Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Why is it archaeologist John Hoopes thinks it's OK to weaponize wikipedia and hide the fact he edits it from those he shares the articles he edited with? This is from JRE # 2231, with me, Jimmy Corsetti and of course, Joe.

30,234 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Wandering Wolf Productions's profile picture
Wandering Wolf Productions1 year ago

@BrightInsight6 Yeah, this really is a huge deal and deserves way way more attention. He should be held to task for this.

Andrew DAVIES's profile picture
Andrew DAVIES1 year ago

@BrightInsight6 Dan, why do you think it's ok to spread unproven allegations and then block when you're called out to prove them. All a bit hypocritical given the fuss you made when Flint blocked you. You are beginning to look a bit shallow and manipulative now. This crosses a line.

Dan Richards The DeDunker aka SuperSexyD's profile picture
Dan Richards The DeDunker aka SuperSexyD1 year ago

@BrightInsight6 I told Any several times to GTFO of my mentions with his drama. He refused to. I will be providing evidence, solid proof that he plagiarized his book… But I won’t be telling him. I’ll be telling the bookstores in Egypt. Now, GTFO of my mentions you slimeball supporter.

Chapps's profile picture
Chapps1 year ago

@BrightInsight6 Experts should and do edit Wikipedia pages that are related to their expertise, donating their time for the greater good (scientific accuracy, et al). Your attempt to smear yet another scientist shows the depths you’ll descend to in order to continue your grift.

RooBait's profile picture
RooBait1 year ago

The long-term racket of "Narrative Sleeving" Wikipedia pages has only really been exposed widely through Elon Musks purchase of X. Exposing the practice to as wide an audience as possible is perhaps one of the bigger steps towards an awakening from the enforced ignorance of woke academia.

Kyle Varu's profile picture
Kyle Varu1 year ago

Just for reference, the mainstream don’t deny that he edits them, they just say that it’s public you can see who edits it and that’s why it’s okay. Wikipedia is a reliable source to them bc there are references at the bottom. Their view not mine 👍 This whole argument is undermined when Marc Young isn’t allowed to contribute to the Wiki page being a key member in the younger dryas impact hypothesis. So either Marc’s lying or it’s goes further than just editing but gatekeeping.

Bex Smith's profile picture
Bex Smith1 year ago

@BrightInsight6 So does that mean I can trust Wikipedia or not ? I mean for the most part I ask grok… Having Dissociative Amnesia makes it hard for me to know if I’m learning the truth or a myth… I mostly have to rely on Podcasts or Grok to give me hopefully accurate information. 🫶🏻

rebirthoftheword's profile picture
rebirthoftheword1 year ago

@BrightInsight6 I'm loving it.

Justin C's profile picture
Justin C1 year ago

@BrightInsight6 Could you scoot closer to the mic please….. 🤪😀

The Master of Violence's profile picture
The Master of Violence1 year ago

@BrightInsight6 Awareness is increasing

Related Videos