正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

WHY MODERN TANK SHELLS MELT ARMOR LIKE BUTTER Even with 100+mm of solid steel, tanks still get shredded - because today’s anti-tank rounds don’t break armor, they obliterate it. Back in WWII, tungsten-tipped shells traveling 3,000+ ft/s turned Shermans into Swiss cheese, but modern threats are worse. Shaped charges... show more

Mario Nawfal

3,664,437 subscribers

423,327 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The Active Protection System (APS) of France's future CAPINT main battle tank is capable of countering Armor-Piercing Fin-Stabilized Discarding Sabot (APFSDS) rounds! 🛡️💥 During an interview with Military Machine Fr, a KNDS expert explained: "To counter the number one enemy of modern tanks—the APFSDS (kinetic energy penetrator/dart projectile)—which flies at incredible speeds up to 1,700 m/s, leaving less than a second of reaction time if fired from 2 km away, we integrated a brand-new defense technology in the black area above the front hull. It launches interceptor projectiles to directly impact and disrupt the incoming long-rod penetrator. This impact instantly alters the projectile’s flight attitude, forcing it to tilt, which drastically reduces its penetration capability. It can even snap or shatter it mid-air, ensuring the fragments strike the hull without causing any catastrophic internal behind-armor damage. It acts like an airborne protective barrier colliding with the penetrator." Sounds remarkably similar to Ukraine's "Zaslon" (Barrier) Active Protection System.

笑脸男人

35,684 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA’S T-80BVM TANK GETS NEW ARMOR FOR DRONE WAR A previously unseen T-80BVM configuration has appeared with a tighter roof screen and expanded side protection. Russian engineers are turning lessons from frontline crews into a more coherent armor package built around the threats tanks actually face in Ukraine. 🔸 The lower anti-drone screen sits closer to the turret and covers more of its upper surface than many early field-built cages. It is designed to trigger FPV warheads away from the thin roof and disrupt clean top-down attacks. 🔸 Additional Relikt explosive reactive armor and side screens strengthen the hull flanks, fuel-tank areas and engine compartment against shaped-charge weapons — the sections drone operators repeatedly try to reach. 🔸 The upgrades preserve the T-80BVM’s main advantage: mobility. Its 1,250 hp gas-turbine engine can push the tank to around 70 km/h, allowing crews to fire, relocate and avoid remaining exposed in one position. 🔸 The tank retains its 125 mm gun, modern fire-control system and ability to launch guided missiles through the barrel, giving it the firepower to engage armor and fortified positions from range. 🔸 Uralvagonzavod says recent T-80BVM batches incorporate combat experience and direct feedback from the front, with the main emphasis placed on crew safety and overall survivability. 🔸 Russia has also increased production of the T-80BVM, T-90M and T-72B3M severalfold. New batches continue to reach the troops as anti-drone protection becomes a standard part of the upgrade process. The T-80BVM keeps its turbine-powered speed while adding protection where FPV crews look first: the turret roof, hull sides and engine deck. Every clean attack angle is becoming harder to find. Which matters most for tank survival now: roof armor, electronic warfare or speed?

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA’S T-80BVM TANK GETS NEW ARMOR FOR DRONE WAR A previously unseen T-80BVM configuration has appeared with a tighter roof screen and expanded side protection. Russian engineers are turning lessons from frontline crews into a more coherent armor package built around the threats tanks actually face in Ukraine. 🔸 The lower anti-drone screen sits closer to the turret and covers more of its upper surface than many early field-built cages. It is designed to trigger FPV warheads away from the thin roof and disrupt clean top-down attacks. 🔸 Additional Relikt explosive reactive armor and side screens strengthen the hull flanks, fuel-tank areas and engine compartment against shaped-charge weapons — the sections drone operators repeatedly try to reach. 🔸 The upgrades preserve the T-80BVM’s main advantage: mobility. Its 1,250 hp gas-turbine engine can push the tank to around 70 km/h, allowing crews to fire, relocate and avoid remaining exposed in one position. 🔸 The tank retains its 125 mm gun, modern fire-control system and ability to launch guided missiles through the barrel, giving it the firepower to engage armor and fortified positions from range. 🔸 Uralvagonzavod says recent T-80BVM batches incorporate combat experience and direct feedback from the front, with the main emphasis placed on crew safety and overall survivability. 🔸 Russia has also increased production of the T-80BVM, T-90M and T-72B3M severalfold. New batches continue to reach the troops as anti-drone protection becomes a standard part of the upgrade process. The T-80BVM keeps its turbine-powered speed while adding protection where FPV crews look first: the turret roof, hull sides and engine deck. Every clean attack angle is becoming harder to find. Which matters most for tank survival now: roof armor, electronic warfare or speed?

NewRulesGeopolitics

41,006 次观看 • 1 个月前

⚡🇺🇸: M1 ABRAMS: WHY IT IS STILL CALLED THE “KING OF ALL TANKS” The M1 Abrams is not just a tank, it is a continuously evolving battlefield system that has defined modern armored warfare for decades. The latest variant, M1A2 SEPv3, represents one of the most advanced main battle tanks ever fielded. It combines a deadly 120mm smoothbore gun with upgraded digital fire control, improved armor protection, and advanced networking that connects it to the wider battlefield in real time. Its survival advantage is built on layered composite armor and upgraded defensive systems designed to counter modern anti tank missiles, loitering munitions, and top attack threats. Unlike many competitors, the Abrams prioritizes crew survivability with a heavily protected internal layout and ammunition storage design. Mobility is another key factor. Powered by a gas turbine engine, the Abrams delivers exceptional acceleration and battlefield responsiveness, allowing it to reposition faster than most heavy tanks despite its weight class. Against rivals like the T 90M, Type 99A, or Leopard 2A7, the Abrams stands out in three core areas: combat proven reliability, continuous upgrade cycles, and integrated digital warfare capability. It has also been tested in real combat across multiple wars, constantly refined based on battlefield experience rather than theory. The upcoming SEPv4 upgrade is expected to push it further with enhanced sensors, better target detection, and improved threat tracking systems, keeping it relevant in the era of drone saturated warfare. This is why the Abrams is still called the “King of Tanks” Not because it is the newest But because it never stopped evolving.

⚡🇺🇸: M1 ABRAMS: WHY IT IS STILL CALLED THE “KING OF ALL TANKS” The M1 Abrams is not just a tank, it is a continuously evolving battlefield system that has defined modern armored warfare for decades. The latest variant, M1A2 SEPv3, represents one of the most advanced main battle tanks ever fielded. It combines a deadly 120mm smoothbore gun with upgraded digital fire control, improved armor protection, and advanced networking that connects it to the wider battlefield in real time. Its survival advantage is built on layered composite armor and upgraded defensive systems designed to counter modern anti tank missiles, loitering munitions, and top attack threats. Unlike many competitors, the Abrams prioritizes crew survivability with a heavily protected internal layout and ammunition storage design. Mobility is another key factor. Powered by a gas turbine engine, the Abrams delivers exceptional acceleration and battlefield responsiveness, allowing it to reposition faster than most heavy tanks despite its weight class. Against rivals like the T 90M, Type 99A, or Leopard 2A7, the Abrams stands out in three core areas: combat proven reliability, continuous upgrade cycles, and integrated digital warfare capability. It has also been tested in real combat across multiple wars, constantly refined based on battlefield experience rather than theory. The upcoming SEPv4 upgrade is expected to push it further with enhanced sensors, better target detection, and improved threat tracking systems, keeping it relevant in the era of drone saturated warfare. This is why the Abrams is still called the “King of Tanks” Not because it is the newest But because it never stopped evolving.

Defence Index

18,814 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇺🇸 The 3 fastest firing weapons ever built. The numbers don't feel real. No. 3: The GAU-8 Avenger. Strapped to the nose of the A-10 Warthog. 3,900 RPM of 30mm armor-piercing shells. Its recoil is greater than the thrust of one of the plane's own engines. Built to shred tanks. Terrifyingly good at it. No. 2: The M134 Minigun. Six barrels. 6,000 RPM. Mounted on helicopters, vehicles and anywhere that needs serious firepower instantly. The sound alone is enough to end the conversation. No. 1: Metal Storm. No moving parts. Electronic ignition. 1 million RPM (!!!). 180 rounds fired in 0.01 seconds. It holds the world record, but has never once been used in combat. The company went bankrupt in 2012. China is now building their own version. War was scary enough with rifles, hell even swords. As military tech advances into sci-fi territory, it’s just not even a fair fight. Source: War Spectator YT

🇺🇸 The 3 fastest firing weapons ever built. The numbers don't feel real. No. 3: The GAU-8 Avenger. Strapped to the nose of the A-10 Warthog. 3,900 RPM of 30mm armor-piercing shells. Its recoil is greater than the thrust of one of the plane's own engines. Built to shred tanks. Terrifyingly good at it. No. 2: The M134 Minigun. Six barrels. 6,000 RPM. Mounted on helicopters, vehicles and anywhere that needs serious firepower instantly. The sound alone is enough to end the conversation. No. 1: Metal Storm. No moving parts. Electronic ignition. 1 million RPM (!!!). 180 rounds fired in 0.01 seconds. It holds the world record, but has never once been used in combat. The company went bankrupt in 2012. China is now building their own version. War was scary enough with rifles, hell even swords. As military tech advances into sci-fi territory, it’s just not even a fair fight. Source: War Spectator YT

Mario Nawfal

70,602 次观看 • 6 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The F-15 Eagle was never meant to play defense; it was built to clear the sky before anything could threaten it. For decades, that design worked almost flawlessly. The F-15 combines speed, altitude, and radar power in a way that lets it engage enemies long before they can respond. Its combat record, more than 100 victories with no air-to-air losses, turned it into something close to a myth: not just dominant, but untouchable. During conflicts from the Lebanon War 1982 to the Gulf War, F-15s consistently proved that control of the air isn’t just about technology, it’s about imposing overwhelming advantage before the fight even begins. But dominance has a blind spot. The F-15’s protection has always come from control of the air, not from armor or stealth. Unlike the A-10, it isn’t built to absorb damage. Unlike newer fighters, it isn’t built to disappear. Its safety depends on staying ahead of threats, seeing first, shooting first, and never letting the fight get close. Modern air defenses don’t need to outfly an F-15. They just need one clean shot, one moment where the jet is low, distracted, or operating inside contested airspace. And one good hit is often enough.

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The F-15 Eagle was never meant to play defense; it was built to clear the sky before anything could threaten it. For decades, that design worked almost flawlessly. The F-15 combines speed, altitude, and radar power in a way that lets it engage enemies long before they can respond. Its combat record, more than 100 victories with no air-to-air losses, turned it into something close to a myth: not just dominant, but untouchable. During conflicts from the Lebanon War 1982 to the Gulf War, F-15s consistently proved that control of the air isn’t just about technology, it’s about imposing overwhelming advantage before the fight even begins. But dominance has a blind spot. The F-15’s protection has always come from control of the air, not from armor or stealth. Unlike the A-10, it isn’t built to absorb damage. Unlike newer fighters, it isn’t built to disappear. Its safety depends on staying ahead of threats, seeing first, shooting first, and never letting the fight get close. Modern air defenses don’t need to outfly an F-15. They just need one clean shot, one moment where the jet is low, distracted, or operating inside contested airspace. And one good hit is often enough.

Mario Nawfal

171,727 次观看 • 6 个月前

🧐🇺🇸 The A-10 Warthog: The Close Air Support Legend No Aircraft Has Truly Replaced Nicknamed the "Tank Killer," the A-10 Thunderbolt II (Warthog) was built for one purpose: protect friendly troops and destroy enemy armor. Its fearsome 30mm GAU-8/A Avenger cannon fires up to 3,900 rounds per minute, capable of tearing through tanks, armored vehicles, and fortified positions with devastating precision. What made the A-10 legendary wasn't just its firepower, it was its ability to fly low, remain over the battlefield for extended periods, absorb significant battle damage, and continue fighting. Titanium armor protects the pilot, redundant flight systems increase survivability, and the aircraft can even return to base after sustaining severe damage. For decades, no aircraft has fully matched the A-10's unique combination of long loiter time, heavy cannon fire, battlefield survivability, and dedicated close air support. While modern fighters such as the F-35 can perform CAS missions, they were designed as multirole aircraft rather than purpose built CAS platforms. The U.S. Air Force is gradually retiring the A-10 as its aging airframes become more expensive to maintain and military planners prepare for future conflicts involving advanced air defenses, stealth aircraft, and long range precision weapons. After nearly half a century of combat service, the Warthog is slowly leaving the battlefield, but its reputation as one of the greatest dedicated Close Air Support aircraft ever built is unlikely to be forgotten.

🧐🇺🇸 The A-10 Warthog: The Close Air Support Legend No Aircraft Has Truly Replaced Nicknamed the "Tank Killer," the A-10 Thunderbolt II (Warthog) was built for one purpose: protect friendly troops and destroy enemy armor. Its fearsome 30mm GAU-8/A Avenger cannon fires up to 3,900 rounds per minute, capable of tearing through tanks, armored vehicles, and fortified positions with devastating precision. What made the A-10 legendary wasn't just its firepower, it was its ability to fly low, remain over the battlefield for extended periods, absorb significant battle damage, and continue fighting. Titanium armor protects the pilot, redundant flight systems increase survivability, and the aircraft can even return to base after sustaining severe damage. For decades, no aircraft has fully matched the A-10's unique combination of long loiter time, heavy cannon fire, battlefield survivability, and dedicated close air support. While modern fighters such as the F-35 can perform CAS missions, they were designed as multirole aircraft rather than purpose built CAS platforms. The U.S. Air Force is gradually retiring the A-10 as its aging airframes become more expensive to maintain and military planners prepare for future conflicts involving advanced air defenses, stealth aircraft, and long range precision weapons. After nearly half a century of combat service, the Warthog is slowly leaving the battlefield, but its reputation as one of the greatest dedicated Close Air Support aircraft ever built is unlikely to be forgotten.

Defence Index

15,890 次观看 • 2 个月前

Russian telegram channels posted videos of fiber optic cable FPV strikes on a Ukrainian Abrams tank in Kursk oblast last week. Aside from a concussion, the crew survived without injury and made it back to friendly lines. Michael Kofman and I spoke to the commander of the tank from Ukraine's 47th Mechanized Brigade about what happened, and here is what he told us: (tweeted with his permission) "That's our tank. But they only posted two of the strikes. Yesterday [from last week] was the first time that the crew survived multiple hits while inside a disabled Abrams. Actually, there were 4-6 direct hits. The crew survived, and even without injuries. God bless America. Fiber-optic FPVs. Between four and six hits within like 2 minutes. I believe that at least one more got stuck in the net. Two more missed several minutes before. They apparently hit the engine. They were unable to penetrate either the turret or the hull elsewhere while we were inside. Although they tried and had a lot of time. As I said, this tank had a unique 'cope cage' (actually, 'cope netting') and a lot more ERA than an average Abrams. We – the crew – designed the arrangement of the ERA completely on our own based on an analysis of the previous hits on all the other Abrams tanks and our own knowledge of the weak spots, and that's why we still live after so many simultaneous strikes. And that's why the Abrams rocks. Would be impossible on a [Russian/Soviet] T series tank." Russian FPV crews hit the tank with several more FPVs after it was abandoned, but the tank was not destroyed and might still be salvageable. Because of recent advances, Russian forces may capture it. When I asked how they made it back to friendly lines, "On foot. It was close to the Russian positions. We finished the combat mission and drove back just 1 km from the Russians or even less. We could not evacuate because the FPVs were coming one after another. When I finally could hear no sound, we just jumped out of the tank and ran to a treeline. They were tracking us, so a mortar started working with some more drones, but we crawled away through the treeline. In the end, in a spot still under FPV control, our company commander rushed in and took us away."

Russian telegram channels posted videos of fiber optic cable FPV strikes on a Ukrainian Abrams tank in Kursk oblast last week. Aside from a concussion, the crew survived without injury and made it back to friendly lines. Michael Kofman and I spoke to the commander of the tank from Ukraine's 47th Mechanized Brigade about what happened, and here is what he told us: (tweeted with his permission) "That's our tank. But they only posted two of the strikes. Yesterday [from last week] was the first time that the crew survived multiple hits while inside a disabled Abrams. Actually, there were 4-6 direct hits. The crew survived, and even without injuries. God bless America. Fiber-optic FPVs. Between four and six hits within like 2 minutes. I believe that at least one more got stuck in the net. Two more missed several minutes before. They apparently hit the engine. They were unable to penetrate either the turret or the hull elsewhere while we were inside. Although they tried and had a lot of time. As I said, this tank had a unique 'cope cage' (actually, 'cope netting') and a lot more ERA than an average Abrams. We – the crew – designed the arrangement of the ERA completely on our own based on an analysis of the previous hits on all the other Abrams tanks and our own knowledge of the weak spots, and that's why we still live after so many simultaneous strikes. And that's why the Abrams rocks. Would be impossible on a [Russian/Soviet] T series tank." Russian FPV crews hit the tank with several more FPVs after it was abandoned, but the tank was not destroyed and might still be salvageable. Because of recent advances, Russian forces may capture it. When I asked how they made it back to friendly lines, "On foot. It was close to the Russian positions. We finished the combat mission and drove back just 1 km from the Russians or even less. We could not evacuate because the FPVs were coming one after another. When I finally could hear no sound, we just jumped out of the tank and ran to a treeline. They were tracking us, so a mortar started working with some more drones, but we crawled away through the treeline. In the end, in a spot still under FPV control, our company commander rushed in and took us away."

Rob Lee

1,358,380 次观看 • 1 年前

Vivaldi didn’t invent heavy metal. But Summer Presto explains why metal feels inevitable. Most people split the rooms: Baroque in a concert hall, metal in an arena. Watch Latvian guitarist Laura Lāce tear through Presto on an Ibanez and that split looks fake. Not because of distortion. Because of the architecture. Vivaldi wrote the movement as weather. Heat. Wind. Hail. The violin line doesn’t “go fast for show.” It has to move fast enough to feel like a storm. Electric guitar just swaps the tool. Sweep picking and alternate picking are the modern translation of those stacked arpeggios. Different hands. Same physics: velocity as drama. Second point Americans miss when they treat classical as background wine music. Metal isn’t heavy because the amp is loud. It’s heavy because of minor-key pressure and hard cuts. Presto lives in that world. Sudden harmonic turns. No polite transition. That’s the same chest-tightening move a good riff uses. Call it shared DNA if you want. Don’t call Vivaldi the godfather. The real bridge is neoclassical metal: Baroque virtuosity run through a stack. Malmsteen made the genre. Covers like this just prove the source material was already violent. Third: the charge is in the original line. Distortion is a switch, not a generator. Mute the dirt and Presto still runs. Flip it on and it face-melts. So this isn’t “classical going slumming with rock.” It’s 18th-century program music doing the thing American metal later industrialized: turn weather into aggression. Classical isn’t dry. It was waiting on the right instrument. Do you hear a storm or a shred track?

Vivaldi didn’t invent heavy metal. But Summer Presto explains why metal feels inevitable. Most people split the rooms: Baroque in a concert hall, metal in an arena. Watch Latvian guitarist Laura Lāce tear through Presto on an Ibanez and that split looks fake. Not because of distortion. Because of the architecture. Vivaldi wrote the movement as weather. Heat. Wind. Hail. The violin line doesn’t “go fast for show.” It has to move fast enough to feel like a storm. Electric guitar just swaps the tool. Sweep picking and alternate picking are the modern translation of those stacked arpeggios. Different hands. Same physics: velocity as drama. Second point Americans miss when they treat classical as background wine music. Metal isn’t heavy because the amp is loud. It’s heavy because of minor-key pressure and hard cuts. Presto lives in that world. Sudden harmonic turns. No polite transition. That’s the same chest-tightening move a good riff uses. Call it shared DNA if you want. Don’t call Vivaldi the godfather. The real bridge is neoclassical metal: Baroque virtuosity run through a stack. Malmsteen made the genre. Covers like this just prove the source material was already violent. Third: the charge is in the original line. Distortion is a switch, not a generator. Mute the dirt and Presto still runs. Flip it on and it face-melts. So this isn’t “classical going slumming with rock.” It’s 18th-century program music doing the thing American metal later industrialized: turn weather into aggression. Classical isn’t dry. It was waiting on the right instrument. Do you hear a storm or a shred track?

𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗰 ✨🎵

149,855 次观看 • 19 天前

Trump’s Kyiv story is absolute weapons-grade bullshit. Yes, Russian forces moved toward Kyiv. Yes, there was a massive convoy north of the city. Yes, mud mattered. Yes, Javelins helped. But Trump takes those real fragments, throws them into a blender with his own ego, and produces the dumbest possible version of the Battle of Kyiv. His claim is basically this: Russia had a perfect highway to Kyiv, one idiot general randomly chose a muddy field instead, the tanks got stuck like cartoon villains, and then Trump’s magical Javelins saved Ukraine. The Russian column was not just hundreds of tanks. It was a huge mixed military convoy: tanks, armored vehicles, trucks, fuel tankers, artillery, supply vehicles, and troops. It stalled because Russia’s entire invasion plan was rotten: bad logistics, fuel shortages, food shortages, poor maintenance, congestion, mechanical failures, Ukrainian resistance, destroyed bridges, artillery fire, ambushes, drones, flooding, mud, and failed operations around Hostomel, Irpin, Moshchun, Brovary, and Chernihiv. There was no single genius moment where Russia could have just gone straight down the “concrete highway” and won the war in four hours. That is idiotic. A tank’s top road speed is irrelevant when you are moving a massive invasion force through hostile territory, under attack, with broken logistics, contested airspace, destroyed infrastructure, and people shooting at you. Roads aren’t even made of fucking concrete. It’s not Trump Tower. And then there is the Javelin lie. Trump keeps saying, “I gave them Javelins,” like he personally walked into Kyiv with a shopping bag full of missiles. No. The first 2018 package was a Foreign Military Sale. Ukraine requested to buy 210 Javelin missiles and 37 launch units for about $47 million. Bought. Not gifted by Saint Donald of Anti-Tank Charity. And even that came with restrictions. Ukrainian forces were initially limited in how they could deploy and use them, with later rules allowing defensive use more broadly. So even his one favourite talking point is inflated, stripped of context, and repackaged as self-worship. Javelins helped. Nobody serious denies that. But they were not the only reason Russian armor got mauled. Ukraine also had NLAWs, Stugna-P, Korsar, Barrier, older ATGWs, artillery, drones, mines, ambush teams, destroyed bridges, flooded approaches, local defenders, and actual soldiers who knew what they were doing. The “Obama gave them sheets” line is also bullshit. Obama refused lethal anti-tank weapons, which is a fair criticism. But US support under Obama was not just blankets. It included training, body armor, helmets, vehicles, night and thermal vision, radios, patrol boats, rations, tents, counter-mortar radars, uniforms, medical supplies, and other equipment. So the real version is simple: Russia did not fail at Kyiv because one general picked mud over a motorway. Russia failed because Ukraine fought back, Russia’s logistics were garbage, its planning was arrogant, its units were badly prepared, its columns were vulnerable, its air assault at Hostomel failed, its advances were delayed and mauled, and Kyiv did not collapse. Trump did not save Ukraine with Javelins. Ukraine bought the first batch, later received more Western weapons, and then Ukrainians did the actual fighting. As usual, Trump found one real word in the story, stapled it to his ego, and called the whole thing truth. Like a retard he is.

Trump’s Kyiv story is absolute weapons-grade bullshit. Yes, Russian forces moved toward Kyiv. Yes, there was a massive convoy north of the city. Yes, mud mattered. Yes, Javelins helped. But Trump takes those real fragments, throws them into a blender with his own ego, and produces the dumbest possible version of the Battle of Kyiv. His claim is basically this: Russia had a perfect highway to Kyiv, one idiot general randomly chose a muddy field instead, the tanks got stuck like cartoon villains, and then Trump’s magical Javelins saved Ukraine. The Russian column was not just hundreds of tanks. It was a huge mixed military convoy: tanks, armored vehicles, trucks, fuel tankers, artillery, supply vehicles, and troops. It stalled because Russia’s entire invasion plan was rotten: bad logistics, fuel shortages, food shortages, poor maintenance, congestion, mechanical failures, Ukrainian resistance, destroyed bridges, artillery fire, ambushes, drones, flooding, mud, and failed operations around Hostomel, Irpin, Moshchun, Brovary, and Chernihiv. There was no single genius moment where Russia could have just gone straight down the “concrete highway” and won the war in four hours. That is idiotic. A tank’s top road speed is irrelevant when you are moving a massive invasion force through hostile territory, under attack, with broken logistics, contested airspace, destroyed infrastructure, and people shooting at you. Roads aren’t even made of fucking concrete. It’s not Trump Tower. And then there is the Javelin lie. Trump keeps saying, “I gave them Javelins,” like he personally walked into Kyiv with a shopping bag full of missiles. No. The first 2018 package was a Foreign Military Sale. Ukraine requested to buy 210 Javelin missiles and 37 launch units for about $47 million. Bought. Not gifted by Saint Donald of Anti-Tank Charity. And even that came with restrictions. Ukrainian forces were initially limited in how they could deploy and use them, with later rules allowing defensive use more broadly. So even his one favourite talking point is inflated, stripped of context, and repackaged as self-worship. Javelins helped. Nobody serious denies that. But they were not the only reason Russian armor got mauled. Ukraine also had NLAWs, Stugna-P, Korsar, Barrier, older ATGWs, artillery, drones, mines, ambush teams, destroyed bridges, flooded approaches, local defenders, and actual soldiers who knew what they were doing. The “Obama gave them sheets” line is also bullshit. Obama refused lethal anti-tank weapons, which is a fair criticism. But US support under Obama was not just blankets. It included training, body armor, helmets, vehicles, night and thermal vision, radios, patrol boats, rations, tents, counter-mortar radars, uniforms, medical supplies, and other equipment. So the real version is simple: Russia did not fail at Kyiv because one general picked mud over a motorway. Russia failed because Ukraine fought back, Russia’s logistics were garbage, its planning was arrogant, its units were badly prepared, its columns were vulnerable, its air assault at Hostomel failed, its advances were delayed and mauled, and Kyiv did not collapse. Trump did not save Ukraine with Javelins. Ukraine bought the first batch, later received more Western weapons, and then Ukrainians did the actual fighting. As usual, Trump found one real word in the story, stapled it to his ego, and called the whole thing truth. Like a retard he is.

Pete

46,764 次观看 • 3 个月前

🔥 BIG REVEAL | METAL RAMPAGE - FIRST COMBATANTS DEPLOYED 🔥 The engines are online. The wasteland is waking up. And the first machines of destruction have entered the arena. Before the executioners. Before the poisoners. There were the pioneers. Two vehicles built to survive the impossible. Two legends that shaped the battlefield. ⚡ Pulsar The Untouchable Transporter 🛞 When the mission is suicidal, when the cargo must arrive no matter the cost, there’s only one name the underground trusts. Pulsar. This high-performance sports machine wasn’t built for chaos. It was built to outsmart it. Lightweight. Surgical. Precise. While others smash their way through combat, Pulsar slips between bullets, traps, and explosions like a ghost at full throttle. Speed is its armor. Control is its weapon. Its signature ability, Shockwave, releases a kinetic burst that repels nearby threats, clearing space and punishing anyone who dares get too close. No collisions. No scratches. No mistakes. Pulsar doesn’t fight the battlefield. It escapes it. And still wins. ❄️ Ice Scream The Frozen Executioner ☢️ At first, you hear the music. A distorted jingle. Slow. Broken. Wrong. Then the temperature drops. Ice Scream is a relic of the old world, a ruined ice cream truck reborn as a cryogenic war machine, dragging death behind it like frostbite. Beneath its rusted shell lies an experimental freezing core capable of locking entire zones in sub-zero terror. Where it drives, engines stall. Armor cracks. Movement stops. Its special ability, Deep Freeze, unleashes a devastating cryo blast that immobilizes enemies in range, turning fast fights into helpless executions. It doesn’t chase. It traps. It doesn’t destroy fast. It freezes everything… then finishes the job. Ice Scream doesn’t bring treats. It delivers winter. Permanent winter. 🚨 METAL RAMPAGE IS COMING 🚨 Pulsar runs the cargo. Ice Scream controls the field. Reaper executes. Widowmaker corrupts. Different roles. Different strategies. One battlefield. Metal Rampage isn’t just vehicular combat. It’s tactical warfare on wheels. 🗓 Launch next month ⚙️ More combatants incoming 🔥 The rampage begins soon Choose your machine. Claim your role. Dominate the wasteland. $NAKA #MetalRampage #BUIDL

🔥 BIG REVEAL | METAL RAMPAGE - FIRST COMBATANTS DEPLOYED 🔥 The engines are online. The wasteland is waking up. And the first machines of destruction have entered the arena. Before the executioners. Before the poisoners. There were the pioneers. Two vehicles built to survive the impossible. Two legends that shaped the battlefield. ⚡ Pulsar The Untouchable Transporter 🛞 When the mission is suicidal, when the cargo must arrive no matter the cost, there’s only one name the underground trusts. Pulsar. This high-performance sports machine wasn’t built for chaos. It was built to outsmart it. Lightweight. Surgical. Precise. While others smash their way through combat, Pulsar slips between bullets, traps, and explosions like a ghost at full throttle. Speed is its armor. Control is its weapon. Its signature ability, Shockwave, releases a kinetic burst that repels nearby threats, clearing space and punishing anyone who dares get too close. No collisions. No scratches. No mistakes. Pulsar doesn’t fight the battlefield. It escapes it. And still wins. ❄️ Ice Scream The Frozen Executioner ☢️ At first, you hear the music. A distorted jingle. Slow. Broken. Wrong. Then the temperature drops. Ice Scream is a relic of the old world, a ruined ice cream truck reborn as a cryogenic war machine, dragging death behind it like frostbite. Beneath its rusted shell lies an experimental freezing core capable of locking entire zones in sub-zero terror. Where it drives, engines stall. Armor cracks. Movement stops. Its special ability, Deep Freeze, unleashes a devastating cryo blast that immobilizes enemies in range, turning fast fights into helpless executions. It doesn’t chase. It traps. It doesn’t destroy fast. It freezes everything… then finishes the job. Ice Scream doesn’t bring treats. It delivers winter. Permanent winter. 🚨 METAL RAMPAGE IS COMING 🚨 Pulsar runs the cargo. Ice Scream controls the field. Reaper executes. Widowmaker corrupts. Different roles. Different strategies. One battlefield. Metal Rampage isn’t just vehicular combat. It’s tactical warfare on wheels. 🗓 Launch next month ⚙️ More combatants incoming 🔥 The rampage begins soon Choose your machine. Claim your role. Dominate the wasteland. $NAKA #MetalRampage #BUIDL

Nakamoto.Games

11,060 次观看 • 8 个月前

some people criticizing and understimating the pain that zhang linghe felt during filming this "mounting a horse" scene in Pursuit of Jade. the harsh critics makes it to the point this actor who also often working with hanging wires make a video to clarify 🎬⚔️ "Everyone, this is a behind-the-scenes clip from the set of the recently very popular web drama, Pursuit of Jade, showing the male lead Zhang Linghe mounting a horse while wearing armor. The reason we’re talking about it is because many people in the comment section have been criticizing him. Let’s watch the video first. Without exaggerating or defending him blindly, as someone in the same profession who has also been suspended on wires a few times, I’ll give an objective evaluation of whether he’s acting or just complaining for no reason. First, the armor he’s wearing must have a sense of heaviness in order to show texture on camera. Judging by eye, this armor probably weighs about 20–30 jin (roughly 10–15 kg). That’s like carrying dozens of pounds of rice while getting onto a horse, which is somewhat difficult. So they use wire to help him mount the horse. That part is not really a problem. Now the key point, everyone should look carefully at the details. Wire rigs are generally made of high-strength steel cables, otherwise they could easily snap. That’s why you often hear news about actors using wire rigs where the cable breaks and they fall, breaking arms or legs. It is indeed very dangerous. I’ve even heard of actors becoming paralyzed after falling when the wire broke. Now here’s where his issue appears: the high-strength steel cable is rubbing against his armpit. People may not know that the skin under the armpit is extremely delicate. Imagine that steel wire bearing such heavy body weight while rubbing against the armpit, and there’s no armor padding there either, basically only a piece of clothing between the skin and the wire. That is very painful. Once when I was filming a costume drama and suspended on wires, I was wearing two layers of clothing, and I didn’t even have the extra weight of armor. Even so, after filming and returning to my room, there was a thick blood mark under my armpit. So regarding this video, I hope everyone can understand and discuss the matter based on facts. He really is in pain. Behind the glamorous appearance, there is suffering that’s hard to talk about. Sometimes if you say it, people think you’re being melodramatic. If you don’t say it, you just feel frustrated. Many times it looks like nothing to outsiders, but only people in the same profession can truly understand. thankyou for the explanation video teacher🥺 I hope people will see zhang linghe's dedication in this vid🥹

some people criticizing and understimating the pain that zhang linghe felt during filming this "mounting a horse" scene in Pursuit of Jade. the harsh critics makes it to the point this actor who also often working with hanging wires make a video to clarify 🎬⚔️ "Everyone, this is a behind-the-scenes clip from the set of the recently very popular web drama, Pursuit of Jade, showing the male lead Zhang Linghe mounting a horse while wearing armor. The reason we’re talking about it is because many people in the comment section have been criticizing him. Let’s watch the video first. Without exaggerating or defending him blindly, as someone in the same profession who has also been suspended on wires a few times, I’ll give an objective evaluation of whether he’s acting or just complaining for no reason. First, the armor he’s wearing must have a sense of heaviness in order to show texture on camera. Judging by eye, this armor probably weighs about 20–30 jin (roughly 10–15 kg). That’s like carrying dozens of pounds of rice while getting onto a horse, which is somewhat difficult. So they use wire to help him mount the horse. That part is not really a problem. Now the key point, everyone should look carefully at the details. Wire rigs are generally made of high-strength steel cables, otherwise they could easily snap. That’s why you often hear news about actors using wire rigs where the cable breaks and they fall, breaking arms or legs. It is indeed very dangerous. I’ve even heard of actors becoming paralyzed after falling when the wire broke. Now here’s where his issue appears: the high-strength steel cable is rubbing against his armpit. People may not know that the skin under the armpit is extremely delicate. Imagine that steel wire bearing such heavy body weight while rubbing against the armpit, and there’s no armor padding there either, basically only a piece of clothing between the skin and the wire. That is very painful. Once when I was filming a costume drama and suspended on wires, I was wearing two layers of clothing, and I didn’t even have the extra weight of armor. Even so, after filming and returning to my room, there was a thick blood mark under my armpit. So regarding this video, I hope everyone can understand and discuss the matter based on facts. He really is in pain. Behind the glamorous appearance, there is suffering that’s hard to talk about. Sometimes if you say it, people think you’re being melodramatic. If you don’t say it, you just feel frustrated. Many times it looks like nothing to outsiders, but only people in the same profession can truly understand. thankyou for the explanation video teacher🥺 I hope people will see zhang linghe's dedication in this vid🥹

张凌赫的小核桃𖹭

107,982 次观看 • 6 个月前

Tulum Peyniri is a Turkish mountain cheese that is matured in a goat skin. Traditionally, local farmers make this cheese using raw cow or sheep milk. In more modern times, you might find versions that are made with pasteurised cow, goat or sheep milk... Tulum Peyniri is a very unusual type of cheese that is gaining popularity in the culinary world. It is a traditional cheese that has been produced for centuries in Turkey. This unique cheese has a distinctive flavour and texture that has been enjoyed by locals and tourists alike. Tulum Peyniri originated in Turkey, specifically in the province of Erzincan. It is believed that the cheese has been produced in this region for over a thousand years. Locals use either cow, goat or sheep milk to make this cheese and age it in goat skin bags called tulum. Actually, this Turkish cheese has a rich history that dates back to the Ottoman Empire. It was a popular cheese among the Ottoman aristocracy and was often served at royal banquets. Over time, the cheese became more widely available and was enjoyed by people from all walks of life. Presently, Tulum Peyniri is primarily produced in the province of Erzincan, which is located in eastern Turkey. The region is known for its rugged terrain and harsh climate, which makes it ideal for sheep farming. The sheep in this region graze on wild herbs and grasses, which gives the milk a unique flavour. Today, there are many small-scale producers in Turkey. Some of the most well-known producers include Hacı Dayı, Çağlayanlar and Özcanlar. Traditionally, the locals used raw cow or sheep milk. But in more modern times, you might find versions that are made with pasteurised cow, goat or sheep milk. And that are aged in metal tins instead of animal hide. After fermenting the fresh milk, the cheesemaker strains it through a cheese cloth to separate the whey from the curds. Afterwards, they rest the young cheese for one night before transferring it to a copper vessel. At this stage, they crumble the cheese and add dry salt. It is then pressed and allowed to drain for a further 10 days. And this is when the magic begins. The formed young cheese is moved into a goat skin that has been specially cleaned and treated. It is pressed into the skin, filling it compactly. And the opening of the skin is then sewn shut. Maturation takes place at high altitudes and humidity. And can last for up to three months. At this age, Tulum develops a beautiful crumbly texture and a delicious complex flavour. Tulum Peyniri has a sharp, tangy flavour that is similar to Feta. However, it has a crumbly texture and is quite dry compared to other types of cheese. Moreover, this cheese has a strong aroma that is earthy and slightly sour. Undoubtedly, this is a very versatile cheese that pairs well with many different foods. Locals often serve it as part of a meze platter alongside olives, tomatoes and other Mediterranean-style dishes. Tulum excels as a table cheese but can also be used in cooking. Some great recipes showcasing this cheese include börek, pides and pesto sauce. Furthermore, it also pairs well with roasted vegetables, grilled meats and salads. 🎥 : Credit to the Owner #archaeohistories

Tulum Peyniri is a Turkish mountain cheese that is matured in a goat skin. Traditionally, local farmers make this cheese using raw cow or sheep milk. In more modern times, you might find versions that are made with pasteurised cow, goat or sheep milk... Tulum Peyniri is a very unusual type of cheese that is gaining popularity in the culinary world. It is a traditional cheese that has been produced for centuries in Turkey. This unique cheese has a distinctive flavour and texture that has been enjoyed by locals and tourists alike. Tulum Peyniri originated in Turkey, specifically in the province of Erzincan. It is believed that the cheese has been produced in this region for over a thousand years. Locals use either cow, goat or sheep milk to make this cheese and age it in goat skin bags called tulum. Actually, this Turkish cheese has a rich history that dates back to the Ottoman Empire. It was a popular cheese among the Ottoman aristocracy and was often served at royal banquets. Over time, the cheese became more widely available and was enjoyed by people from all walks of life. Presently, Tulum Peyniri is primarily produced in the province of Erzincan, which is located in eastern Turkey. The region is known for its rugged terrain and harsh climate, which makes it ideal for sheep farming. The sheep in this region graze on wild herbs and grasses, which gives the milk a unique flavour. Today, there are many small-scale producers in Turkey. Some of the most well-known producers include Hacı Dayı, Çağlayanlar and Özcanlar. Traditionally, the locals used raw cow or sheep milk. But in more modern times, you might find versions that are made with pasteurised cow, goat or sheep milk. And that are aged in metal tins instead of animal hide. After fermenting the fresh milk, the cheesemaker strains it through a cheese cloth to separate the whey from the curds. Afterwards, they rest the young cheese for one night before transferring it to a copper vessel. At this stage, they crumble the cheese and add dry salt. It is then pressed and allowed to drain for a further 10 days. And this is when the magic begins. The formed young cheese is moved into a goat skin that has been specially cleaned and treated. It is pressed into the skin, filling it compactly. And the opening of the skin is then sewn shut. Maturation takes place at high altitudes and humidity. And can last for up to three months. At this age, Tulum develops a beautiful crumbly texture and a delicious complex flavour. Tulum Peyniri has a sharp, tangy flavour that is similar to Feta. However, it has a crumbly texture and is quite dry compared to other types of cheese. Moreover, this cheese has a strong aroma that is earthy and slightly sour. Undoubtedly, this is a very versatile cheese that pairs well with many different foods. Locals often serve it as part of a meze platter alongside olives, tomatoes and other Mediterranean-style dishes. Tulum excels as a table cheese but can also be used in cooking. Some great recipes showcasing this cheese include börek, pides and pesto sauce. Furthermore, it also pairs well with roasted vegetables, grilled meats and salads. 🎥 : Credit to the Owner #archaeohistories

Archaeo - Histories

99,207 次观看 • 2 年前

Microphone Shaped Charge Conspiracy Theory It is not improbable, it is impossible to have killed Charlie Kirk. The first graphic depicts the maximum size of the charge that could theoretically fit inside of the microphone, assuming it was a Rode Wireless II (1.8 × 1.7 × 0.8 inches). The size of the charge is limited by the width of the mic. This is because a shaped charge is cylindrical. The most optimally sized charge is based off of the diameter of the cylinder, which does fit into the mic (theoretically). The design of the shaped charge has been around since the late 1800's, and with over 100 years of testing, the science is clear. Limitations: In order to function effectively, the charge must be perfectly "rear center primed" or RCP. As noted in the provided graphic, the detonator must be positioned perfectly center of the cylinder. This is due to the propagation wave of the explosive as it travels towards the empty cone space. Once the wave, traveling at about 8,000 meters per second, reaches the cone, forward and inward pressures cause a compression of the air inside of the space. Any copper, metal, glass liner forming the cone is turned into jagged particles. If the detonator is placed off center, the detonation wave will reach one side faster than the other side, negating the desired effect. BTW, you would also have only a few millimeters worth of space to make this happen. Penetration depth at optimal stand off distance through steel. The expected penetration through steel is 1/2 diameter of the cone at optimal distance. In this case, it could penetrate up to 0.365" with an optimal standoff distance of 1.065 inches. At and estimated 12x the optimal standoff distance from the mic to Charlie's neck, the compressed wave/particles would have completely dissipated. Cutting Through The Conspiracy If all of this was too complicated for you to understand, then know this. Anyone suggesting this is what killed Charlie, or could have been used, has literally no idea what they are talking about or is lying. While this charge is "directional" in nature, it is still an explosive device. The inward pressure that creates the penetrating jet only exists because there is an outward pressure as well. This would have blown a large hole in Charlie's shirt and caused considerable damage to his pectoral muscle. The attached video is 2.5 grams of PETN detonating as a shaped charge. You would have known if there was any explosive charge. He goes by the name "poopswindler" on youtube if you want to look him up.

Microphone Shaped Charge Conspiracy Theory It is not improbable, it is impossible to have killed Charlie Kirk. The first graphic depicts the maximum size of the charge that could theoretically fit inside of the microphone, assuming it was a Rode Wireless II (1.8 × 1.7 × 0.8 inches). The size of the charge is limited by the width of the mic. This is because a shaped charge is cylindrical. The most optimally sized charge is based off of the diameter of the cylinder, which does fit into the mic (theoretically). The design of the shaped charge has been around since the late 1800's, and with over 100 years of testing, the science is clear. Limitations: In order to function effectively, the charge must be perfectly "rear center primed" or RCP. As noted in the provided graphic, the detonator must be positioned perfectly center of the cylinder. This is due to the propagation wave of the explosive as it travels towards the empty cone space. Once the wave, traveling at about 8,000 meters per second, reaches the cone, forward and inward pressures cause a compression of the air inside of the space. Any copper, metal, glass liner forming the cone is turned into jagged particles. If the detonator is placed off center, the detonation wave will reach one side faster than the other side, negating the desired effect. BTW, you would also have only a few millimeters worth of space to make this happen. Penetration depth at optimal stand off distance through steel. The expected penetration through steel is 1/2 diameter of the cone at optimal distance. In this case, it could penetrate up to 0.365" with an optimal standoff distance of 1.065 inches. At and estimated 12x the optimal standoff distance from the mic to Charlie's neck, the compressed wave/particles would have completely dissipated. Cutting Through The Conspiracy If all of this was too complicated for you to understand, then know this. Anyone suggesting this is what killed Charlie, or could have been used, has literally no idea what they are talking about or is lying. While this charge is "directional" in nature, it is still an explosive device. The inward pressure that creates the penetrating jet only exists because there is an outward pressure as well. This would have blown a large hole in Charlie's shirt and caused considerable damage to his pectoral muscle. The attached video is 2.5 grams of PETN detonating as a shaped charge. You would have known if there was any explosive charge. He goes by the name "poopswindler" on youtube if you want to look him up.

Matt Tardio

70,473 次观看 • 3 个月前

It is impossible for all NATO allies to be like Turkiye. Why? This is because there are some countries within the alliance that demand all kinds of assistance without assuming any operational responsibility or join missions, and some has been engaging in hostile actions and lobbying efforts for years with the aim of hindering the progress of other NATO countries. Not only has this country failed to make any financial or military contributions to NATO, but it is also attempting to weaken NATO from within in order to hinder the progress of countries like Turkiye—which carry out NATO missions under the NATO flag from the Baltic states to Eastern Europe. Let’s turn to the other aspect of the issue: the question of being like Turkiye. Just think about it this way; What business does a country that can’t even build a cheap commercial ship have in the same military alliance as one that can produce over 50 warships including destroyers, aircraft carriers and submarines at the same time? Can the perception of power and alliance ever be the same between a country capable of delivering thousands of AG munitions in a single shipment and a country that is delighted even to purchase just 30–40 AG munitions? Can a country with only 150-170 tanks that could be considered "modern" in its inventory be the same as one that is building facilities capable of delivering 100 tanks a year? Can there be a spirit of unity between a country that can develop and fly a 5th-generation fighter jet, and build facilities to produce 24+9 KAAN fighter jets/year and a country that, upon purchasing 20-25 4th-generation aircraft, immediately thinks of provocation, illegal actions and violating treaties for expanding ? As long as NATO fails to purge own parasites within its union, other countries will be forced to walk with a burden on their backs. Without these types of freeloaders—who don’t shoulder any of the alliance’s burdens—NATO could be a much stronger military organization. They're of no use—at least we'd be spared the harm they cause. Imagine flying side by side in battle with the incompetents who crashed a plane into parked fighter jets during a NATO exercise or caused a helicopter to crash into the sea in other exercise while flying at low altitude. May God grant us ease.

It is impossible for all NATO allies to be like Turkiye. Why? This is because there are some countries within the alliance that demand all kinds of assistance without assuming any operational responsibility or join missions, and some has been engaging in hostile actions and lobbying efforts for years with the aim of hindering the progress of other NATO countries. Not only has this country failed to make any financial or military contributions to NATO, but it is also attempting to weaken NATO from within in order to hinder the progress of countries like Turkiye—which carry out NATO missions under the NATO flag from the Baltic states to Eastern Europe. Let’s turn to the other aspect of the issue: the question of being like Turkiye. Just think about it this way; What business does a country that can’t even build a cheap commercial ship have in the same military alliance as one that can produce over 50 warships including destroyers, aircraft carriers and submarines at the same time? Can the perception of power and alliance ever be the same between a country capable of delivering thousands of AG munitions in a single shipment and a country that is delighted even to purchase just 30–40 AG munitions? Can a country with only 150-170 tanks that could be considered "modern" in its inventory be the same as one that is building facilities capable of delivering 100 tanks a year? Can there be a spirit of unity between a country that can develop and fly a 5th-generation fighter jet, and build facilities to produce 24+9 KAAN fighter jets/year and a country that, upon purchasing 20-25 4th-generation aircraft, immediately thinks of provocation, illegal actions and violating treaties for expanding ? As long as NATO fails to purge own parasites within its union, other countries will be forced to walk with a burden on their backs. Without these types of freeloaders—who don’t shoulder any of the alliance’s burdens—NATO could be a much stronger military organization. They're of no use—at least we'd be spared the harm they cause. Imagine flying side by side in battle with the incompetents who crashed a plane into parked fighter jets during a NATO exercise or caused a helicopter to crash into the sea in other exercise while flying at low altitude. May God grant us ease.

TR_tech

18,247 次观看 • 3 个月前

"In 'Zodiac' (2007), I wanted the audience to feel like they went through the ringer with these guys,(...) in retrospect you look at it & say maybe audiences who are looking for entertainment on a Friday night don’t want that toll taken on them." --- David Fincher Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: It’s so rare to walk out of a movie and to feel like I know more about a subject than I did walking into it. Watching Zodiac is like the experience of reading a really absorbing non-fiction book, and I know that part of it for you was about honoring the people who were the victims of the Zodiac, but you also have so many details, so many facts, you take it to such a level where there’s so much information… why was that important to you? Fincher: I don’t respect movies that treat me like I don’t have the attention span or mental faculty to follow… it’s one thing to talk about Dave Toschi’s fall from grace in an oblique and generic way. I can answer that question in a couple of different ways. I wanted the movie to take its toll on the audience, I wanted the audience to feel like they went through it, like they went through the ringer with these guys, and I didn’t know how to do that because these guys didn’t run across rooftops and fall off fire escapes. In their quest to bring the Zodiac to justice they followed the trail of breadcrumbs as far as it would take them, and they kept pushing and kept pushing when there were crackpots coming out of the woodwork. I felt like I didn’t want to make one of those movies where you do montage/montage/montage and you get the idea that they went to the mat with this, that it took its toll – I wanted the audience to feel that. You know, in retrospect you look at it and say maybe audiences who are looking for entertainment on a Friday night don’t want that toll taken on them. I felt like anything less than that would be doing the story and people involved a disservice. You could do it as something compressed, where you get the gist of it, and we would have shots of Jake [Gyllenhaal] half asleep and you would have those obligatory shots where the boss says, ‘You look like sh!t.’ And in the end I still don’t feel like you get enough of what happens with his family, we don’t get enough with his wife and kids, but it was all we could do to get it in at under two hours and forty minutes. I feel like we took about as much time as you can really expect an audience to sit still for and we tried to make them feel what it was like to be invested in this circuitous run down the rabbit hole." (David Fincher's interview with Devin Farachi, 2008)

"In 'Zodiac' (2007), I wanted the audience to feel like they went through the ringer with these guys,(...) in retrospect you look at it & say maybe audiences who are looking for entertainment on a Friday night don’t want that toll taken on them." --- David Fincher Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: It’s so rare to walk out of a movie and to feel like I know more about a subject than I did walking into it. Watching Zodiac is like the experience of reading a really absorbing non-fiction book, and I know that part of it for you was about honoring the people who were the victims of the Zodiac, but you also have so many details, so many facts, you take it to such a level where there’s so much information… why was that important to you? Fincher: I don’t respect movies that treat me like I don’t have the attention span or mental faculty to follow… it’s one thing to talk about Dave Toschi’s fall from grace in an oblique and generic way. I can answer that question in a couple of different ways. I wanted the movie to take its toll on the audience, I wanted the audience to feel like they went through it, like they went through the ringer with these guys, and I didn’t know how to do that because these guys didn’t run across rooftops and fall off fire escapes. In their quest to bring the Zodiac to justice they followed the trail of breadcrumbs as far as it would take them, and they kept pushing and kept pushing when there were crackpots coming out of the woodwork. I felt like I didn’t want to make one of those movies where you do montage/montage/montage and you get the idea that they went to the mat with this, that it took its toll – I wanted the audience to feel that. You know, in retrospect you look at it and say maybe audiences who are looking for entertainment on a Friday night don’t want that toll taken on them. I felt like anything less than that would be doing the story and people involved a disservice. You could do it as something compressed, where you get the gist of it, and we would have shots of Jake [Gyllenhaal] half asleep and you would have those obligatory shots where the boss says, ‘You look like sh!t.’ And in the end I still don’t feel like you get enough of what happens with his family, we don’t get enough with his wife and kids, but it was all we could do to get it in at under two hours and forty minutes. I feel like we took about as much time as you can really expect an audience to sit still for and we tried to make them feel what it was like to be invested in this circuitous run down the rabbit hole." (David Fincher's interview with Devin Farachi, 2008)

DepressedBergman

19,335 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 HER OLD FORD TRUCK HAS A FEATURE NEW CARS GOT RID OF — NOW EVERYONE WANTS IT BACK A woman just showed off a feature on her old Ford truck right as she was about to run out of gas... and people can't believe manufacturers ever got rid of it. A SECOND FUEL TANK. Instead of panicking when the first tank was almost empty, she simply flipped over to the extra tank and kept driving. And apparently, that's only the beginning of what we've lost. Videos comparing older vehicles to modern cars are exploding online as people rediscover features that used to be completely normal. One guy showed a 1998 Buick LeSabre Limited with huge couch-like bench seats, leather wrapping around the seats, physical steering-wheel controls for the climate system and radio, carpeted door panels, wood and chrome trim... even separate passenger climate controls built into the passenger door. Almost 30 years ago. Another old Jeep owner demonstrated something that's nearly impossible with many modern push-button cars: removing the key while the engine continues running, using it to unlock something, then putting it back. Meanwhile, another driver filmed himself fighting through a modern Ford touchscreen just to perform one of the simplest functions imaginable: TURN ON THE AIR CONDITIONING. People are starting to wonder whether somewhere along the way, automakers confused MORE TECHNOLOGY with BETTER DESIGN. Physical buttons became touchscreens. Simple controls became menus. Plush interiors became increasingly minimalist. And useful features like auxiliary fuel tanks became far less common on everyday vehicles. Maybe old cars weren't better at everything. But they definitely make you wonder: Did cars actually become more convenient over the last 30 years… or did we trade simplicity for technology nobody asked for?

🚨 HER OLD FORD TRUCK HAS A FEATURE NEW CARS GOT RID OF — NOW EVERYONE WANTS IT BACK A woman just showed off a feature on her old Ford truck right as she was about to run out of gas... and people can't believe manufacturers ever got rid of it. A SECOND FUEL TANK. Instead of panicking when the first tank was almost empty, she simply flipped over to the extra tank and kept driving. And apparently, that's only the beginning of what we've lost. Videos comparing older vehicles to modern cars are exploding online as people rediscover features that used to be completely normal. One guy showed a 1998 Buick LeSabre Limited with huge couch-like bench seats, leather wrapping around the seats, physical steering-wheel controls for the climate system and radio, carpeted door panels, wood and chrome trim... even separate passenger climate controls built into the passenger door. Almost 30 years ago. Another old Jeep owner demonstrated something that's nearly impossible with many modern push-button cars: removing the key while the engine continues running, using it to unlock something, then putting it back. Meanwhile, another driver filmed himself fighting through a modern Ford touchscreen just to perform one of the simplest functions imaginable: TURN ON THE AIR CONDITIONING. People are starting to wonder whether somewhere along the way, automakers confused MORE TECHNOLOGY with BETTER DESIGN. Physical buttons became touchscreens. Simple controls became menus. Plush interiors became increasingly minimalist. And useful features like auxiliary fuel tanks became far less common on everyday vehicles. Maybe old cars weren't better at everything. But they definitely make you wonder: Did cars actually become more convenient over the last 30 years… or did we trade simplicity for technology nobody asked for?

HustleBitch

107,681 次观看 • 1 个月前

Why did the Israeli defense minister say: "we are fighting human animals"? You may think it is because of earlier atrocities, but it is not Few know this, but the Jewish oral tradition, the Talmud, states that all non-jews are animals in human form built only to serve the Jews in a more respectable manner than a four-legged beast. What makes a Jew a Jew is their obedience to the Talmud, not the Old Testament, this is a common misconception. Just like the Pharisees with their traditions of men, the Talmud is a legalistic workaround all of God's OT laws. Mark 7:13: "Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye" Unfortunately, many modern Christians have devolved into blatant Pharisee worship, even elevating the flag of the Pharisees 🇮🇱 with the cross of our Lord ✝️ pledging their undying support to the Pharisee cause. There is a difference though the oral tradition of today is even worse than at the time of the crucifixion and now allows, by their religious law, theft, cheating, murder of non-jews, and even pedophilia. There is a very small community (40,000 worldwide) of Kararite Jews that actually do worship the OT exclusively, but they are horribly discriminated against and were banned from entering Israel by official diktat until only recently in 2007. To this day, they are still hated in Israel for choosing (half) of the Word of God over the man-made traditions of the Pharisees.

Why did the Israeli defense minister say: "we are fighting human animals"? You may think it is because of earlier atrocities, but it is not Few know this, but the Jewish oral tradition, the Talmud, states that all non-jews are animals in human form built only to serve the Jews in a more respectable manner than a four-legged beast. What makes a Jew a Jew is their obedience to the Talmud, not the Old Testament, this is a common misconception. Just like the Pharisees with their traditions of men, the Talmud is a legalistic workaround all of God's OT laws. Mark 7:13: "Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye" Unfortunately, many modern Christians have devolved into blatant Pharisee worship, even elevating the flag of the Pharisees 🇮🇱 with the cross of our Lord ✝️ pledging their undying support to the Pharisee cause. There is a difference though the oral tradition of today is even worse than at the time of the crucifixion and now allows, by their religious law, theft, cheating, murder of non-jews, and even pedophilia. There is a very small community (40,000 worldwide) of Kararite Jews that actually do worship the OT exclusively, but they are horribly discriminated against and were banned from entering Israel by official diktat until only recently in 2007. To this day, they are still hated in Israel for choosing (half) of the Word of God over the man-made traditions of the Pharisees.

Politics Is Masonic Theater: 🍞 & 🎪

194,686 次观看 • 3 年前