Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Why won't the White House answer the questions posed about David Grusch's allegations of a crash retrieval and reverse engineering program? Surely President Donald J. Trump would want to immediately dismiss such an allegation if it was untrue? Why is it so hard to answer this Q?

142,974 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

UAP Juan's profile picture
UAP Juan3 years ago

@POTUS The lack of a clear answer is the ANSWER itself.

Darren Plane's profile picture
Darren Plane3 years ago

@POTUS The whole reason they set AARO up is for a 'dead letter office', to be used anytime questions are asked, they can just deflect to AARO, and move on to the next question.

Brian Johnson's profile picture
Brian Johnson3 years ago

@POTUS They love to play the plausible deniability game. Decreases risk of adverse impacts on Secretkeepers, Government, Military branches, Aerospace corps, stock market, citizen blowback. It’s good for nearly all parties involved except the UFO community, which bears the brunt.

Dr. Malcolm Davis 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦's profile picture
Dr. Malcolm Davis 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦3 years ago

Ross, as you know - I'm yet to be convinced on the 'aliens' angle. There could be credible terrestrial explanations, and I'd need much more substantial evidence and better yet, proof, for anything more exotic in origin. But, if it is terrestrial (as I think is the more likely explanation), then national security comes into play, whether its a US black program, or a hostile foreign capability. Either way, the US Government may have legitimate justification for not revealing all.

Phos - Disclosure's profile picture
Phos - Disclosure3 years ago

@POTUS Ross can you confirm the names of all the members of Congress that David has personally given all the top secret information to? I don’t think this information is classified and would help us have a better picture of who is being honest in interviews. Cheers.

Nick Madrid's profile picture
Nick Madrid3 years ago

@POTUS Ross do we have any information on whether senators or house members whose lawyers and staffers listened to Mr. Grusch's testimony have read it, spoken with him in a SCIF or any of the 40 individuals he interviewed that substantiate his allegations have been questioned?

Joseph Burkes's profile picture
Joseph Burkes3 years ago

@POTUS No comment on Grusch cause Biden has a plan worked out with Schumer, UAP Disclosure Act of 2023. They want a controlled disclosure w gradual release of videos, documents etc. to allow people to adjust to the new reality.

The Doc 🅁🅅🄽 ₿'s profile picture
The Doc 🅁🅅🄽 ₿3 years ago

@POTUS This is encouraging. I hope they persist in asking at every briefing about what is being done with Grusch’s testimony, especially the closed session he had already done and the evidence he has already handed over to ICIG and Senate committee.

Phil's profile picture
Phil3 years ago

@POTUS Don't worry Ross, something tells me @POTUS knows what's up. He just doesn't want to cause any ontological shock

Tall White's profile picture
Tall White3 years ago

@POTUS It's hard because they don't have an answer that makes them look good.

Related Videos