Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Why I don’t love this drill: - “Parallel Feet” – does not produce force when hitting or tackling and encourages stopping your feet and “catching” the runner. Imagine if a running back at contact got his base wide and started chopping his feet parallel—would he break any tackles? -... Tackling with force comes from decelerating with a “Gather Step” (staggered feet) and then re-accelerating just before contact by driving force into the ground. - “Head Up” tackle. Only in rare cases should a defender find himself head-up on a runner. 90% will be some sort of leverage tackle. You can even see in this clip he tries to get his helmet to the side, because head-up is unnatural. I recently did a breakdown on Demario Davis the 1st clip was as close to perfect of a “Heads Up” tackle in the hole as you will see.show more

Adam Archuleta

9,526 subscribers

16,188 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Miami has some of the best tackling DBs in the country Here’s a drill they use to improve their technique - and it shows on game day ✅ NFNS (or at least have staggered feet) ✅ Head out of contact ✅ Wrap the legs ✅ Drive feet after contact

Miami has some of the best tackling DBs in the country Here’s a drill they use to improve their technique - and it shows on game day ✅ NFNS (or at least have staggered feet) ✅ Head out of contact ✅ Wrap the legs ✅ Drive feet after contact

Pick 6 Athletics | DefensiveBack.com

50,590 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Just got done watching the game again and I will say this… Javon Kinlaw was really good. He only played 26 snaps but made the most of them. I did a cutup of a few of his plays: • Clip 1: 3rd & 1, he stuffs Pacheco to force KC to punt • Clip 2: He walks his guy back and forces Mahomes out of the pocket and into Chase Young • Clip 3: This is nuts… He gets picked up by two linemen, comes down and makes the tackle on Pacheco

Just got done watching the game again and I will say this… Javon Kinlaw was really good. He only played 26 snaps but made the most of them. I did a cutup of a few of his plays: • Clip 1: 3rd & 1, he stuffs Pacheco to force KC to punt • Clip 2: He walks his guy back and forces Mahomes out of the pocket and into Chase Young • Clip 3: This is nuts… He gets picked up by two linemen, comes down and makes the tackle on Pacheco

Coach Yac 🗣

158,875 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

As I said on the broadcast, if the GK does this with his feet and tackles the attacking player with his feet trying to play the ball…it’s a penalty. Why isn’t this?!

As I said on the broadcast, if the GK does this with his feet and tackles the attacking player with his feet trying to play the ball…it’s a penalty. Why isn’t this?!

Taylor Twellman

147,673 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: In Oklahoma City, ICE agents are seen chasing a young man through a parking lot, tasing him, then repeatedly smashing his head, and dragging his face across the concrete… while he isn’t resisting. In the video, after he falls to the ground, agents pile on top of him, as the agents smash his head into the concrete multiple times. While he’s lying on the ground… not fighting back, and making no visible attempt to get away… the agents drag his face across the pavement as they go to handcuff him. Then, with both agents already on top of him, and his arms being pulled behind his back, one agent slams his head into the concrete, again. Even after both agents have him pinned, and are kneeling on him, one agent continues forcing his head into the pavement. By the time they finally pull him to his feet, you can clearly see his face is injured. Law enforcement are allowed to use force, that’s objectively reasonable, under the circumstances. But, once someone is effectively under control, any additional force has to be justified by a legitimate safety need… not punishment, anger, or retaliation. If someone is no longer actively resisting, repeatedly driving their head into concrete… is difficult to justify as necessary force. This is exactly what happens when the government refuses to hold ICE agents accountable. The more ICE agents get away with excessive force, the more excessive force becomes their normal.

🚨BREAKING: In Oklahoma City, ICE agents are seen chasing a young man through a parking lot, tasing him, then repeatedly smashing his head, and dragging his face across the concrete… while he isn’t resisting. In the video, after he falls to the ground, agents pile on top of him, as the agents smash his head into the concrete multiple times. While he’s lying on the ground… not fighting back, and making no visible attempt to get away… the agents drag his face across the pavement as they go to handcuff him. Then, with both agents already on top of him, and his arms being pulled behind his back, one agent slams his head into the concrete, again. Even after both agents have him pinned, and are kneeling on him, one agent continues forcing his head into the pavement. By the time they finally pull him to his feet, you can clearly see his face is injured. Law enforcement are allowed to use force, that’s objectively reasonable, under the circumstances. But, once someone is effectively under control, any additional force has to be justified by a legitimate safety need… not punishment, anger, or retaliation. If someone is no longer actively resisting, repeatedly driving their head into concrete… is difficult to justify as necessary force. This is exactly what happens when the government refuses to hold ICE agents accountable. The more ICE agents get away with excessive force, the more excessive force becomes their normal.

Jesus Freakin Congress

31,385 Aufrufe • vor 4 Stunden

I’d be appealing this as well… Lees doesn’t lead with the head at all. Neither this incident or the Dupree on Batch one should result in bans (even though that’s the direction of travel this season) - both are accidental contact in the act of tackling. Can’t make heads disappear. If the disciplinary loves a bit mitigation does Thompson not lead with his head angled into contact?

I’d be appealing this as well… Lees doesn’t lead with the head at all. Neither this incident or the Dupree on Batch one should result in bans (even though that’s the direction of travel this season) - both are accidental contact in the act of tackling. Can’t make heads disappear. If the disciplinary loves a bit mitigation does Thompson not lead with his head angled into contact?

RedVee.Net 🌹

39,564 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol are now pistol-whipping 16-year-olds and smashing their heads into the curb. In the video, an agent illegally tries to detain an unaccompanied minor, in Long Beach, California. The child has his hands in the air. An agent runs up and hits him in the head with a pistol. Then two agents tackle him and force his head down against the curb. After the child is already on the ground, pinned by two armed adults, another agent brings out a K9, for what reason exactly? Then one agent puts his knee on the child’s neck while another handcuffs him, even though he’s not resisting at all. Unaccompanied minors are supposed to be handled through child-welfare procedures, not slammed into concrete by armed agents. Using a gun as a weapon is deadly force. You don’t get to use deadly force on a child who is standing still with his hands up. And putting a knee on someone’s neck while they’re restrained is a textbook violation of use-of-force rules and basic constitutional rights. ICE/Border Patrol agents are brutalizing people for sport, they are executing people because they can, trafficking children, and if they aren’t stopped no one will be safe.

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol are now pistol-whipping 16-year-olds and smashing their heads into the curb. In the video, an agent illegally tries to detain an unaccompanied minor, in Long Beach, California. The child has his hands in the air. An agent runs up and hits him in the head with a pistol. Then two agents tackle him and force his head down against the curb. After the child is already on the ground, pinned by two armed adults, another agent brings out a K9, for what reason exactly? Then one agent puts his knee on the child’s neck while another handcuffs him, even though he’s not resisting at all. Unaccompanied minors are supposed to be handled through child-welfare procedures, not slammed into concrete by armed agents. Using a gun as a weapon is deadly force. You don’t get to use deadly force on a child who is standing still with his hands up. And putting a knee on someone’s neck while they’re restrained is a textbook violation of use-of-force rules and basic constitutional rights. ICE/Border Patrol agents are brutalizing people for sport, they are executing people because they can, trafficking children, and if they aren’t stopped no one will be safe.

Jesus Freakin Congress

3,367,260 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Rookie Kuechly getting knockback on an angle tackle that turns into a profile when the force player turns the play back. its very rare to generate enough force at this angle to generate knockback. crazy to stay on his feet too

betz

35,755 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I have been sitting on this for a minute, I am not sure what is happening here but it certainly looks deliberate. The guy in khaki pants and a blue shirt comes up the stair and feels his pants as you can see in the video, and in the next frames you can see he basically throws a phone out onto the ground by two other people. Was this not deliberate? Why would you not try to pick your phone back up and why did the guy on the ground appear to wave him off? @PBInvestigate LouisianaGirl (Tara) Candace Owens

I have been sitting on this for a minute, I am not sure what is happening here but it certainly looks deliberate. The guy in khaki pants and a blue shirt comes up the stair and feels his pants as you can see in the video, and in the next frames you can see he basically throws a phone out onto the ground by two other people. Was this not deliberate? Why would you not try to pick your phone back up and why did the guy on the ground appear to wave him off? @PBInvestigate LouisianaGirl (Tara) Candace Owens

troofevades

452,859 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This is a routine tackle, Damien Harris even continues kicking his feet as he goes down. Sounds like another commotio cordis with Damar Hamlin. You can clearly see where they make contact, shoulder to shoulder. Sure injuries happen, it’s a tough sport but this ain’t it. Something isn’t right. One would expect such an injury from a head on collision but that isn’t the case here. Wouldn’t he have immediately dropped if his neck injury was that bad and not continue to run and try to break free??

This is a routine tackle, Damien Harris even continues kicking his feet as he goes down. Sounds like another commotio cordis with Damar Hamlin. You can clearly see where they make contact, shoulder to shoulder. Sure injuries happen, it’s a tough sport but this ain’t it. Something isn’t right. One would expect such an injury from a head on collision but that isn’t the case here. Wouldn’t he have immediately dropped if his neck injury was that bad and not continue to run and try to break free??

Luther ‘Ćyrus’

37,005 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

I've been asked to review and provide thoughts on the question of a potential targeting call in the Hardin-Simmons Cowboy Football / UMHB Football🏈 #d3fb game Saturday. I have synced up two videos -- one from UMHB's broadcast and one posted by In The (D3FB) Huddle contributor Riley Conlee (Riley Conlee) (if he could provide credit to the videographer of it, I'd appreciate it). There is a full-speed view and a 20% speed view of the central action included in the video. To evaluate targeting, we have to review both aspects of the rule to see what, if anything, qualifies. I want to provide the entire set of rules (9-1-3 & 9-1-4): "Targeting and Making Forcible Contact With the Crown of the Helmet ARTICLE 3. No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of their helmet. The crown of the helmet is the top segment of the helmet; namely, the circular area defined by a 6-inch radius from the apex (top) of the helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 9-6) (A.R. 9-1-3-I) Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI) Note 1: “Targeting” means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to: - Launch. A player leaving their feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area. - A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground. - Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area. - Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet. Note 2: Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14). When in question, a player is defenseless. Examples of defenseless players include but are not limited to: - A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass. This includes an offensive player in a passing posture with focus downfield. - A receiver attempting to catch a forward pass or in position to receive a backward pass, or one who has completed a catch and has not had time to protect themselves or has not clearly become a ball carrier. - A kicker in the act of or just after kicking a ball, or during the kick or the return. - A kick returner attempting to catch or recover a kick, or one who has completed a catch or recovery and has not had time to protect themselves or has not clearly become a ball carrier. - A player on the ground. - A player obviously out of the play. - A player who receives a blind-side block. - A ball carrier already in the grasp of an opponent and whose forward progress has been stopped. - A quarterback any time after a change of possession - A ball carrier who has obviously given themselves up and is sliding feet- first. - A player attempting to recover a loose ball." We need to start at Note 2 to see if Kyle Brown qualified here as a "defenseless player." If not, then 9-1-4 would not apply to him here. Kyle was not a receiver or a passer per se here -- he was clearly a runner downfield and was not in the grasp of any player. As a result, he was not "defenseless" by definition. That means that the only way targeting can be called here is if the provisions of Rule 9-1-3 were violated. Rule 9-1-3 is VERY specific about the initial requirement before we can go to the question of a required indicator: "No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of their helmet." The crown of the helmet is "the top segment of the helmet, specifically the circular area with a 6-inch radius from the apex (top) of the helmet." In the videos, we see a couple of telling signs. First, Kyle appeared to actually lower HIS helmet as the contact became imminent, which is something coaches advise against for a variety of reasons, including self-preservation. But what is telling is that the UMHB defender attempted to peel off as he saw the angle of the contact he was heading toward with Brown. Specifically, he appeared to end up perpendicular to Brown, perhaps catching Brown's facemask enough to cause the helmet to fly. Yet, that contact was NOT with the defender's crown. As a result, since Brown was not defenseless by rule and because the crown of the helmet was not used for forcible contact to the head/neck area, the picking up of the flag by the officials was appropriate. That said, I spoke with an official who reviewed the videos without commentary and who landed in the same spot as I did concerning the above. They stated that if immediate replay review was available, crews will generally throw the flag and go to review (here, it likely would have been overturned by review, preserving the defender's eligibility). Since the ASC is not providing the on-field replay review yet, the officials' decision would have impacted the game by ejecting a player for the last 6 minutes of the first half until a Halftime review would have been available. For those wondering about how replay is impacting the game, I think this is a good reminder of the nuances it can impact.

I've been asked to review and provide thoughts on the question of a potential targeting call in the Hardin-Simmons Cowboy Football / UMHB Football🏈 #d3fb game Saturday. I have synced up two videos -- one from UMHB's broadcast and one posted by In The (D3FB) Huddle contributor Riley Conlee (Riley Conlee) (if he could provide credit to the videographer of it, I'd appreciate it). There is a full-speed view and a 20% speed view of the central action included in the video. To evaluate targeting, we have to review both aspects of the rule to see what, if anything, qualifies. I want to provide the entire set of rules (9-1-3 & 9-1-4): "Targeting and Making Forcible Contact With the Crown of the Helmet ARTICLE 3. No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of their helmet. The crown of the helmet is the top segment of the helmet; namely, the circular area defined by a 6-inch radius from the apex (top) of the helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 9-6) (A.R. 9-1-3-I) Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI) Note 1: “Targeting” means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to: - Launch. A player leaving their feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area. - A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground. - Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area. - Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet. Note 2: Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14). When in question, a player is defenseless. Examples of defenseless players include but are not limited to: - A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass. This includes an offensive player in a passing posture with focus downfield. - A receiver attempting to catch a forward pass or in position to receive a backward pass, or one who has completed a catch and has not had time to protect themselves or has not clearly become a ball carrier. - A kicker in the act of or just after kicking a ball, or during the kick or the return. - A kick returner attempting to catch or recover a kick, or one who has completed a catch or recovery and has not had time to protect themselves or has not clearly become a ball carrier. - A player on the ground. - A player obviously out of the play. - A player who receives a blind-side block. - A ball carrier already in the grasp of an opponent and whose forward progress has been stopped. - A quarterback any time after a change of possession - A ball carrier who has obviously given themselves up and is sliding feet- first. - A player attempting to recover a loose ball." We need to start at Note 2 to see if Kyle Brown qualified here as a "defenseless player." If not, then 9-1-4 would not apply to him here. Kyle was not a receiver or a passer per se here -- he was clearly a runner downfield and was not in the grasp of any player. As a result, he was not "defenseless" by definition. That means that the only way targeting can be called here is if the provisions of Rule 9-1-3 were violated. Rule 9-1-3 is VERY specific about the initial requirement before we can go to the question of a required indicator: "No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of their helmet." The crown of the helmet is "the top segment of the helmet, specifically the circular area with a 6-inch radius from the apex (top) of the helmet." In the videos, we see a couple of telling signs. First, Kyle appeared to actually lower HIS helmet as the contact became imminent, which is something coaches advise against for a variety of reasons, including self-preservation. But what is telling is that the UMHB defender attempted to peel off as he saw the angle of the contact he was heading toward with Brown. Specifically, he appeared to end up perpendicular to Brown, perhaps catching Brown's facemask enough to cause the helmet to fly. Yet, that contact was NOT with the defender's crown. As a result, since Brown was not defenseless by rule and because the crown of the helmet was not used for forcible contact to the head/neck area, the picking up of the flag by the officials was appropriate. That said, I spoke with an official who reviewed the videos without commentary and who landed in the same spot as I did concerning the above. They stated that if immediate replay review was available, crews will generally throw the flag and go to review (here, it likely would have been overturned by review, preserving the defender's eligibility). Since the ASC is not providing the on-field replay review yet, the officials' decision would have impacted the game by ejecting a player for the last 6 minutes of the first half until a Halftime review would have been available. For those wondering about how replay is impacting the game, I think this is a good reminder of the nuances it can impact.

Frank Rossi

10,688 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Charlie Kirk's impossible neck position, as he gets carried away from the scene. It is kind of hard to see on this image. I did my best pointing out with two dots the back and the front of his head. It looks like his head position is just about parallel with his shoulders. I am not sure how many men can have their head in this kind of normal resting position, or even in their stretched position ? Maybe ladies can ? I do not know. But men, I do not think so. I surely can not do this even close. If any of you guys can do this, please mention it in the comments. But it does look to me like his neck, at this moment, is broken ? And for those, who do not have a background to this claim, I am attaching a video that hints to how his neck could have been broken, upon his hard body slam from about 4-5 height.

Charlie Kirk's impossible neck position, as he gets carried away from the scene. It is kind of hard to see on this image. I did my best pointing out with two dots the back and the front of his head. It looks like his head position is just about parallel with his shoulders. I am not sure how many men can have their head in this kind of normal resting position, or even in their stretched position ? Maybe ladies can ? I do not know. But men, I do not think so. I surely can not do this even close. If any of you guys can do this, please mention it in the comments. But it does look to me like his neck, at this moment, is broken ? And for those, who do not have a background to this claim, I am attaching a video that hints to how his neck could have been broken, upon his hard body slam from about 4-5 height.

US_did_ 911

22,208 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Houston Texans Assistant LBs Coach Ben Bolling - Tackling Techniques/Fundamentals Profile Tackle - Same Foot Same Shoulder - Eyes through the midline - Lift & drive for 5 (run your feet) - Finish with violence (Finish with a body part) Sprint Tackle - Sprint to aiming point / Leverage side hip - Track to where he is - Run through the leverage side hip - Put a body on a body (Finish with a body part) Compression Tackle - Sprint to aiming point / Keep head leverage side hip - Strike & drive target area - Wrap & squeeze - Drive for 5 (run your feet) - Use your help & keep your leverage

James Light

13,546 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

I had never seen the Soviet Krechet spacesuit, developed for the Soviet Moon expedition, this close up and in such detail. Holy shit, the dieselpunk level is unreal. I mean, if the Americans flew and landed their spacecraft with a full-fledged computer on board, the Soviets were supposed to fly basically on mechanics and automation. In other words, straight-up Newtonian: everything as lever-and-vacuum-tube as possible — and the spacesuit is from exactly the same universe. And yes, in theory, they could have landed the spacecraft, but there was a high chance it would have been a “landing” with no return. Since the Soviet rocket was weaker, only one person was supposed to land on the Moon, not two as in the U.S. program. That’s why, in the tests, you can see them practicing ways for a cosmonaut to get back on his feet if he fell. Because there would be no one there to help you. It really does break your brain when you imagine a person in this “canvas-pump-and-dial” suit — alone, on the Moon. But it has to be admitted: yes, there is a certain charm to this kind of extreme engineering minimalism turned up to full dieselpunk.

I had never seen the Soviet Krechet spacesuit, developed for the Soviet Moon expedition, this close up and in such detail. Holy shit, the dieselpunk level is unreal. I mean, if the Americans flew and landed their spacecraft with a full-fledged computer on board, the Soviets were supposed to fly basically on mechanics and automation. In other words, straight-up Newtonian: everything as lever-and-vacuum-tube as possible — and the spacesuit is from exactly the same universe. And yes, in theory, they could have landed the spacecraft, but there was a high chance it would have been a “landing” with no return. Since the Soviet rocket was weaker, only one person was supposed to land on the Moon, not two as in the U.S. program. That’s why, in the tests, you can see them practicing ways for a cosmonaut to get back on his feet if he fell. Because there would be no one there to help you. It really does break your brain when you imagine a person in this “canvas-pump-and-dial” suit — alone, on the Moon. But it has to be admitted: yes, there is a certain charm to this kind of extreme engineering minimalism turned up to full dieselpunk.

Yigal Levin

198,574 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Driving at night on a lonely country road can be terrifying by itself. This man driving, trying to find his way back to the main road when he sees something on the left side of the road, when he tries to drive off he can hear it scratch at his door and try to grab the door handle. I know I would hit the gas and not look back in a situation like this, what would you do?

Driving at night on a lonely country road can be terrifying by itself. This man driving, trying to find his way back to the main road when he sees something on the left side of the road, when he tries to drive off he can hear it scratch at his door and try to grab the door handle. I know I would hit the gas and not look back in a situation like this, what would you do?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

140,979 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

When you slow the Minneapolis video down and zoom in, you can clearly see that the ICE Agent was NOT in front of the vehicle when he shoots. He was not “rammed.” Both his feet are off to the side. He drew his gun as she backed up and shot her as she drove past him. It’s MURDER

When you slow the Minneapolis video down and zoom in, you can clearly see that the ICE Agent was NOT in front of the vehicle when he shoots. He was not “rammed.” Both his feet are off to the side. He drew his gun as she backed up and shot her as she drove past him. It’s MURDER

JΛKΣ

110,806 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

How will Deebo be watching this weekend’s games? On the couch, with his feet up, in front of a 90-inch TV, with wings and fries. #FTTB #49ers

How will Deebo be watching this weekend’s games? On the couch, with his feet up, in front of a 90-inch TV, with wings and fries. #FTTB #49ers

49ers Webzone

172,987 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This is a small clip from the latest coaches clinic I did with Morgan Stuart . I am touching on rake through backhands. Feet should stay in motion in order to keep your momentum, as it’s your feet that take you through the ball, not your glove. If you want to catch the entire coaches clinic, Morgan and I will be doing a live Zoom Nov 17th where we are walking through the recording of our coaches clinic but will be stopping to add more talking points or tips. You’ll also receive the entire recording after the event along with a detailed list of our drills and a 12u practice plan. Sign up:

This is a small clip from the latest coaches clinic I did with Morgan Stuart . I am touching on rake through backhands. Feet should stay in motion in order to keep your momentum, as it’s your feet that take you through the ball, not your glove. If you want to catch the entire coaches clinic, Morgan and I will be doing a live Zoom Nov 17th where we are walking through the recording of our coaches clinic but will be stopping to add more talking points or tips. You’ll also receive the entire recording after the event along with a detailed list of our drills and a 12u practice plan. Sign up:

Megan Rembielak

45,706 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Here is the Ryan Lindgren hit on Evan Bouchard in real time! Ryan Leonard with a great back check forcing Bouchard wide and Lindgren has him lined up! This play is happening so fast, Bouchard has his head down and tries to cut back inside! The concussion happens from Evan Bouchard’s head hitting the ice, not from the hit! If anything this is a 2 minute interference penalty but don’t think it’s a dirty hit! I think this is on Evan Bouchard having his head down and not protecting himself!

Here is the Ryan Lindgren hit on Evan Bouchard in real time! Ryan Leonard with a great back check forcing Bouchard wide and Lindgren has him lined up! This play is happening so fast, Bouchard has his head down and tries to cut back inside! The concussion happens from Evan Bouchard’s head hitting the ice, not from the hit! If anything this is a 2 minute interference penalty but don’t think it’s a dirty hit! I think this is on Evan Bouchard having his head down and not protecting himself!

The cfb lliason

556,152 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Glad to step up as Head of Marketing at Tonkeeper Self-custody isn't a feature. It's the freedom to transact without asking permission. MTONGA is in full force now — and Tonkeeper is the wallet you hold it with. Why this, why now ↓

Glad to step up as Head of Marketing at Tonkeeper Self-custody isn't a feature. It's the freedom to transact without asking permission. MTONGA is in full force now — and Tonkeeper is the wallet you hold it with. Why this, why now ↓

Crypto Fan

14,965 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

this is what a fighting spirit spot should look like. you can see kawada registering the damage and watch as he fights through the pain to get back to his feet. then kawada gets off some offense while clearly weakened before kobashi is able to blast him one time before going down from the offense kawada delivered. it's not just jumping up after a move with your fists balled and yelling "ahhhh!"

this is what a fighting spirit spot should look like. you can see kawada registering the damage and watch as he fights through the pain to get back to his feet. then kawada gets off some offense while clearly weakened before kobashi is able to blast him one time before going down from the offense kawada delivered. it's not just jumping up after a move with your fists balled and yelling "ahhhh!"

emil

11,248 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten