正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Why Does π = 3.14 Create Order While π = 3.1 Creates Chaos? 🌀✨ This Is Why Precision Matters in Mathematics.

349,657 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

49 条评论

Michael Gimera 的头像
Michael Gimera4 个月前

“Sir. I send a rhyme excelling in sacred truth and rigid spelling Numerical sprites elucidate For me the lexicons dull weight” Memorize that poem, and you will always have Pi to 20 digits with you! Sir.=3. I = 1 Send = 4 A = 1 Rhyme = 5 …and so on.

Real World Physics 的头像
Real World Physics4 个月前

That's a brilliant pi mnemonic. Thanks for sharing! 👏🌀

Capitaine Haddock 的头像
Capitaine Haddock4 个月前

3.1 is pretty symetrical and orderial if you ask me

Real World Physics 的头像
Real World Physics4 个月前

Agreed, 3.1 is innocent too – just less accurate.

i 的头像
i4 个月前

I understand what is this is attempting to demonstrate, however… Precision is mathematics in its current form is a fallacy. There is no zero, the universe expressly demonstrates that nothing does not exist, yet zero is the most common approximation. The universe around us demonstrates that there is infinitesimally smaller or larger than the center point. To circle back, the demonstration is provided by a binary system, fed by 0’s and 1’s because we fundamentally to not approximate the analog representation we exist within.

Real World Physics 的头像
Real World Physics4 个月前

Interesting viewpoint. Whether discovered or invented, mathematics remains remarkably effective at describing the universe. Thank you

i 的头像
i4 个月前

It certainly describes the universe within the limitations of our collective perceptions of how it should operate, rather than how it does operate. You are welcome.

Real World Physics 的头像
Real World Physics4 个月前

Perhaps. But when a model consistently predicts observations, it tells us we're capturing at least part of how reality truly operates

i 的头像
i4 个月前

If this is accurate, why do the models continually get rewritten to support the latest findings while the authors of said articles frame themselves as the victims of the observed phenomena operating outside of the constraints laid out by the model, rather than an acknowledgment of the model’s limitation to predict unanticipated phenomena?

Frankenbyte 的头像
Frankenbyte4 个月前

It's not a question of choas or stability. This is a question of fidelity.

Real World Physics 的头像
Real World Physics4 个月前

Exactly. It’s less about chaos and more about fidelity. Small numerical errors accumulate into visibly different outcomes. Thanks for the valuable comment

菅野正人 的头像
菅野正人4 个月前

これはジョークですか? π≠3.14 幾何学は近似値では語れませんよ。 弧度法で2πは単位円一周分の長さ 2π/nでn個の複素数体 円弧の長さが 2π/n 円弧の両端の2点を直線で繋げば真値の正n角形を描く リーマン予想 証明完了!

Ron 的头像
Ron4 个月前

A buddy of mine just turned me on to this post. As I told him, I’ve had 3.1415926 memorized for decades. Why? Who knows…..

Real World Physics 的头像
Real World Physics4 个月前

And now this post finally gave those digits a purpose 😄

Royal Cubit 的头像
Royal Cubit4 个月前

Because pi is residue from squares not circles

Real World Physics 的头像
Real World Physics4 个月前

That's an intriguing way to think about it

Alex Donkers 的头像
Alex Donkers4 个月前

pi is never 3.1

Real World Physics 的头像
Real World Physics4 个月前

💯👌🏻

ரஞ் ஸ்ரீவ 的头像
ரஞ் ஸ்ரீவ4 个月前

But isn't pi=3.1416********************

Real World Physics 的头像
Real World Physics4 个月前

Even more beautiful 😍

𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝐵𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑡ℎ 的头像
𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝐵𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑡ℎ4 个月前

Chaos? Where?

Nino 的头像
Nino4 个月前

It’s the reverse

wuming 的头像
wuming4 个月前

数字没往后一位就会增加friction.

hello 的头像
hello4 个月前

Pi is the definition of not precise…

c. k. 的头像
c. k.4 个月前

@BoltzSpaghetti Both create. Where is there chaos. Always in the eyes of the beholder never in an observation. I suggest bec you have positioned yourself as a source of knowledge so I am offering another variable to see the beauty in all forms. Amen.

xchroot 的头像
xchroot4 个月前

Pi=3.14 is the similar chaos, but you need to wait 10 times longer to see it

J Bryan Price 的头像
J Bryan Price4 个月前

3.1 looks more ordered in this example

Boomr 的头像
Boomr4 个月前

I get the point, but I think I prefer 3.1

Unwoke Media Inc. 的头像
Unwoke Media Inc.4 个月前

speed of light is the number it is the same way. any other number and universe would fall apart

Real World Physics 的头像
Real World Physics4 个月前

Interesting perspective The role of fundamental constants is certainly fascinating.

God Flow by Walking Fetus 的头像
God Flow by Walking Fetus4 个月前

at 21 seconds at 3.1, the distribution is completed with a reinforced shell and hollowed interior that is susceptible to stresses, pushing, and pulling. when adding the additional 4 hundredths of tolerance, the structure then allows each lower bound to build solidarity until the whole of the structure is complete.

ENTP 的头像
ENTP4 个月前

It’s amazing what passes for chaos nowadays

Hrosik 的头像
Hrosik4 个月前

Bloody Stupid Johnson sends his regards 😁

𝖖...𝖕 的头像
𝖖...𝖕4 个月前

Looking at the video: 1) 3.14 creates infinite change, some might say - chaos. 2) 3.1 creates everlasting harmony - but maybe it will get boring and will not advance to anything even better. Still, I would prefer 3.1 in my life for couple of years.

DapperDiscourse | Local AI + Life 的头像
DapperDiscourse | Local AI + Life4 个月前

3.14 looks holographic.

Trueam 的头像
Trueam4 个月前

because it is access code to your universe properties - and access to seed number to procedurally generate it lol🥳

lokh 的头像
lokh4 个月前

Because our screens are not good enough to show 3.14 also create chaos compared to 3.1416

Alex Oliver 的头像
Alex Oliver4 个月前

😁

Condensed Matter 的头像
Condensed Matter4 个月前

No. It did not create chaos. More decimals create more detail and complexity.

Xan Cynthia 的头像
Xan Cynthia4 个月前

And still there is more to see, if you put π with more decimals after the 3.14...

snout 的头像
snout4 个月前

It's funny how precision matters but pi itself is an estimation.

^2Pu55y Popin 的头像
^2Pu55y Popin4 个月前

Top 10 dumbest posts

zain_112358 的头像
zain_1123584 个月前

Just more decimal more detail

Roger Garrett 的头像
Roger Garrett4 个月前

Chaos? Where's the chaos? I see no chaos in those animations. What the heck is your definition of chaos? How is the lower one less ordered than the first?

jurAjPE Uhlobaron 的头像
jurAjPE Uhlobaron4 个月前

Epic

🇩🇪 Klimaerwärmung 的头像
🇩🇪 Klimaerwärmung4 个月前

Weil 3,1 Stillstand in der Geometrie bedeutet.

liberto 的头像
liberto4 个月前

How about p = 3.1415?

Real World Physics 的头像
Real World Physics4 个月前

3.1415 would make the pattern even more stable

liberto 的头像
liberto4 个月前

🤣🤣🤣

相关视频