Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Why does Urduwood always make comedy only about Hindu religious figures? Why does Urduwood avoid playing with other religions? Film: Dhol (2007) Starring: Tusshar (brother of Ektaa R Kapoor), Rajpal Yadav, Kunal Khemu and others Jab tak....

Ge(r)ms of Bollywood बॉलीवुड के रत्न

478,162 subscribers

30,857 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Adv. Abhishek Raskar2 years ago

Simple. Because, present day Hindus have forgotten their sanatan roots. They think that there is no God in temples. They think that Bhajan and Kirtan is only for the old age. They think that Sanatan Dharma can be interpreted and moulded in any way. I think that our Shastras are written by some old men and are not applicable to the present age. They think that reading the Shastras is not important. Basically the Hindu totally disconnected from the very foundation of his religion and the Hindu is Hindu in name only. There are foolish Hindus who think that there is no rebirth on the basis of ones karmic account!

Nagesh Addapa2 years ago

@3mrvikaspandey @TusshKapoor @EktaaRKapoor Point is that these movie are made by Hindu directors

kakashi2 years ago

@TusshKapoor @EktaaRKapoor Bhand hai 🤡🤡🤡 joker

Neelk2 years ago

@TusshKapoor @EktaaRKapoor What blasphemy!!

Abhishek Singh2 years ago

@TusshKapoor @EktaaRKapoor Such a pity on us, to make these people Stars!

Alpha.rule2 years ago

@TusshKapoor @EktaaRKapoor Bc ye bollywood k mc nhi sudhrenge

Shri Subrat Kumar Prusty for Viksit Bharat2 years ago

@TusshKapoor @EktaaRKapoor Why not ban those movies or remove those scenes from movies? They will continue to pollute as many times it is shown in TV or in movie halls.

Reshmi.C.🗨🇮🇳2 years ago

@UdayMahurkar @TusshKapoor @EktaaRKapoor Better if UPI diverts funds to Anurag Kashyap " the Dada of Wasseypur" the most ungrateful director.

Nishant2 years ago

@TusshKapoor @EktaaRKapoor This movie also has this quote.. "ये कुंडली वुण्डली सब बंडल है यार हिम्मत-ए-बंदा तो मदद-ए-खुदा"

Rajiv2 years ago

@TusshKapoor @EktaaRKapoor STSJ ka risk hai isliye. #BollywoodKiGandagi #BoycottBollywoodCompletely

Related Videos

Kavya Karnatac : Are you against religion and religious people? Dhruv Rathee : I am not against religion. I am against fraud people like Bageshwar Baba. Rathee has only targeted Hindu saints and babas and called them frauds. He hasn’t spoken a single word against any other community. Why does Rathee see frauds only in Hinduism? Why doesn’t he see any in other religions? Rathee always runs propaganda only against Hindus to defame them.

Kavya Karnatac : Are you against religion and religious people? Dhruv Rathee : I am not against religion. I am against fraud people like Bageshwar Baba. Rathee has only targeted Hindu saints and babas and called them frauds. He hasn’t spoken a single word against any other community. Why does Rathee see frauds only in Hinduism? Why doesn’t he see any in other religions? Rathee always runs propaganda only against Hindus to defame them.

Saffron Chargers

43,174 views • 6 months ago

Hindu Child Forced Out of London School for Wearing Tilak While Other Faiths’ Religious Dress Is Allowed. 😤😡 It is utterly shocking that at Vicar’s Green Primary School in London, Muslim and Sikh children are allowed to wear religious headwear, such as hijabs and turbans, as part of the school uniform, with only minor restrictions on colour and safety. Yet, when an 8‑year‑old Hindu child wore a Tilak, a sacred mark on his forehead, the school singled him out, interrogating him about his faith and pressuring his parents, eventually forcing them to withdraw their child. This is not just unfair, it is a clear case of religious discrimination. While visible expressions of faith are respected for some religions, Hindu practices were targeted and punished. Every child’s religion deserves equal respect. The question is simple, why was it only the Hindu child who was made to suffer?

Hindu Child Forced Out of London School for Wearing Tilak While Other Faiths’ Religious Dress Is Allowed. 😤😡 It is utterly shocking that at Vicar’s Green Primary School in London, Muslim and Sikh children are allowed to wear religious headwear, such as hijabs and turbans, as part of the school uniform, with only minor restrictions on colour and safety. Yet, when an 8‑year‑old Hindu child wore a Tilak, a sacred mark on his forehead, the school singled him out, interrogating him about his faith and pressuring his parents, eventually forcing them to withdraw their child. This is not just unfair, it is a clear case of religious discrimination. While visible expressions of faith are respected for some religions, Hindu practices were targeted and punished. Every child’s religion deserves equal respect. The question is simple, why was it only the Hindu child who was made to suffer?

JIX5A

89,304 views • 7 months ago

Why is remembering Hindu pain called “hate”? Why is demanding justice for raped daughters and beheaded fathers labeled “communal”? In this hard-hitting episode of DrishtikoneTV, we revisit the horrifying genocide of Noakhali in 1946, a time when Hindu families were slaughtered, women were raped, and leaders like Rajendralal Roychowdhury were beheaded, their daughters handed over as sex slaves. This is not a story from ancient history. This is the unspoken prelude to Partition and a shadow that still haunts India today. And yet, when these truths are shared in public even in a simple WhatsApp group people respond with: "Don’t spread hate." "Please don’t share political or religious stuff." "This spoiled my peaceful morning." This video asks the difficult but essential questions: Why does the truth about Hindu genocide make people uncomfortable? Why should remembering real atrocities cause communal tension unless we subconsciously believe those around us are no different from the original perpetrators? Why is Hindu silence seen as peace, and Hindu remembrance seen as threat? Why can't we expect members of all communities to stand with the victims, to say: “Never again”? Why is truth-telling being weaponized, and synthetic communal harmony manufactured by silencing Hindu voices? This isn’t about revenge. This is about justice, memory, and civilizational survival. 🟦 What You’ll Learn in This Video: ✅ The full story of Noakhali genocide and Direct Action Day ✅ Why remembering Hindu suffering is taboo in modern India ✅ How secularism has become a tool to muzzle Hindu voices ✅ The disturbing parallels with Kashmir, Bengal, and beyond ✅ Why selective remembrance is more dangerous than hate itself 🟧 This video is a call: To every Hindu: Don’t apologize for remembering. Speak. Loudly. To every Indian: If you care about humanity, then stand against all genocide, even the ones your textbooks forgot. To every global citizen: Understand how truth is erased, and how peace is manufactured by burying history. 📢 Truth ≠ Hate. Silence ≠ Peace. 🕯️ Memory is Resistance. 🛑 “Never Again” means nothing if you say “Never Remember.” Credit : Drishtikone/Desh Kapoor.

Why is remembering Hindu pain called “hate”? Why is demanding justice for raped daughters and beheaded fathers labeled “communal”? In this hard-hitting episode of DrishtikoneTV, we revisit the horrifying genocide of Noakhali in 1946, a time when Hindu families were slaughtered, women were raped, and leaders like Rajendralal Roychowdhury were beheaded, their daughters handed over as sex slaves. This is not a story from ancient history. This is the unspoken prelude to Partition and a shadow that still haunts India today. And yet, when these truths are shared in public even in a simple WhatsApp group people respond with: "Don’t spread hate." "Please don’t share political or religious stuff." "This spoiled my peaceful morning." This video asks the difficult but essential questions: Why does the truth about Hindu genocide make people uncomfortable? Why should remembering real atrocities cause communal tension unless we subconsciously believe those around us are no different from the original perpetrators? Why is Hindu silence seen as peace, and Hindu remembrance seen as threat? Why can't we expect members of all communities to stand with the victims, to say: “Never again”? Why is truth-telling being weaponized, and synthetic communal harmony manufactured by silencing Hindu voices? This isn’t about revenge. This is about justice, memory, and civilizational survival. 🟦 What You’ll Learn in This Video: ✅ The full story of Noakhali genocide and Direct Action Day ✅ Why remembering Hindu suffering is taboo in modern India ✅ How secularism has become a tool to muzzle Hindu voices ✅ The disturbing parallels with Kashmir, Bengal, and beyond ✅ Why selective remembrance is more dangerous than hate itself 🟧 This video is a call: To every Hindu: Don’t apologize for remembering. Speak. Loudly. To every Indian: If you care about humanity, then stand against all genocide, even the ones your textbooks forgot. To every global citizen: Understand how truth is erased, and how peace is manufactured by burying history. 📢 Truth ≠ Hate. Silence ≠ Peace. 🕯️ Memory is Resistance. 🛑 “Never Again” means nothing if you say “Never Remember.” Credit : Drishtikone/Desh Kapoor.

Augadh

17,998 views • 9 months ago

While working as colleagues at *Basara IIIT*, a Hindu man and a Muslim woman, who are from neighboring villages, were returning home together on a bike from the college in Basara. Near *Janakampet* in Nizamabad district (Induru district), some Muslims stopped them and questioned/threatened, "You are a Hindu, why are you taking a Muslim woman with you?" and then attacked him. Does it make sense to feel sad about what is happening in Afghanistan, when you don't even know what your own future holds in your country? O Hindu, if you don't let go of the foolish illusion that "all religions are the same," and if you don't protect your Dharma now, in the future, you and your family won't even find a small place to live with dignity and safety...😵

While working as colleagues at Basara IIIT, a Hindu man and a Muslim woman, who are from neighboring villages, were returning home together on a bike from the college in Basara. Near Janakampet in Nizamabad district (Induru district), some Muslims stopped them and questioned/threatened, "You are a Hindu, why are you taking a Muslim woman with you?" and then attacked him. Does it make sense to feel sad about what is happening in Afghanistan, when you don't even know what your own future holds in your country? O Hindu, if you don't let go of the foolish illusion that "all religions are the same," and if you don't protect your Dharma now, in the future, you and your family won't even find a small place to live with dignity and safety...😵

Tathvam-asi

72,277 views • 1 year ago

Donna Brazile on Redistricting: “Texas 25 Republicans, 13 [Democrats] in a state that is majority minority.” Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX): “Why does skin color automatically impose political beliefs?” Donna Brazile: “Because race has always been identified as a political consideration, not only as it relates to the constitution of the United States but also how it is implemented at the state level. That’s why these districts were always drawn so that they took race into consideration.” Dan Crenshaw: “But why?” Bill Maher: “Because of the history of the United States.” Dan Crenshaw: “Well, there’s a history, but as we grow out of that history, which I hope we would have by now. An enlightened society would not say that your skin color is an immutable characteristic as an indicator of your political persuasion.” It’s the same story every time with the left. They always make it about race.

Donna Brazile on Redistricting: “Texas 25 Republicans, 13 [Democrats] in a state that is majority minority.” Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX): “Why does skin color automatically impose political beliefs?” Donna Brazile: “Because race has always been identified as a political consideration, not only as it relates to the constitution of the United States but also how it is implemented at the state level. That’s why these districts were always drawn so that they took race into consideration.” Dan Crenshaw: “But why?” Bill Maher: “Because of the history of the United States.” Dan Crenshaw: “Well, there’s a history, but as we grow out of that history, which I hope we would have by now. An enlightened society would not say that your skin color is an immutable characteristic as an indicator of your political persuasion.” It’s the same story every time with the left. They always make it about race.

RedWave Press

1,011,237 views • 3 months ago

The anti-Hindu mindset of Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, his habit of mocking and belittling Hindu traditions, keeps coming out whenever he gets a platform. Shri Mallikarjuna Kharge, what is the connection between Hindu religious practices and poverty? If you have the courage to ridicule Hindu beliefs, why do you lack the courage to speak in the same tone about other religions? Wearing the cap of another faith and kneeling to pray in their style is not a problem for you. But when Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji follows his own faith, it suddenly becomes objectionable? The Somnath Temple was destroyed by your “brothers’” attacks, yet even after a thousand years, it has risen again as a symbol of Hindu resilience and Indian civilisation. Does celebrating that revival look like superstition to you? You may insult tradition of Budubudike as superstition, but Lord Shiva, who holds the damaru, is our revered God, and the Budubudike who follow him are our own people too. Why are you spreading blatant lies by claiming that people in Iran are on the streets for food and vandalising government offices? In reality, people in Iran—especially women—are protesting against religious oppression. They are fighting for democracy, rejecting Islamic rule, and demanding the restoration of their Persian heritage. People are not fools to blindly believe whatever you say from a stage. Did you not mock the grand Kumbh Mela, one of the greatest expressions of Hindu faith? Perhaps you should ask the Karnataka Congress government whether insulting Hindu beliefs also comes under the so-called hate speech law.

The anti-Hindu mindset of Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, his habit of mocking and belittling Hindu traditions, keeps coming out whenever he gets a platform. Shri Mallikarjuna Kharge, what is the connection between Hindu religious practices and poverty? If you have the courage to ridicule Hindu beliefs, why do you lack the courage to speak in the same tone about other religions? Wearing the cap of another faith and kneeling to pray in their style is not a problem for you. But when Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji follows his own faith, it suddenly becomes objectionable? The Somnath Temple was destroyed by your “brothers’” attacks, yet even after a thousand years, it has risen again as a symbol of Hindu resilience and Indian civilisation. Does celebrating that revival look like superstition to you? You may insult tradition of Budubudike as superstition, but Lord Shiva, who holds the damaru, is our revered God, and the Budubudike who follow him are our own people too. Why are you spreading blatant lies by claiming that people in Iran are on the streets for food and vandalising government offices? In reality, people in Iran—especially women—are protesting against religious oppression. They are fighting for democracy, rejecting Islamic rule, and demanding the restoration of their Persian heritage. People are not fools to blindly believe whatever you say from a stage. Did you not mock the grand Kumbh Mela, one of the greatest expressions of Hindu faith? Perhaps you should ask the Karnataka Congress government whether insulting Hindu beliefs also comes under the so-called hate speech law.

Dr. Ravi C. T 🇮🇳 ಡಾ. ರವಿ ಸಿ. ಟಿ

17,016 views • 7 months ago

50 Cent brings up Ye and Nicki Minaj as examples of why he chooses to steer clear of politics and religion. On Tuesday (Jan. 20), 50 was on hand at the Los Angeles premiere of his new film, Moses The Black, at the SilverScreen Theater in West Hollywood, Calif. The rapper-film exec spoke about putting together a film with non-secular themes. "It's important for me not to make [the film] about religion and make it about entertainment," 50 said before the screening. "Immediately, subtext is strong. It's there. I wanted to promote the project as something that everybody needs to see." He further expounded on why he stays away from politics and religion and cited Ye and Nicki Minaj becoming pariahs after letting their political and religious stances be known. "There's two things they tell you to stay away from," 50 said. "They tell you to stay away from religion and stay away from politics, because no matter what you think, someone passionately disagrees with you. I stay away from those things. That's how Kanye f**ked up. Then Nicki said some sh*t. It feels crazy, but it is very accurate." Set for a nationwide release on Jan. 30, Moses The Black is a crime drama film executive-produced by 50 Cent and starring Wiz Khalifa, Quavo, Omar Epps, Chukwudi Iwuji and others. The movie is inspired by the repentance story of the fifth-century saint of the same name.

50 Cent brings up Ye and Nicki Minaj as examples of why he chooses to steer clear of politics and religion. On Tuesday (Jan. 20), 50 was on hand at the Los Angeles premiere of his new film, Moses The Black, at the SilverScreen Theater in West Hollywood, Calif. The rapper-film exec spoke about putting together a film with non-secular themes. "It's important for me not to make [the film] about religion and make it about entertainment," 50 said before the screening. "Immediately, subtext is strong. It's there. I wanted to promote the project as something that everybody needs to see." He further expounded on why he stays away from politics and religion and cited Ye and Nicki Minaj becoming pariahs after letting their political and religious stances be known. "There's two things they tell you to stay away from," 50 said. "They tell you to stay away from religion and stay away from politics, because no matter what you think, someone passionately disagrees with you. I stay away from those things. That's how Kanye f**ked up. Then Nicki said some sh*t. It feels crazy, but it is very accurate." Set for a nationwide release on Jan. 30, Moses The Black is a crime drama film executive-produced by 50 Cent and starring Wiz Khalifa, Quavo, Omar Epps, Chukwudi Iwuji and others. The movie is inspired by the repentance story of the fifth-century saint of the same name.

XXL Magazine

48,842 views • 7 months ago

Razakar is releasing this 26th. In an industry ruled by communists, someone making a film on Hindu genocide is literally putting his career, mental peace, and even life at risk, as evident by the multiple litigations it faced to stop its release. That's why it's important for us to support this kind of film. So that the maker feels empowered and others too get the motivation to make such films. Releasing with good reviews, the Razakar movie is about the ancestors of Owaisi committing Hindu genocide in Hyderabad at a time when the police were not removed for 15 minutes, but the police belonged to Razakars only. A gruesome history that was brushed under the carpet in plain sight. Not anymore. Films like Razakar open the scope of debate and ignite curiosity and the thought process to seek what our ancestors suffered.

Razakar is releasing this 26th. In an industry ruled by communists, someone making a film on Hindu genocide is literally putting his career, mental peace, and even life at risk, as evident by the multiple litigations it faced to stop its release. That's why it's important for us to support this kind of film. So that the maker feels empowered and others too get the motivation to make such films. Releasing with good reviews, the Razakar movie is about the ancestors of Owaisi committing Hindu genocide in Hyderabad at a time when the police were not removed for 15 minutes, but the police belonged to Razakars only. A gruesome history that was brushed under the carpet in plain sight. Not anymore. Films like Razakar open the scope of debate and ignite curiosity and the thought process to seek what our ancestors suffered.

THE SKIN DOCTOR

275,562 views • 2 years ago

🚨 THEY ASKED HIM WHY NASA WOULD LIE ABOUT FLAT EARTH — HIS ANSWER STARTED A WAR This man is going viral after his audience asked him the question flat Earth believers constantly get: Why would NASA... and presumably thousands of scientists... lie about the shape of the Earth? His answer sent the comments into complete chaos. He claims the real reason isn't about the shape of Earth itself. It's about what's supposedly ABOVE us. According to his theory, Earth is flat with some kind of dome overhead... possibly made of ice or glass... and heaven is literally sitting on the other side. But then he went even further. He pointed toward the Milky Way and claimed what we're actually seeing isn't a galaxy at all. He believes it's a “tear in the sky” with light from heaven shining through it. And THAT'S where the internet completely split. Some people say his explanation connects ancient religious descriptions of the firmament with what we see in the night sky. Others are asking how a theory like this could possibly account for satellites, spaceflight, astronomy and centuries of independent observations showing Earth is roughly spherical and that the Milky Way is our galaxy. Why does questioning NASA make you ‘crazy’... but blindly trusting NASA supposedly makes you smart?

🚨 THEY ASKED HIM WHY NASA WOULD LIE ABOUT FLAT EARTH — HIS ANSWER STARTED A WAR This man is going viral after his audience asked him the question flat Earth believers constantly get: Why would NASA... and presumably thousands of scientists... lie about the shape of the Earth? His answer sent the comments into complete chaos. He claims the real reason isn't about the shape of Earth itself. It's about what's supposedly ABOVE us. According to his theory, Earth is flat with some kind of dome overhead... possibly made of ice or glass... and heaven is literally sitting on the other side. But then he went even further. He pointed toward the Milky Way and claimed what we're actually seeing isn't a galaxy at all. He believes it's a “tear in the sky” with light from heaven shining through it. And THAT'S where the internet completely split. Some people say his explanation connects ancient religious descriptions of the firmament with what we see in the night sky. Others are asking how a theory like this could possibly account for satellites, spaceflight, astronomy and centuries of independent observations showing Earth is roughly spherical and that the Milky Way is our galaxy. Why does questioning NASA make you ‘crazy’... but blindly trusting NASA supposedly makes you smart?

HustleBitch

31,025 views • 5 days ago

Rahul Gandhi’s “Smash Patriarchy” campaign raises a simple question: does his crusade apply to every religion, or only to Hinduism? The Allahabad High Court recently held that there was no material to establish hijab as an essential religious practice of Islam and upheld the school’s uniform requirement. Will Rahul Gandhi acknowledge this? If he selectively quotes Hindu scriptures to lecture Hindus about patriarchy, why the silence on difficult passages in other religious texts? Quran 4:34 describes men as “in charge of women” and contains the instruction to “strike them” in the circumstances specified. 1 Timothy 2:11–12 says women should learn “in quietness and full submission” and does not permit a woman “to teach or to assume authority over a man.” Ephesians 5:22–24 instructs wives to submit to their husbands. These passages deserve context and honest debate. So do difficult passages in Hindu texts. But Rahul Gandhi’s selective outrage is the problem. Why is Hinduism subjected to one standard while other faiths receive another? Hinduism is not defined by its most controversial verses. Its remarkable strength lies in its capacity to question, debate and reform itself from within—as it has done for millennia. If Rahul Gandhi really wants to “Smash Patriarchy,” he should apply the principle universally. No selective outrage. No vote-bank exemptions. Read everything. Understand everything. Then lecture.

Rahul Gandhi’s “Smash Patriarchy” campaign raises a simple question: does his crusade apply to every religion, or only to Hinduism? The Allahabad High Court recently held that there was no material to establish hijab as an essential religious practice of Islam and upheld the school’s uniform requirement. Will Rahul Gandhi acknowledge this? If he selectively quotes Hindu scriptures to lecture Hindus about patriarchy, why the silence on difficult passages in other religious texts? Quran 4:34 describes men as “in charge of women” and contains the instruction to “strike them” in the circumstances specified. 1 Timothy 2:11–12 says women should learn “in quietness and full submission” and does not permit a woman “to teach or to assume authority over a man.” Ephesians 5:22–24 instructs wives to submit to their husbands. These passages deserve context and honest debate. So do difficult passages in Hindu texts. But Rahul Gandhi’s selective outrage is the problem. Why is Hinduism subjected to one standard while other faiths receive another? Hinduism is not defined by its most controversial verses. Its remarkable strength lies in its capacity to question, debate and reform itself from within—as it has done for millennia. If Rahul Gandhi really wants to “Smash Patriarchy,” he should apply the principle universally. No selective outrage. No vote-bank exemptions. Read everything. Understand everything. Then lecture.

Amit Malviya

19,770 views • 10 days ago

PHUWIN WITH CHIKKI #ChikkixPhuwin #ปอนด์ภูวินทร์ R: He gave a whole building for u Phu: Kub R: Tang V. Hv u read it? Phu: I read it. I was a little shock when I saw it bc I never thought it will come this big R: Sm1 teasing said he not free at all. He very busy. But pop up in front of ur house Phu: Ahhh. He busy? Really? R: Aww! He told everyone like that Phu: Oh he told everyone that he is busy R: But what did he tell u? Phu: He told me, he is free R: Why Pond answer not the same Phu: I don't know about this. Its a question for u to ask Pond next time R: Does he always hv this standard? Phu: Always hv this standard? I'm not sure with others. But with me.... I don't know either. Bc I don't hv anything to compare R: I thought he hv Phuwin's standard only Phu: But I was surprised that friend came to surprised me at home

PHUWIN WITH CHIKKI #ChikkixPhuwin #ปอนด์ภูวินทร์ R: He gave a whole building for u Phu: Kub R: Tang V. Hv u read it? Phu: I read it. I was a little shock when I saw it bc I never thought it will come this big R: Sm1 teasing said he not free at all. He very busy. But pop up in front of ur house Phu: Ahhh. He busy? Really? R: Aww! He told everyone like that Phu: Oh he told everyone that he is busy R: But what did he tell u? Phu: He told me, he is free R: Why Pond answer not the same Phu: I don't know about this. Its a question for u to ask Pond next time R: Does he always hv this standard? Phu: Always hv this standard? I'm not sure with others. But with me.... I don't know either. Bc I don't hv anything to compare R: I thought he hv Phuwin's standard only Phu: But I was surprised that friend came to surprised me at home

Az91saifar :)

25,395 views • 2 months ago

🚨 WHICH VERSION OF MIKE BENZ DO YOU TRUST MORE? 🚨 Because yes — there are two of them. 🎙️What you’re HEARING in the video is Mike Benz aka FrameGame, an anonymous Twitter account active from ~2016–2018. – A Jewish "anti-Semite" who spent years infiltrating the alt-right. – He denied the Holocaust, attacked Zionism, and ranted about AIPAC and Jewish power, all while acting like a honeypot, most likely gathering names, influencing movements, and building profiles. 📺What you are SEEING in the video are tweets from him from when he suddenly reappeared as Mike Benz, the clean-cut “censorship expert” featured three times on Tucker Carlson, then on Joe Rogan, praised by Elon Musk and Glenn Greenwald. – He’s now extremely Jewish, fiercely against antisemitism, calls for censorship of anyone who crosses that line. – And contrary to him as FrameGame, never utters a word about AIPAC, Mossad, or Epstein. So ask yourself: – How does someone go from Holocaust denial to being the poster boy for Jewish victimhood narratives within a few years? – Why was there no trace of Mike Benz online before 2023, until people began connecting him to FrameGame? – Why does the “new Benz” recycle research from others and present it as original work, while never addressing the massive elephant in the room: his own intelligence-connected past and most likely present? – Why did he get denied security clearance twice at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development? – Why does he never talk about AIPAC or Epstein/Mossad blackmail ops anymore — even though “old Benz” did so obsessively? THINK THAT'S A COINCIDENCE? This man was either: 1.) A state and/or Israeli asset all along, now repackaged as “independent media hero,” or 2.) A deeply compromised opportunist with zero integrity, sent to shape the opposition by controlling its boundaries. Either way, he’s not what he seems. 🧠 Think for yourself: – Why is he promoted so heavily by 'alternative' platforms? – Why does he avoid naming actual power centers? – Why do the most obvious red flags get completely ignored? Don’t be fooled by re-brands. Watch. Compare. And ask yourself: how does this man keep getting a platform? Because nothing about this adds up — and yet most people are too blind or too cowardly to say it. Make it make sense.

🚨 WHICH VERSION OF MIKE BENZ DO YOU TRUST MORE? 🚨 Because yes — there are two of them. 🎙️What you’re HEARING in the video is Mike Benz aka FrameGame, an anonymous Twitter account active from ~2016–2018. – A Jewish "anti-Semite" who spent years infiltrating the alt-right. – He denied the Holocaust, attacked Zionism, and ranted about AIPAC and Jewish power, all while acting like a honeypot, most likely gathering names, influencing movements, and building profiles. 📺What you are SEEING in the video are tweets from him from when he suddenly reappeared as Mike Benz, the clean-cut “censorship expert” featured three times on Tucker Carlson, then on Joe Rogan, praised by Elon Musk and Glenn Greenwald. – He’s now extremely Jewish, fiercely against antisemitism, calls for censorship of anyone who crosses that line. – And contrary to him as FrameGame, never utters a word about AIPAC, Mossad, or Epstein. So ask yourself: – How does someone go from Holocaust denial to being the poster boy for Jewish victimhood narratives within a few years? – Why was there no trace of Mike Benz online before 2023, until people began connecting him to FrameGame? – Why does the “new Benz” recycle research from others and present it as original work, while never addressing the massive elephant in the room: his own intelligence-connected past and most likely present? – Why did he get denied security clearance twice at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development? – Why does he never talk about AIPAC or Epstein/Mossad blackmail ops anymore — even though “old Benz” did so obsessively? THINK THAT'S A COINCIDENCE? This man was either: 1.) A state and/or Israeli asset all along, now repackaged as “independent media hero,” or 2.) A deeply compromised opportunist with zero integrity, sent to shape the opposition by controlling its boundaries. Either way, he’s not what he seems. 🧠 Think for yourself: – Why is he promoted so heavily by 'alternative' platforms? – Why does he avoid naming actual power centers? – Why do the most obvious red flags get completely ignored? Don’t be fooled by re-brands. Watch. Compare. And ask yourself: how does this man keep getting a platform? Because nothing about this adds up — and yet most people are too blind or too cowardly to say it. Make it make sense.

Dr. Simon

263,005 views • 1 year ago

Another minor Hindu girl became a victim of Abdul and now she is going to commit suicide. 😢😓 Her name is Rani Nishad. She considered herself secular and fell blindly in love with a mullah. In the end, her Abdul turned out to be the same as that of others. After playing with her body completely, he is now blackmailing her, demanding money from her and forcing her to do wrong things with other Muslim boys. If she does not do so, he is also threatening to make her private video viral. 😡 We are explaining so much against love jihad but these blind girls still do not understand.😓 All sisters are requested to be cautious of Love Jihad and if anyone you know is with Jihadis then tell him about Love Jihad, it is a virus. 🙏🚩

Another minor Hindu girl became a victim of Abdul and now she is going to commit suicide. 😢😓 Her name is Rani Nishad. She considered herself secular and fell blindly in love with a mullah. In the end, her Abdul turned out to be the same as that of others. After playing with her body completely, he is now blackmailing her, demanding money from her and forcing her to do wrong things with other Muslim boys. If she does not do so, he is also threatening to make her private video viral. 😡 We are explaining so much against love jihad but these blind girls still do not understand.😓 All sisters are requested to be cautious of Love Jihad and if anyone you know is with Jihadis then tell him about Love Jihad, it is a virus. 🙏🚩

Bharatrastrasena

141,312 views • 11 months ago

On this day, 38 years ago, Krzysztof Kieślowski's "A Short Film About Ki!!ing" (1988) premiered in Warsaw, Poland. Krzysztof Kieślowski on his reasons for making the movie: "I think I wanted to make this film precisely because all this takes place in my name, because I'm a member of this society, I'm a citizen of this country, Poland, and if someone, in this country, puts a noose around someone else's neck and kicks the stool from under his feet, he's doing it in my name. And I don't wish it. I don't want them to do it. I think this film isn't really about capital punishment but about ki!!ing in general. It's wrong no matter why you kill, no matter whom you ki!! and no matter who does the ki!!ing. I think that's the second reason why I wanted to make this film. The third reason is that I wanted to describe the Polish world, a world which is quite terrible and dull, a world where people don't have any pity for each other, a world where they hate each other, a world where they not only don't help but get in each other's way. A world where they repel each other. A world of people living alone." ("Kieślowski on Kieślowski", edited by Danusia Stok, 1993)

On this day, 38 years ago, Krzysztof Kieślowski's "A Short Film About Ki!!ing" (1988) premiered in Warsaw, Poland. Krzysztof Kieślowski on his reasons for making the movie: "I think I wanted to make this film precisely because all this takes place in my name, because I'm a member of this society, I'm a citizen of this country, Poland, and if someone, in this country, puts a noose around someone else's neck and kicks the stool from under his feet, he's doing it in my name. And I don't wish it. I don't want them to do it. I think this film isn't really about capital punishment but about ki!!ing in general. It's wrong no matter why you kill, no matter whom you ki!! and no matter who does the ki!!ing. I think that's the second reason why I wanted to make this film. The third reason is that I wanted to describe the Polish world, a world which is quite terrible and dull, a world where people don't have any pity for each other, a world where they hate each other, a world where they not only don't help but get in each other's way. A world where they repel each other. A world of people living alone." ("Kieślowski on Kieślowski", edited by Danusia Stok, 1993)

DepressedBergman

41,401 views • 5 months ago

🚨WARNING: We Are Waiting Until it’s Too Late! 🚨 While the rest of us scroll, argue, and pretend everything is fine… They’re finishing the underground bunkers. They’re building the data centers that will watch every move. And something far darker is happening behind the scenes with children. The video you’re about to watch doesn’t ask for your opinion. It asks why you’re still participating. If the elite already have their exits planned… what does that say about the future they’re preparing for the rest of us? Why does the idea of simply “stopping participation” feel more radical than anything politicians ever propose? At what point does waiting for permission become the most dangerous form of obedience? If this is already happening in plain sight… how much longer do we keep pretending we didn’t see it? The game only continues because we keep playing. Tag someone who still thinks “it’ll never happen.” And be honest in the comments: are we already too late… or is this the last window? Let me know what You think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And if You're not already following Noah B. Price... What the absolute heck are You doing?!

🚨WARNING: We Are Waiting Until it’s Too Late! 🚨 While the rest of us scroll, argue, and pretend everything is fine… They’re finishing the underground bunkers. They’re building the data centers that will watch every move. And something far darker is happening behind the scenes with children. The video you’re about to watch doesn’t ask for your opinion. It asks why you’re still participating. If the elite already have their exits planned… what does that say about the future they’re preparing for the rest of us? Why does the idea of simply “stopping participation” feel more radical than anything politicians ever propose? At what point does waiting for permission become the most dangerous form of obedience? If this is already happening in plain sight… how much longer do we keep pretending we didn’t see it? The game only continues because we keep playing. Tag someone who still thinks “it’ll never happen.” And be honest in the comments: are we already too late… or is this the last window? Let me know what You think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And if You're not already following Noah B. Price... What the absolute heck are You doing?!

Noah B. Price

17,680 views • 1 month ago

Scared Aamir Khan needs to learn a thing or two about courage from the wonderful Naseeruddin Shah sahab. Why does Aamir Khan feel the need to clarify his wife's religion or whom his sisters married? Why respond to people who thrive on outrage and fleeting attention? In my view, such clarifications only give unnecessary importance to voices that don't deserve it. This is the same Aamir Khan who built his reputation on conviction, stood by his choices, and fought for his self-respect throughout his career. So why does he now appear to be explaining himself to insignificant critics? Aamir did one film at a time when other heroes were doing 25 films. He set the ground for others. On the other hand, there is Naseeruddin Shah sahab—an actor whose body of work speaks for itself. Whether it's his portrayal of JRD Tata in Made In India a Titan story. He defines what patriotism is all about. Main Vaapis Aaonga is an Oscar winning performance. He has delivered countless unforgettable performances over the decades, he has consistently expressed his beliefs without fear. That fearlessness, as much as his acting, will be remembered by history. With 1947 (earlier titled Lahore 1947), produced by Aamir Khan and based on a play by Avtar Bajaj sahab, I'm personally not convinced by the communication strategy around the film. It feels as though Aamir has been sanitizing his public messaging far more than before, and I genuinely wonder why. What do you think? Do you agree, disagree, or see it differently? Share your thoughts.

Scared Aamir Khan needs to learn a thing or two about courage from the wonderful Naseeruddin Shah sahab. Why does Aamir Khan feel the need to clarify his wife's religion or whom his sisters married? Why respond to people who thrive on outrage and fleeting attention? In my view, such clarifications only give unnecessary importance to voices that don't deserve it. This is the same Aamir Khan who built his reputation on conviction, stood by his choices, and fought for his self-respect throughout his career. So why does he now appear to be explaining himself to insignificant critics? Aamir did one film at a time when other heroes were doing 25 films. He set the ground for others. On the other hand, there is Naseeruddin Shah sahab—an actor whose body of work speaks for itself. Whether it's his portrayal of JRD Tata in Made In India a Titan story. He defines what patriotism is all about. Main Vaapis Aaonga is an Oscar winning performance. He has delivered countless unforgettable performances over the decades, he has consistently expressed his beliefs without fear. That fearlessness, as much as his acting, will be remembered by history. With 1947 (earlier titled Lahore 1947), produced by Aamir Khan and based on a play by Avtar Bajaj sahab, I'm personally not convinced by the communication strategy around the film. It feels as though Aamir has been sanitizing his public messaging far more than before, and I genuinely wonder why. What do you think? Do you agree, disagree, or see it differently? Share your thoughts.

Faridoon Shahryar

24,648 views • 1 month ago