why isn't agent thinking visual?

It consumes more tokens :(

might save tokens if they are just a set of available animations

Because no one wants to pay for pictures they'll ignore after 2 minutes that they also have to interpret

Because humans cant think visual. Words have 39 bits of info/s where image is 10

im too poor to see this

this is insane. when tokens are dirt cheap, we can literally do anything. no need to even think about cost-benefit ratios anymore. wild.

@ethanproia insane

probably tokens, but i think it’s a great idea and we’ll definitely see it in the near future

this is sick - not sure if it's efficient

is human thinking visual?

So cool! @_madebygray

woah!!

why would it be ?

I'd want to click the cube and see the email behind that choice.

this visual looks cool! @kylon_ai can you create a version for cloud and birds?

absolute waste of tokens

Consumes more power and slows down the work

How about triangulating?

Very creative! Someone should make a DeepSeek harness plug like this.

Love this idea!!

Love this!

Low iq activities

Look cool but unless you are running long agent requests which generally ppl don’t it’s not useful

Wasted compute visual wouldn't existif humans didn't but uknew that

your linkedin redirection link isnt working on your portfolio!

Tokens go brrrr

Yes please. Reading walls of agent logs is the worst part of building with AI.

devs

Tbh, unnecessary, gotta save that memory for the background processing and tasks.

waste of token..

Is this actually real or just a demo with the images supplied manually? This is amazing, would be great in the future when super small models can do it.

Because text tokens are cheap and fast, while live visual reasoning turns the GPU cluster into a space heater. It's a pipeline cost problem

how do you keep the visual in sync when tool results arrive faster than the animation can transition? do you queue each state or morph straight to the latest one?