Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Why is USAID running a global Internet censorship program, which pools together 100s of censorship NGOs into a common network, with the USAID program’s express stated goal being to pressure foreign governments to pass laws and regulations to censor speech on social media?

5,605,540 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

Dana's profile picture
Dana1 year ago

Shut it all down!

Evan Guthrie's profile picture
Evan Guthrie1 year ago

Because no one exposed them before now. Keep exposing them.

Standing for Freedom Center's profile picture
Standing for Freedom Center2 years ago

Like the plot to a dystopian movie, New York will now monitor social media writings, collect data, and use law enforcement to crack down on any expression it deems to be hate speech.

BruceX 🇺🇸's profile picture
BruceX 🇺🇸1 year ago

This is absolutely dangerous!

TanksToTweets's profile picture
TanksToTweets1 year ago

Shut them down for good!

🇺🇲 ROMA Nation Network 🇺🇲's profile picture
🇺🇲 ROMA Nation Network 🇺🇲1 year ago

This is LITERALLY what I DMed you about. Holy Crap

Critical Thinker's profile picture
Critical Thinker1 year ago

Can’t wait for our next stream

Ukmetitelj's profile picture
Ukmetitelj1 year ago

80 million USD for regime change in Bosnia. Tops the list.

America Floats! †⚡︎'s profile picture
America Floats! †⚡︎1 year ago

How many asked out of a 100 would assume USAID is for Foreign Aid? 90? 80? END USAID BY 2026!

Tami 🌵🌞🍊's profile picture
Tami 🌵🌞🍊1 year ago

Every f’n day I find out about more sh*t that I’m funding with MY TAX DOLLARS! I didn’t vote for this. No wonder we pay so much tax in this country. These morons are flushing it down the toilet and spending on crap like this to undermine our system. WTF?

Mark W. Smith/#2A Scholar's profile picture
Mark W. Smith/#2A Scholar1 year ago

Wow. So this is where the "Democracy" talking points comes from even though our country is NOT a democracy but a constitutional republic.

Related Videos

It's All Much Worse Than I Thought The corporate media are all-in on government censorship Over the last three years, we have come to learn of the role that our own government officials have played in demanding censorship by social media platforms. Some of this censorship was overt, particularly as it related to COVID. However, some of it was also done in secrecy, as we discovered in the Twitter Files. Many of us thought that once we had uncovered the censorship, governments would be sufficiently embarrassed to stop doing it. And to some extent, that has been the case. But now, governments around the world are stepping up their efforts to demand more censorship. Last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation quietly announced it had resumed its outreach to social media companies. Scotland’s Police could even investigate comedians under a new hate speech law if someone complains about a joke. Major media outlets are currently working with government-funded censorship activists at the University of Washington and Stanford Internet Observatory to demand greater censorship in the name of “saving Democracy.” Without a doubt, those of us who have uncovered censorship have had an impact. On “60 Minutes” last Sunday, the government-funded advocates of censorship at the University of Washington said they have stopped demanding censorship of social media platforms. Simply drawing awareness to who is demanding censorship and who is funding them has weakened their power. But governments, government-funded NGOs, and the news media have been relentless in their demands for a crackdown on speech they deem hateful and false. At the Supreme Court last week, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed unironic concern that the First Amendment restricts the government’s ability to censor. And everyone from the New Yorker to the New York Times to NBC is suggesting that the only people who are worried about government censorship are Trump supporters, which is obviously false. The 60 Minutes segment was particularly shocking. Lesly Stahl never mentioned the mass censorship of accurate information about COVID’S origins, COVID vaccines, and lockdowns. She falsely suggested that shining a light on the censorship activists was tantamount to persecution. And she suggested that if the government didn’t do more to censor misinformation, Trump supporters would overthrow the government, which is a form of disinformation aimed at scaring people into giving up our first and most fundamental freedom. There are many reasons why they are doing this....

Michael Shellenberger

21,897,944 views • 2 years ago