Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🇺🇸 Why has Reid Hoffman escaped the same public shaming as Joi Ito? In 2019, MIT Media Lab director Joi Ito resigned in disgrace after a whistleblower revealed he hid Epstein’s donations and their close relationship. Yet Hoffman, who flew on the Lolita Express, visited Epstein’s island, and met...

81,963 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Reid Hoffman stayed at Jeffrey Epstein's ranch, private island, and Manhattan apartment. He bought "ice cream... for the girls" and a "metal sculpture for the island." Hoffman donated over $100M to Democratic causes. He funded fake Russian bots on Twitter and financed the E. Jean Carroll lawsuit against President Trump. He funded Clear Choice PAC, which used lawfare to remove Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Cornel West from the ballot in battleground states. He claims to be fighting for democratic principles. Yet his money financed fake Russian bot armies and stripped Americans of their right to vote for their preferred candidates. He also funded FusionGPS, the firm behind the Steele dossier, which fueled the disinformation campaign that claimed Trump was a Russian asset. Hoffman is the co-founder of LinkedeIn, an early investor in Facebook, on the board of Microsoft, and he was in a total bromance with Jeffrey Epstein. They emailed each other 1,700+ times, called each other "very close friends," discussed visits to Epstein’s properties, private jet shopping, gift exchanges, and talked about how much they “missed” each other. Among the presidents, princes, prime ministers, tech billionaires, and powerful people named in the Epstein files, who stayed at all three of Epstein's homes? Reid Hoffman. Hoffman was in the 1% of Epstein's inner circle who stayed at all three of his homes. And the craziest email? In January 2015, as allegations that Epstein trafficked Virginia Roberts to Prince Andrew went global, Hoffman offered to help Epstein with his negative press coverage. Why was Reid Hoffman, one of the Democratic Party’s largest donors, offering Jeffrey Epstein PR assistance as the child trafficking scandal exploded?

KanekoaTheGreat

2,143,987 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Hillary Clinton admitted Bill Clinton flew on Epstein's LOLITA EXPRESS and also accuses President Trump of the same, which is a 100% false statement as President Trump has NEVER flown on the Lolita Express. Here are the facts... The Lolita Express Boeing 727-200 wasn't purchased until January 19, 2001, with Donald Trump flying on ONE of Epstein's private jets 7x for short domestic trips between 1993 and 1997, which is before Epstein ever even purchased the Lolita Express or his Little St. James Island in 1998 for $7.95 million. The Lolita Express is a Boeing 727-200 (tail# N908JE). Epstein owned a total of 5 different aircraft over the years but the Lolita Express was specifically known as the shuttle used for travel to his Little St. James Island. All of Trump's trips were on the smaller Gulfstream, primarily between Palm Beach International Airport and New York-area airports, such as Teterboro and LaGuardia. Epstein's other aircraft included: - Hawker Siddeley - Gulfstream II - Gulfstream IV - Boeing 727-200 "Lolita Express" purchased 1/19/01 - Gulfstream G550 Another one of Trump's trips was a stop in Washington D.C. Passengers on these trips included his then-wife Marla Maples, their infant daughter Tiffany, son Eric (around 11), a nanny, and staff. There is NO indication in the logs or anywhere or testimony from anyone that any of these flights involved minors outside of his own family, and has never been to the island because Epstein didn't even own it yet. Trump has been cleared numerous times, over and over again, with Epstein's own pilot confirming Trump has never flew on the Lolita Express or to the island because he didn't own either of them at the time.

The SCIF

19,456 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨BOMBSHELL: MAJOR ALLEGATIONS Surface Against Turning Point USA –Is TYLER BOYER Working With AZ Senator Jake Hoffman To EMBEZZLE Funds From TPUSA? IRS 990 forms that were missing for months from Turning Point USA’s affiliated organizations have suddenly been posted online, dated May 2025 – right as public scrutiny intensified. What they reveal is deeply troubling: • TPUSA President Tyler Boyer listed himself as the highest-paid independent contractor on one of the filings and used his personal residence (a large luxury home) as the business address. • Over the past three years, Turning Point Action paid nearly $1.5 million to a company called 1.10 LLC for “digital media ad placement.” • The address listed for 1.10 LLC on the official IRS forms is a small strip mall in Queen Creek, Arizona. • An independent investigator visited the location today: there is no office, no signage, and no evidence the company operates there. • Public records show 1.10 LLC is owned by Arizona State Senator Jake Hoffman, who previously served as communications director for Turning Point USA. The same strip mall address is used for multiple businesses Hoffman controls, including suites that house a grocery store, Panda Express, and a pet dental clinic. The company has no website and no visible physical presence. These are public IRS documents and state financial disclosures – the information is verifiable by anyone.Conservative donors gave this money to advance causes on campuses and at the ballot box, not to fund luxury homes or untraceable payments to politically connected insiders. Be sure to FOLLOW WolvesAndFinance and watch their FULL Investigation, the LINK is down in the comments below. Transparency matters. The public, the donors, and federal regulators deserve answers. Time to DEMAND an Investigation. RT and Tag Candace Owens

Project Constitution

395,702 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The US celebrity/political/media machine, with its partisan manipulation and narrative control, is very obvious and (clearly) problematic. Again, everything Harry and Markle accuse others of doing they do themselves. The 'symbiotic' relationship they accused the British monarchy of having with the British media and establishment is exactly what has existed in the USA for decades - and it's a relationship Harry and Markle 𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘵 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮. To date, their only successful product has been Royal related - either cosplaying royals or selling negative stories about them. Nothing else has been successful, as a brand or financially. They profited from their accusations, and from the public's negative views of the royal family. Harry said👇🏽the royal family were jealous of the media coverage he and Markle recieved because royals needed media front pages to get donations for their charities. Think about that 🤔 Who would he be talking about? Can't be William and Catherine, who shared the Royal Foundation with Harry until mid 2019. That doesn't make sense. Yes, King Charles has had many charitable interests over the years, but front page media attention wasn't 'needed' for donations, and there had been many occasions he wasn't getting front page coverage. Also personal 'royal charities' are a side gig, not the standard 'work' of the royal family. So it's an odd claim 🤷🏻‍♀️ And Christmas parties for the media? (🤨) The accusations Harry and Markle made are seen as 'how and why' the royal family would wage a smear campaign against them. 𝗕𝘂𝘁, those circumstances apply to Harry and Markle's current situation • they need positive media for charitable donations (hello Gavin) • they have a transactional and symbiotic relationship with celebrity and news media (🤨) • and their institution survives on public perception, so there's some control (hello 'Hollywood') • Christmas parties? 🎭 I was planning on doing a bit of a Ken Sunshine/Sachs #throwback thread to prove my point, but it's become bigger than one thread. There will be many threads over time, all probably very boring. On Sunshine Sachs, their clients, celebrity humanitarianism, celebrity media, involvement of politics...and other random things. 😂 it's just me sharing receipts in a public way.

mrc 🦇

11,510 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce