Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Why is DOJ Classifiying Trump Assassination Attempt Documents? Mike Benz explains that the DOJ recently moved to classify the evidence, so not even Ryan Routh’s attorneys can see the evidence being brought against him. “If this is the most transparent administration in American history…what could possibly be classified at... show more

One America News

2,322,546 subscribers

106,593 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨WATCH🚨 The criminal trial for Ryan Routh, the suspect in the attempted assassination of Trump, is set to start soon. The DOJ recently introduced new evidence against Routh, which seems to be a foreign report. Ken Silva has been following the DOJ’s moves and he joins us to discuss.

🚨WATCH🚨 The criminal trial for Ryan Routh, the suspect in the attempted assassination of Trump, is set to start soon. The DOJ recently introduced new evidence against Routh, which seems to be a foreign report. Ken Silva has been following the DOJ’s moves and he joins us to discuss.

Breanna Morello

56,088 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨HAPPENING🚨 Judge Aileen Cannon has permitted the DOJ to withhold evidence in the case of alleged Trump assassination suspect Ryan Routh, citing that its release could result in significant or extremely severe harm to U.S. national security. Ken Silva breaks it down.

🚨HAPPENING🚨 Judge Aileen Cannon has permitted the DOJ to withhold evidence in the case of alleged Trump assassination suspect Ryan Routh, citing that its release could result in significant or extremely severe harm to U.S. national security. Ken Silva breaks it down.

Breanna Morello

26,278 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Tulsi Gabbard Releases Documents that PROVE it Was Barack Obama who Led the Russiagate Conspiracy and Coup Against Donald Trump – Documents Have Been Turned Over to the DOJ Tulsi Gabbard: The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirmed that fact. Now that the DOJ has this information let’s see if Pam Bondi has the guts to charge Barack Obama for leading this attempted coup of the Trump administration. Here is video from The Jesse Watters Show.

Tulsi Gabbard Releases Documents that PROVE it Was Barack Obama who Led the Russiagate Conspiracy and Coup Against Donald Trump – Documents Have Been Turned Over to the DOJ Tulsi Gabbard: The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirmed that fact. Now that the DOJ has this information let’s see if Pam Bondi has the guts to charge Barack Obama for leading this attempted coup of the Trump administration. Here is video from The Jesse Watters Show.

Tony Seruga

157,134 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨The DOJ has introduced "CLASSIFIED" evidence against Routh, with the presiding judge saying that the information could cause "exceptionally grave damages to the national security of the US” Its release has now been blocked.

🚨The DOJ has introduced "CLASSIFIED" evidence against Routh, with the presiding judge saying that the information could cause "exceptionally grave damages to the national security of the US” Its release has now been blocked.

George Papadopoulos

425,805 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN: Wannabe Trump assassln Ryan Routh is now in his final pre-trial hearing after FIRING his public defenders The DOJ introduced "CLASSIFIED" evidence against Routh, which the judge said could cause "exceptionally grave damages to the national security of the US," so she BLOCKED its release The public deserves to know if this guy was working on behalf of a foreign country or a deep state intel agency!

🚨 JUST IN: Wannabe Trump assassln Ryan Routh is now in his final pre-trial hearing after FIRING his public defenders The DOJ introduced "CLASSIFIED" evidence against Routh, which the judge said could cause "exceptionally grave damages to the national security of the US," so she BLOCKED its release The public deserves to know if this guy was working on behalf of a foreign country or a deep state intel agency!

Nick Sortor

226,289 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

WOW! James Comey is REFUSING to answer what other evidence the DOJ has against him besides the 8647 seashell message "I'm not going to talk about that." Keep in mind: Comey was indicted by a FEDERAL grand jury. It's very likely DOJ caught Comey in some lies, and there's MORE evidence that the public hasn't seen yet.

WOW! James Comey is REFUSING to answer what other evidence the DOJ has against him besides the 8647 seashell message "I'm not going to talk about that." Keep in mind: Comey was indicted by a FEDERAL grand jury. It's very likely DOJ caught Comey in some lies, and there's MORE evidence that the public hasn't seen yet.

Nick Sortor

131,624 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Perino: This is an administration that has not been shy and showing us the evidence that they have against people who did something wrong. For example, the guy that threw the sandwich at the ice officer. I would love to see more evidence before I'm willing to buy it was vandalism. I think the dirty water in the Potomac… you can trace it. Hurt: I love that. Blame it on the E. Coli that Democrats allowed in the river.

Perino: This is an administration that has not been shy and showing us the evidence that they have against people who did something wrong. For example, the guy that threw the sandwich at the ice officer. I would love to see more evidence before I'm willing to buy it was vandalism. I think the dirty water in the Potomac… you can trace it. Hurt: I love that. Blame it on the E. Coli that Democrats allowed in the river.

Acyn

63,369 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Anna Paulina Luna on UFOs -“we're hoping to present that information and at least acknowledge it from a government perspective that we are not alone, but also let's see what the evidence is.” “The biggest information problems that we've had with UAPs is the amount of stonewalling stove piping, and also it seems that there is this push to gaslight the American people into looking at the evidence and then not fully believing it. I think for us, if we're writing the budget, for example, into the Pentagon, if we're writing the budget overall for whatever programs might be out there, why is it that members of Congress who are given a top secret security clearance are being denied access? That's not a free and true government, and so for us, especially being that we have now a Secretary of State who's actually open to Declassify Declassification and Marco Rubio, we're hoping to present that information and at least acknowledge it from a government perspective that we are not alone, but also let's see what the evidence is”

Anna Paulina Luna on UFOs -“we're hoping to present that information and at least acknowledge it from a government perspective that we are not alone, but also let's see what the evidence is.” “The biggest information problems that we've had with UAPs is the amount of stonewalling stove piping, and also it seems that there is this push to gaslight the American people into looking at the evidence and then not fully believing it. I think for us, if we're writing the budget, for example, into the Pentagon, if we're writing the budget overall for whatever programs might be out there, why is it that members of Congress who are given a top secret security clearance are being denied access? That's not a free and true government, and so for us, especially being that we have now a Secretary of State who's actually open to Declassify Declassification and Marco Rubio, we're hoping to present that information and at least acknowledge it from a government perspective that we are not alone, but also let's see what the evidence is”

neandrewthal

147,966 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Here’s more evidence that the DOJ is editing the Epstein files to try and coverup Trump’s name! 🤬

Here’s more evidence that the DOJ is editing the Epstein files to try and coverup Trump’s name! 🤬

Suzie rizzio

42,629 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Perryman: This is yet another example of Todd Blanche not being willing to give sworn testimony in a courtroom, even if it means the DOJ loses. Well, it’s quite remarkable that you have a DOJ that is willing to make statements to a court in its briefing that it’s not willing to swear to. If you’re making these representations as an officer of the court, then why is it too much to ask that you make them under penalty of perjury? And this is something the DOJ has not been willing to do.

Perryman: This is yet another example of Todd Blanche not being willing to give sworn testimony in a courtroom, even if it means the DOJ loses. Well, it’s quite remarkable that you have a DOJ that is willing to make statements to a court in its briefing that it’s not willing to swear to. If you’re making these representations as an officer of the court, then why is it too much to ask that you make them under penalty of perjury? And this is something the DOJ has not been willing to do.

Acyn

65,895 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

Lieu: McCarthy stated that if the DOJ can prosecute Trump then they can do that to any American. He is absolutely correct. If the DOJ can prosecute Trump for unlawfully retaining top secret classified documents and sharing those documents with random people…

Lieu: McCarthy stated that if the DOJ can prosecute Trump then they can do that to any American. He is absolutely correct. If the DOJ can prosecute Trump for unlawfully retaining top secret classified documents and sharing those documents with random people…

Acyn

627,347 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

695,191 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

BREAKING: Speaker of the House Mike Johnson just said “There is insufficient evidence at the moment to initiate formal impeachment proceedings [against Joe Biden].” This comes after he just recently said (seen below) that the evidence shows that Biden took part in Bribery and “Pay to Play schemes.” Now that evidence is apparently "insufficient." I’ve said it over and over again. Republicans will not impeach Biden. They will merely keep pushing this narrative because, in my opinion, they know they don’t have the evidence to show Biden did anything illegal. They will just claim that that evidence is there and let the media run with it. It’s all theater. It’s all an attempt to create these bogus headlines of “corruption,” “bribery” and “Biden crime family” narratives.

BREAKING: Speaker of the House Mike Johnson just said “There is insufficient evidence at the moment to initiate formal impeachment proceedings [against Joe Biden].” This comes after he just recently said (seen below) that the evidence shows that Biden took part in Bribery and “Pay to Play schemes.” Now that evidence is apparently "insufficient." I’ve said it over and over again. Republicans will not impeach Biden. They will merely keep pushing this narrative because, in my opinion, they know they don’t have the evidence to show Biden did anything illegal. They will just claim that that evidence is there and let the media run with it. It’s all theater. It’s all an attempt to create these bogus headlines of “corruption,” “bribery” and “Biden crime family” narratives.

Ed Krassenstein

2,529,976 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

REPORTER: President Trump explicitly directed the DOJ to scrutinize Chris Krebs to see if it can find any evidence of criminal wrongdoing. How is that not an abuse of power? LEAVITT: The president signed that executive order. It's the position of the president in this White House that it's well within his authority to do it; otherwise, he wouldn't have signed it.

REPORTER: President Trump explicitly directed the DOJ to scrutinize Chris Krebs to see if it can find any evidence of criminal wrongdoing. How is that not an abuse of power? LEAVITT: The president signed that executive order. It's the position of the president in this White House that it's well within his authority to do it; otherwise, he wouldn't have signed it.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

527,272 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨The UK government is paying organisations to gather evidence for court cases against Russia over its war in Ukraine. Is the UK government helping groups to collect evidence that could be used against Israel in a future war crimes case? David Lammy refuses to answer.

🚨The UK government is paying organisations to gather evidence for court cases against Russia over its war in Ukraine. Is the UK government helping groups to collect evidence that could be used against Israel in a future war crimes case? David Lammy refuses to answer.

Declassified UK

78,492 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Swalwell: Gaetz wants the AG to publicize evidence from an investigation that was closed against President Biden while at the same time Gaetz is being protected by the same DOJ policy that is refusing to turn over evidence from his sex trafficking investigation

Swalwell: Gaetz wants the AG to publicize evidence from an investigation that was closed against President Biden while at the same time Gaetz is being protected by the same DOJ policy that is refusing to turn over evidence from his sex trafficking investigation

Acyn

1,046,770 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Reno Omokri said that Bola Tinubu has links to drug trafficking, insisting the claim is not defamatory and that he has evidence to support it. Can please you tag Reno to present the evidence?

Reno Omokri said that Bola Tinubu has links to drug trafficking, insisting the claim is not defamatory and that he has evidence to support it. Can please you tag Reno to present the evidence?

CrownprinceCom2

15,746 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten