正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Why We Stopped Progressing | Peter Thiel

40,070 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Matthias Giger 的头像
Matthias Giger1 年前

The stagnation is real. No question.

kerka 的头像
kerka1 年前

is the answer " we are not letting israel to kill more children"?

David Krewson 的头像
David Krewson1 年前

Thanks for taking off your mask you Deep State Wolf! After discovering Ben is an agent for Israel and you for the Military Industrial Complex, I’m canceling the Daily Wire! Your the Psychopath Narcissist! That explains your wardrobe! Christ is King!!!!

Make NZ Greater 🇳🇿 的头像
Make NZ Greater 🇳🇿1 年前

I find the discussion about sacrifice particularly interesting, and agree with @peterthiel that the language about this can be confusing. Every choice we make has opportunity costs, which means we are constantly sacrificing these alternative pathways. But the implication is that we choose what we think is the best pathway, so somewhat paradoxically, by sacrificing the alternative pathways we are acting in our own long-term self-interest - all things considered. In extreme cases, even sacrificing your own life might be in your own self-interest, if this act helps your loved ones or a cause you believe in to survive and/or thrive, thus securing your legacy. The other definition of sacrifice is that you should make choices that are against your own long-term self-interest, all things considered. This doctrine of altruism will ultimately lead to your own destruction if taken too far, yet it is still espoused by some as the more moral pathway - supposedly because it helps others. The problem with this is that if everyone acted in such a "sacrificial" self-destructive manner, it benefits nobody, so this doesn't seem like the right strategy. It seems to me that the disagreement in this discussion is caused by confusion between these two definitions. From all that I have seen from @jordanbpeterson, I believe the first definition of sacrifice is what he is talking about, but Mr Thiel appears to assume he is using the second definition. We probably need a better term for "acting in our own long-term self-interest (all things considered), including giving up anything that gets in the way of this goal". Perhaps we need to bring back Aristotle's idea of Eudaimonia - using the term sacrifice can lead some to assume this means acting against your own self-interest, resulting in them either rejecting the idea or acting in a self-destructive manner.

The Washington Post 的头像
The Washington Post1 年前

A rundown of Donald Trump’s biggest campaign promises and whether he has or hasn’t delivered.

Freedom Stonks PhD CFA 的头像
Freedom Stonks PhD CFA1 年前

@JDHaltigan That was great

Bobby Shell⚡ 的头像
Bobby Shell⚡1 年前

The zero to one moment for democrats in 2028 will be there are two genders 😂

Mammon Chaser 的头像
Mammon Chaser1 年前

@JDHaltigan What an amazing conversation. Thank you.

Edward Mehr 的头像
Edward Mehr1 年前

@grok can you tell us about the golden age of Islam?

相关视频