s innocence must be protected. Powerful video from our member ThePoliticalMixster #GaysAgainstGroomers
1:24

“Why do you care so much? You don’t even have kids.” The thing is, many of us WERE the kids. And those of us who grew up before this, would have been the kids. And some of us in GAG actually are parents as well, which many might not know. But to be completely honest, you need not have any of these apply to you to know that children’s innocence must be protected. Powerful video from our member ThePoliticalMixster #GaysAgainstGroomers

Gays Against Groomers

91,895 views • 2 years ago

Stars and planets are not what they told you they are. Go look in the sky yourself. Do you really think our eyes/telescopes could see thousands of light years away? In reality, the stars and wandering stars (AKA planets) are very close within our firmament, just like the Bible tells us. Over 240 verses in the Bible describe Flat Earth, not one about a spinning ball or space. All evidence supports Flat Earth, and the Bible correlates perfectly with the evidence. One of the many reasons for the Big Lie is to hide our Creator.
0:30

Stars and planets are not what they told you they are. Go look in the sky yourself. Do you really think our eyes/telescopes could see thousands of light years away? In reality, the stars and wandering stars (AKA planets) are very close within our firmament, just like the Bible tells us. Over 240 verses in the Bible describe Flat Earth, not one about a spinning ball or space. All evidence supports Flat Earth, and the Bible correlates perfectly with the evidence. One of the many reasons for the Big Lie is to hide our Creator.

Ben Wehrman

17,025 views • 1 month ago

Arteta: “To be fair, it's a bit different when you finish second and when you win it with your phone, and that's a sport and it's a big lesson in life as well because the margins are so small and it can go either way. “When you just accomplish it, you realise, yeah, how immense it is, how big it is for so many people. I mean, just to witness the happiness and the enjoyment, all the things that I've seen from all of our supporters, families in different countries, it's just so good.”
0:45

Arteta: “To be fair, it's a bit different when you finish second and when you win it with your phone, and that's a sport and it's a big lesson in life as well because the margins are so small and it can go either way. “When you just accomplish it, you realise, yeah, how immense it is, how big it is for so many people. I mean, just to witness the happiness and the enjoyment, all the things that I've seen from all of our supporters, families in different countries, it's just so good.”

Connor Humm

39,215 views • 2 months ago

I was just joking with you. In fact, all these photos are some of the details captured from a 200MP. photo taken by the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. Now you know how powerful this 200MP system is, right? Look at the original image. It can even recognize QR codes magnified 100 x. You heard correctly. It is not achieved through camera zoom, but through just a single photograph, it records up to 100x more effective information.This is the most powerful 200MP photo ever.
0:43

I was just joking with you. In fact, all these photos are some of the details captured from a 200MP. photo taken by the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. Now you know how powerful this 200MP system is, right? Look at the original image. It can even recognize QR codes magnified 100 x. You heard correctly. It is not achieved through camera zoom, but through just a single photograph, it records up to 100x more effective information.This is the most powerful 200MP photo ever.

Ice Universe

38,660 views • 7 months ago

PIERS MORGAN: ALL THE THINGS ELON DOES ARE A FORCE FOR GOOD “I think Elon actually might be a superhero. Almost every business he starts, everyone condemns it to immediate failure. It's always done on a massive grandiose scale with a massive grandiose plan. And he's delivered. Look at what SpaceX does around the world now. Look at the satellite systems, never mind anything else, they are just on a different level to anything we've seen. Then you look at 𝕏 and what he's done there, it's gone from 67% Democrat, 32% Republican on 𝕏 to now it's pretty well 50-50. He's redressed the balance. He's democratized this very undemocratic but massively popular, powerful social media tool. I look at all the things he's been doing, and I think, actually, what's the common thread here? All of it is a force for good. All of it is ultimately designed to save us from ourselves. I'm not saying he's a perfect human being, he can be difficult and all the rest of it. But by a superhero criterion right now in the world, who is a bigger transformative superhero right now than Elon Musk? Who—give me a name.” Source: Piers Morgan on Candace Owens' Podcast, December 2024, Piers Morgan
1:47

PIERS MORGAN: ALL THE THINGS ELON DOES ARE A FORCE FOR GOOD “I think Elon actually might be a superhero. Almost every business he starts, everyone condemns it to immediate failure. It's always done on a massive grandiose scale with a massive grandiose plan. And he's delivered. Look at what SpaceX does around the world now. Look at the satellite systems, never mind anything else, they are just on a different level to anything we've seen. Then you look at 𝕏 and what he's done there, it's gone from 67% Democrat, 32% Republican on 𝕏 to now it's pretty well 50-50. He's redressed the balance. He's democratized this very undemocratic but massively popular, powerful social media tool. I look at all the things he's been doing, and I think, actually, what's the common thread here? All of it is a force for good. All of it is ultimately designed to save us from ourselves. I'm not saying he's a perfect human being, he can be difficult and all the rest of it. But by a superhero criterion right now in the world, who is a bigger transformative superhero right now than Elon Musk? Who—give me a name.” Source: Piers Morgan on Candace Owens' Podcast, December 2024, Piers Morgan

Mario Nawfal

200,316 views • 1 year ago

Real satellites are what us flat-earthers like to call "Satelloons". They're satellites floating on balloons. Search Google for real images of satellites in space - All the images you see are fake. They're CGI. If there were really satellites in space, we should see them in the photos NASA releases from space, but we never do. Satellites physically could not survive the thermosphere as the metals that satellites are made of have a lower melting point than the thermospere's temperature. Who is the world's biggest consumer of helium? NASA. Are you starting to see how deep this lie of heliocentrism is?
1:28

Real satellites are what us flat-earthers like to call "Satelloons". They're satellites floating on balloons. Search Google for real images of satellites in space - All the images you see are fake. They're CGI. If there were really satellites in space, we should see them in the photos NASA releases from space, but we never do. Satellites physically could not survive the thermosphere as the metals that satellites are made of have a lower melting point than the thermospere's temperature. Who is the world's biggest consumer of helium? NASA. Are you starting to see how deep this lie of heliocentrism is?

₿en Wehrman

23,257 views • 4 months ago

LEGO SPACE SHUTTLE NOW DOUBLES AS WALL ART A Lego builder showed off a custom wall frame for the NASA Discovery Shuttle set, turning it into decor. Instead of gathering dust on a shelf, the shuttle can now hang like modern art with glowing backlighting. The frame opens so you can still play with the model, including the Hubble telescope hidden in its bay. It’s the perfect mix of geek pride and interior design, making Lego look cooler than just “kids’ toys.” Collectors online are loving the idea, especially since it keeps massive sets safe and stylish on the wall. Source: jin_bricks
0:51

LEGO SPACE SHUTTLE NOW DOUBLES AS WALL ART A Lego builder showed off a custom wall frame for the NASA Discovery Shuttle set, turning it into decor. Instead of gathering dust on a shelf, the shuttle can now hang like modern art with glowing backlighting. The frame opens so you can still play with the model, including the Hubble telescope hidden in its bay. It’s the perfect mix of geek pride and interior design, making Lego look cooler than just “kids’ toys.” Collectors online are loving the idea, especially since it keeps massive sets safe and stylish on the wall. Source: jin_bricks

Mario Nawfal

33,593 views • 11 months ago

Does the sun now feel like it’s shining through a magnifying glass? Does it feel extremely hot on your face and skin? It is. How high is the UV radiation? View the actual tests in the video. As I state in this clip, we are told by all major agencies that no more than 5% of all UV radiation should be UVB. Here is an exact quote from the National Library of Medicine: “The UV component of terrestrial radiation from the midday sun comprises about 95% UVA and 5% UVB; UVC and most of UVB are removed from extraterrestrial radiation by stratospheric ozone”. In reality (as confirmed by UV metering) we are actually getting as much as 55% to 60% UVB on the surface. This means that we are seeing UVB levels that are up to 1000% or more above what is being officially disclosed. Follow us for more:
2:14

Does the sun now feel like it’s shining through a magnifying glass? Does it feel extremely hot on your face and skin? It is. How high is the UV radiation? View the actual tests in the video. As I state in this clip, we are told by all major agencies that no more than 5% of all UV radiation should be UVB. Here is an exact quote from the National Library of Medicine: “The UV component of terrestrial radiation from the midday sun comprises about 95% UVA and 5% UVB; UVC and most of UVB are removed from extraterrestrial radiation by stratospheric ozone”. In reality (as confirmed by UV metering) we are actually getting as much as 55% to 60% UVB on the surface. This means that we are seeing UVB levels that are up to 1000% or more above what is being officially disclosed. Follow us for more:

Dane Wigington

14,880,959 views • 11 months ago