Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Why Sequoia is not less ownership-centric than ever "The outcomes are growing. It's also more capital intensive, but most importantly, it's your time. In my career, I can expect to be on the board of 20 companies. I'm not going to short myself. I'm going to work really hard...

22,440 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 7

Фото профиля SKYLINE🥷
SKYLINE🥷1 месяц назад

bro basically said i'm in the trenches with you

Фото профиля Eugen
Eugen1 месяц назад

Whatever specific thing we need, a niche hire, an expert, particular customer intro, they put in the work and have an answer every single time 🫡 awesome to see @JulienBek share more publicly

Фото профиля Gorkem Yurtseven
Gorkem Yurtseven1 месяц назад

You get the work with the inference queen @sonyatweetybird 🐥

Фото профиля John Koretoff
John Koretoff1 месяц назад

Great episode sir 🫡

Фото профиля Raven
Raven1 месяц назад

20 board seats is a lot of nodding at slides

Фото профиля MONOLITH
MONOLITH1 месяц назад

Capital gets you on the cap table. Removing the founder’s next bottleneck earns the ownership.

Фото профиля Marcus
Marcus1 месяц назад

the 2026 frontier is getting a supercomputer to remember what you told it yesterday. we gave amnesia a workout plan.

Похожие видео

CoreWeave $CRWV CEO Michael Intrator, on the Big Technology Podcast, providing what I believe is the most compelling rebuttal to the narrative that GPUs only have a 2 to 3-year useful life. CoreWeave's customers are the world's most sophisticated users of GPUs, and they are signing contracts to utilize today's GPUs for the next 5 years, despite Nvidia's new product release cadence resulting in more efficient GPUs every 1-2 years. The use-case for the GPUs might change over time as Nvidia rolls out new products (e.g. older chips are moved from training to inference workloads), but the "usefulness" does not. "The most important tool that I have for understanding what the depreciation curve or the obsolescence curve of compute is not what I think, right? It's not what some historic short (seller) thinks. It's what are the buyers, the most sophisticated companies in the world are willing to pay for today. And when they come to me and they put in a contract for a 5-year deal or 6-year deal, in what world do I not think that they who are the consumers of this understand that there are new, more powerful chips coming out? Of course they do. They understand it, but they also understand what their various use cases are. And they're saying to themselves, "I'm going to buy this because I'm going to need it today. I'm going to need it in 3 years, and I'm going to need it in 5 years"... My opinions around depreciation are informed by the only entities that get to vote in my world, which are the folks that are paying for the compute over time."

Rittenhouse Research

161,972 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад