Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Why oh why doesn’t our establishment accept that its only moral obligation is to the British state and the British people? Not to global welfare. Not to international liberalism. To us, and our country, and our self-government. That is it. The moment they do that, so many of the...

DrDStarkeyCBE's profile picture

David Starkey

38,051 subscribers

117,549 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Melanie Phillips thinks Jewish identity is "the unique fusion of a people, a faith and a land", which is why "the Jewish people, as *a* people, is entitled to live in its ancestral homeland." But British identity, she says, "is civic and not ethnic", and therefore has no comparable collective claim to possess the British Isles as their homeland. This double standard is unsustainable. "British" describes the distinct ethnic groups of the British Isles, whose lineage can be traced back thousands of years, and whose Christian faith shaped their nuclearised family units, small farm holdings, manners, morals, culture, and customs. They are a people, with a territory, faith, and distinct identity. And while Melanie says "the suggestion that Jews want to deny to the British the self-determination that the Jews have fulfilled in the State of Israel is false and disgraceful", she also thinks British people excluding anyone of foreign ancestry from being considered as British as they are is racist. It would be inconceivable for me to tell Melanie what being Jewish actually means, or that Jews shouldn't be alarmed if they were set to become demographic minorities in Israel. Melanie believes Jews are entitled to this in Israel, and that it guarantees their demographic security, but that the same consideration is not given to the British people in Britain. And I just won’t accept that. I don’t have to. It would be disadvantageous to my nation, and dishonourable to my children, if I did. If Israel is the only way to prevent Jews from becoming a persecuted minority in foreign lands, then I want the same for my own people, to prevent us from becoming a hated minority in our own country. That is a reasonable demand. If you expect me to support that for you but not for myself, at the expense of my children's future, then I won't take you seriously, no matter what names you call me.
34:02

Melanie Phillips thinks Jewish identity is "the unique fusion of a people, a faith and a land", which is why "the Jewish people, as *a* people, is entitled to live in its ancestral homeland." But British identity, she says, "is civic and not ethnic", and therefore has no comparable collective claim to possess the British Isles as their homeland. This double standard is unsustainable. "British" describes the distinct ethnic groups of the British Isles, whose lineage can be traced back thousands of years, and whose Christian faith shaped their nuclearised family units, small farm holdings, manners, morals, culture, and customs. They are a people, with a territory, faith, and distinct identity. And while Melanie says "the suggestion that Jews want to deny to the British the self-determination that the Jews have fulfilled in the State of Israel is false and disgraceful", she also thinks British people excluding anyone of foreign ancestry from being considered as British as they are is racist. It would be inconceivable for me to tell Melanie what being Jewish actually means, or that Jews shouldn't be alarmed if they were set to become demographic minorities in Israel. Melanie believes Jews are entitled to this in Israel, and that it guarantees their demographic security, but that the same consideration is not given to the British people in Britain. And I just won’t accept that. I don’t have to. It would be disadvantageous to my nation, and dishonourable to my children, if I did. If Israel is the only way to prevent Jews from becoming a persecuted minority in foreign lands, then I want the same for my own people, to prevent us from becoming a hated minority in our own country. That is a reasonable demand. If you expect me to support that for you but not for myself, at the expense of my children's future, then I won't take you seriously, no matter what names you call me.

Connor Tomlinson

30,499 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The British people have never wanted mass immigration. We certainly do not want our children to grow up as a minority in their own country. Yet on present trends, that will be the case. What we now do about that is the central question of our age.
1:46

The British people have never wanted mass immigration. We certainly do not want our children to grow up as a minority in their own country. Yet on present trends, that will be the case. What we now do about that is the central question of our age.

Charlie Downes

125,864 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Rupert Lowe believes the British state has become the enemy of the British people. "Most of them are members of the Fabian Society." "And that is ideologically driven... They want a dependency culture. They don't want a thriving, independent, self-reliant state." "The government that we've got wants to encourage this welfarism as a way of effectively controlling the British people." "[British people have] got to start growing a bit of backbone... otherwise they're going to lose the country that we all dearly love." Credit: Rupert Lowe MP Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪
1:26

Rupert Lowe believes the British state has become the enemy of the British people. "Most of them are members of the Fabian Society." "And that is ideologically driven... They want a dependency culture. They don't want a thriving, independent, self-reliant state." "The government that we've got wants to encourage this welfarism as a way of effectively controlling the British people." "[British people have] got to start growing a bit of backbone... otherwise they're going to lose the country that we all dearly love." Credit: Rupert Lowe MP Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪

Wide Awake Media

118,311 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This is NOT racism, its not cruel, its not bigotry it is FACT and we MUST put the British people first. It’s simply not fair and our priority must be the survival, safety and wellbeing of our own people! Its as simple as that. Restore Britain
0:31

This is NOT racism, its not cruel, its not bigotry it is FACT and we MUST put the British people first. It’s simply not fair and our priority must be the survival, safety and wellbeing of our own people! Its as simple as that. Restore Britain

Orla Minihane

22,642 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This is Britain now. A foreign man holds a British child in place while a gang of youths beat him senseless. The video is sickening. A little British boy being restrained and attacked by a group that has no business being here in the first place. This isn’t “enrichment.” This is the direct, predictable result of decades of mass immigration from incompatible cultures, weak borders, and a political class that has refused to protect British children. While our own kids are being targeted on the streets, the authorities often seem more interested in protecting the feelings of certain communities than in keeping our streets safe. We’ve seen this pattern before — grooming gangs that raped and trafficked thousands of British girls for years while police and councils looked the other way. Now we have street violence where foreign men hold British children down so their mates can attack them. And what’s the response? Too often, hesitation, excuses, or two-tier policing that treats native victims as secondary. The British people did not vote for this. We did not consent to turning our towns and cities into places where our children are no longer safe walking down the street. The same government that imports these problems then expects us to accept the violence as the new normal. This has to stop. Foreign nationals involved in attacks on British children should face immediate deportation after any sentence. No human rights loopholes. No endless appeals. The safety of our kids comes first. We need proper border control, mass remigration of those who refuse to integrate or who commit crimes, and a justice system that actually protects British people instead of bending over backwards for those who attack us. That child should never have been in that situation. His attackers should never have been in this country. Every incident like this is another indictment of the failed policies that have transformed parts of Britain beyond recognition. British children deserve to grow up safe in their own country. Not held down and beaten while foreign men facilitate the attack. Not living in fear because politicians prioritised open borders and political correctness over their protection. Enough is enough. Protect our kids. Deport the predators. Restore Britain.
0:38

This is Britain now. A foreign man holds a British child in place while a gang of youths beat him senseless. The video is sickening. A little British boy being restrained and attacked by a group that has no business being here in the first place. This isn’t “enrichment.” This is the direct, predictable result of decades of mass immigration from incompatible cultures, weak borders, and a political class that has refused to protect British children. While our own kids are being targeted on the streets, the authorities often seem more interested in protecting the feelings of certain communities than in keeping our streets safe. We’ve seen this pattern before — grooming gangs that raped and trafficked thousands of British girls for years while police and councils looked the other way. Now we have street violence where foreign men hold British children down so their mates can attack them. And what’s the response? Too often, hesitation, excuses, or two-tier policing that treats native victims as secondary. The British people did not vote for this. We did not consent to turning our towns and cities into places where our children are no longer safe walking down the street. The same government that imports these problems then expects us to accept the violence as the new normal. This has to stop. Foreign nationals involved in attacks on British children should face immediate deportation after any sentence. No human rights loopholes. No endless appeals. The safety of our kids comes first. We need proper border control, mass remigration of those who refuse to integrate or who commit crimes, and a justice system that actually protects British people instead of bending over backwards for those who attack us. That child should never have been in that situation. His attackers should never have been in this country. Every incident like this is another indictment of the failed policies that have transformed parts of Britain beyond recognition. British children deserve to grow up safe in their own country. Not held down and beaten while foreign men facilitate the attack. Not living in fear because politicians prioritised open borders and political correctness over their protection. Enough is enough. Protect our kids. Deport the predators. Restore Britain.

Right over Left Everytime

103,249 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

"If all this can happen to me. Imagine what can happen to others." I interviewed George Galloway and his wonderful wife Gayatri in Moscow this week. About their exile in Russia. And its so crazy. British police even interrogated Gayatri about the Palestine flag painted on her fingernail! "Essentially the government will be able to designate any individual or organization as acting against the British state." And he's scared of getting that 4am knock on the door. So one of Britains most famous political figures went into exile. And what has he done? Promoted peace with Russia. Well, that's in British interests. Promoted peace with Iran. Well, that's in British interests. Its not in British interests what Isreal is doing in Gaza either. And so how has he damaged British interests? The British security state is out of control. Britain in not sovreign. Those in charge are acting in foreign interests. And everyone knows it. That is the problem. George Galloway gayatri 🍀
5:01

"If all this can happen to me. Imagine what can happen to others." I interviewed George Galloway and his wonderful wife Gayatri in Moscow this week. About their exile in Russia. And its so crazy. British police even interrogated Gayatri about the Palestine flag painted on her fingernail! "Essentially the government will be able to designate any individual or organization as acting against the British state." And he's scared of getting that 4am knock on the door. So one of Britains most famous political figures went into exile. And what has he done? Promoted peace with Russia. Well, that's in British interests. Promoted peace with Iran. Well, that's in British interests. Its not in British interests what Isreal is doing in Gaza either. And so how has he damaged British interests? The British security state is out of control. Britain in not sovreign. Those in charge are acting in foreign interests. And everyone knows it. That is the problem. George Galloway gayatri 🍀

Johnny miller

145,646 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

We shall uphold our commitment to the security of the Falkland Islands. If necessary, we shall do this alone. Our purpose is that the Falkland Islands shall never again be a victim of unprovoked aggression. The final details will not become clear for a few days yet, but we know that some 250 British servicemen and civilians have been killed. They died so that others may live in freedom and justice. Those men did not risk their lives in any way to have a United Nations trusteeship. They risked their lives to defend British sovereign territory, the British way of life and the rights of British people to determine their own future...I do not intend to negotiate on the sovereignty of the islands in any way, except with the people who live there. That is my fervent belief.
2:07

We shall uphold our commitment to the security of the Falkland Islands. If necessary, we shall do this alone. Our purpose is that the Falkland Islands shall never again be a victim of unprovoked aggression. The final details will not become clear for a few days yet, but we know that some 250 British servicemen and civilians have been killed. They died so that others may live in freedom and justice. Those men did not risk their lives in any way to have a United Nations trusteeship. They risked their lives to defend British sovereign territory, the British way of life and the rights of British people to determine their own future...I do not intend to negotiate on the sovereignty of the islands in any way, except with the people who live there. That is my fervent belief.

Margaret Thatcher

14,153 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Henry Bolton, British politician and former leader of the UK Independence Party: The truth is, the British and our European allies do not want war. We do not want escalation, nor do we want a settlement that is imposed by outside powers and that hands president Putin precisely what his invasion was intended to achieve. We, the people of Europe and our governments, fully recognize the stakes. We know what war is. But if we reward Putin for his aggression now, we will have to pay again later - in the Baltics, in the Balkans, in Moldova, perhaps even further west, perhaps even in Poland. It is not warmongering to refuse to reward an aggressor. It is loyalty to the very principles that have kept Europe safe and at peace since 1945. To suggest that European governments are ignoring the British is not only inaccurate - it undermines those governments, the very democratic institutions that America has always encouraged Europe to build and protect - Henry Bolton OBE 🇬🇧
4:30

Henry Bolton, British politician and former leader of the UK Independence Party: The truth is, the British and our European allies do not want war. We do not want escalation, nor do we want a settlement that is imposed by outside powers and that hands president Putin precisely what his invasion was intended to achieve. We, the people of Europe and our governments, fully recognize the stakes. We know what war is. But if we reward Putin for his aggression now, we will have to pay again later - in the Baltics, in the Balkans, in Moldova, perhaps even further west, perhaps even in Poland. It is not warmongering to refuse to reward an aggressor. It is loyalty to the very principles that have kept Europe safe and at peace since 1945. To suggest that European governments are ignoring the British is not only inaccurate - it undermines those governments, the very democratic institutions that America has always encouraged Europe to build and protect - Henry Bolton OBE 🇬🇧

Anton Gerashchenko

90,815 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "We know how special this country is. It's the place that gave us freedom. It's the place that's given us opportunity. It's the place that has given our parents, our grandparents, and many of you the chance not just to do well in life, but to do the most important thing any of us ever want, and that is to leave our children better off than ourselves. That is what makes America special. That's why we love it. That's why we're passionate about it. That is our heritage in this country."
0:46

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "We know how special this country is. It's the place that gave us freedom. It's the place that's given us opportunity. It's the place that has given our parents, our grandparents, and many of you the chance not just to do well in life, but to do the most important thing any of us ever want, and that is to leave our children better off than ourselves. That is what makes America special. That's why we love it. That's why we're passionate about it. That is our heritage in this country."

Rapid Response 47

116,329 просмотров • 12 дней назад

Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. It has planned lethal attacks on British soil, murdered a generation of its own citizens, attacked RAF Akrotiri, and targeted our allies in the region with unprovoked aggression. Hundreds of thousands of British citizens are stranded in the region. They need to know what the British government is doing to bring them home. Britain cannot sit on the fence, and our adversaries must know that we will not stand back when our allies are under attack.
1:35

Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. It has planned lethal attacks on British soil, murdered a generation of its own citizens, attacked RAF Akrotiri, and targeted our allies in the region with unprovoked aggression. Hundreds of thousands of British citizens are stranded in the region. They need to know what the British government is doing to bring them home. Britain cannot sit on the fence, and our adversaries must know that we will not stand back when our allies are under attack.

Priti Patel MP

61,349 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

We are proud to welcome Sally Beck (Sally Beck) to the College as we continue to grow a movement committed to putting British citizens first again. Sally is a national newspaper journalist who has spoken powerfully about the abandonment of the vaccine injured, the collapse of support for families, the worsening outcomes for British children, and the growing sense that politics no longer serves the public. For too long, Britain has been governed in the interests of corporate power, political self-preservation and institutional failure, not in the interests of its own people. We believe that has to end.
2:54

We are proud to welcome Sally Beck (Sally Beck) to the College as we continue to grow a movement committed to putting British citizens first again. Sally is a national newspaper journalist who has spoken powerfully about the abandonment of the vaccine injured, the collapse of support for families, the worsening outcomes for British children, and the growing sense that politics no longer serves the public. For too long, Britain has been governed in the interests of corporate power, political self-preservation and institutional failure, not in the interests of its own people. We believe that has to end.

Advance UK

10,312 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This screeching anti-British activist doesn’t know the first thing about British values. British ppl have every right to want to keep this culture British. We are built on Christian values and that is our culture. We are not moving from it! RT if agree. #IAmBritish🇬🇧
2:03

This screeching anti-British activist doesn’t know the first thing about British values. British ppl have every right to want to keep this culture British. We are built on Christian values and that is our culture. We are not moving from it! RT if agree. #IAmBritish🇬🇧

I Am British 🇬🇧

355,025 просмотров • 1 год назад

Iran’s FM Araghchi: "In our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and strength" If it is assumed that Iran has attacked its neighbors, that assumption is wrong; we have not attacked our neighbors. - We have targeted American bases and facilities that unfortunately are located in the territories of our neighboring countries. Therefore, we have not targeted our neighbors; we target the Americans who have attacked us. We are responding. We were not the ones who started the war; it was the United States that started the war against us, and we are simply defending ourselves. It is clear that our missiles do not reach American soil. What we can do is target American bases and facilities around us that unfortunately are located in the territories of neighboring countries. - First, in our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and strength. Second, he apologized to the people of the region for the problems caused as a result of the US aggression and our response. In fact, it is the President of the United States who should apologize to the people of the region and to the people of Iran for the killings and destruction they have caused.
1:42

Iran’s FM Araghchi: "In our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and strength" If it is assumed that Iran has attacked its neighbors, that assumption is wrong; we have not attacked our neighbors. - We have targeted American bases and facilities that unfortunately are located in the territories of our neighboring countries. Therefore, we have not targeted our neighbors; we target the Americans who have attacked us. We are responding. We were not the ones who started the war; it was the United States that started the war against us, and we are simply defending ourselves. It is clear that our missiles do not reach American soil. What we can do is target American bases and facilities around us that unfortunately are located in the territories of neighboring countries. - First, in our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and strength. Second, he apologized to the people of the region for the problems caused as a result of the US aggression and our response. In fact, it is the President of the United States who should apologize to the people of the region and to the people of Iran for the killings and destruction they have caused.

True Promise - الوعد الصادق ✪🇮🇷

19,518 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The Constitution of Ireland begins not with government, but with the Nation—with the People themselves. That is not symbolism. That is authority. It is from the People that all power flows, and it is by our collective will that we established the Constitution as the supreme law of this State. Within it, we gave ourselves courts—not as instruments of control, but as guardians of liberty. Under Article 34, we vested those courts with a solemn duty: to protect and vindicate our personal rights. Those personal rights are not abstract ideas. They are expressly recognised and protected across the Constitution—beginning in Article 40, and extending through Articles 41, 42, 42A, 43, and 44. Together, they safeguard what it means to live freely and with dignity in Ireland: our personal liberty, our families, our children, our right to educate according to conscience, our private property, and our freedom of religion. These rights do not exist at the pleasure of the State. They do not depend on policy, preference, or administrative convenience. They are fundamental, and they are inalienable. What we are witnessing at this moment is something profoundly serious. A member of the Government—holding office as a Minister of State, an office that exists only by statute—has purported, through a statutory instrument, to prevent the People of Ireland from exercising their constitutional rights in their own courts. That cannot stand. No statutory instrument can override the Constitution. No minister, junior or otherwise, can suspend fundamental rights. No act of secondary legislation can lawfully obstruct access to the courts where those rights are vindicated. To suggest otherwise is not merely mistaken—it is constitutionally impossible. The courts do not belong to the executive. They do not belong to departments. They belong to the People, because the Constitution says so. And so, this is where the line is drawn. The Constitution is not optional. Fundamental rights are not negotiable. Access to justice is not a privilege to be rationed. Tomorrow, the law will be laid plainly before the Minister for Justice—not in defiance, but in fidelity to the Constitution; not in anger, but in duty to the People; not for personal grievance, but for the protection of all. Because if fundamental rights can be restrained today, they can be extinguished tomorrow. And if we do not stand now, we leave our children standing alone later. This is not about power. It is about principle. It is about ensuring that the Constitution lives—not on paper, but in practice. And it is about the furtherance of our fundamental rights, so that we may protect ourselves, our families, our children, the way we educate our children, our private property, and our religion—today, and for generations to come. #NoFeeOnGuarantee
1:14

The Constitution of Ireland begins not with government, but with the Nation—with the People themselves. That is not symbolism. That is authority. It is from the People that all power flows, and it is by our collective will that we established the Constitution as the supreme law of this State. Within it, we gave ourselves courts—not as instruments of control, but as guardians of liberty. Under Article 34, we vested those courts with a solemn duty: to protect and vindicate our personal rights. Those personal rights are not abstract ideas. They are expressly recognised and protected across the Constitution—beginning in Article 40, and extending through Articles 41, 42, 42A, 43, and 44. Together, they safeguard what it means to live freely and with dignity in Ireland: our personal liberty, our families, our children, our right to educate according to conscience, our private property, and our freedom of religion. These rights do not exist at the pleasure of the State. They do not depend on policy, preference, or administrative convenience. They are fundamental, and they are inalienable. What we are witnessing at this moment is something profoundly serious. A member of the Government—holding office as a Minister of State, an office that exists only by statute—has purported, through a statutory instrument, to prevent the People of Ireland from exercising their constitutional rights in their own courts. That cannot stand. No statutory instrument can override the Constitution. No minister, junior or otherwise, can suspend fundamental rights. No act of secondary legislation can lawfully obstruct access to the courts where those rights are vindicated. To suggest otherwise is not merely mistaken—it is constitutionally impossible. The courts do not belong to the executive. They do not belong to departments. They belong to the People, because the Constitution says so. And so, this is where the line is drawn. The Constitution is not optional. Fundamental rights are not negotiable. Access to justice is not a privilege to be rationed. Tomorrow, the law will be laid plainly before the Minister for Justice—not in defiance, but in fidelity to the Constitution; not in anger, but in duty to the People; not for personal grievance, but for the protection of all. Because if fundamental rights can be restrained today, they can be extinguished tomorrow. And if we do not stand now, we leave our children standing alone later. This is not about power. It is about principle. It is about ensuring that the Constitution lives—not on paper, but in practice. And it is about the furtherance of our fundamental rights, so that we may protect ourselves, our families, our children, the way we educate our children, our private property, and our religion—today, and for generations to come. #NoFeeOnGuarantee

Patrick McGreal

12,106 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

English MP Rupert Lowe believes the British state has become the enemy of the British people. "Most of them are members of the Fabian Society." "And that is ideologically driven... They want a dependency culture. They don't want a thriving, independent, self-reliant state." "The government that we've got wants to encourage this welfarism as a way of effectively controlling the British people." "Covid was a really disappointing lesson in how meek and mild the British people are, but I think they've got to start growing a bit of backbone... otherwise they're going to lose the country that we all dearly love." Credit: Rupert Lowe MP Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪
1:26

English MP Rupert Lowe believes the British state has become the enemy of the British people. "Most of them are members of the Fabian Society." "And that is ideologically driven... They want a dependency culture. They don't want a thriving, independent, self-reliant state." "The government that we've got wants to encourage this welfarism as a way of effectively controlling the British people." "Covid was a really disappointing lesson in how meek and mild the British people are, but I think they've got to start growing a bit of backbone... otherwise they're going to lose the country that we all dearly love." Credit: Rupert Lowe MP Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪

Wide Awake Media

88,376 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The demented idea that the countryside is racist is gaining traction in our woke institutions. But, make no mistake: this is not about racism The British people are being demoralised in a prolonged war of attrition that seeks to undermine Britain's culture, heritage & way of life The race zealots who say the countryside is racist or that British culture is racist don't care about ethnic minorities at all. They have a visceral hatred of Britain & the West and seek to undermine them at every opportunity Every day it seems, a different institution tells the British people that they are racist, their culture is racist, their history is racist, their national heroes are racist, and now even their countryside is racist. If ever you wanted proof that Britain is a post-revolutionary society whose institutions have been completely captured by ideological apparatchicks trying to transform the soul of the nation, this is it. Why are they attacking the countryside? Because English, Welsh, Scottish & Northern Irish identities are intrinsically linked to the landscape. Ask an Englishman to conjure up an image of England, and thoughts immediately turn to the countryside – the gently rolling hills and patchwork fields of England’s green and pleasant land. The countryside epitomises both nation and love of nation. It's a deeply emotional – almost spiritual – connection. Denouncing the countryside as racist is to directly attack both nation and national identity. Whether it be the National Trust, the British Library or our universities, our captured institutions are feverishly creating a future where the British people no longer have any pride, trust or belief in the nation. That is the ultimate goal. Alas, when one looks at surveys of British youth and their attitudes to the nation, it's a plan that is succeeding.
2:37

The demented idea that the countryside is racist is gaining traction in our woke institutions. But, make no mistake: this is not about racism The British people are being demoralised in a prolonged war of attrition that seeks to undermine Britain's culture, heritage & way of life The race zealots who say the countryside is racist or that British culture is racist don't care about ethnic minorities at all. They have a visceral hatred of Britain & the West and seek to undermine them at every opportunity Every day it seems, a different institution tells the British people that they are racist, their culture is racist, their history is racist, their national heroes are racist, and now even their countryside is racist. If ever you wanted proof that Britain is a post-revolutionary society whose institutions have been completely captured by ideological apparatchicks trying to transform the soul of the nation, this is it. Why are they attacking the countryside? Because English, Welsh, Scottish & Northern Irish identities are intrinsically linked to the landscape. Ask an Englishman to conjure up an image of England, and thoughts immediately turn to the countryside – the gently rolling hills and patchwork fields of England’s green and pleasant land. The countryside epitomises both nation and love of nation. It's a deeply emotional – almost spiritual – connection. Denouncing the countryside as racist is to directly attack both nation and national identity. Whether it be the National Trust, the British Library or our universities, our captured institutions are feverishly creating a future where the British people no longer have any pride, trust or belief in the nation. That is the ultimate goal. Alas, when one looks at surveys of British youth and their attitudes to the nation, it's a plan that is succeeding.

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

219,072 просмотров • 2 лет назад