Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Why was Aave redesign so successful and well-received by their audience? First, they made bold changes. Comparing their before and after, the major difference is the new branding and how they approached it on their website. Aave 's communication used to focus a lot on their mascot, which is...

101,167 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Ceci
Cecivor 1 Jahr

Regarding the light mode trend, that's exactly what we did (@LitCollective_ team) with @iofinnet as an example. We spent over six months creating a website that conveyed credibility and elegance, which was crucial for a DeFi project, and we achieved that result. Today, iofinnet has over 1,000 currencies and assets, and the website reflects the seriousness and grandeur of the brand.

Profilbild von Aave
Aavevor 1 Jahr

👻

Profilbild von Ceci
Cecivor 1 Jahr

happy to see you here ronnie 👻

Profilbild von Harvest
Harvestvor 1 Jahr

@aave light mode 🤝

Profilbild von Ceci
Cecivor 1 Jahr

@aave big fan 🤝

Profilbild von Stani.eth
Stani.ethvor 1 Jahr

@aave ✨

Profilbild von Ceci
Cecivor 1 Jahr

@aave 🤌

Profilbild von bigtown
bigtownvor 1 Jahr

@aave Let's not forget these cute buds; they personified their logo more, and made it more emotive 👻

Profilbild von Ceci
Cecivor 1 Jahr

@aave thanks for pointing that out! SO amazing!

Profilbild von cega 🥚
cega 🥚vor 1 Jahr

@aave Aave's redesign clearly showcases the power of bold, cohesive branding.

Profilbild von Ceci
Cecivor 1 Jahr

@aave words I live by 🙏

Ähnliche Videos

The Rolling Stones in 1973, on how their audiences transformed over ten years: At a press conference in Amsterdam during their 1973 European tour, the Stones were a decade into their career. When asked whether crowds still reacted the same way as when they started, they traced the entire arc of their relationship with the audience. "They used to scream; that used to be the thing. When we first started, they used to just sort of clap, like for the Osmonds. Then we got into the screaming period, which was enjoyable in a way but got rather boring because you couldn't play." The screaming era pushed them off the road entirely: "We gave up the stage for two years, and when we came back, it was a different thing. It was slightly easier to play because it wasn't the screaming, but the audiences are generally very good and appreciative." Touring Europe in 1973 was a different game to touring America. Asked about the difference, they explained: "In Europe, there tends to be really a lot of difference between each country and even each town, whereas in America, even with short distances, you get into completely different languages and frontiers. Still, playing in a hall to people is basically the same; you're still on stage playing to a live audience." Language shaped the connection, but only up to a point: "Like say in Germany, I can't say anything very much to the audience because I don't speak German, so the communication is limited to music and gestures, which should be enough really." One interviewer suggested the crowds looked frightening, even seedy, when seen from the stage. The Stones rejected the premise: "No, they don't. I love them, don't I? If they come to see us, it's great. Sometimes they look happy, sometimes they look really miserable." The night before, fans had been collapsing in the crush: "They fainted a lot yesterday, which was very disappointing; we didn't like that, and we asked them not to stand up." But fear was never part of the equation: "Individually you could be scared by people, but they come there to enjoy it for the same reasons as we do, so it's not a question of being frightened." Asked what it feels like to play to 30,000 people, the answer was simple: "I couldn't describe it in this brief space; you get a lot of adrenaline bounce. It's a bit like going on the telly for the first time."

History Nerd

50,847 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Woman who has been working with Section 8 for 12 years talks about what the program has turned into “It's got some problems. Section 8 was supposed to be a helping hand. It was not supposed to be forever, and it has turned into forever “Section 8. Trump's talking about really reducing the program, and I happen to know a lot about it. I've been working with Section 8 and renting to Section 8 participants for, gosh, almost 12 years now. — I remember when I first started renting and working with Section 8, there was a mom and daughter. This is when we had to go meet them at the office to turn in the packet, and the mom was so proud that her daughter, she was able to, like, get her daughter onto the program and like, pass it down from generation to generation because they knew at that point they were, their rent was going to be covered for the rest of their lives. And we're not talking about people who are disabled and like, physically disabled and can't work. They may have been given a lot in life where they haven't really, like, developed skills or been able to, like, compete within the workforce. But where's the motivation? If you know that your rent's going to get paid, you can get on SNAP benefits, you can get free health care. We've created this society that knows that the government will take care of them and that there's no motivation for them to change their path and to take care of themselves. I mean, in the 12 years I've been doing it, I had 2 tenants work their way off of Section 8. That's it. I'm on average have about 80 to 90 Section 8 leases from year to year. So those aren't really great odds. So I think it would be good for the program to be revamped in some way, shape or form where it rewards those that work rather than it feeling like a punishment”

Wall Street Apes

696,731 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr