Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Why is the burden to facilitate integration always imposed upon the host population? Because white nations have had a few hundred years on the Enlightenment merry-go-round, and are expected to know better than to notice differences between groups that are all equal, deep down. But you don’t get a...

15,317 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

If I had to summarize two of the loci that have attracted the most pronounced animus of the young bucks who have roared into intramural conservative disputes over the last five years, those two issues would be “Christian Zionist support for Israel,” just referred to above, and “the boomers.” A major part of the bulwarkiness of the white evangelicals has to do with the boomer vibe that pervades the entire evangelical world. And that is because the white boomer believers are themselves the ones who tithe. White evangelicals are generally really conservative, across all age groups, and good for them. But the ones who are generally conservative and have significant resources to donate to the cause would be the boomers. This is not to cast shade on anybody, but as a practical reality you generally have more money forty years after graduation than you did four years after graduation. And so our strategic geniuses of the right also decided that this was a good time to start antagonizing the donor class of the lone bulwark. What could go wrong? Let’s build up a cohort of young activists who distinguish themselves by calling their only possible donor class a bunch of names. “That’s a bold strategy, Cotton. Let’s see if it plays out for him.” Coalitions are one thing, and foundations are another. When you are manning the ramparts, you will have disparate groups all around the top of the wall. You and your folks have down to the Fish Gate, and somebody else is manning the section that goes out as far as the Water Gate. It is usually considered bad form to start shooting at allies and cobelligerents up and down the wall, not to mention being a tad counterproductive. So what are we to make of those who believe that white evangelicals are the lone bulwark against moral insanity, which is precisely the case, but who then turn their energies to blowing up that bulwark? The most charitable description of them is that they are strategically challenged.

Douglas Wilson

29,326 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten