正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Why Microsoft didn't have LLMs do their recent Typescript native rewrite in Go Anders Hejlsberg (Creator of Typescript): "If we just let AI loose on, what is it, half a million lines of code that we have in the old compiler? Well, I don't know that that would absolve...

ryanlpeterman's profile picture

Ryan Peterman

28,563 subscribers

81,989 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

TypeScript was inspired by a strange ask from the outlook team. Anders Hejlsberg(Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript, Turbo Pascal & Delphi - tells us how TypeScript was born: “The world started building larger and larger applications in JavaScript. We saw that externally, but also internally. One of the trigger events was when the outlook team came to see the C# team and asked us whether we would pretty please productize this thing called Script#. And we go, well, what is Script#? It's this cross compiler that allows you to cross compile C# into JavaScript such that you can basically treat JavaScript as an instruction language and run your C# apps in a browser. Why would anyone want to do that? Well, because then you can get a grownup programming language with grownup tooling. You can use Visual Studio, you can have projects. You can do all of these wonderful things that you can't do with JavaScript because JavaScript is just the scripting language with shitty tooling. And we thought, well, perhaps a better approach would be to fix JavaScript. I mean, surely you're not going to be best of breed in the JavaScript ecosystem by telling people to write in a different programming language”
1:33

TypeScript was inspired by a strange ask from the outlook team. Anders Hejlsberg(Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript, Turbo Pascal & Delphi - tells us how TypeScript was born: “The world started building larger and larger applications in JavaScript. We saw that externally, but also internally. One of the trigger events was when the outlook team came to see the C# team and asked us whether we would pretty please productize this thing called Script#. And we go, well, what is Script#? It's this cross compiler that allows you to cross compile C# into JavaScript such that you can basically treat JavaScript as an instruction language and run your C# apps in a browser. Why would anyone want to do that? Well, because then you can get a grownup programming language with grownup tooling. You can use Visual Studio, you can have projects. You can do all of these wonderful things that you can't do with JavaScript because JavaScript is just the scripting language with shitty tooling. And we thought, well, perhaps a better approach would be to fix JavaScript. I mean, surely you're not going to be best of breed in the JavaScript ecosystem by telling people to write in a different programming language”

The Pragmatic Engineer

116,193 次观看 • 2 个月前

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."
2:04

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."

The Pragmatic Engineer

39,011 次观看 • 3 个月前

Matt Damon said some canceled people would have preferred an 18-month prison sentence because it has a clear end date. Joe Rogan: What we're talking about earlier about people that have been canceled, you know? That, that, this idea that one thing you said or one thing you did, and now we're going to exaggerate that to the fullest extent and cast you out of civilization. Matt Damon: In perpetuity, yeah. Joe Rogan: It's fucking crazy and it's... Matt Damon: Yeah, I would say because, because I bet some of those people would have preferred to go to jail for 18 months or whatever to, and, and then come out and say, "No, but I, that, that we can't... I, I paid my debt, like we're done." Yeah, like can we be done? Like, the, the thing about, about that, you know, getting kind of excoriated publicly like that, it's, it just never ends. And it's, and it's the first thing that, you know, it's just, it just will follow you to the grave, I think.
2:28

Matt Damon said some canceled people would have preferred an 18-month prison sentence because it has a clear end date. Joe Rogan: What we're talking about earlier about people that have been canceled, you know? That, that, this idea that one thing you said or one thing you did, and now we're going to exaggerate that to the fullest extent and cast you out of civilization. Matt Damon: In perpetuity, yeah. Joe Rogan: It's fucking crazy and it's... Matt Damon: Yeah, I would say because, because I bet some of those people would have preferred to go to jail for 18 months or whatever to, and, and then come out and say, "No, but I, that, that we can't... I, I paid my debt, like we're done." Yeah, like can we be done? Like, the, the thing about, about that, you know, getting kind of excoriated publicly like that, it's, it just never ends. And it's, and it's the first thing that, you know, it's just, it just will follow you to the grave, I think.

Ruzy.hl

82,786 次观看 • 2 个月前

Jordan Peterson: "If you can't fix your room, you can't fix your life" "Why should you even bother improving yourself? The answer is something like: so you don't suffer anymore stupidly than you have to. And maybe so others don't have to either. It's not some casual self-help doctrine. If you don't organize yourself properly, you'll pay for it. In a big way. And so will the people around you." Peterson continues: "You can say, 'Well, I don't care about that.' But that's actually not true, you do care about it. Because if you're in pain, you will care about it. It's very rare that you can find someone in excruciating pain who would say, 'Well, it would be no better if I was out of this.' Pain brings the idea that it would be better if it didn't exist along with it. It's incontrovertible." On how to start: "Look around for something that bothers you and see if you can fix it. You can do this in a room. Sit in your bedroom and think: 'If I wanted to spend ten minutes making this room better, what would I have to do?' You have to ask yourself that, it's a genuine question. And things will pop out. There's a stack of papers bugging you. Some rubbish behind your computer monitor you haven't attended to for six months. Cables tangled up." He explains why this matters: "If you were coming to see me for psychotherapy, the easiest thing would be to get you to organize your room. You think, is that psychotherapy? It depends on how you conceive the limits of your being. Start where you can start. If something announces itself as in need of repair that you could repair, fix it. Fix a hundred things like that, your life will be a lot different." On fixing what you repeat every day: "People tend to think of their daily routines as trivial. You get up, brush your teeth, have breakfast. Those probably constitute 50% of your life. People think, they're mundane, I don't need to pay attention to them. No, that's exactly wrong. The things you do every day are the most important things you do. Hands down. Just do the arithmetic." On staying within your competence: "Sometimes you don't know how to fix something. Imagine you're walking down the street and there's a guy who's alcoholic and schizophrenic and has been homeless for ten years. That's a problem. It would be good if you could fix it, but you haven't got a clue. You walk around that and go find something you could fix. Just because something announces itself as in need of repair doesn't mean it's you, right then and there, who should repair it. You have to have some humility. You don't walk up to a helicopter that isn't working and just start tinkering away." Peterson shares the key insight: "As soon as you give your mind a genuine aim, it'll reconfigure the world in keeping with that aim. That's actually how you see to begin with. You've all seen the video where you watch basketballs being tossed back and forth, and while you're doing that, a gorilla walks into the middle of the video and you don't see it. If you thought about that experiment for five years, that would be about the right amount of time to spend thinking about it." He explains what it reveals: "What it shows you is that you see what you aim at. If you can get one thing through your head, that would be a good one. You see what you aim at. One inference you might draw from that is: be careful what you aim at. What you aim at determines the way the world manifests itself to you. So if the world is manifesting itself in a very negative way, one thing to ask is: are you aiming at the right thing?"
6:59

Jordan Peterson: "If you can't fix your room, you can't fix your life" "Why should you even bother improving yourself? The answer is something like: so you don't suffer anymore stupidly than you have to. And maybe so others don't have to either. It's not some casual self-help doctrine. If you don't organize yourself properly, you'll pay for it. In a big way. And so will the people around you." Peterson continues: "You can say, 'Well, I don't care about that.' But that's actually not true, you do care about it. Because if you're in pain, you will care about it. It's very rare that you can find someone in excruciating pain who would say, 'Well, it would be no better if I was out of this.' Pain brings the idea that it would be better if it didn't exist along with it. It's incontrovertible." On how to start: "Look around for something that bothers you and see if you can fix it. You can do this in a room. Sit in your bedroom and think: 'If I wanted to spend ten minutes making this room better, what would I have to do?' You have to ask yourself that, it's a genuine question. And things will pop out. There's a stack of papers bugging you. Some rubbish behind your computer monitor you haven't attended to for six months. Cables tangled up." He explains why this matters: "If you were coming to see me for psychotherapy, the easiest thing would be to get you to organize your room. You think, is that psychotherapy? It depends on how you conceive the limits of your being. Start where you can start. If something announces itself as in need of repair that you could repair, fix it. Fix a hundred things like that, your life will be a lot different." On fixing what you repeat every day: "People tend to think of their daily routines as trivial. You get up, brush your teeth, have breakfast. Those probably constitute 50% of your life. People think, they're mundane, I don't need to pay attention to them. No, that's exactly wrong. The things you do every day are the most important things you do. Hands down. Just do the arithmetic." On staying within your competence: "Sometimes you don't know how to fix something. Imagine you're walking down the street and there's a guy who's alcoholic and schizophrenic and has been homeless for ten years. That's a problem. It would be good if you could fix it, but you haven't got a clue. You walk around that and go find something you could fix. Just because something announces itself as in need of repair doesn't mean it's you, right then and there, who should repair it. You have to have some humility. You don't walk up to a helicopter that isn't working and just start tinkering away." Peterson shares the key insight: "As soon as you give your mind a genuine aim, it'll reconfigure the world in keeping with that aim. That's actually how you see to begin with. You've all seen the video where you watch basketballs being tossed back and forth, and while you're doing that, a gorilla walks into the middle of the video and you don't see it. If you thought about that experiment for five years, that would be about the right amount of time to spend thinking about it." He explains what it reveals: "What it shows you is that you see what you aim at. If you can get one thing through your head, that would be a good one. You see what you aim at. One inference you might draw from that is: be careful what you aim at. What you aim at determines the way the world manifests itself to you. So if the world is manifesting itself in a very negative way, one thing to ask is: are you aiming at the right thing?"

Jaynit

68,799 次观看 • 4 个月前

“Imagine being told your entire life that you can just follow your dream and you can just pursue something that you love.” “So you then go to college for something that you love and you know is the right thing for you. You graduate and then you find out that you can't make any money in that field.” “I just think about everybody in college right now that is really doing what they love and they will just never make it. I feel so bad.”
0:39

“Imagine being told your entire life that you can just follow your dream and you can just pursue something that you love.” “So you then go to college for something that you love and you know is the right thing for you. You graduate and then you find out that you can't make any money in that field.” “I just think about everybody in college right now that is really doing what they love and they will just never make it. I feel so bad.”

Wall Street Mav

193,565 次观看 • 5 个月前

"I think the one that stands out probably the most is that you have to train to all-out failure to optimize muscle development. So I came from the old school, either you go all out, or you go home, or the vein in the side of my head wasn't bulging at the end of every set. I wasn't training hard enough. And the research that we have on the topic now really shows you can be a couple reps or three short of failure and still get roughly the same amount of muscle growth." Brad Schoenfeld, PhD
0:52

"I think the one that stands out probably the most is that you have to train to all-out failure to optimize muscle development. So I came from the old school, either you go all out, or you go home, or the vein in the side of my head wasn't bulging at the end of every set. I wasn't training hard enough. And the research that we have on the topic now really shows you can be a couple reps or three short of failure and still get roughly the same amount of muscle growth." Brad Schoenfeld, PhD

Louisa Nicola

11,927 次观看 • 2 个月前

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."
1:51

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."

Ahmed/The Ears/IG: BigBizTheGod 🇸🇴

373,876 次观看 • 5 个月前

I asked Luke Kornet about his memories from stretches where he was a DNP for many games in a row, and what his message is to the young guys who find themselves in that position now: “It's just a lot of peace to come to life of accepting the position that you're in and then just doing the best with that, versus trying to fight it and want to be in a different one.” “You can spend a lot of time worrying about things that you can't really control. But when you just take the opportunity that you have and do the best with that, you can have days like today where a lot of guys came in and were able to contribute. You can have peace about knowing that you did your job well, just as you did the day before, the day after. It might just look a different way every time. I feel like that's what I've been taught through my life. That's the only thing attitude that you can have that you can actually do something with – versus trying to control things that are outside of what you can control.”
2:15

I asked Luke Kornet about his memories from stretches where he was a DNP for many games in a row, and what his message is to the young guys who find themselves in that position now: “It's just a lot of peace to come to life of accepting the position that you're in and then just doing the best with that, versus trying to fight it and want to be in a different one.” “You can spend a lot of time worrying about things that you can't really control. But when you just take the opportunity that you have and do the best with that, you can have days like today where a lot of guys came in and were able to contribute. You can have peace about knowing that you did your job well, just as you did the day before, the day after. It might just look a different way every time. I feel like that's what I've been taught through my life. That's the only thing attitude that you can have that you can actually do something with – versus trying to control things that are outside of what you can control.”

Noa Dalzell 🏀

48,992 次观看 • 1 年前

‼️"Ritchie Torres Ain't Shit" (w/ Michael Blake)‼️ "I have talked about how in that [AIPAC] meeting when apartheid came up, they shut the meeting down. I have talked about how people have absolutely gone after us for calling it a genocide. And so, to the dynamic of: 'what would you do differently?' If it's here and now, of course, hindsight always twenty-twenty, would you go on a trip knowing what you know about AIPAC? No, of course not. I wouldn't. But I didn't know that then. And I just think that there is a scenario where I would hope that people would recognize that when you learn, you do better. That is what I've done."
2:01

‼️"Ritchie Torres Ain't Shit" (w/ Michael Blake)‼️ "I have talked about how in that [AIPAC] meeting when apartheid came up, they shut the meeting down. I have talked about how people have absolutely gone after us for calling it a genocide. And so, to the dynamic of: 'what would you do differently?' If it's here and now, of course, hindsight always twenty-twenty, would you go on a trip knowing what you know about AIPAC? No, of course not. I wouldn't. But I didn't know that then. And I just think that there is a scenario where I would hope that people would recognize that when you learn, you do better. That is what I've done."

Briahna Joy Gray

13,083 次观看 • 4 个月前

Elon Musk: A future of amazing abundance means that if you can think of it, you can have it. “Sustainable energy, space travel, AI and robotics will bring amazing abundance to everyone. It’s really the only path to amazing abundance. It's not to say it can’t go wrong, but I think it’ll probably go right. It’ll be a future that you love. It’s the best future I can think of. Then, we go beyond the Moon, beyond Mars, and sail through the Rings of Saturn. Wouldn’t it be amazing if you could take a trip to Saturn? Frankly, if you have a trip to Saturn, I think things will be free in the future. It sounds nuts, but if you’ve got an AI-robotics economy that is anywhere close to a million times the size of the current Earth economy, literally any need you possibly want can be met. If you can think of it, you can have it. Iain Banks in his Culture books has it pretty much right: there actually isn’t money in the future, and there’s abundance for everyone. If you can think of it, you can have it. That means anyone could have a trip to Saturn—it won’t be just a few people. If you want it, you can have it.” From: Terafab announcement, March 21, 2026
1:16

Elon Musk: A future of amazing abundance means that if you can think of it, you can have it. “Sustainable energy, space travel, AI and robotics will bring amazing abundance to everyone. It’s really the only path to amazing abundance. It's not to say it can’t go wrong, but I think it’ll probably go right. It’ll be a future that you love. It’s the best future I can think of. Then, we go beyond the Moon, beyond Mars, and sail through the Rings of Saturn. Wouldn’t it be amazing if you could take a trip to Saturn? Frankly, if you have a trip to Saturn, I think things will be free in the future. It sounds nuts, but if you’ve got an AI-robotics economy that is anywhere close to a million times the size of the current Earth economy, literally any need you possibly want can be met. If you can think of it, you can have it. Iain Banks in his Culture books has it pretty much right: there actually isn’t money in the future, and there’s abundance for everyone. If you can think of it, you can have it. That means anyone could have a trip to Saturn—it won’t be just a few people. If you want it, you can have it.” From: Terafab announcement, March 21, 2026

ELON CLIPS

10,193 次观看 • 4 个月前

🎥| “This is the kind of fans... that make such a — What is the bark about? I get it every show. What is it? I can't hear you now, instead of barking, can you...? Is it called bulldogs? Is that what it is? Okay, okay... Thank you, thank you... Go on then, give me a bark, I know you want to. Go on. Now you don't want to do it, yeah? That was decent, that... [Talking to a fan] What did you say? I can't hear a word you're saying!... I don't even know where to go from that, you know. I'm fucking confused now. Right, listen, listen, listen. I say this every night, it's important that everyone understands. You can mind your barks for a second... Um, it's a fanbase that makes a fucking big difference to my personal and my professional life. I would never be able to get on this stage without the feeling that I get every single night that I'm endlessly loved and endlessly supported every single night. I'll never take that for granted. Never, ever... Go on, then. [Fans start barking] I still don't know what it fucking means.” Louis Tomlinson on stage at #HDWGHWTAtlanta via allmylines
1:28

🎥| “This is the kind of fans... that make such a — What is the bark about? I get it every show. What is it? I can't hear you now, instead of barking, can you...? Is it called bulldogs? Is that what it is? Okay, okay... Thank you, thank you... Go on then, give me a bark, I know you want to. Go on. Now you don't want to do it, yeah? That was decent, that... [Talking to a fan] What did you say? I can't hear a word you're saying!... I don't even know where to go from that, you know. I'm fucking confused now. Right, listen, listen, listen. I say this every night, it's important that everyone understands. You can mind your barks for a second... Um, it's a fanbase that makes a fucking big difference to my personal and my professional life. I would never be able to get on this stage without the feeling that I get every single night that I'm endlessly loved and endlessly supported every single night. I'll never take that for granted. Never, ever... Go on, then. [Fans start barking] I still don't know what it fucking means.” Louis Tomlinson on stage at #HDWGHWTAtlanta via allmylines

World Tomlinson

33,495 次观看 • 1 个月前

ELON: YOU HAVE TO BE CAREFUL HOW YOU PROGRAM AI “If you program an AI to think that misgendering is the worst thing that could possibly occur, then, well, it could do something totally crazy. In order to ensure that there's no misgendering that can ever happen, we'll just annihilate all humans. That ensures the probability of misgendering is zero, because there's zero humans.” Source: Joe Rogan Experience
0:30

ELON: YOU HAVE TO BE CAREFUL HOW YOU PROGRAM AI “If you program an AI to think that misgendering is the worst thing that could possibly occur, then, well, it could do something totally crazy. In order to ensure that there's no misgendering that can ever happen, we'll just annihilate all humans. That ensures the probability of misgendering is zero, because there's zero humans.” Source: Joe Rogan Experience

Mario Nawfal

73,293 次观看 • 1 年前

Dabo Swinney shares his mindset on toughness and why smooth hands don't get rings. "I love the Rocky movies, man. We live modern, but we train old." "That's a mindset so that you don't lose the perspective." Then he said something every team needs to hear: "You just fall in love with the grind. It's a grind, and you gotta love it." You can't be successful if you just love the results and hate the process. You have to show up and earn it every day. "Our strength coach always says, 'They don't put championship rings on smooth hands.' You gotta put the work in." "The quality of the construction is based on the commitment of the crew...You gotta have guys and coaches and staff that are committed. That's my job every year: to make sure that we have that in place." There are no shortcuts, you have to show up and do the work. • It means commitment. • It means toughness. • It means sacrifice.
0:36

Dabo Swinney shares his mindset on toughness and why smooth hands don't get rings. "I love the Rocky movies, man. We live modern, but we train old." "That's a mindset so that you don't lose the perspective." Then he said something every team needs to hear: "You just fall in love with the grind. It's a grind, and you gotta love it." You can't be successful if you just love the results and hate the process. You have to show up and earn it every day. "Our strength coach always says, 'They don't put championship rings on smooth hands.' You gotta put the work in." "The quality of the construction is based on the commitment of the crew...You gotta have guys and coaches and staff that are committed. That's my job every year: to make sure that we have that in place." There are no shortcuts, you have to show up and do the work. • It means commitment. • It means toughness. • It means sacrifice.

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

14,306 次观看 • 4 个月前

🐧 should we all go to a haunted house? 🐰 you can go yourself 🧸 i’d go if we’re going 🐧 should all five of us go? beomgyu hyung wasn’t there when we went 🧸 exactly, i wanted to try doing that 🐧 the five of us should go together, let’s do an outdoor one this time 🐿️ the two of you can go for ‘not to do’ 🦊 the two of you can go 🐧 it wouldn’t be fun if the two of us went 🦊 the two of you can go and put the ghosts in a tough spot, that kind of content… 🐧 that would make me feel so bad 🐿️ or the two of you can go to one that’s popular for being really scary 🧸 when you go to places like that, how do you go to the toilet..? 🦊 you probably just don’t go..? 🐿️ what do you mean toilet? you just gotta wear a diaper before you go 🦊 you just go in your pants 🧸 …really? 🐧 really..(?)
0:32

🐧 should we all go to a haunted house? 🐰 you can go yourself 🧸 i’d go if we’re going 🐧 should all five of us go? beomgyu hyung wasn’t there when we went 🧸 exactly, i wanted to try doing that 🐧 the five of us should go together, let’s do an outdoor one this time 🐿️ the two of you can go for ‘not to do’ 🦊 the two of you can go 🐧 it wouldn’t be fun if the two of us went 🦊 the two of you can go and put the ghosts in a tough spot, that kind of content… 🐧 that would make me feel so bad 🐿️ or the two of you can go to one that’s popular for being really scary 🧸 when you go to places like that, how do you go to the toilet..? 🦊 you probably just don’t go..? 🐿️ what do you mean toilet? you just gotta wear a diaper before you go 🦊 you just go in your pants 🧸 …really? 🐧 really..(?)

💬

42,961 次观看 • 3 个月前

Why did so many languages copy async/await from C#? Anders Hejlsberg(Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of TypeScript, C# & Turbo Pascal - on what they got right with the design: #1 - async/await was designed to solve a common problem in the event-loop model: "A lot of languages are built around cooperative multitasking in the sense that they have an event loop that sits and dispatches events. Then you handle the event and then you yield back to the event handler loop. And it all runs in a single thread cooperatively. The problem with that is if you then want to do some long running work: how do I stop in the middle of this piece of long running work and yield back to the event loop cooperatively? And then when my result is ready, I can come back and continue executing here." #2 - state machines are the solution, but hard to build: "Well, in order to do that in an inverted architecture like that, you have to build a state machine. State machines are notoriously hard for people to implement because you've got to move all of your state off of the stack into objects. And then you have this big case statement that envelopes your entire logic. It's a nightmare to figure out. But, the transformation from serially executing code into a state machine, its continuation-passing-style translation is actually one that you can do in a machine-based fashion." #3 - compilers are good at writing state machines: "You can have the compiler write the state machine if you introduce syntax that allows you to indicate where you want to yield. And that's what await is. Await is basically saying, I want to yield here, and I want to yield this promise, and then when the promise completes, I want you to come back here and continue executing. Then the compiler writes a state machine around it and it actually turns it into this big switch statement and moves all of the state that survives across the await into something that's heap allocated. So it can be brought back. And doing all of that work is something that compilers are great at. And so that was sort of the idea that we have this new style of programming where we're using promises or the equivalent of promises and the ability to yield and then we have callbacks. But trying to write your program in that style, that's also what JavaScript suffered from a lot. It's like all this callback style stuff. With Async and Await, you get the illusion that you're just writing normal sequential code and then the compiler does the painful transformation for you. That turns out to be really useful."
3:13

Why did so many languages copy async/await from C#? Anders Hejlsberg(Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of TypeScript, C# & Turbo Pascal - on what they got right with the design: #1 - async/await was designed to solve a common problem in the event-loop model: "A lot of languages are built around cooperative multitasking in the sense that they have an event loop that sits and dispatches events. Then you handle the event and then you yield back to the event handler loop. And it all runs in a single thread cooperatively. The problem with that is if you then want to do some long running work: how do I stop in the middle of this piece of long running work and yield back to the event loop cooperatively? And then when my result is ready, I can come back and continue executing here." #2 - state machines are the solution, but hard to build: "Well, in order to do that in an inverted architecture like that, you have to build a state machine. State machines are notoriously hard for people to implement because you've got to move all of your state off of the stack into objects. And then you have this big case statement that envelopes your entire logic. It's a nightmare to figure out. But, the transformation from serially executing code into a state machine, its continuation-passing-style translation is actually one that you can do in a machine-based fashion." #3 - compilers are good at writing state machines: "You can have the compiler write the state machine if you introduce syntax that allows you to indicate where you want to yield. And that's what await is. Await is basically saying, I want to yield here, and I want to yield this promise, and then when the promise completes, I want you to come back here and continue executing. Then the compiler writes a state machine around it and it actually turns it into this big switch statement and moves all of the state that survives across the await into something that's heap allocated. So it can be brought back. And doing all of that work is something that compilers are great at. And so that was sort of the idea that we have this new style of programming where we're using promises or the equivalent of promises and the ability to yield and then we have callbacks. But trying to write your program in that style, that's also what JavaScript suffered from a lot. It's like all this callback style stuff. With Async and Await, you get the illusion that you're just writing normal sequential code and then the compiler does the painful transformation for you. That turns out to be really useful."

The Pragmatic Engineer

13,258 次观看 • 2 个月前

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”
1:31

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”

neandrewthal

74,654 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: We have to have free speech in order for civilization to advance. “It's a bigger deal than you'd think. It's the kind of thing that you don't know what you're missing until you don't have it. In a lot of places, people don't have it. It's important to bear in mind that the nature of free speech is, the acid test for it is, are people you don't like allowed to say things that you don't like? Otherwise it's not free. It can't be just be things that you like because eventually somebody's not going to like what you say and they're going to shut you up. That's the essence of free speech. That's why it's the First Amendment in this country. And if we lose that, I think we lose the bedrock of democracy.” From: NBC Universal Marketing Conference, April 18, 2023
1:05

Elon Musk: We have to have free speech in order for civilization to advance. “It's a bigger deal than you'd think. It's the kind of thing that you don't know what you're missing until you don't have it. In a lot of places, people don't have it. It's important to bear in mind that the nature of free speech is, the acid test for it is, are people you don't like allowed to say things that you don't like? Otherwise it's not free. It can't be just be things that you like because eventually somebody's not going to like what you say and they're going to shut you up. That's the essence of free speech. That's why it's the First Amendment in this country. And if we lose that, I think we lose the bedrock of democracy.” From: NBC Universal Marketing Conference, April 18, 2023

ELON CLIPS

33,631 次观看 • 1 年前

"Research is the most important thing. ... You got to research who it's going to hurt and why it's going to hurt them, and then you make a decision on how you go about it. You can still go about it and do it in a way that group of people appreciate it. If you can do it in a way the people who it would normally offend, appreciates it then you've done it correctly. I defend comedy over everything." - Ryan Davis
2:23

"Research is the most important thing. ... You got to research who it's going to hurt and why it's going to hurt them, and then you make a decision on how you go about it. You can still go about it and do it in a way that group of people appreciate it. If you can do it in a way the people who it would normally offend, appreciates it then you've done it correctly. I defend comedy over everything." - Ryan Davis

Club Shay Shay

88,797 次观看 • 7 个月前