Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

"Why else do you halt something, unless it was expected to trade?" Both $MMTLP Corporate Actions informed the reader that positions needed to be settled by 12/12/22. Investors didn't need to understand this! It was the fiduciary responsibility of the Corporate Action Department of each brokerage, to read and...

RareDealsHere's profile picture

Rare DD

3,229 subscribers

18,080 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 4

Фото профиля Rare DD
Rare DD1 год назад

EVIDENCE!!! $MMTLP And even if there was a brokerage that somehow misunderstood that "positions needing to be settled by 12/12/22" meant that the last day to "OPEN" a position in order to be settled in time for 12/12/22... FINRA has the ability under their Rule 11893 to classify the transactions as Erroneous and therefore reverse them. If FINRA believed there shouldn't have even been Position Close transactions after 12/8/22, then they should've made this clear on 12/6/22 or sooner! This appears to have been a deliberate act of misleading investors and the brokerages! @TheJusticeDept @FBI

Фото профиля Jalen J. Jalen
Jalen J. Jalen1 год назад

Inconvenient facts for @FBIDDBongino to continue to ignore. Wonder when he's going to say there's no bluesheets on $MMTLP?

Фото профиля mason
mason1 год назад

#FINRAFRAUD

Фото профиля DP
DP1 год назад

@johnbrda That U3 halt mean they were fucked and couldn’t unfuck themselves

Похожие видео

🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 The Metamaterials spin-off S-1 was made effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The S-1 was the governing document for the "corporate action". It layed out the precise steps/timeline for the 1-for-1 exchange after the close of business on 12/14/22 that was to result in the automatic cancellation of $MMTLP. This was a legally binding process that both the issuer and the market had to follow. Any deviation from this plan would be a serious breach of the approved "corporate action" outlined in the S-1. By FINRA's decision to delete the trading symbol early, effective 12/13 (zero hour), they acted outside of the issuer's SEC-effective plan. This action disrupted the planned process and caused significant market confusion and harm to investors. It forced brokerages to perform a reorganization or mandatory exchange on an altered timeline, which led to errors, the inability to settle trades, and financial losses for investors. (There was a mandatory exchange BEFORE the alleged 1-for-1 exchange took place, FINRA NEVER addressed this in their FAQs) Symbol deletion is a consequential step, not a discretionary one, in many corporate actions. For a 1-for-1 exchange where the original shares are cancelled, the symbol for those shares would naturally be deleted after the shares are no longer tradable. This was a technical step that followed the main corporate action. (☝🏾 FINRA and the SEC know that this is the correct procedure) The S-1 described the legal and financial aspects of the transaction (the exchange ratio, the cancellation of shares etc), while FINRA handled the technical and logistical aspects, like managing the trading symbols and CUSIPs. (NOT CHANGING OR INCORPORATING EXTRA DATES) Yet when you observe the 12/8/22 MMTLP Corporate Action, FINRA made "EARLY DELETION OF THE MMTLP TRADING SYMBOL" the MAIN COMPONENT, effective the zero hour of 12/13/22, 40 hours before the exchange set to take place after the close of business on 12/14/22. This was in direct conflict to FINRA's mandate to maintain fair and orderly markets. The outcome and the chaos these past (almost) 3 years is proof! How long can Paul Atkins ignore this? Hester Peirce The full video 🎥 linked below explains even more regulatory shortcomings 👇🏾
0:38

🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 The Metamaterials spin-off S-1 was made effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The S-1 was the governing document for the "corporate action". It layed out the precise steps/timeline for the 1-for-1 exchange after the close of business on 12/14/22 that was to result in the automatic cancellation of $MMTLP. This was a legally binding process that both the issuer and the market had to follow. Any deviation from this plan would be a serious breach of the approved "corporate action" outlined in the S-1. By FINRA's decision to delete the trading symbol early, effective 12/13 (zero hour), they acted outside of the issuer's SEC-effective plan. This action disrupted the planned process and caused significant market confusion and harm to investors. It forced brokerages to perform a reorganization or mandatory exchange on an altered timeline, which led to errors, the inability to settle trades, and financial losses for investors. (There was a mandatory exchange BEFORE the alleged 1-for-1 exchange took place, FINRA NEVER addressed this in their FAQs) Symbol deletion is a consequential step, not a discretionary one, in many corporate actions. For a 1-for-1 exchange where the original shares are cancelled, the symbol for those shares would naturally be deleted after the shares are no longer tradable. This was a technical step that followed the main corporate action. (☝🏾 FINRA and the SEC know that this is the correct procedure) The S-1 described the legal and financial aspects of the transaction (the exchange ratio, the cancellation of shares etc), while FINRA handled the technical and logistical aspects, like managing the trading symbols and CUSIPs. (NOT CHANGING OR INCORPORATING EXTRA DATES) Yet when you observe the 12/8/22 MMTLP Corporate Action, FINRA made "EARLY DELETION OF THE MMTLP TRADING SYMBOL" the MAIN COMPONENT, effective the zero hour of 12/13/22, 40 hours before the exchange set to take place after the close of business on 12/14/22. This was in direct conflict to FINRA's mandate to maintain fair and orderly markets. The outcome and the chaos these past (almost) 3 years is proof! How long can Paul Atkins ignore this? Hester Peirce The full video 🎥 linked below explains even more regulatory shortcomings 👇🏾

Rare DD

13,531 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

FINRA made a conscious effort to no longer mention "December 14th" after their first $MMTLP FAQ. Whats the significance of December 14th? It was the most important date in the MMTLP/Next Bridge Hydrocarbons spin-off/exchange! It was the "Pay/Distribution Date" for the Next Bridge shares... after the close of business. It was the MMTLP "Share Cancellation Date"... after the close of business. Which meant that it also should've been the overall "Effective Date" for the Corporate Action. But after FINRA met with DTCC, FINRA unilaterally revised the MMTLP Corporate Action, removing "December 14th". Then, after mentioning "December 14th" 7 times in the initial FAQ, FINRA didn't mention it once in the Supplemental FAQ... And in Robert W. Cook's 32 page response to Ralph Norman and the 70 plus members of Congress, he didn't mention "December 14th" at all! This is not a coincidence! The video 🎥 linked in the quote post below 👇🏾 explains in great detail why FINRA distanced themselves from the most important date of the Corporate Action. Where's Paul Atkins and Hester Peirce? Why isn't the SEC addressing this? Attorney General Pamela Bondi
1:18

FINRA made a conscious effort to no longer mention "December 14th" after their first $MMTLP FAQ. Whats the significance of December 14th? It was the most important date in the MMTLP/Next Bridge Hydrocarbons spin-off/exchange! It was the "Pay/Distribution Date" for the Next Bridge shares... after the close of business. It was the MMTLP "Share Cancellation Date"... after the close of business. Which meant that it also should've been the overall "Effective Date" for the Corporate Action. But after FINRA met with DTCC, FINRA unilaterally revised the MMTLP Corporate Action, removing "December 14th". Then, after mentioning "December 14th" 7 times in the initial FAQ, FINRA didn't mention it once in the Supplemental FAQ... And in Robert W. Cook's 32 page response to Ralph Norman and the 70 plus members of Congress, he didn't mention "December 14th" at all! This is not a coincidence! The video 🎥 linked in the quote post below 👇🏾 explains in great detail why FINRA distanced themselves from the most important date of the Corporate Action. Where's Paul Atkins and Hester Peirce? Why isn't the SEC addressing this? Attorney General Pamela Bondi

Rare DD

12,820 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

$MMTLP #MMTLP In other words, instead of using the tools FINRA described like Rule 6490 and declaring a corporate action deficient, you published the corporate actions WITH YOUR OWN LANGUAGE/DATES to create the “significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process” and THEN issued a U3 halt. This was blatantly premeditated collusion. You’re caught. 🤓 #FINRAfraud #CheckMate
2:06

$MMTLP #MMTLP In other words, instead of using the tools FINRA described like Rule 6490 and declaring a corporate action deficient, you published the corporate actions WITH YOUR OWN LANGUAGE/DATES to create the “significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process” and THEN issued a U3 halt. This was blatantly premeditated collusion. You’re caught. 🤓 #FINRAfraud #CheckMate

Kurtis

241,847 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The strange thing about Pete Sessions' involvement with $MMTLP is that he was already in contact with FINRA concerning the Corporate Action on 12/6/22 (or earlier, he lies). Why was he contacting FINRA? Why haven't we seen the letter? Why did FINRA do him the courtesy of responding the same day, and why hasn't FINRA published the correspondences like they did with Next Bridge? FBI Los Angeles Full video 🎥 linked in the quote post below 👇🏾
1:25

The strange thing about Pete Sessions' involvement with $MMTLP is that he was already in contact with FINRA concerning the Corporate Action on 12/6/22 (or earlier, he lies). Why was he contacting FINRA? Why haven't we seen the letter? Why did FINRA do him the courtesy of responding the same day, and why hasn't FINRA published the correspondences like they did with Next Bridge? FBI Los Angeles Full video 🎥 linked in the quote post below 👇🏾

Rare DD

10,800 просмотров • 1 год назад

𝐋𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐄𝐒𝐓 𝐂𝐎𝐑𝐑𝐔𝐏𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐈𝐍 𝐔.𝐒. 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐂𝐊 𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐄𝐓 𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 🚨 “Largest corruption in securities fraud in U.S. history, unresolved it could blow up into a financial crisis bigger than FTX, bigger than Madoff, bigger than the 2008 recession” ⚠️ $MMTLP On December 9th of 2022 MMTLP got abruptly halted by FINRA, just two days before the companies record date. Brokerages told their customers they can trade(SELL) their stock on the 9th and the 12th of December, and the VP of OTC markets states MMTLP will trade on December 12th. FINRA abruptly HALTS trading on the 9th without any explanation There’s allegedly millions counterfeit shares in MMTLP, and FINRA stated in their FAQ all open short positions in MMTLP will automatically be transferred into the private company. According to many reliable sources “you can’t have a short position in a private company” The CEO of OTC Markets states that short positions have to reconcile and settle their shares. There has been over 40,000 letters sent to Congress, 15 signature Congressional Inquiry to SEC & Gary Gensler, and Media Coverage. As of now there is no resolution to MMTLP. The $MMTLP community got support from Dave Lauer Jon Stewart James O'Keefe Roger James Hamilton Charles V Payne - MMTLP is no longer halted although due to the halt it trapped thousands of investors who wanted to sell and not receive shares in a private company Just imagine your bank notified you that they were closing on the 12th and said you had up to that date to take your money out, but abruptly closes on the 9th not allowing you to have access to any of your money. PLEASE share & retweet no matter if you’re in MMTLP or not to spread the word of corruption in our markets‼️ All the Media & Constitutional Coverage… 🎥 NEARLY A YEAR LATER… please RT now 🚨 #FinraFraud
2:59

𝐋𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐄𝐒𝐓 𝐂𝐎𝐑𝐑𝐔𝐏𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐈𝐍 𝐔.𝐒. 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐂𝐊 𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐄𝐓 𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 🚨 “Largest corruption in securities fraud in U.S. history, unresolved it could blow up into a financial crisis bigger than FTX, bigger than Madoff, bigger than the 2008 recession” ⚠️ $MMTLP On December 9th of 2022 MMTLP got abruptly halted by FINRA, just two days before the companies record date. Brokerages told their customers they can trade(SELL) their stock on the 9th and the 12th of December, and the VP of OTC markets states MMTLP will trade on December 12th. FINRA abruptly HALTS trading on the 9th without any explanation There’s allegedly millions counterfeit shares in MMTLP, and FINRA stated in their FAQ all open short positions in MMTLP will automatically be transferred into the private company. According to many reliable sources “you can’t have a short position in a private company” The CEO of OTC Markets states that short positions have to reconcile and settle their shares. There has been over 40,000 letters sent to Congress, 15 signature Congressional Inquiry to SEC & Gary Gensler, and Media Coverage. As of now there is no resolution to MMTLP. The $MMTLP community got support from Dave Lauer Jon Stewart James O'Keefe Roger James Hamilton Charles V Payne - MMTLP is no longer halted although due to the halt it trapped thousands of investors who wanted to sell and not receive shares in a private company Just imagine your bank notified you that they were closing on the 12th and said you had up to that date to take your money out, but abruptly closes on the 9th not allowing you to have access to any of your money. PLEASE share & retweet no matter if you’re in MMTLP or not to spread the word of corruption in our markets‼️ All the Media & Constitutional Coverage… 🎥 NEARLY A YEAR LATER… please RT now 🚨 #FinraFraud

X Market News🚨

96,276 просмотров • 2 лет назад

When you look at communications from brokerages before the U3 halt of MMTLP, they contradict FINRA's rationale for issuing the halt. The FIF emails confirm that broker-dealers were put in a compromised position, once again contradicting FINRA's claim that the halt was to protect investors from buying after December 8th. The meeting between FINRA and the DTCC (without the issuer) makes it seem pretty obvious that the halt was necessary to protect the clearing agency. We need a resolution!
6:42

When you look at communications from brokerages before the U3 halt of MMTLP, they contradict FINRA's rationale for issuing the halt. The FIF emails confirm that broker-dealers were put in a compromised position, once again contradicting FINRA's claim that the halt was to protect investors from buying after December 8th. The meeting between FINRA and the DTCC (without the issuer) makes it seem pretty obvious that the halt was necessary to protect the clearing agency. We need a resolution!

Rare DD

40,396 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

FINANCIAL CORRUPTION 🚨TOMORROW MARKS 600 DAYS SINCE FINRA INITIATED THE HALT OF $MMTLP 600 Days later and there’s currently NO resolution to MMTLP shareholders who were wrongfully denied trading of the ticker by FINRA just two days before the companies record date. WRONGDOINGS BY FINRA: - The company gave clear instructions that MMTLP’s last trading day would be December 12th (can no longer trade after the 12th) - FINRA halted MMTLP on December 9th prior to market open - This prevented shareholders who wanted to sell their shares (no matter the reason) & short sellers covering their positions since you are NOT allowed to carry a short position into a private company TO BE CLEAR: Many brokerage firms stated to their customers they will FORCE/REQUIRE all short positions to close out their position on the 9th or the 12th, FINRA prevented this liability by initiating the RARE U3 HALT two days early. If you invest in the U.S. stock market you should repost this video to spread the word of corruption🔂 let’s get this viral $AMC $GME $MULN $SPCE $DJT
3:11

FINANCIAL CORRUPTION 🚨TOMORROW MARKS 600 DAYS SINCE FINRA INITIATED THE HALT OF $MMTLP 600 Days later and there’s currently NO resolution to MMTLP shareholders who were wrongfully denied trading of the ticker by FINRA just two days before the companies record date. WRONGDOINGS BY FINRA: - The company gave clear instructions that MMTLP’s last trading day would be December 12th (can no longer trade after the 12th) - FINRA halted MMTLP on December 9th prior to market open - This prevented shareholders who wanted to sell their shares (no matter the reason) & short sellers covering their positions since you are NOT allowed to carry a short position into a private company TO BE CLEAR: Many brokerage firms stated to their customers they will FORCE/REQUIRE all short positions to close out their position on the 9th or the 12th, FINRA prevented this liability by initiating the RARE U3 HALT two days early. If you invest in the U.S. stock market you should repost this video to spread the word of corruption🔂 let’s get this viral $AMC $GME $MULN $SPCE $DJT

X Market News🚨

54,156 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Why the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission appears to be an even bigger culprit than FINRA in the $MMTLP Fiasco is... The SEC suspected that Brda and Palikaras were guilty of a scheme since at least September 2021. A scheme that according to the SEC, means that neither man should be able to run or presumably be involved with a publicly traded company if found guilty of the charges filed 3 years after the initial subpoenas. So if investors needed to be protected from Brda & Palikaras, how does the SEC justify allowing investors to invest in $MMAT & $MMTLP (TRCH also if the SEC suspected a scheme leading up to the reverse merger), and also making effective the S1 for the Next Bridge Hydrocarbons spin-off? How is it that the SEC has shared oversight of the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC), but they haven't lifted a finger to show the party(s) responsible for getting options started in TRCH directly before the reverse merger? Coincidentally, the SEC has oversight of FINRA, but the SEC hasn't formally addressed the many ways FINRA violated their Rule 6490 when processing the MMTLP Corporate Action, Nor have they lifted a finger to show the party(s) responsible for getting MMTLP tradeable. It's almost like the SEC tried to enact their own form of justice to punish Brda and Palikaras for the alleged scheme, but at the same time, investors were treated like justifiable casualties. This is only part 1 of 5, full video 🎥 linked in the quote post below. Paul Atkins Hester Peirce
1:14

Why the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission appears to be an even bigger culprit than FINRA in the $MMTLP Fiasco is... The SEC suspected that Brda and Palikaras were guilty of a scheme since at least September 2021. A scheme that according to the SEC, means that neither man should be able to run or presumably be involved with a publicly traded company if found guilty of the charges filed 3 years after the initial subpoenas. So if investors needed to be protected from Brda & Palikaras, how does the SEC justify allowing investors to invest in $MMAT & $MMTLP (TRCH also if the SEC suspected a scheme leading up to the reverse merger), and also making effective the S1 for the Next Bridge Hydrocarbons spin-off? How is it that the SEC has shared oversight of the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC), but they haven't lifted a finger to show the party(s) responsible for getting options started in TRCH directly before the reverse merger? Coincidentally, the SEC has oversight of FINRA, but the SEC hasn't formally addressed the many ways FINRA violated their Rule 6490 when processing the MMTLP Corporate Action, Nor have they lifted a finger to show the party(s) responsible for getting MMTLP tradeable. It's almost like the SEC tried to enact their own form of justice to punish Brda and Palikaras for the alleged scheme, but at the same time, investors were treated like justifiable casualties. This is only part 1 of 5, full video 🎥 linked in the quote post below. Paul Atkins Hester Peirce

Rare DD

10,801 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🔊🔊LISTEN🔊🔊 REALLY, GARY??? NO advice... NO permission... Then WTH were in those 13,177 pages of electronically maintained email records in the days immediately preceeding FINRA's U3 Halt? #FOIA You know, the ones involving the 5 SEC COMMISSIONERS from December 2, 2022, through December 9, 2022, discussing MMTLP??? (See chat for FOIA response) Wait, were you not ONE OF THOSE COMMISSIONERS, Former Chairman & COMMISSIONER Gensler??? BUT, you testified in front of Congress that FINRA did not seek advice or approval... #GenslerLied If the SEC was NOT giving advice/permission on the MMTLP share imbalance, FINRA's U3 Trading Halt and corporate action, then what were you discussing in the 13,177 emails???… RECIPES & MAKE-UP TIPS for soon-to-be defrauded investors??? Unfortunately for you, those were not in the #FOIA request. #GTFOH #RICO #SECKnew Vice President JD Vance Tim Burchett Department of Government Efficiency Department of Government Efficiency_SEC Department of Justice (DOJ) First the Steele Dossier, then MMTLP...Gary can't seem to tell the story straight!!! Guess, we are going to need to update our list below. #Weaponization #EO14147 $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH
0:24

🔊🔊LISTEN🔊🔊 REALLY, GARY??? NO advice... NO permission... Then WTH were in those 13,177 pages of electronically maintained email records in the days immediately preceeding FINRA's U3 Halt? #FOIA You know, the ones involving the 5 SEC COMMISSIONERS from December 2, 2022, through December 9, 2022, discussing MMTLP??? (See chat for FOIA response) Wait, were you not ONE OF THOSE COMMISSIONERS, Former Chairman & COMMISSIONER Gensler??? BUT, you testified in front of Congress that FINRA did not seek advice or approval... #GenslerLied If the SEC was NOT giving advice/permission on the MMTLP share imbalance, FINRA's U3 Trading Halt and corporate action, then what were you discussing in the 13,177 emails???… RECIPES & MAKE-UP TIPS for soon-to-be defrauded investors??? Unfortunately for you, those were not in the #FOIA request. #GTFOH #RICO #SECKnew Vice President JD Vance Tim Burchett Department of Government Efficiency Department of Government Efficiency_SEC Department of Justice (DOJ) First the Steele Dossier, then MMTLP...Gary can't seem to tell the story straight!!! Guess, we are going to need to update our list below. #Weaponization #EO14147 $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH

JunkSavvy

20,052 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

$MMTLP: Yesterday, during a town hall, Congressman Pete Sessions was asked directly by an MMTLP shareholder about FINRA’s conduct and the broken promise of a share audit. Sessions responded by agreeing that the rug was pulled from under us... which we appreciate... but then pivoted to mention the SEC’s recent charges against former Meta executives. The shareholder, to their credit, pushed back immediately and pointed out what many of us have said for months now: those charges have nothing to do with the lack of a share audit and transparency from the regulators. The issue at the heart of this is simple... how many shares exist, and why has no regulator been willing to account for them? That question still hangs in the air, unanswered. I also found it interesting that Sessions also brought up the price action on the last day of trading and asked why people didn’t sell if they were concerned. So let me try to explain this in a way that hopefully makes it clearer for the Congressman, or anyone else still asking that question. In the two days before the halt... Wednesday, December 7th and Thursday, December 8th... every single major U.S. broker told their clients that Friday, December 9th, and Monday, December 12th, would be “position close only” for MMTLP. That meant you couldn’t open new positions... only close out existing ones. In addition to that, some brokers even notified clients that short positions would be forced to close during that time. So what does that mean in practical terms? It means that retail investors were led to believe... based directly on FINRA’s own guidance and two separate corporate action notices... that Friday and Monday were the critical two days to sell. And it wasn’t just a hope. It was an expectation. The price of the shares moving upward was not just likely... it was logically anticipated, based on the idea that shorts would have no choice but to buy back shares to close, in an environment where opening of any short positions would not be allowed. That’s when the price was supposed to run. So why didn’t people sell sooner? Because it would’ve been like walking out of a bingo hall with a nearly full card before the last ball was pulled. If you knew the dealer told the hall that the card would likely fill out on Friday and Monday, why would you walk out of the game on Thursday... especially if your card was nearly full? We were all playing by the timeline FINRA gave us. Then they moved the goalpost mid play. They halted trading on Friday before the open, without warning, and locked everyone in. That’s why people didn’t sell. Because we were told... explicitly... that we still had time. So Mr. Sessions, with respect: We appreciate your continued acknowledgment that something went terribly wrong here. But let’s not minimize the decision to hold based on clear regulatory messaging that was reversed without notice. This wasn’t investor negligence. This was investor reliance... on information published by FINRA and echoed by brokerages across the country. And that is exactly why a share audit is still critical. Because if that rug pull happened after millions of counterfeit or unsettled shares were sold into this security... and never reconciled... then what happened to us wasn’t just a regulatory breakdown. It was theft. Plain and simple, sir. We invite your office to re-engage, demand the share audit you called for, and press the SEC and FINRA for real answers... not recycled statements. At this point, transparency should not be optional. Thank you.
4:37

$MMTLP: Yesterday, during a town hall, Congressman Pete Sessions was asked directly by an MMTLP shareholder about FINRA’s conduct and the broken promise of a share audit. Sessions responded by agreeing that the rug was pulled from under us... which we appreciate... but then pivoted to mention the SEC’s recent charges against former Meta executives. The shareholder, to their credit, pushed back immediately and pointed out what many of us have said for months now: those charges have nothing to do with the lack of a share audit and transparency from the regulators. The issue at the heart of this is simple... how many shares exist, and why has no regulator been willing to account for them? That question still hangs in the air, unanswered. I also found it interesting that Sessions also brought up the price action on the last day of trading and asked why people didn’t sell if they were concerned. So let me try to explain this in a way that hopefully makes it clearer for the Congressman, or anyone else still asking that question. In the two days before the halt... Wednesday, December 7th and Thursday, December 8th... every single major U.S. broker told their clients that Friday, December 9th, and Monday, December 12th, would be “position close only” for MMTLP. That meant you couldn’t open new positions... only close out existing ones. In addition to that, some brokers even notified clients that short positions would be forced to close during that time. So what does that mean in practical terms? It means that retail investors were led to believe... based directly on FINRA’s own guidance and two separate corporate action notices... that Friday and Monday were the critical two days to sell. And it wasn’t just a hope. It was an expectation. The price of the shares moving upward was not just likely... it was logically anticipated, based on the idea that shorts would have no choice but to buy back shares to close, in an environment where opening of any short positions would not be allowed. That’s when the price was supposed to run. So why didn’t people sell sooner? Because it would’ve been like walking out of a bingo hall with a nearly full card before the last ball was pulled. If you knew the dealer told the hall that the card would likely fill out on Friday and Monday, why would you walk out of the game on Thursday... especially if your card was nearly full? We were all playing by the timeline FINRA gave us. Then they moved the goalpost mid play. They halted trading on Friday before the open, without warning, and locked everyone in. That’s why people didn’t sell. Because we were told... explicitly... that we still had time. So Mr. Sessions, with respect: We appreciate your continued acknowledgment that something went terribly wrong here. But let’s not minimize the decision to hold based on clear regulatory messaging that was reversed without notice. This wasn’t investor negligence. This was investor reliance... on information published by FINRA and echoed by brokerages across the country. And that is exactly why a share audit is still critical. Because if that rug pull happened after millions of counterfeit or unsettled shares were sold into this security... and never reconciled... then what happened to us wasn’t just a regulatory breakdown. It was theft. Plain and simple, sir. We invite your office to re-engage, demand the share audit you called for, and press the SEC and FINRA for real answers... not recycled statements. At this point, transparency should not be optional. Thank you.

DrewDiligence

50,614 просмотров • 1 год назад

📣📣SEC HAVE YOU ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT MMTLP ❓️❓️ It has been a week since the press conference outside of the SEC in Washington DC and way over a 1000 days since the MMTLP U3 Halt. Paul Atkins you took an oath and said it would be a "New Day At The SEC" Your lack of action doesn't indicate that to be true. MMTLP Shareholders and many investors from other tickers have sent thousands of letters, Whistleblower reports and FOIA requests. But zero action is being take to protect Retail from blatant fraud. Many Countries like South Korea and China are taking this matter very seriously. While the SEC turns a blind eye and pushes disclosures and transparency years down the road. WE DEMAND ACTION NOW‼️ IGNORING THE PROBLEM DOESN'T SOLVE IT WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY
2:56

📣📣SEC HAVE YOU ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT MMTLP ❓️❓️ It has been a week since the press conference outside of the SEC in Washington DC and way over a 1000 days since the MMTLP U3 Halt. Paul Atkins you took an oath and said it would be a "New Day At The SEC" Your lack of action doesn't indicate that to be true. MMTLP Shareholders and many investors from other tickers have sent thousands of letters, Whistleblower reports and FOIA requests. But zero action is being take to protect Retail from blatant fraud. Many Countries like South Korea and China are taking this matter very seriously. While the SEC turns a blind eye and pushes disclosures and transparency years down the road. WE DEMAND ACTION NOW‼️ IGNORING THE PROBLEM DOESN'T SOLVE IT WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY

Stephanie

14,238 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

📣📣SEC COMPROMISED & INCOMPETENT More evidence of SEC failures. In this clip we see Charles V Payne question Hester Peirce regarding MMTLP the crime scene frozen in time. Hester says that Retail investors should send letters to the SEC that they take these very seriously. MMTLP Shareholders have sent over 50 THOUSAND LETTERS 1000's of FOIA requests 70 members of Congress co-signed a formal letter to the SEC and FINRA demanding a comprehensive review of the situation. SO QUESTION IS HESTER WHY WAS THIS IGNORED BY BOTH THE SEC & FINRA❓️❓️
1:46

📣📣SEC COMPROMISED & INCOMPETENT More evidence of SEC failures. In this clip we see Charles V Payne question Hester Peirce regarding MMTLP the crime scene frozen in time. Hester says that Retail investors should send letters to the SEC that they take these very seriously. MMTLP Shareholders have sent over 50 THOUSAND LETTERS 1000's of FOIA requests 70 members of Congress co-signed a formal letter to the SEC and FINRA demanding a comprehensive review of the situation. SO QUESTION IS HESTER WHY WAS THIS IGNORED BY BOTH THE SEC & FINRA❓️❓️

Stephanie 🇬🇧🇺🇸🦍

32,429 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The Financial Information Forum (FIF) is a place where financial entities can have their concerns heard by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Due to an abundance of unchecked manipulation, followed by the U3 halt of $MMTLP, many of these entities including TradeStation found themselves in a bind due to the proposed subscription rights S-1 from Next Bridge Hydrocarbons. But after multiple meetings with the SEC, the SEC found a reason to get Next Bridge to withdraw the request! Investors have sent thousands of letters/complaints through the official channels but the SEC is yet to formally address MMTLP. The FIF and similar groups have a direct access to the SEC because clearly the SEC is not here to protect investors! Paul Atkins Full video 🎥 linked in the quote post below 👇🏾
1:20

The Financial Information Forum (FIF) is a place where financial entities can have their concerns heard by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Due to an abundance of unchecked manipulation, followed by the U3 halt of $MMTLP, many of these entities including TradeStation found themselves in a bind due to the proposed subscription rights S-1 from Next Bridge Hydrocarbons. But after multiple meetings with the SEC, the SEC found a reason to get Next Bridge to withdraw the request! Investors have sent thousands of letters/complaints through the official channels but the SEC is yet to formally address MMTLP. The FIF and similar groups have a direct access to the SEC because clearly the SEC is not here to protect investors! Paul Atkins Full video 🎥 linked in the quote post below 👇🏾

Rare DD

38,124 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

$MMTLP “In working with Mr. Cook’s organization (FINRA), I’m trying to move my work as well as their work more to find answers in a way from less investigation and more directly to the problems that people may bring to us.” - Pete Sessions of Financial Services GOP December 12, 2023 With all due respect, the attempts at finding answers from #FINRA like the open letter signed by yourself and 73 other members of Congress are not yielding results. It’s been over 17 months. We NEED a hearing for #MMTLP now!
1:44

$MMTLP “In working with Mr. Cook’s organization (FINRA), I’m trying to move my work as well as their work more to find answers in a way from less investigation and more directly to the problems that people may bring to us.” - Pete Sessions of Financial Services GOP December 12, 2023 With all due respect, the attempts at finding answers from #FINRA like the open letter signed by yourself and 73 other members of Congress are not yielding results. It’s been over 17 months. We NEED a hearing for #MMTLP now!

Kurtis

96,258 просмотров • 2 лет назад

📣📣RALPH NORMAN DEFENDING HIS LACK OF ACTION REGARDING MMTLP Congress has subpoena power to find out what happened. The SEC has subpoena power to find out what happened. Both have not used the power they have to find out what happened in MMTLP. The Trustee in the MMAT MMTLP Bankruptcy case is doing the job that Congress and the SEC should have done. Why no investigation❓️ Why won't the SEC meet with Next Bridge Hydrocarbon ❓️ There is a risk in investing but blatant manipulation is not an unforseen risk it's an engineered outcome. THIS IS A COVER UP‼️
1:34

📣📣RALPH NORMAN DEFENDING HIS LACK OF ACTION REGARDING MMTLP Congress has subpoena power to find out what happened. The SEC has subpoena power to find out what happened. Both have not used the power they have to find out what happened in MMTLP. The Trustee in the MMAT MMTLP Bankruptcy case is doing the job that Congress and the SEC should have done. Why no investigation❓️ Why won't the SEC meet with Next Bridge Hydrocarbon ❓️ There is a risk in investing but blatant manipulation is not an unforseen risk it's an engineered outcome. THIS IS A COVER UP‼️

Stephanie

17,398 просмотров • 8 дней назад

Parsi: There is no doubt that we have now, after 20 years of hearing from the hawks, that the only solution is to go to war, we tried it. One third of the U.S. Navy was there in the region. This was not a small operation. This was a major operation short of an actual invasion, and it failed. There is just no doubt that the military operation was not a success. And hopefully, at a minimum, we will not be having that debate again. It has now been settled. It's no longer a theoretical or academic topic. It has been tried, proven to be a failure.
2:04

Parsi: There is no doubt that we have now, after 20 years of hearing from the hawks, that the only solution is to go to war, we tried it. One third of the U.S. Navy was there in the region. This was not a small operation. This was a major operation short of an actual invasion, and it failed. There is just no doubt that the military operation was not a success. And hopefully, at a minimum, we will not be having that debate again. It has now been settled. It's no longer a theoretical or academic topic. It has been tried, proven to be a failure.

Acyn

133,603 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

$MMTLP Tucker Carlson gets it. “This is one of the wildest interviews I’ve ever done and I hope people understand the importance of it…because what it shows is that there is a shocking level of coordination between major institutions in our society that are not supposed to be coordinating with each other and that it’s on behalf of what is in my view a CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OF SHORT SELLING.”
0:25

$MMTLP Tucker Carlson gets it. “This is one of the wildest interviews I’ve ever done and I hope people understand the importance of it…because what it shows is that there is a shocking level of coordination between major institutions in our society that are not supposed to be coordinating with each other and that it’s on behalf of what is in my view a CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OF SHORT SELLING.”

Kurtis

21,556 просмотров • 1 год назад

Charlie Kirk was shot on a Wednesday, Tyler arrived to the university at 8:39am. The University would have been packed with student walking to class all over the campus. How did no one see him scouting the rooftops? How did he know Charlie would be setup in a location that he would give him a clear line of sight? He retrieved the gun at 12:15, made it to the prone position at 12:22, then took the shot at 12:33? Some how he also assembled his rifle and disassembled his rifle and that exact same period of time?
5:10

Charlie Kirk was shot on a Wednesday, Tyler arrived to the university at 8:39am. The University would have been packed with student walking to class all over the campus. How did no one see him scouting the rooftops? How did he know Charlie would be setup in a location that he would give him a clear line of sight? He retrieved the gun at 12:15, made it to the prone position at 12:22, then took the shot at 12:33? Some how he also assembled his rifle and disassembled his rifle and that exact same period of time?

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

2,106,240 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад