Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

WHY THE HELL ARE WE IGNORING THIS?! Countries THRIVE under conservatism—it’s NO DAMN COINCIDENCE, and it’s INFURIATING that liberals keep burying their heads in the sand while our nations suffer! 😡🔥 Look at Poland under the conservative PiS government from 2015-2023: They slashed unemployment from over 20% pre-EU days...

JayGenXer's profile picture

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

90,793 subscribers

14,465 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Last week, I debunked the Democrats false narrative of the Trump economy. Seems like Kamala still can’t tell the truth so I’ll say it again, slowly… Biden and Harris didn’t inherit a bad economy—they built one. Under President Trump, the American economy was thriving. Then COVID hit. Even in the midst of a global pandemic, with Democratic governors and mayors keeping their economies locked down well beyond what was necessary, we were back on track when Biden took office. Biden and Harris inherited a resurgent economy, with GDP growth of 34.8% in the third quarter of 2020, 4.2% in the fourth, and 5.2% in the first quarter of 2021. By the end of that first quarter, real GDP had returned to its pre-pandemic high. But then Biden and Harris decided to "fix" things by flooding the economy with trillions of dollars in welfare—driving up demand—while simultaneously crippling supply. They did this by restricting energy production and piling on regulations that stifled economic growth. This is Economics 101: too much demand, too few goods—that’s how you get inflation. Now, Kamala wants to double down and inject trillions more into the economy by helicoptering $25,000 to every first-time homebuyer, expand the child-tax credit with no work requirements, and introduce price caps on every grocer in the country. Her “opportunity economy” doesn’t make sense unless your goal is to create an inflationary spiral that crushes working families and small businesses under the weight of bad policy and government overreach.
1:56

Last week, I debunked the Democrats false narrative of the Trump economy. Seems like Kamala still can’t tell the truth so I’ll say it again, slowly… Biden and Harris didn’t inherit a bad economy—they built one. Under President Trump, the American economy was thriving. Then COVID hit. Even in the midst of a global pandemic, with Democratic governors and mayors keeping their economies locked down well beyond what was necessary, we were back on track when Biden took office. Biden and Harris inherited a resurgent economy, with GDP growth of 34.8% in the third quarter of 2020, 4.2% in the fourth, and 5.2% in the first quarter of 2021. By the end of that first quarter, real GDP had returned to its pre-pandemic high. But then Biden and Harris decided to "fix" things by flooding the economy with trillions of dollars in welfare—driving up demand—while simultaneously crippling supply. They did this by restricting energy production and piling on regulations that stifled economic growth. This is Economics 101: too much demand, too few goods—that’s how you get inflation. Now, Kamala wants to double down and inject trillions more into the economy by helicoptering $25,000 to every first-time homebuyer, expand the child-tax credit with no work requirements, and introduce price caps on every grocer in the country. Her “opportunity economy” doesn’t make sense unless your goal is to create an inflationary spiral that crushes working families and small businesses under the weight of bad policy and government overreach.

Dan Crenshaw

84,513 views • 1 year ago

2025: Elon Musk wants the European Union to be abolished 2016: That time David Cameron reminded us of the benefits of being in the EU, including the special op-out status the UK once had Comparing US states to EU countries works as a shorthand: both are smaller entities in a larger union, but unlike US states, EU countries keep their full sovereignty - here are some examples: ❌U S states gave up sovereignty to form a union ✅ EU countries keep their sovereignty 🆘 Abolishing the EU isn’t breaking up a federation, it’s attacking national sovereignty ❌ US states can’t have separate militaries ✅ EU countries maintain their own armies 🆘 Dismantling the EU wouldn’t "free states" it would undermine national sovereignty ❌ US states follow one federal constitution ✅ EU countries retain their own constitutions 🆘 Ending the EU would ignore the sovereignty each nation has carefully preserved ❌ US states can’t sign international treaties ✅ EU countries sign treaties individually and collectively 🆘 Abolishing the EU attacks their sovereignty on both national and international levels ❌ US states can’t control borders ✅ EU countries control who enters their territory 🆘 Destroying the EU would remove their border sovereignty ❌ US states rely on one federal currency ✅ EU countries, like those outside the eurozone, can keep their own money 🆘 Abolishing the EU would compromise financial sovereignty ❌ US states can’t impose independent foreign policy ✅ EU countries have independent foreign policies 🆘 Ending the EU doesn’t restore "freedom" it erodes national sovereignty ❌ US states can’t set nationwide defense policies ✅ EU countries maintain sovereignty over defence and security 🆘 Dismantling the EU threatens each nation’s sovereign decisions ❌ US states can’t maintain unique laws on education, healthcare, taxes ✅ EU countries make their own laws 🆘 Abolishing the EU ignores the sovereignty in domestic governance ❌ US states cannot leave the US ✅ EU countries can theoretically leave the union (like Brexit) 🆘 Attacking the EU’s existence is an attack on countries’ sovereign choice ❌ US states rely entirely on federal law enforcement ✅ EU countries maintain their own police and justice systems 🆘 Abolishing the EU would undermine their sovereign law enforcement ❌ US states cannot print passports or control visas ✅ EU countries issue their own passports and control immigration 🆘 Ending the EU would infringe on national sovereignty over borders ❌ US states cannot veto federal treaties ✅ EU countries vote on treaties and agreements individually 🆘 Abolishing the EU would strip countries of treaty sovereignty ❌ US states share a single central bank ✅ EU countries can keep or choose their own currencies 🆘 Destroying the EU would attack financial sovereignty ❌ US states can’t run independent foreign aid programs ✅ EU countries manage foreign aid and international development 🆘 Abolishing the EU would erode sovereign control over foreign policy ❌ US states cannot maintain their own national holidays or symbols officially ✅ EU countries preserve national symbols, holidays, and languages 🆘 Ending the EU wouldn’t restore “freedom”—it would threaten cultural and political sovereignty The EU union setup is often considered "better" than the US state system in terms of sovereignty and flexibility This allows each country to make independent decisions while still benefiting from cooperation on trade, environmental standards, and other shared policies The EU model encourages policy diversity and experimentation. Countries can implement unique social, economic, or environmental policies without conflicting with the union, whereas US states are often limited by federal law The EU balances shared governance with national sovereignty, which is why the sooner the UK rejoins the EU the better We will most likely have lost all of the opt outs we had before Brexit, maybe it's time for the UK to join the EU on a similar terms as other nations - all for one and one for all 👍
1:34

2025: Elon Musk wants the European Union to be abolished 2016: That time David Cameron reminded us of the benefits of being in the EU, including the special op-out status the UK once had Comparing US states to EU countries works as a shorthand: both are smaller entities in a larger union, but unlike US states, EU countries keep their full sovereignty - here are some examples: ❌U S states gave up sovereignty to form a union ✅ EU countries keep their sovereignty 🆘 Abolishing the EU isn’t breaking up a federation, it’s attacking national sovereignty ❌ US states can’t have separate militaries ✅ EU countries maintain their own armies 🆘 Dismantling the EU wouldn’t "free states" it would undermine national sovereignty ❌ US states follow one federal constitution ✅ EU countries retain their own constitutions 🆘 Ending the EU would ignore the sovereignty each nation has carefully preserved ❌ US states can’t sign international treaties ✅ EU countries sign treaties individually and collectively 🆘 Abolishing the EU attacks their sovereignty on both national and international levels ❌ US states can’t control borders ✅ EU countries control who enters their territory 🆘 Destroying the EU would remove their border sovereignty ❌ US states rely on one federal currency ✅ EU countries, like those outside the eurozone, can keep their own money 🆘 Abolishing the EU would compromise financial sovereignty ❌ US states can’t impose independent foreign policy ✅ EU countries have independent foreign policies 🆘 Ending the EU doesn’t restore "freedom" it erodes national sovereignty ❌ US states can’t set nationwide defense policies ✅ EU countries maintain sovereignty over defence and security 🆘 Dismantling the EU threatens each nation’s sovereign decisions ❌ US states can’t maintain unique laws on education, healthcare, taxes ✅ EU countries make their own laws 🆘 Abolishing the EU ignores the sovereignty in domestic governance ❌ US states cannot leave the US ✅ EU countries can theoretically leave the union (like Brexit) 🆘 Attacking the EU’s existence is an attack on countries’ sovereign choice ❌ US states rely entirely on federal law enforcement ✅ EU countries maintain their own police and justice systems 🆘 Abolishing the EU would undermine their sovereign law enforcement ❌ US states cannot print passports or control visas ✅ EU countries issue their own passports and control immigration 🆘 Ending the EU would infringe on national sovereignty over borders ❌ US states cannot veto federal treaties ✅ EU countries vote on treaties and agreements individually 🆘 Abolishing the EU would strip countries of treaty sovereignty ❌ US states share a single central bank ✅ EU countries can keep or choose their own currencies 🆘 Destroying the EU would attack financial sovereignty ❌ US states can’t run independent foreign aid programs ✅ EU countries manage foreign aid and international development 🆘 Abolishing the EU would erode sovereign control over foreign policy ❌ US states cannot maintain their own national holidays or symbols officially ✅ EU countries preserve national symbols, holidays, and languages 🆘 Ending the EU wouldn’t restore “freedom”—it would threaten cultural and political sovereignty The EU union setup is often considered "better" than the US state system in terms of sovereignty and flexibility This allows each country to make independent decisions while still benefiting from cooperation on trade, environmental standards, and other shared policies The EU model encourages policy diversity and experimentation. Countries can implement unique social, economic, or environmental policies without conflicting with the union, whereas US states are often limited by federal law The EU balances shared governance with national sovereignty, which is why the sooner the UK rejoins the EU the better We will most likely have lost all of the opt outs we had before Brexit, maybe it's time for the UK to join the EU on a similar terms as other nations - all for one and one for all 👍

Farrukh

168,375 views • 8 months ago

Who the hell is Traditional Thoughts and what’s he all about? Well, I’m Danny, a conservative who values two things above all else: laughter and honesty. Let me tell you why these matter so much to me – and why they should matter to you all too. Laughter is the glue that holds us together. As a conservative, I believe in strong families and communities that look out for everyone in them. Life can be a total bitch – whether it’s dealing with being marginalized by a tyrannical lib government or just the daily grind. Laughter always cuts through that. It reminds us to stay grounded, to enjoy the freedom we fight for, and to cherish the people around us. It’s not just a moment of joy; it’s an absolute rebellion against despair!! Honesty – that’s the bedrock of everything I stand for. Some of you know about my history and some of the things I’ve been through. This makes being honest and having integrity my top priority in life. As conservatives, we value truth, even when it’s hard. If you’re standing up for what’s right or you’re poking holes in the lefts woke nonsense, honesty, builds, trust. That’s how we hold ourselves accountable to God, to our families, and to our country, without it nothing else works. Laughter and honesty, aren’t just personal values – their conservative principles that keep us free, keep us real, and keep us united. So laugh loud, speak the truth boldly and let’s build an X community we can all believe in! Stay honest, keep laughing and God bless you all. Now laugh at my stupid joke in this video!
0:46

Who the hell is Traditional Thoughts and what’s he all about? Well, I’m Danny, a conservative who values two things above all else: laughter and honesty. Let me tell you why these matter so much to me – and why they should matter to you all too. Laughter is the glue that holds us together. As a conservative, I believe in strong families and communities that look out for everyone in them. Life can be a total bitch – whether it’s dealing with being marginalized by a tyrannical lib government or just the daily grind. Laughter always cuts through that. It reminds us to stay grounded, to enjoy the freedom we fight for, and to cherish the people around us. It’s not just a moment of joy; it’s an absolute rebellion against despair!! Honesty – that’s the bedrock of everything I stand for. Some of you know about my history and some of the things I’ve been through. This makes being honest and having integrity my top priority in life. As conservatives, we value truth, even when it’s hard. If you’re standing up for what’s right or you’re poking holes in the lefts woke nonsense, honesty, builds, trust. That’s how we hold ourselves accountable to God, to our families, and to our country, without it nothing else works. Laughter and honesty, aren’t just personal values – their conservative principles that keep us free, keep us real, and keep us united. So laugh loud, speak the truth boldly and let’s build an X community we can all believe in! Stay honest, keep laughing and God bless you all. Now laugh at my stupid joke in this video!

Traditional Thoughts

21,724 views • 1 year ago

Economic Survey ▪️Pegs GDP growth for next fiscal FY27 at 6.8-7.2%, this is lower than current fiscal ▪️Projects medium-term growth potential at 7% ▪️Geo political scenario could disrupt foreign capital inflows and consequently impact the Rupee ▪️External environment uncertain, India needs to be cautious ▪️Drying up foreign capital making the Rupee unstable ▪️Net surplus in services and remittances not enough to offset trade deficit ▪️Urges private sector to accelerate investment and job creation ▪️Indian firms’ outward investment rises from $14 bn to $24 bn in FY25 ▪️Manufacturing estimated to contribute 12.8% of GDP in FY26 ▪️Cautions against a bigger economic crisis than 2008 due to overheated AI valuations ▪️Need to retain students beyond Class 8 ▪️India’s pulses, maize and cereal yields remain below global averages ▪️Traffic and expensive houses are roadblocks for development ▪️Policy reshape needed for gig workers Some questions arise on the basis of what the Economic Survey says 👇 👉What are we celebrating? A sub 7% growth rate? 👉Survey estimates FY26 GDP growth at 7.4% and nominal GDP growth for the same period at just 8%. Why is the difference between nominal and real GDP growth rate only 0.6%? 👉Rupee has depreciated by over 6.5%. So a 8% nominal GDP growth with 6.5% Rupee depreciation means dollar GDP growth of just 1.5%. Why are we not worried? 👉For Viksit Bharat by 2047 - India needs a GDP growth of at least 8.2% every year for the next 21 years. What are we doing about it? 👉Finally someone in the govt accepting that the Rupee has been falling, but blaming it all on geo political uncertainty. But who will explain why the Rupee is the worst performing Asian currency especially when the dollar has weakened? 👉Why are foreign portfolio investors pulling money out of India? What is the plan to save the Rupee from this withdrawal? 👉Why is net FDI negative for 4 months in a row? 👉Why is India’s private sector not investing in India? 👉Why are Indian corporates investing more overseas than in India (outward investment of Indian cos rises from $14 bn to $24 bn in FY25)? 👉Why is manufacturing’s contribution to overall GDP still languishing at 12.8% - down from 15.6% under UPA and way below the targeted 25% of GDP? 👉Why have Make In India, Production-Linked Incentives (PLIs), failed to boost manufacturing? 👉Modi govt had announced 3 Employment-Linked-Incentive schemes (ELIs) in FY25 Budget to create more than 2 crore jobs. How many jobs have been created? 👉Govt had also announced an incentive scheme for 1 crore internships. Why did less than 10,000 people intern in the last 18 months? 👉Survey shows Corporate tax contribution to the total tax kitty declining, personal income tax collection rising. Why are all incentives then for wealthy corporates and not the ordinary tax payers? 👉The survey’s acceptance that students beyond Class 8 are dropping out should ring alarm bells for our education system. Does the Modi govt care which has shut down 90,000 Govt schools and consistently reduced education budget over the years? 👉Survey says India’s pulses, maize and cereal yields remain below global averages - what is being done to make agriculture more remunerative? 👉Survey says traffic and expensive houses are roadblocks for development - will the unliveable urban cities saddled with traffic, waste and pollution wake the govt up?
7:57

Economic Survey ▪️Pegs GDP growth for next fiscal FY27 at 6.8-7.2%, this is lower than current fiscal ▪️Projects medium-term growth potential at 7% ▪️Geo political scenario could disrupt foreign capital inflows and consequently impact the Rupee ▪️External environment uncertain, India needs to be cautious ▪️Drying up foreign capital making the Rupee unstable ▪️Net surplus in services and remittances not enough to offset trade deficit ▪️Urges private sector to accelerate investment and job creation ▪️Indian firms’ outward investment rises from $14 bn to $24 bn in FY25 ▪️Manufacturing estimated to contribute 12.8% of GDP in FY26 ▪️Cautions against a bigger economic crisis than 2008 due to overheated AI valuations ▪️Need to retain students beyond Class 8 ▪️India’s pulses, maize and cereal yields remain below global averages ▪️Traffic and expensive houses are roadblocks for development ▪️Policy reshape needed for gig workers Some questions arise on the basis of what the Economic Survey says 👇 👉What are we celebrating? A sub 7% growth rate? 👉Survey estimates FY26 GDP growth at 7.4% and nominal GDP growth for the same period at just 8%. Why is the difference between nominal and real GDP growth rate only 0.6%? 👉Rupee has depreciated by over 6.5%. So a 8% nominal GDP growth with 6.5% Rupee depreciation means dollar GDP growth of just 1.5%. Why are we not worried? 👉For Viksit Bharat by 2047 - India needs a GDP growth of at least 8.2% every year for the next 21 years. What are we doing about it? 👉Finally someone in the govt accepting that the Rupee has been falling, but blaming it all on geo political uncertainty. But who will explain why the Rupee is the worst performing Asian currency especially when the dollar has weakened? 👉Why are foreign portfolio investors pulling money out of India? What is the plan to save the Rupee from this withdrawal? 👉Why is net FDI negative for 4 months in a row? 👉Why is India’s private sector not investing in India? 👉Why are Indian corporates investing more overseas than in India (outward investment of Indian cos rises from $14 bn to $24 bn in FY25)? 👉Why is manufacturing’s contribution to overall GDP still languishing at 12.8% - down from 15.6% under UPA and way below the targeted 25% of GDP? 👉Why have Make In India, Production-Linked Incentives (PLIs), failed to boost manufacturing? 👉Modi govt had announced 3 Employment-Linked-Incentive schemes (ELIs) in FY25 Budget to create more than 2 crore jobs. How many jobs have been created? 👉Govt had also announced an incentive scheme for 1 crore internships. Why did less than 10,000 people intern in the last 18 months? 👉Survey shows Corporate tax contribution to the total tax kitty declining, personal income tax collection rising. Why are all incentives then for wealthy corporates and not the ordinary tax payers? 👉The survey’s acceptance that students beyond Class 8 are dropping out should ring alarm bells for our education system. Does the Modi govt care which has shut down 90,000 Govt schools and consistently reduced education budget over the years? 👉Survey says India’s pulses, maize and cereal yields remain below global averages - what is being done to make agriculture more remunerative? 👉Survey says traffic and expensive houses are roadblocks for development - will the unliveable urban cities saddled with traffic, waste and pollution wake the govt up?

Supriya Shrinate

29,538 views • 6 months ago

The Vice President JD Vance then had his turn to speak. He didn’t waste the moment. Instead, he meticulously laid out just how far America has come in only a few months under Trump, after inheriting an absolute DISASTER from Biden. First up: jobs. Under Biden, all net job growth went to the foreign-born. Under Trump, that growth is finally going to American citizens who deserve it. “All of the net job growth under the Biden administration had done to the foreign-born, now that net job growth is going to American citizens who deserve opportunity in their own country.” Then came the deficit. Vance reminded everyone that they inherited the largest peacetime deficit in American history....yet Trump’s trade policies are now pulling in trillions over ten years through tariffs. “People forget that we inherited the LARGEST peacetime deficit in the history of the United States of America, and now—we’re collecting hundreds of billions of dollars, trillions of dollars over ten years in tariffs from countries and companies that were formerly taking advantage of the American people.” And it wasn’t just about dollars. Vance said safety is the most sacred thing a government can give its people. Thanks to Trump’s crackdown, working Americans, not just the wealthy, can finally feel safe in their own neighborhoods again. “You heard Pam talk about the public safety and the success we’ve had there. I happen to believe that maybe the most sacred thing we can deliver to American workers, is the ability to live safely and comfortably in their own neighborhoods.” “Public safety is not just something that should belong to the wealthy. It should belong to every working man and woman in the United States of America, and because of the work of this administration, that is happening.” He finished by slamming Biden’s inflation disaster, revealing a stat that shocked even the room: Housing costs doubled under the Biden administration. Truly shocking. “Mr. President, you yourself talked about the inflation mess that we inherited under the Biden administration.” “Maybe the most striking and even shocking statistic of the Biden administration is that housing costs have gone up by 100% over the four years of the Biden administration—literally doubled, making the American dream of homeownership unaffordable.” Vance closed with a promise: there’s a lot more work to do...and they’re not slowing down. “We’ve made great strides and great progress already. But to the American people who are listening, there’s a lot more to do. We’re going to keep on working hard at it.”
1:45

The Vice President JD Vance then had his turn to speak. He didn’t waste the moment. Instead, he meticulously laid out just how far America has come in only a few months under Trump, after inheriting an absolute DISASTER from Biden. First up: jobs. Under Biden, all net job growth went to the foreign-born. Under Trump, that growth is finally going to American citizens who deserve it. “All of the net job growth under the Biden administration had done to the foreign-born, now that net job growth is going to American citizens who deserve opportunity in their own country.” Then came the deficit. Vance reminded everyone that they inherited the largest peacetime deficit in American history....yet Trump’s trade policies are now pulling in trillions over ten years through tariffs. “People forget that we inherited the LARGEST peacetime deficit in the history of the United States of America, and now—we’re collecting hundreds of billions of dollars, trillions of dollars over ten years in tariffs from countries and companies that were formerly taking advantage of the American people.” And it wasn’t just about dollars. Vance said safety is the most sacred thing a government can give its people. Thanks to Trump’s crackdown, working Americans, not just the wealthy, can finally feel safe in their own neighborhoods again. “You heard Pam talk about the public safety and the success we’ve had there. I happen to believe that maybe the most sacred thing we can deliver to American workers, is the ability to live safely and comfortably in their own neighborhoods.” “Public safety is not just something that should belong to the wealthy. It should belong to every working man and woman in the United States of America, and because of the work of this administration, that is happening.” He finished by slamming Biden’s inflation disaster, revealing a stat that shocked even the room: Housing costs doubled under the Biden administration. Truly shocking. “Mr. President, you yourself talked about the inflation mess that we inherited under the Biden administration.” “Maybe the most striking and even shocking statistic of the Biden administration is that housing costs have gone up by 100% over the four years of the Biden administration—literally doubled, making the American dream of homeownership unaffordable.” Vance closed with a promise: there’s a lot more work to do...and they’re not slowing down. “We’ve made great strides and great progress already. But to the American people who are listening, there’s a lot more to do. We’re going to keep on working hard at it.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

284,423 views • 11 months ago

I can’t forget the visualization below of the scale of a billion dollars. It is why I laugh when the number is carelessly thrown around by Nigerians. According to Mark Cuban, getting wealth at this scale is more about luck than skill or knowledge. You can’t get it linearly, only from exponential growth. The question we should ask if we seriously want to get wealth at this level is how many opportunities are open to an African to create exponential growth in any offering? In America and elsewhere, the market rewards people for creating that level of growth largely through valuation of future prospects and the probability of gaining more as exponential growth continues. We got a brief taste of those valuations in tech simply because foreign money decided to make some bets on entities that are still legally in their own country but operating in Africa. The way those companies are currently valued gives an idea of what they think about our markets but it is not always the reality on ground. The most objective measure is income and we are now slowly proving that previous valuations make sense. Getting to the point of creating individual billionaires is still far away unless we unlock further exponential growth opportunities. Speculation won’t create more billionaires. The government route has largely helped to create our current dollar billionaires by giving them advantage in areas where exponential demand was present. Those areas still have opportunities for growth. Someone sent me a deck and said he was trying to raise $10 Billion dollars, after laughing, I started to seriously look at the opportunities in the sector. The conclusion I reached with my cousin was that the only way to invest money and make money at that scale is to be in bed with the government. This is the bitter reality of Nigeria.
0:53

I can’t forget the visualization below of the scale of a billion dollars. It is why I laugh when the number is carelessly thrown around by Nigerians. According to Mark Cuban, getting wealth at this scale is more about luck than skill or knowledge. You can’t get it linearly, only from exponential growth. The question we should ask if we seriously want to get wealth at this level is how many opportunities are open to an African to create exponential growth in any offering? In America and elsewhere, the market rewards people for creating that level of growth largely through valuation of future prospects and the probability of gaining more as exponential growth continues. We got a brief taste of those valuations in tech simply because foreign money decided to make some bets on entities that are still legally in their own country but operating in Africa. The way those companies are currently valued gives an idea of what they think about our markets but it is not always the reality on ground. The most objective measure is income and we are now slowly proving that previous valuations make sense. Getting to the point of creating individual billionaires is still far away unless we unlock further exponential growth opportunities. Speculation won’t create more billionaires. The government route has largely helped to create our current dollar billionaires by giving them advantage in areas where exponential demand was present. Those areas still have opportunities for growth. Someone sent me a deck and said he was trying to raise $10 Billion dollars, after laughing, I started to seriously look at the opportunities in the sector. The conclusion I reached with my cousin was that the only way to invest money and make money at that scale is to be in bed with the government. This is the bitter reality of Nigeria.

Osaretin Victor Asemota

77,890 views • 11 months ago

🚨 Canada’s Spring Economic Update Summary 1. Liberals: “Deficit down $11.5 billion.” Reality: The deficit is still $66.9 BILLION. It’s lower than their own inflated projection. They’re celebrating missing their target by less. 2. Liberals: “Responsible fiscal management.” Reality: $37+ billion in NEW spending added on top. Still no path to balance. Deficit still $53+ billion by 2030. 3. Liberals: “GDP growth revised upwards.” Reality: Real GDP grew 1.7% in 2025. Private sector employment fell in January and February 2026. 4. Liberals: “Non-US exports up 40%.” Reality: It’s because of gold prices and oil. NOT BECAUSE OF DIVERSIFICATION OR NEW TRADE RELATIONSHIPS. 5. Liberals: “Strong jobs and wage growth.” Reality: Youth unemployment: 18%. Private sector jobs fell first two months of 2026. Rogers just offered packages to 25,000 Canadians. 6. Liberals: “Home prices and rents down.” Reality: Yes. First true claim. 7. Liberals: “Direct investment at a 20 year high.” Reality: Over half is mergers and acquisitions. Foreign companies buying Canadian companies. Not building anything new. Shell just bought ARC Resources today for $22 billion. That counts as FDI. 8. Liberals: “Canada Strong Fund. A sovereign wealth fund.” Reality: $25 billion seed money. FROM TAXPAYER DEBT. We are running a $66.9 billion deficit. It’s a Sovereign Debt Fund. 9. Liberals: “Zero opposition votes needed.” That one is actually true. And that’s the whole problem.
2:56

🚨 Canada’s Spring Economic Update Summary 1. Liberals: “Deficit down $11.5 billion.” Reality: The deficit is still $66.9 BILLION. It’s lower than their own inflated projection. They’re celebrating missing their target by less. 2. Liberals: “Responsible fiscal management.” Reality: $37+ billion in NEW spending added on top. Still no path to balance. Deficit still $53+ billion by 2030. 3. Liberals: “GDP growth revised upwards.” Reality: Real GDP grew 1.7% in 2025. Private sector employment fell in January and February 2026. 4. Liberals: “Non-US exports up 40%.” Reality: It’s because of gold prices and oil. NOT BECAUSE OF DIVERSIFICATION OR NEW TRADE RELATIONSHIPS. 5. Liberals: “Strong jobs and wage growth.” Reality: Youth unemployment: 18%. Private sector jobs fell first two months of 2026. Rogers just offered packages to 25,000 Canadians. 6. Liberals: “Home prices and rents down.” Reality: Yes. First true claim. 7. Liberals: “Direct investment at a 20 year high.” Reality: Over half is mergers and acquisitions. Foreign companies buying Canadian companies. Not building anything new. Shell just bought ARC Resources today for $22 billion. That counts as FDI. 8. Liberals: “Canada Strong Fund. A sovereign wealth fund.” Reality: $25 billion seed money. FROM TAXPAYER DEBT. We are running a $66.9 billion deficit. It’s a Sovereign Debt Fund. 9. Liberals: “Zero opposition votes needed.” That one is actually true. And that’s the whole problem.

Mario Zelaya

15,906 views • 3 months ago

“Fairness” = give the bureaucracy more money? Canada’s Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland is raising the tax on capital investments to the highest level in the G7. This video reveals a sad, dystopian view of Canadians. She uses the resentful ‘class war’ language of the 1970s, where Canada will be filled with a sad majority feeling ‘wrath’ unless you accept her new tax. Who writes these speeches? Have they travelled? Famously egalitarian nations Belgium and Switzerland and Singapore have zero cap gains taxes. Do they hate fairness? Seriously, this is her proposal: Take $18 billion in risk capital proceeds away from Canada’s small but critical investor class with a globally uncompetitive tax rate. Then give that money - along with another $40 billion in debt - to a federal bureaucracy that currently does not show up for work in person more than twice a week. They will invest it instead. The nation will heal. Thats not fairness. It’s losing. Again. On an international scale. Here’s why this tax will add to her economic losing streak: 1. It kills economic growth. Taxing capital investment discourages the cash that backs the entrepreneurial ideas that turn into the jobs and companies that grow the economy and improve productivity and living standards. Every other large advanced economy will have a lower cap gains tax than Canada. Are they less ‘fair’ than Minister Freeland? Or do they have an economic strategy of shared prosperity that allows for individual success without the sad language of class resentment and envy? Every company whose services we love today - no matter how large - started with an entrepreneur - and some investors crazy enough to fund them with risk capital. Most nations do whatever they can to attract entrepreneurs and investors because they bring growth and economic vitality and jobs. This Minister is taxing them away in the name of fairness. But federal fiscal incoherence is costing Canadians $54 billion interest losses degrading public services and the worst declining GDP performance in the G7 2019-2024 and the worst GDP per capita of all 40 advanced nations in the OECD modelled out to 2030. Fairness for Canadians starts with federal fiscal competence. 2. It kills jobs (the real ones): The private sector creates jobs when good ideas or expansion is funded by risk capital - that is why positive jobs reports are usually signals of economic growth. But Canada’s jobs reports aren’t signals of economic growth anymore because they feature a failing economy where most of the jobs being reported are actually government roles bought with debt. This kills economic productivity. When governments use debt to buy jobs it turns a single debt-funded position into a permanent unfunded annual govt operating cost. Every one of these jobs costs more in tax, debt and interest than it can ever contribute back. Taxing the risk capital that creates real jobs while borrowing money to buy public sector jobs with debt - the current modus operandi of this government and its “jobs” announcements - kills GDP productivity. 3. It takes Canada backwards Canada’s private sector is the only mechanism to fund Canadian prosperity. Risk capital funds the companies and jobs that are the engine that pays for everything - including all government employees and services - and all debt and interest. A previous Liberal government knew this. They dropped this tax back in 2000 to help Canada compete with the rest of the world, who in turn compete hard for the mobile investment capital of the smartest and most successful investors because it has such a positive impact on economic growth. For everyone. Economic prosperity is the best form of fairness. Going backwards to economic policies from the last century, wrapped in the dystopian language of big government ‘fairness’ isn’t helping anyone. Cut taxes, spending and the bloated state. Fairness = fiscal competence.
3:49

“Fairness” = give the bureaucracy more money? Canada’s Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland is raising the tax on capital investments to the highest level in the G7. This video reveals a sad, dystopian view of Canadians. She uses the resentful ‘class war’ language of the 1970s, where Canada will be filled with a sad majority feeling ‘wrath’ unless you accept her new tax. Who writes these speeches? Have they travelled? Famously egalitarian nations Belgium and Switzerland and Singapore have zero cap gains taxes. Do they hate fairness? Seriously, this is her proposal: Take $18 billion in risk capital proceeds away from Canada’s small but critical investor class with a globally uncompetitive tax rate. Then give that money - along with another $40 billion in debt - to a federal bureaucracy that currently does not show up for work in person more than twice a week. They will invest it instead. The nation will heal. Thats not fairness. It’s losing. Again. On an international scale. Here’s why this tax will add to her economic losing streak: 1. It kills economic growth. Taxing capital investment discourages the cash that backs the entrepreneurial ideas that turn into the jobs and companies that grow the economy and improve productivity and living standards. Every other large advanced economy will have a lower cap gains tax than Canada. Are they less ‘fair’ than Minister Freeland? Or do they have an economic strategy of shared prosperity that allows for individual success without the sad language of class resentment and envy? Every company whose services we love today - no matter how large - started with an entrepreneur - and some investors crazy enough to fund them with risk capital. Most nations do whatever they can to attract entrepreneurs and investors because they bring growth and economic vitality and jobs. This Minister is taxing them away in the name of fairness. But federal fiscal incoherence is costing Canadians $54 billion interest losses degrading public services and the worst declining GDP performance in the G7 2019-2024 and the worst GDP per capita of all 40 advanced nations in the OECD modelled out to 2030. Fairness for Canadians starts with federal fiscal competence. 2. It kills jobs (the real ones): The private sector creates jobs when good ideas or expansion is funded by risk capital - that is why positive jobs reports are usually signals of economic growth. But Canada’s jobs reports aren’t signals of economic growth anymore because they feature a failing economy where most of the jobs being reported are actually government roles bought with debt. This kills economic productivity. When governments use debt to buy jobs it turns a single debt-funded position into a permanent unfunded annual govt operating cost. Every one of these jobs costs more in tax, debt and interest than it can ever contribute back. Taxing the risk capital that creates real jobs while borrowing money to buy public sector jobs with debt - the current modus operandi of this government and its “jobs” announcements - kills GDP productivity. 3. It takes Canada backwards Canada’s private sector is the only mechanism to fund Canadian prosperity. Risk capital funds the companies and jobs that are the engine that pays for everything - including all government employees and services - and all debt and interest. A previous Liberal government knew this. They dropped this tax back in 2000 to help Canada compete with the rest of the world, who in turn compete hard for the mobile investment capital of the smartest and most successful investors because it has such a positive impact on economic growth. For everyone. Economic prosperity is the best form of fairness. Going backwards to economic policies from the last century, wrapped in the dystopian language of big government ‘fairness’ isn’t helping anyone. Cut taxes, spending and the bloated state. Fairness = fiscal competence.

David Knight Legg

266,287 views • 2 years ago

In just under a minute, Scott Jennings delivered a masterful breakdown of why Republicans are winning the argument heading into the midterms. Kaitlan Collins was forced to sit there and listen to every word of it. JENNINGS: “Look, gas prices are not up. They’re down. Below $4 a gallon nationally, oil is trading at $71 a barrel.” “We don’t run the gas price tracker on the screen anymore for a reason. You know, I mean, it’s because it’s a non-story.” “The pool was vandalized. You keep bringing up the pool. It was vandalized by people who were so broken brained about our politics, they went out there and vandalized the pool. It’s in the court documents, which you can read yourself today.” “And as it relates to cost, the Republicans cut taxes. Working people all over this country got major tax refunds. We have a booming job market. We have a stock market that’s up.” “Right now, we have an economy that’s on the upswing because of Republican policies. And we’ve got insane Democrats winning primaries, promising socialism all over this country.” “Those are the facts and that’s the argument that will be carried to the election.”
0:44

In just under a minute, Scott Jennings delivered a masterful breakdown of why Republicans are winning the argument heading into the midterms. Kaitlan Collins was forced to sit there and listen to every word of it. JENNINGS: “Look, gas prices are not up. They’re down. Below $4 a gallon nationally, oil is trading at $71 a barrel.” “We don’t run the gas price tracker on the screen anymore for a reason. You know, I mean, it’s because it’s a non-story.” “The pool was vandalized. You keep bringing up the pool. It was vandalized by people who were so broken brained about our politics, they went out there and vandalized the pool. It’s in the court documents, which you can read yourself today.” “And as it relates to cost, the Republicans cut taxes. Working people all over this country got major tax refunds. We have a booming job market. We have a stock market that’s up.” “Right now, we have an economy that’s on the upswing because of Republican policies. And we’ve got insane Democrats winning primaries, promising socialism all over this country.” “Those are the facts and that’s the argument that will be carried to the election.”

Overton

281,875 views • 1 month ago

Then came one of the biggest financial updates of the meeting...from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. What he revealed was staggering. Bessent said that America is now pulling in RECORD tariff revenues...between $500 BILLION and $1 TRILLION a year...and the budget deficit is already down 26% from Biden’s last year in office. These are not small numbers. Bessent explained how Trump flipped the system on its head. The days of unbalanced international trade are over, and with that comes a massive influx of cash directly affecting America’s deficit. “On the international front you have a leveled the international trading system whereby countries took advantage of us and that’s over. It’s OVER.” “The Treasury Department is in is taking in record tariff revenues that I had been saying was running at a rate of 300 billion a year.” “You chastised me for saying that—number is too low. And as usual, you we’re right, that we had a substantial, jump from July to August, and I think we’re going to see a bigger jump from August to September.” “So I think we could be on our way, well, over half a trillion, maybe the, towards the trillion dollar number.” “This administration, your administration, has made a meaningful dent in the budget deficit.” Even the CBO, which often clashes with the Trump administration, had to concede: the deficit is projected to drop by $4 trillion over the next decade. “The average budget deficit during this term is 26% less than the last 12 months under Biden and even the CBO, and we don’t agree with CBO on everything as you said, last Friday—had to admit that they believe over the next ten years the budget deficit will be 4 trillion lower than they had previously scored.” And according to Bessent, that number could go even higher. “4 trillion: 3.3 trillion of tariff income, 700 billion of lower interest cost, and, you know, I would expect that that number could go up from here.”
1:34

Then came one of the biggest financial updates of the meeting...from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. What he revealed was staggering. Bessent said that America is now pulling in RECORD tariff revenues...between $500 BILLION and $1 TRILLION a year...and the budget deficit is already down 26% from Biden’s last year in office. These are not small numbers. Bessent explained how Trump flipped the system on its head. The days of unbalanced international trade are over, and with that comes a massive influx of cash directly affecting America’s deficit. “On the international front you have a leveled the international trading system whereby countries took advantage of us and that’s over. It’s OVER.” “The Treasury Department is in is taking in record tariff revenues that I had been saying was running at a rate of 300 billion a year.” “You chastised me for saying that—number is too low. And as usual, you we’re right, that we had a substantial, jump from July to August, and I think we’re going to see a bigger jump from August to September.” “So I think we could be on our way, well, over half a trillion, maybe the, towards the trillion dollar number.” “This administration, your administration, has made a meaningful dent in the budget deficit.” Even the CBO, which often clashes with the Trump administration, had to concede: the deficit is projected to drop by $4 trillion over the next decade. “The average budget deficit during this term is 26% less than the last 12 months under Biden and even the CBO, and we don’t agree with CBO on everything as you said, last Friday—had to admit that they believe over the next ten years the budget deficit will be 4 trillion lower than they had previously scored.” And according to Bessent, that number could go even higher. “4 trillion: 3.3 trillion of tariff income, 700 billion of lower interest cost, and, you know, I would expect that that number could go up from here.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

238,588 views • 11 months ago

The Tragedy of Child Brides in Afghanistan: Poverty and Desperation Under Taliban Rule : Since the Taliban's return to power in Afghanistan in August 2021, the humanitarian situation has dramatically deteriorated, especially for women and girls. Among the many grave challenges is the distressing rise in the sale of young girls, often under the age of 18, into marriage for a small sum of money. This harrowing practice is driven by a combination of crippling poverty, lack of education, and social restrictions imposed by the Taliban regime. The Desperate Situation of Afghan Families ; Afghanistan has long struggled with poverty, but the economic collapse following the Taliban's return has made the situation worse. The withdrawal of international aid, frozen assets, and sanctions on the Taliban government have led to widespread unemployment and food shortages. Families are grappling with severe hunger, and for many, the choice has come down to survival. In rural areas, where poverty is most pronounced, families face heart-wrenching decisions: unable to feed their children, some parents feel they have no choice but to sell their daughters into early marriage. These transactions, which are akin to the sale of a child, often fetch a meager amount of money — sometimes as little as a few hundred dollars. The exchange offers temporary financial relief but leaves girls trapped in lives of servitude and abuse. Girls as Young as 12 Sold into Marriage ; Girls as young as 12 or even younger are being sold into marriages with much older men, who view the transaction as a straightforward exchange of wealth. While child marriage was not unheard of in Afghanistan before the Taliban's return, it has escalated dramatically as the economic situation has worsened. The girls involved in these forced marriages face a lifetime of hardship. Deprived of their right to education, they are left with few prospects for improving their lives. In most cases, they are confined to the home, subject to their husband's control, and expected to bear children while still children themselves. The Role of the Taliban ; Under the Taliban's strict interpretation of Islamic law, the rights of women and girls have been drastically curtailed. Girls over the age of 12 are banned from attending school, and women are restricted from working in most professions or moving freely in public spaces. These policies further entrench the cycle of poverty and deprivation, leaving girls without the education or skills to change their circumstances. The Taliban claim to oppose child marriage, but in practice, they have done little to stop it. In many cases, Taliban officials themselves engage in or condone the practice. The legal and social protections that could prevent the sale of girls into marriage have been eroded under Taliban rule, making it difficult for families and communities to resist the pressures of poverty and cultural norms. Breaking the Cycle ; The sale of young girls into marriage is a symptom of a much larger problem in Afghanistan — a cycle of poverty and repression that disproportionately affects women and girls. Breaking this cycle requires a multifaceted approach, including humanitarian aid, access to education, and a commitment to gender equality. For many Afghan girls, the future remains uncertain. Until the international community finds a way to address the economic and social crisis in Afghanistan, and until the Taliban's repressive policies are reversed, countless young lives will continue to be sold for a fraction of their worth. These girls deserve the chance to grow, learn, and thrive — free from the bonds of forced marriage and the burdens of poverty. #Right_Justice_Freedom
1:16

The Tragedy of Child Brides in Afghanistan: Poverty and Desperation Under Taliban Rule : Since the Taliban's return to power in Afghanistan in August 2021, the humanitarian situation has dramatically deteriorated, especially for women and girls. Among the many grave challenges is the distressing rise in the sale of young girls, often under the age of 18, into marriage for a small sum of money. This harrowing practice is driven by a combination of crippling poverty, lack of education, and social restrictions imposed by the Taliban regime. The Desperate Situation of Afghan Families ; Afghanistan has long struggled with poverty, but the economic collapse following the Taliban's return has made the situation worse. The withdrawal of international aid, frozen assets, and sanctions on the Taliban government have led to widespread unemployment and food shortages. Families are grappling with severe hunger, and for many, the choice has come down to survival. In rural areas, where poverty is most pronounced, families face heart-wrenching decisions: unable to feed their children, some parents feel they have no choice but to sell their daughters into early marriage. These transactions, which are akin to the sale of a child, often fetch a meager amount of money — sometimes as little as a few hundred dollars. The exchange offers temporary financial relief but leaves girls trapped in lives of servitude and abuse. Girls as Young as 12 Sold into Marriage ; Girls as young as 12 or even younger are being sold into marriages with much older men, who view the transaction as a straightforward exchange of wealth. While child marriage was not unheard of in Afghanistan before the Taliban's return, it has escalated dramatically as the economic situation has worsened. The girls involved in these forced marriages face a lifetime of hardship. Deprived of their right to education, they are left with few prospects for improving their lives. In most cases, they are confined to the home, subject to their husband's control, and expected to bear children while still children themselves. The Role of the Taliban ; Under the Taliban's strict interpretation of Islamic law, the rights of women and girls have been drastically curtailed. Girls over the age of 12 are banned from attending school, and women are restricted from working in most professions or moving freely in public spaces. These policies further entrench the cycle of poverty and deprivation, leaving girls without the education or skills to change their circumstances. The Taliban claim to oppose child marriage, but in practice, they have done little to stop it. In many cases, Taliban officials themselves engage in or condone the practice. The legal and social protections that could prevent the sale of girls into marriage have been eroded under Taliban rule, making it difficult for families and communities to resist the pressures of poverty and cultural norms. Breaking the Cycle ; The sale of young girls into marriage is a symptom of a much larger problem in Afghanistan — a cycle of poverty and repression that disproportionately affects women and girls. Breaking this cycle requires a multifaceted approach, including humanitarian aid, access to education, and a commitment to gender equality. For many Afghan girls, the future remains uncertain. Until the international community finds a way to address the economic and social crisis in Afghanistan, and until the Taliban's repressive policies are reversed, countless young lives will continue to be sold for a fraction of their worth. These girls deserve the chance to grow, learn, and thrive — free from the bonds of forced marriage and the burdens of poverty. #Right_Justice_Freedom

Afghanistan Womens And Children S.W.O

79,646 views • 1 year ago

🇭🇺 The Official Start of Magyar Péter's Government Begins. "Hungary's economic growth is now recorded to be in second place in Europe. No income tax for mothers with 3 or 4 children and those under the age of 25." Orbán's Government leaves the country in stability despite claims by the Opposition. Hungary's economy has grown, nationalization of assets was a priority in the past 16 years. The IMF was kicked out and all debt from it paid off ahead of time. The Government has regained ownership of the Budapest airport and energy companies like MOL. Gold reserves increased from 3 tons to 100+ tons. Military spending was less so about 1-time use of expensive contracts for oversea's weapons. But about building that industry at home. Nearly every deal was made on this basis. Hungary's Economy was re-built to work and operate as a Sovereign Nation the past 16 years. Do you think Magyar Péter's true goal is to sell everything off to foreign ownership leaving the Hungarians again in foreign debt and ownership? The 27 points the EU is asking for is judicial changes structurally. The official ask is to make judges and institutions 'independent' and aligned the Nation with the EU court. This means, the loss of sovereignty, every nation in Europe has done the same. When it came to accepting migrants or LGBT propagation for children. There was NEVER once any resistance by these 'independent' courts by the European Union Nations. Judiciary reform means a loss of sovereignty, and power being focused to the EU. Courts will NOT act in the interest of Hungary. If a Nation loses control of their judiciary they lose control of their Sovereignty. Its just the first step before everything else is imposed and everything is able to be sold off to foreign ownership.
2:00

🇭🇺 The Official Start of Magyar Péter's Government Begins. "Hungary's economic growth is now recorded to be in second place in Europe. No income tax for mothers with 3 or 4 children and those under the age of 25." Orbán's Government leaves the country in stability despite claims by the Opposition. Hungary's economy has grown, nationalization of assets was a priority in the past 16 years. The IMF was kicked out and all debt from it paid off ahead of time. The Government has regained ownership of the Budapest airport and energy companies like MOL. Gold reserves increased from 3 tons to 100+ tons. Military spending was less so about 1-time use of expensive contracts for oversea's weapons. But about building that industry at home. Nearly every deal was made on this basis. Hungary's Economy was re-built to work and operate as a Sovereign Nation the past 16 years. Do you think Magyar Péter's true goal is to sell everything off to foreign ownership leaving the Hungarians again in foreign debt and ownership? The 27 points the EU is asking for is judicial changes structurally. The official ask is to make judges and institutions 'independent' and aligned the Nation with the EU court. This means, the loss of sovereignty, every nation in Europe has done the same. When it came to accepting migrants or LGBT propagation for children. There was NEVER once any resistance by these 'independent' courts by the European Union Nations. Judiciary reform means a loss of sovereignty, and power being focused to the EU. Courts will NOT act in the interest of Hungary. If a Nation loses control of their judiciary they lose control of their Sovereignty. Its just the first step before everything else is imposed and everything is able to be sold off to foreign ownership.

Based Hungary 🇭🇺

45,140 views • 2 months ago

WTF is wrong with these Liberals?! 😡 For 11 straight years under Trudeau (and now Carney?!), they’ve been sabotaging Canada’s future by turning EVERYTHING into an anti-Trump circus. Blaming the “big bad orange man” for our messes while ignoring their own epic failures. Newsflash: Trump’s only been back in power since 2025, but our economic decay? That’s on 11 years of Liberal incompetence! This didn’t happen overnight—it built up through endless scandals, bloated spending, and alienating our biggest trade partner. And now, with the CUSMA review hitting July 1, 2026, they’re STILL poking the bear down south? Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe nailed it: Our trade relationship with the US is “strong” and “very advantageous” as long as CUSMA stays intact. Both countries benefit HUGE—Canada exports over $400 billion in goods to the US annually (as of 2025), supporting millions of jobs in industries, for workers, and families. Daily cross-border trade? A whopping $3.6 billion CAD in goods and services! Keeping CUSMA means duty-free access for $294 billion in industrial goods and $87 billion in energy exports. But Liberals’ constant US-bashing risks it all. Why destroy a pact that boosts our GDP by $6.8 billion and secures energy security? It’s like they’re hell-bent on tanking us! Canadians, wake up—this is YOUR economy on the line. Who’s with me? RT if you’re furious! #LiberalFail #SaveCUSMA #CanadaFirst #TrudeauLegacy #MoeIsRight #USCanadaTrade
1:16

WTF is wrong with these Liberals?! 😡 For 11 straight years under Trudeau (and now Carney?!), they’ve been sabotaging Canada’s future by turning EVERYTHING into an anti-Trump circus. Blaming the “big bad orange man” for our messes while ignoring their own epic failures. Newsflash: Trump’s only been back in power since 2025, but our economic decay? That’s on 11 years of Liberal incompetence! This didn’t happen overnight—it built up through endless scandals, bloated spending, and alienating our biggest trade partner. And now, with the CUSMA review hitting July 1, 2026, they’re STILL poking the bear down south? Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe nailed it: Our trade relationship with the US is “strong” and “very advantageous” as long as CUSMA stays intact. Both countries benefit HUGE—Canada exports over $400 billion in goods to the US annually (as of 2025), supporting millions of jobs in industries, for workers, and families. Daily cross-border trade? A whopping $3.6 billion CAD in goods and services! Keeping CUSMA means duty-free access for $294 billion in industrial goods and $87 billion in energy exports. But Liberals’ constant US-bashing risks it all. Why destroy a pact that boosts our GDP by $6.8 billion and secures energy security? It’s like they’re hell-bent on tanking us! Canadians, wake up—this is YOUR economy on the line. Who’s with me? RT if you’re furious! #LiberalFail #SaveCUSMA #CanadaFirst #TrudeauLegacy #MoeIsRight #USCanadaTrade

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

22,675 views • 5 months ago

Must watch interview. Ed Davey calls for a customs union with the EU to grow the UK economy And Laura Kuenssberg ends up making the case for why the UK should be in a customs union with the EU, without realising it 🤷‍♂️ LK, "Why should we have a long negotiation to go into a customs union?" ED, "People are worried about the cost of living.. And economic growth to fund e.g. the NHS" "If we have a UK-EU customs union we can grow faster than anything Rachel Reeves and Labour are saying at the moment" LK, "Who has the appetite for a long negotiation" ED, "It could be done quickly.. There would be negotiation but it wouldn't be like what we saw before.. And the benefits would come quickly" "A Youth mobility scheme.. To travel work and live across Europe, that would be good for our economy" LK, "EU proposal has no limits" ED, "We should go for a capped scheme.. Korea, Japan, Australia, they're capped schemes.. Two or three year visas" LK, "Conservative leaders found the EU wasn't open limits of migration" ED, "Conservatives leaders sold Britain out" LK, "There might be benefits to a customs union but the UK would have to follow rules of EU countries.. We would be a rule taker not a rule maker" ED, "We're already a rule taker.. Bottles with tops that have to be recycled.. That was an EU regulation, we have no voice whatsoever.. But UK based manufacturers are applying that regulation" LK, "They're choosing to so they can sell into the Eurozone" ED, "You make my point for me, they take those rules for they can market, export and grow - presumably we want to do that don't we?" LK, "European growth.. UK growth is 1%.. EU average is 1%.. Your suggestion that if we work with those countries we'd grow more, that doesn't stack up does it?" ED, "It shows Europe would be keen for a UK-EU customs union" LK, "In some countries their growth is worse than ours, in others its the same" ED, "With respect, you've shown some countries where it's worse than ours but you haven't shown EU countries where growth is better than ours" "My argument is trade deals are mutually beneficial" "Even if economies aren't growing at the moment, there's more reason we should have a trade deal" "You're playing into my own argument that a UK-EU customs union would help us, and it would be relatively easy to get" LK, "Where is your evidence the EU would want this?" ED, "My challenge to Keir Starmer is to open negotiations.. Latest by 2030 we have a full UK-EU customs union" LK, "Is this the first step for the LibDems getting us back into the EU?" ED, "Yes, we are pro European, we should be back at the heart of Europe"
9:14

Must watch interview. Ed Davey calls for a customs union with the EU to grow the UK economy And Laura Kuenssberg ends up making the case for why the UK should be in a customs union with the EU, without realising it 🤷‍♂️ LK, "Why should we have a long negotiation to go into a customs union?" ED, "People are worried about the cost of living.. And economic growth to fund e.g. the NHS" "If we have a UK-EU customs union we can grow faster than anything Rachel Reeves and Labour are saying at the moment" LK, "Who has the appetite for a long negotiation" ED, "It could be done quickly.. There would be negotiation but it wouldn't be like what we saw before.. And the benefits would come quickly" "A Youth mobility scheme.. To travel work and live across Europe, that would be good for our economy" LK, "EU proposal has no limits" ED, "We should go for a capped scheme.. Korea, Japan, Australia, they're capped schemes.. Two or three year visas" LK, "Conservative leaders found the EU wasn't open limits of migration" ED, "Conservatives leaders sold Britain out" LK, "There might be benefits to a customs union but the UK would have to follow rules of EU countries.. We would be a rule taker not a rule maker" ED, "We're already a rule taker.. Bottles with tops that have to be recycled.. That was an EU regulation, we have no voice whatsoever.. But UK based manufacturers are applying that regulation" LK, "They're choosing to so they can sell into the Eurozone" ED, "You make my point for me, they take those rules for they can market, export and grow - presumably we want to do that don't we?" LK, "European growth.. UK growth is 1%.. EU average is 1%.. Your suggestion that if we work with those countries we'd grow more, that doesn't stack up does it?" ED, "It shows Europe would be keen for a UK-EU customs union" LK, "In some countries their growth is worse than ours, in others its the same" ED, "With respect, you've shown some countries where it's worse than ours but you haven't shown EU countries where growth is better than ours" "My argument is trade deals are mutually beneficial" "Even if economies aren't growing at the moment, there's more reason we should have a trade deal" "You're playing into my own argument that a UK-EU customs union would help us, and it would be relatively easy to get" LK, "Where is your evidence the EU would want this?" ED, "My challenge to Keir Starmer is to open negotiations.. Latest by 2030 we have a full UK-EU customs union" LK, "Is this the first step for the LibDems getting us back into the EU?" ED, "Yes, we are pro European, we should be back at the heart of Europe"

Farrukh

77,320 views • 1 year ago

Ukrainian Member of Parliament Ihor Mosiychuk described how Zelensky interferes in the elections in Hungary against Orbán: «Globalists are deeply afraid of the victory of Viktor Orbán Viktor , the current Prime Minister of Hungary. They are afraid because they understand that if he wins, a right-conservative renaissance will begin in Europe. And Zelensky, as their instrument, as their flagship, is attacking Orbán. He is attacking Orbán, but along with Orbán, he is also attacking the Hungarian people. Everything might have been fine, but the situation inside Ukraine is beginning to change, and more and more Ukrainians, in the confrontation between Zelensky and Orbán, support not Volodymyr Zelensky, but Viktor Orbán. Why, friends? The answer is obvious. Where did Zelensky begin? By stopping the “Druzhba” oil pipeline, through which Russian oil was supplied to Hungary and Slovakia. For four years of the large-scale war, Zelensky and his circle were making money from this, profiting from oil transit. But now, ahead of the elections in Hungary, in order to please his globalist patrons, Zelensky shuts down the Druzhba pipeline to raise fuel prices in Hungary, to provoke dissatisfaction among Hungarians with Prime Minister Orbán, and to exploit this politically. He shuts it down, claiming that a Russian missile hit it. Viktor Orbán says: “Let a Hungarian or at least a joint EU commission in to inspect it.” The European Union says: “We are ready to repair it.” Zelensky responds: “Yes, but repairs will take two months — that is, after the elections in Hungary,” and does not allow either the EU commission or Hungarian representatives access to the pipeline. This immediately raises questions: perhaps everything there is actually intact, perhaps they are being deceived, perhaps this is simply an attempt to influence Hungarian voters. The point is that Orbán calls things by their proper names, saying what pseudo-opposition Ukrainian politicians are afraid to say. He directly asks: “Who is Volodymyr Zelensky?” He removes the mask from this supposedly powerful Ukrainian leader. Yes, Viktor Orbán blocks financial and credit assistance for Ukraine, but he does so in defense of Hungary’s national interests. And more and more Ukrainians are realizing that Ukraine needs its own Ukrainian Viktor Orbán — someone who will defend not the interests of globalists, not run around pleasing them in the East or the West, but will think and act based on Ukrainian national interests, defending them the same way Viktor Orbán defends Hungary’s national interests. And if Ukraine had such a leader, it would never have fallen into the situation it is in now. The large-scale war would never have begun. One more point. Yesterday, Viktor Orbán, once again demonstrating how he acts in defense of national interests, banned entry into Hungary and the European Union — using Hungary’s EU membership — for several Ukrainian politicians and political analysts, three to begin with: Karas, Omelchenko, Tiesenhausen. But for some reason, he allowed in the propagandists of Bankova, who suggest wiping one’s feet on Hungary, who effectively propose declaring war on Hungary, and who incite anti-Hungarian sentiment in Ukraine. We will prepare an appeal to Viktor Orbán, and to the administration of Donald Trump — because they are also attacking Trump — and we will initiate a ban on entry to the European Union for at least three propagandists of Zelensky’s regime: Vova Petrov, Serhii Ivanov, and Hrishyn. Both to the European Union and to the United States of America. This will be fair and just.»
11:21

Ukrainian Member of Parliament Ihor Mosiychuk described how Zelensky interferes in the elections in Hungary against Orbán: «Globalists are deeply afraid of the victory of Viktor Orbán Viktor , the current Prime Minister of Hungary. They are afraid because they understand that if he wins, a right-conservative renaissance will begin in Europe. And Zelensky, as their instrument, as their flagship, is attacking Orbán. He is attacking Orbán, but along with Orbán, he is also attacking the Hungarian people. Everything might have been fine, but the situation inside Ukraine is beginning to change, and more and more Ukrainians, in the confrontation between Zelensky and Orbán, support not Volodymyr Zelensky, but Viktor Orbán. Why, friends? The answer is obvious. Where did Zelensky begin? By stopping the “Druzhba” oil pipeline, through which Russian oil was supplied to Hungary and Slovakia. For four years of the large-scale war, Zelensky and his circle were making money from this, profiting from oil transit. But now, ahead of the elections in Hungary, in order to please his globalist patrons, Zelensky shuts down the Druzhba pipeline to raise fuel prices in Hungary, to provoke dissatisfaction among Hungarians with Prime Minister Orbán, and to exploit this politically. He shuts it down, claiming that a Russian missile hit it. Viktor Orbán says: “Let a Hungarian or at least a joint EU commission in to inspect it.” The European Union says: “We are ready to repair it.” Zelensky responds: “Yes, but repairs will take two months — that is, after the elections in Hungary,” and does not allow either the EU commission or Hungarian representatives access to the pipeline. This immediately raises questions: perhaps everything there is actually intact, perhaps they are being deceived, perhaps this is simply an attempt to influence Hungarian voters. The point is that Orbán calls things by their proper names, saying what pseudo-opposition Ukrainian politicians are afraid to say. He directly asks: “Who is Volodymyr Zelensky?” He removes the mask from this supposedly powerful Ukrainian leader. Yes, Viktor Orbán blocks financial and credit assistance for Ukraine, but he does so in defense of Hungary’s national interests. And more and more Ukrainians are realizing that Ukraine needs its own Ukrainian Viktor Orbán — someone who will defend not the interests of globalists, not run around pleasing them in the East or the West, but will think and act based on Ukrainian national interests, defending them the same way Viktor Orbán defends Hungary’s national interests. And if Ukraine had such a leader, it would never have fallen into the situation it is in now. The large-scale war would never have begun. One more point. Yesterday, Viktor Orbán, once again demonstrating how he acts in defense of national interests, banned entry into Hungary and the European Union — using Hungary’s EU membership — for several Ukrainian politicians and political analysts, three to begin with: Karas, Omelchenko, Tiesenhausen. But for some reason, he allowed in the propagandists of Bankova, who suggest wiping one’s feet on Hungary, who effectively propose declaring war on Hungary, and who incite anti-Hungarian sentiment in Ukraine. We will prepare an appeal to Viktor Orbán, and to the administration of Donald Trump — because they are also attacking Trump — and we will initiate a ban on entry to the European Union for at least three propagandists of Zelensky’s regime: Vova Petrov, Serhii Ivanov, and Hrishyn. Both to the European Union and to the United States of America. This will be fair and just.»

Myroslav Oleshko

18,087 views • 4 months ago

In a country where one can go to jail for criticizing Putin’s policies, a well-respected Russian economist Abel Aganbegyan spoke up about the pathetic state of the Russian economy. Please see a few takeaways from Aganbegyan’s speech below or watch the video where he goes into further very interesting details. “Because for 34 years of the existence of the new Russia, according to Rosstat our GDP has grown by 37%. 1% per year. In comparison to 1990. Developing countries grew 3 to 6 times. India 8.6 times. China 13 times. While our [economy] grew by 37%. According to all international ratings, including welfare and economic indicators, we have gone down greatly. Innovation-wise it's just a disaster. After 2020, out of 1658 “unicorn companies” worth more than one billion dollars at the beginning of 2025, not a single one is in Russia. Out of the 2,500 large innovative commercial private firms in 43 countries where €35,000,000 and above is spent on research and development, only 3 are in Russia. Our number of robots is 19 per 10,000 workers. In South Korea - it's 1014. In other developed countries it's 200 to 600. We have 7 supercomputers while China and the USA have 150 each. Where can we get innovative firms from if the main source of their development is venture capital, which in 2021 was 3.4 billion and now it's 270 million dollars? Not 3.4 billion. Our global share of high-tech goods and services is 1.3% and in exports it’s 0.3%. With such indicators, there can be no growth.”
9:45

In a country where one can go to jail for criticizing Putin’s policies, a well-respected Russian economist Abel Aganbegyan spoke up about the pathetic state of the Russian economy. Please see a few takeaways from Aganbegyan’s speech below or watch the video where he goes into further very interesting details. “Because for 34 years of the existence of the new Russia, according to Rosstat our GDP has grown by 37%. 1% per year. In comparison to 1990. Developing countries grew 3 to 6 times. India 8.6 times. China 13 times. While our [economy] grew by 37%. According to all international ratings, including welfare and economic indicators, we have gone down greatly. Innovation-wise it's just a disaster. After 2020, out of 1658 “unicorn companies” worth more than one billion dollars at the beginning of 2025, not a single one is in Russia. Out of the 2,500 large innovative commercial private firms in 43 countries where €35,000,000 and above is spent on research and development, only 3 are in Russia. Our number of robots is 19 per 10,000 workers. In South Korea - it's 1014. In other developed countries it's 200 to 600. We have 7 supercomputers while China and the USA have 150 each. Where can we get innovative firms from if the main source of their development is venture capital, which in 2021 was 3.4 billion and now it's 270 million dollars? Not 3.4 billion. Our global share of high-tech goods and services is 1.3% and in exports it’s 0.3%. With such indicators, there can be no growth.”

Natalka

108,431 views • 1 year ago

Left: Rachel Johnson who broke covid rules to play tennis repeats Boris Johnson's lie that we had a faster vaccine roll out because of Brexit Right: Dr June Raine explains that the UK was under EU laws at the time, it had nothing to do with Brexit. In fact Hungary, Poland and Slovakia had separate programs in addition to the EU program Rachel Johnson then criticises Brexit repeatedly before saying she's proud of her brother Boris Johnson for delivering Brexit 🤷‍♂️ "A lot of those who did vote to leave.. Have gone to the great Whetherspoons in the sky.. Or the Reform party.. Or are in the House of Lords" "Desmond Swayne saying nobody wants to be part of Europe, the engine is failing. What a c*ck. I mean really, why is Ukraine risking life and limb to be in. the waiting room of room? Why are Georgia and Moldova risking bombs and bullets in order to join the EU?" "The EU is a trading bloc, a security organisation, it was also our oyster, the world was our oyster. We could live, work and travel in any one of those countries" "Brexit saved my marriage, the only benefit of Brexit" "David Cameron never expected to lose the referendum, he expected to win.. Vote Leave never expected to win either" "I"m not speaking against Boris Johnson or my generation at Oxford, they're all friends of mine. I'm proud of my brother.. He got Brexit over the line" "But now the country has got Boris done. We have our blue passports, our pint glasses, but one vote, one referendum cannot bind another" "If we had been in the EU, the UK part of a strong united Europe, think how different the world would be today" "When I was asked to speak tonight.. This was such a no brainer, that I didn't have to write two speeches one in favour, and one against, in order to work out what I've felt. Because I've always felt very strongly that we are better together"
3:09

Left: Rachel Johnson who broke covid rules to play tennis repeats Boris Johnson's lie that we had a faster vaccine roll out because of Brexit Right: Dr June Raine explains that the UK was under EU laws at the time, it had nothing to do with Brexit. In fact Hungary, Poland and Slovakia had separate programs in addition to the EU program Rachel Johnson then criticises Brexit repeatedly before saying she's proud of her brother Boris Johnson for delivering Brexit 🤷‍♂️ "A lot of those who did vote to leave.. Have gone to the great Whetherspoons in the sky.. Or the Reform party.. Or are in the House of Lords" "Desmond Swayne saying nobody wants to be part of Europe, the engine is failing. What a c*ck. I mean really, why is Ukraine risking life and limb to be in. the waiting room of room? Why are Georgia and Moldova risking bombs and bullets in order to join the EU?" "The EU is a trading bloc, a security organisation, it was also our oyster, the world was our oyster. We could live, work and travel in any one of those countries" "Brexit saved my marriage, the only benefit of Brexit" "David Cameron never expected to lose the referendum, he expected to win.. Vote Leave never expected to win either" "I"m not speaking against Boris Johnson or my generation at Oxford, they're all friends of mine. I'm proud of my brother.. He got Brexit over the line" "But now the country has got Boris done. We have our blue passports, our pint glasses, but one vote, one referendum cannot bind another" "If we had been in the EU, the UK part of a strong united Europe, think how different the world would be today" "When I was asked to speak tonight.. This was such a no brainer, that I didn't have to write two speeches one in favour, and one against, in order to work out what I've felt. Because I've always felt very strongly that we are better together"

Farrukh

189,095 views • 1 year ago