Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Why would the filmmakers behind Primetime make Chris Hansen look like a ratings-obsessed maniac while portraying real-life child predators as the victims? He points out that you don't have to look very far into Hollywood's history for a plausible explanation: "And why would they do this? Let's remember that...

glennbeck's profile picture

Glenn Beck

2,290,377 subscribers

59,158 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

19 Yorum

USTesla profil fotoğrafı
USTesla13 gün önce

@chrishansen This is hollywoods way of slowly normalizing pedophilia They did the same thing with gays and trans. They make the predators look like the victims instead of the monsters they are. It’s quite obvious what they’re doing here and we’ll see more and more of this in the coming years

David M. Robbins 🛡️✝️🇺🇸⚔️ profil fotoğrafı
David M. Robbins 🛡️✝️🇺🇸⚔️13 gün önce

@chrishansen Because they believe pedophila is just another sexual orientation.

Jeff Christ profil fotoğrafı
Jeff Christ13 gün önce

Weinstein corporatized abuse as a part of his business model, when he thought he had the protection of his own brand. Hollywood has had deviancy since Hollywood became Hollywood. Encouraging vigilantism is a bad idea. The internet made the problem more complex. AI or super intelligence will make it even more complex. Just as Weinstein corporatized his abuse of others, another industry becomes the counter to that, and makes bank all the same, just as nefarious unless there is some benefit to society beyond the shock value of exposing it.

bbeennny profil fotoğrafı
bbeennny13 gün önce

@chrishansen is anybody shocked by this if you are you have not been paying attention

Elena Maritza Delgado profil fotoğrafı
Elena Maritza Delgado13 gün önce

@chrishansen Of course they villainize Hansen while coddling predators. Par for the course from an industry that preaches one thing and does another.

Take The Red Pill. profil fotoğrafı
Take The Red Pill.13 gün önce

@chrishansen Wait... wait.... I know.... I know..... Hollywood is a bunch of pedophiles, liars, and dickheads.

Illegal Cluster 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Illegal Cluster 🇺🇸13 gün önce

@chrishansen The problem with Hollywood is: most victims of Hollywood remain silent about the abuses, because they too aspire to be the future Hollywood victimizers. Same is true in the fake news. PBS News and ABC News conspired with Charlie Rose and Epstein. They are LEGION.

Angrywelder profil fotoğrafı
Angrywelder13 gün önce

@chrishansen Maybe they're hoping people will be sympathetic. When it all comes out

(((David Maggard))) profil fotoğrafı
(((David Maggard)))13 gün önce

@chrishansen I think it is brave that the execs, writers, etc at @A24 to finally admit they, and the rest of Hollywood, are pro-pedophile, the honesty is refreshing. Now let's deal with it properly

Jason Sanders profil fotoğrafı
Jason Sanders13 gün önce

@chrishansen Cause the like the pedo and abhor those who fight them

Jean Poniske profil fotoğrafı
Jean Poniske13 gün önce

@chrishansen 👿😡

Dewberry888 profil fotoğrafı
Dewberry88813 gün önce

@chrishansen Didn't Chris Hansen get arrested for having child p@rno? I'm sure that I've heard this a few years ago!

Marcus Vance - WestCapCry profil fotoğrafı
Marcus Vance - WestCapCry13 gün önce

@chrishansen Exactly. Hollywood keeps re‑packaging the same power dynamics, turning predators into moral crusaders while rewarding ratings. It’s a classic case of state‑overreach masquerading as justice, fuelin...

Millicent Garrenger profil fotoğrafı
Millicent Garrenger13 gün önce

@chrishansen Concerning

TomHB profil fotoğrafı
TomHB13 gün önce

@chrishansen Why would you and the rest of the @GOP continue to try to hide the Epstein files, give Maxwell a sweetheart deal in a "club fed" as long as she keeps her mouth shut, and ignore that Trump is mentioned in the Epstein Files more than anyone else?

Hanover Fiste - 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Hanover Fiste - 🇺🇸13 gün önce

@chrishansen Because we're ruled by sick pederasts.

Christopher Hull profil fotoğrafı
Christopher Hull13 gün önce

@chrishansen Whole Lotta bullshit to avoid saying "Jews. "

Tracy Zentz profil fotoğrafı
Tracy Zentz13 gün önce

@chrishansen Perhaps because they have similar likes as the predators.

Jeremy Luke Zimmerman profil fotoğrafı
Jeremy Luke Zimmerman13 gün önce

@chrishansen Popularity doesn't equal principle—a concerning number of young folks seem blind to that fact.

Benzer Videolar

Reza Pahlavi: You know, from the first day I started, I considered my mission in life to bring the country to a point that we can have that final referendum and the people elect their first democratic government in the future. That to me is the finish line and mission accomplished in life. I don't have any personal ambition. I'm not seeking power. I don't want to have a crown on my head or a title, but I think that they should look at me as a bridge to that destination and not the destination itself. That's my focus. And any other argument about whether or not I will have a future role is placing a cart before the horse. My focus is on delivering on what I promised forty-seven years ago. That has been my commitment, and the reason millions of people in Iran are calling my name and want my return is because they know that they can trust me on this. I'm the only person that was not part of the revolution or ever associated with this regime. And that's a big plus when it comes to how many candidates are out there. That's why you hear my name chanted on the streets of Iran, and a lot of people in the diaspora support it as well.
1:00

Reza Pahlavi: You know, from the first day I started, I considered my mission in life to bring the country to a point that we can have that final referendum and the people elect their first democratic government in the future. That to me is the finish line and mission accomplished in life. I don't have any personal ambition. I'm not seeking power. I don't want to have a crown on my head or a title, but I think that they should look at me as a bridge to that destination and not the destination itself. That's my focus. And any other argument about whether or not I will have a future role is placing a cart before the horse. My focus is on delivering on what I promised forty-seven years ago. That has been my commitment, and the reason millions of people in Iran are calling my name and want my return is because they know that they can trust me on this. I'm the only person that was not part of the revolution or ever associated with this regime. And that's a big plus when it comes to how many candidates are out there. That's why you hear my name chanted on the streets of Iran, and a lot of people in the diaspora support it as well.

Open Source Intel

84,084 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Jacob Tierney discusses his process for writing Heated Rivalry and outlining season two: "The book [Heated Rivalry] is in five parts and very quickly I was like, part one, episode one. Part two, episode two. It was very clear to me. …So in this case, I actually did not outline. Because I was just using these parts of this book, and I knew these books so well at this point. Something that I did, and that I'm trying to do again now when I'm writing the new season, is I'm trying to use—Because there's a dreaminess to this show, I try to use my memory as a guide. I'm like, what do I remember? And then I try to give primacy to the stuff that I remember and that has stuck in my brain all these years with this story. So I’m like, oh I have to do that! And that's a nice way for me to kind of center things. Where if I have to do that, then it means maybe I don't have to do this, and it maybe means I want to combine or collapse different things. Because if this is going to take up—If one incident that I'm thinking of is going to take up the space in an episode that I think of as the heart, …then you don't need to do a first version of it in the same way, you know? Little things like that. That being said, for this season because I'm working with a co-writer as well, we have outlined everything. And every time, I do approach outlining like a teenager, where I'm like, [modulates voice] I don't want to. But then when I do it, I'm always like, why don't I always do this? It makes everything so much easier. So I kind of gaslight myself in that way." ✍🏼 transcription via Heated Rivalry News & Updates. Please credit if reposting. 🗣️ quote via q&a with Stage 32 on March 24, 2026. 🔗
2:12

Jacob Tierney discusses his process for writing Heated Rivalry and outlining season two: "The book [Heated Rivalry] is in five parts and very quickly I was like, part one, episode one. Part two, episode two. It was very clear to me. …So in this case, I actually did not outline. Because I was just using these parts of this book, and I knew these books so well at this point. Something that I did, and that I'm trying to do again now when I'm writing the new season, is I'm trying to use—Because there's a dreaminess to this show, I try to use my memory as a guide. I'm like, what do I remember? And then I try to give primacy to the stuff that I remember and that has stuck in my brain all these years with this story. So I’m like, oh I have to do that! And that's a nice way for me to kind of center things. Where if I have to do that, then it means maybe I don't have to do this, and it maybe means I want to combine or collapse different things. Because if this is going to take up—If one incident that I'm thinking of is going to take up the space in an episode that I think of as the heart, …then you don't need to do a first version of it in the same way, you know? Little things like that. That being said, for this season because I'm working with a co-writer as well, we have outlined everything. And every time, I do approach outlining like a teenager, where I'm like, [modulates voice] I don't want to. But then when I do it, I'm always like, why don't I always do this? It makes everything so much easier. So I kind of gaslight myself in that way." ✍🏼 transcription via Heated Rivalry News & Updates. Please credit if reposting. 🗣️ quote via q&a with Stage 32 on March 24, 2026. 🔗

Heated Rivalry News & Updates

60,684 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Burt Lancaster on why Frank Perry was the wrong choice to direct "The Swimmer" (1968) & the directors he felt would have handled it better: "'The Swimmer' (1968) is certainly one of my favorites. It's a John Cheever story and there was the very difficult problem of translating a literary work to the screen. Cheever speaks in the short story of how a man is walking through a lane and he smells a fire, it's an autumn fire; he describes it as the smell of autumn in the air. Well, that kind of thing in writing is lovely, especially in Cheever's phrases, but when you try to get this quality onto film, it requires some kind of approach. I'll say that I don't think Frank Perry was able to do this, and I don't know that any other director would have been. But you certainly need someone like a Fellini or a Truffaut, or someone with that kind of imagination to let the camera also tell your story. Film has its own particular life—regardless of what's actually going on in a film. And it needed some kind of strange, weird approach to capture the audience and make them realize that, in a way, they were not looking at anything real. In talking about the script we would say, "I don't know why two men in white coats don't come take this guy away." It should have been obvious that this man was going through something that was not quite real; it was all part of his imagination. But it was played in a realistic sense—so when you come to the end of that film, instead of being sympathetic and heartbroken for the man, you were surprised and shocked." ("Take 22: Moviemakers on Moviemaking" Judith Crist, 1984)
2:11

Burt Lancaster on why Frank Perry was the wrong choice to direct "The Swimmer" (1968) & the directors he felt would have handled it better: "'The Swimmer' (1968) is certainly one of my favorites. It's a John Cheever story and there was the very difficult problem of translating a literary work to the screen. Cheever speaks in the short story of how a man is walking through a lane and he smells a fire, it's an autumn fire; he describes it as the smell of autumn in the air. Well, that kind of thing in writing is lovely, especially in Cheever's phrases, but when you try to get this quality onto film, it requires some kind of approach. I'll say that I don't think Frank Perry was able to do this, and I don't know that any other director would have been. But you certainly need someone like a Fellini or a Truffaut, or someone with that kind of imagination to let the camera also tell your story. Film has its own particular life—regardless of what's actually going on in a film. And it needed some kind of strange, weird approach to capture the audience and make them realize that, in a way, they were not looking at anything real. In talking about the script we would say, "I don't know why two men in white coats don't come take this guy away." It should have been obvious that this man was going through something that was not quite real; it was all part of his imagination. But it was played in a realistic sense—so when you come to the end of that film, instead of being sympathetic and heartbroken for the man, you were surprised and shocked." ("Take 22: Moviemakers on Moviemaking" Judith Crist, 1984)

DepressedBergman

74,700 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Keegan Bradley says losing the Ryder Cup at Bethpage was the “darkest time of his life”. However, he also would love to do it again and “avenge that loss.” Speaking ahead of the Hero World Challenge, he said: “I have this like gaping hole in my career now that I don't know that I'll ever be able to fill. This isn't something that you lose the Masters, you lose a tournament, I'm going to work extra hard to get back and win. “Being the captain of the Ryder Cup team is not something you can work hard for, it's just something that's sort of elected on you. “I don't know. Of course I would love to do it again, I would love to avenge that loss, but that's not up to me. That's not up to -- I don't think that's fair for me to come out here and say that. “But I would love to do it again at some point. I don't know if that will ever happen, probably won't. I think if you ask any losing captain if they would like to do it again, they would all want another shot.” On what the weeks after the Ryder Cup were like for him emotionally, he said: “I mean, the darkest time of my life probably. I mean, I don't know how else to describe it. Certainly, definitely of my career. There's always this letdown after a Ryder Cup or Presidents Cup regardless of the outcome because the emotions are so extreme. It's Ryder Cup hangover and you're just exhausted and you're down, you know. That takes a toll on you. “But there's just, it just was, it just was a tough time. Still is. But to be honest with you, the last couple weeks I've felt more like myself. Getting back, getting ready to play tournaments, playing the Skins game, getting ready to come play here. “Really, it's been tough for all of us; not just me, the players as well. I feel like every time I see a player on the team here I want to just go give him a hug and sit down and chat. But I'm grateful for everybody. I'm in a unique position where I could make another team, which has never been done. I would love to do that.” What are your thoughts on this, would you give Keegan another shot at being Captain in 2027?
1:33

Keegan Bradley says losing the Ryder Cup at Bethpage was the “darkest time of his life”. However, he also would love to do it again and “avenge that loss.” Speaking ahead of the Hero World Challenge, he said: “I have this like gaping hole in my career now that I don't know that I'll ever be able to fill. This isn't something that you lose the Masters, you lose a tournament, I'm going to work extra hard to get back and win. “Being the captain of the Ryder Cup team is not something you can work hard for, it's just something that's sort of elected on you. “I don't know. Of course I would love to do it again, I would love to avenge that loss, but that's not up to me. That's not up to -- I don't think that's fair for me to come out here and say that. “But I would love to do it again at some point. I don't know if that will ever happen, probably won't. I think if you ask any losing captain if they would like to do it again, they would all want another shot.” On what the weeks after the Ryder Cup were like for him emotionally, he said: “I mean, the darkest time of my life probably. I mean, I don't know how else to describe it. Certainly, definitely of my career. There's always this letdown after a Ryder Cup or Presidents Cup regardless of the outcome because the emotions are so extreme. It's Ryder Cup hangover and you're just exhausted and you're down, you know. That takes a toll on you. “But there's just, it just was, it just was a tough time. Still is. But to be honest with you, the last couple weeks I've felt more like myself. Getting back, getting ready to play tournaments, playing the Skins game, getting ready to come play here. “Really, it's been tough for all of us; not just me, the players as well. I feel like every time I see a player on the team here I want to just go give him a hug and sit down and chat. But I'm grateful for everybody. I'm in a unique position where I could make another team, which has never been done. I would love to do that.” What are your thoughts on this, would you give Keegan another shot at being Captain in 2027?

Flushing It

269,146 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

.DHH on how tobi lutke saw the potential of AI before most others: “The difference between a great racer and a mediocre racer is very often where do they look? If you're looking at the turn-in where you're supposed to turn, and not at the apex —you're not going to hit it. You go where you look. Don't look at the tree or you'll steer right into it. And training your eyes to look further ahead is actually quite difficult in racing, and I think it's quite difficult in business and life in general. And Tobi had an eye that was just looking further ahead than I was. And he was going "Yeah but it's [AI] not going to be like this forever.” Intuitively had this understanding of the evolution. And I'm still not entirely sure what did he see? Why didn't I see it? And I'm actually a little frustrated on my own behalf that I did not have the same conviction as Tobi did as early as he did, towards seeing yeah you don't like it right now but just imagine two more years of this. And he wrote a memo to the company internally I think in '23 or early '24 way before agents were doing the work on their own going: I've seen it. This is the big switch. This is what we've been waiting for. This is why I'm here as CEO to identify those kind of discontinuations in the trend line. We need to be a very different company to be able to position ourselves for that and take advantage of that.”
1:29

.DHH on how tobi lutke saw the potential of AI before most others: “The difference between a great racer and a mediocre racer is very often where do they look? If you're looking at the turn-in where you're supposed to turn, and not at the apex —you're not going to hit it. You go where you look. Don't look at the tree or you'll steer right into it. And training your eyes to look further ahead is actually quite difficult in racing, and I think it's quite difficult in business and life in general. And Tobi had an eye that was just looking further ahead than I was. And he was going "Yeah but it's [AI] not going to be like this forever.” Intuitively had this understanding of the evolution. And I'm still not entirely sure what did he see? Why didn't I see it? And I'm actually a little frustrated on my own behalf that I did not have the same conviction as Tobi did as early as he did, towards seeing yeah you don't like it right now but just imagine two more years of this. And he wrote a memo to the company internally I think in '23 or early '24 way before agents were doing the work on their own going: I've seen it. This is the big switch. This is what we've been waiting for. This is why I'm here as CEO to identify those kind of discontinuations in the trend line. We need to be a very different company to be able to position ourselves for that and take advantage of that.”

David Senra

109,102 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Tobey Maguire reveals why the organic web shooters were the most controversial decision in the original Spider-Man movie. ​"I think the most controversial one that I can remember was the web-shooters prior to the first movie and would they be organic or would Peter make them" ​"It didn’t seem plausible... how's a kid, who was essentially a young teen or a very young man, make something which big companies couldn't make" ​"My argument for that was if he could do that, if he was that intelligent, scientifically minded, couldn't he be wealthy from that and not taking photos"
0:31

Tobey Maguire reveals why the organic web shooters were the most controversial decision in the original Spider-Man movie. ​"I think the most controversial one that I can remember was the web-shooters prior to the first movie and would they be organic or would Peter make them" ​"It didn’t seem plausible... how's a kid, who was essentially a young teen or a very young man, make something which big companies couldn't make" ​"My argument for that was if he could do that, if he was that intelligent, scientifically minded, couldn't he be wealthy from that and not taking photos"

Garaa

1,953,160 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Look, I know I'm harping on this a lot today, but I can't stop thinking about Occam's Razor here: Why are we not seriously considering that the reason we allegedly have mystery craft that defy the laws of physics but do not have physicists because "the one type of person who could possibly help with this" IS EXACTLY WHO THEY DON'T WANT? Imagine for a moment that they have a crime scene that they are assigning unqualified personnel to. Why would you do that? Because you're trying not to solve the the crime, only to make it LOOK like you are. Why would you not try to solve a crime? Because you already know who did it. But you go through the motions because you don't want anyone to know you know. That raises other questions, of course, like, "did they already solve it a long time ago?" or "did they not need to solve it because they were told how it works by whoever made it?" Maybe I'm wrong. But it feels like the one answer that might answer the question, "Why not do the most obvious thing?"
1:52

Look, I know I'm harping on this a lot today, but I can't stop thinking about Occam's Razor here: Why are we not seriously considering that the reason we allegedly have mystery craft that defy the laws of physics but do not have physicists because "the one type of person who could possibly help with this" IS EXACTLY WHO THEY DON'T WANT? Imagine for a moment that they have a crime scene that they are assigning unqualified personnel to. Why would you do that? Because you're trying not to solve the the crime, only to make it LOOK like you are. Why would you not try to solve a crime? Because you already know who did it. But you go through the motions because you don't want anyone to know you know. That raises other questions, of course, like, "did they already solve it a long time ago?" or "did they not need to solve it because they were told how it works by whoever made it?" Maybe I'm wrong. But it feels like the one answer that might answer the question, "Why not do the most obvious thing?"

Steve Skojec

114,638 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Bret is atheist adjacent and Joel is a creationist, yet the agree on this: WEINSTEIN: I've been thinking that there's something actually incorrect about the religious stories, the way we're passing them down, that has us misunderstanding the problems. And I'm very interested in fixing that puzzle if it's fixable, because I don't think we can afford to misunderstand these problems. We have to address them, because they're going to be fatal. So they come down to issues of free will, the question of evil, and the question of dominion. This is the third one on that list. And the idea that we have dominion over the earth, because of the way it's interpreted, I think is a very destructive idea. SALATIN: Couldn't agree more. When those conquistadors came in and murdered civilizations and exploited the resources in the name of God and the queen, the crusades — the fact is that a lot has been done wrong in the name of God, or any religion for that matter. And certainly not just God. Name your divinity. Plenty has gone wrong in that. And so it is a right understanding, I think, of our role as stewards, as caretakers of something ultimately that is not ours. That is kind of a starting point across religions, across all beliefs. That is where you start. You don't start with "I'm in control." You start with "I'm a seeker and a learner. Teach me what I need to do to help." That's a very different thing than saying, "I'm going to come in and do this, this, and this, and it's going to do this, this, and this for me."
2:11

Bret is atheist adjacent and Joel is a creationist, yet the agree on this: WEINSTEIN: I've been thinking that there's something actually incorrect about the religious stories, the way we're passing them down, that has us misunderstanding the problems. And I'm very interested in fixing that puzzle if it's fixable, because I don't think we can afford to misunderstand these problems. We have to address them, because they're going to be fatal. So they come down to issues of free will, the question of evil, and the question of dominion. This is the third one on that list. And the idea that we have dominion over the earth, because of the way it's interpreted, I think is a very destructive idea. SALATIN: Couldn't agree more. When those conquistadors came in and murdered civilizations and exploited the resources in the name of God and the queen, the crusades — the fact is that a lot has been done wrong in the name of God, or any religion for that matter. And certainly not just God. Name your divinity. Plenty has gone wrong in that. And so it is a right understanding, I think, of our role as stewards, as caretakers of something ultimately that is not ours. That is kind of a starting point across religions, across all beliefs. That is where you start. You don't start with "I'm in control." You start with "I'm a seeker and a learner. Teach me what I need to do to help." That's a very different thing than saying, "I'm going to come in and do this, this, and this, and it's going to do this, this, and this for me."

The DarkHorse Podcast

22,350 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

Trump said that Russia could have ended the war against Ukraine on the very first day if not for a Russian general who sent tanks to Kyiv "through the swamp." 🗣"They got stuck in the swamp, almost like in quicksand. It was mud, like quicksand. They could not move. If that general had just gone straight on the concrete highway, that speaks volumes. That is why war is always associated with risk. If he had just moved straight on the highway to the city, they would have been in Kyiv in four hours, and Ukraine would have been able to do nothing. This war would have ended in one day. This was four and a half years ago. It was a huge mistake. The general decided to go through the field instead of the road and highway," he said I know Ukrainian roads are far from perfect but calling E40 highway (Kyiv-Chernihiv) “swamp” is a bit too much… Kyiv, Brovary direction, March 2022
0:36

Trump said that Russia could have ended the war against Ukraine on the very first day if not for a Russian general who sent tanks to Kyiv "through the swamp." 🗣"They got stuck in the swamp, almost like in quicksand. It was mud, like quicksand. They could not move. If that general had just gone straight on the concrete highway, that speaks volumes. That is why war is always associated with risk. If he had just moved straight on the highway to the city, they would have been in Kyiv in four hours, and Ukraine would have been able to do nothing. This war would have ended in one day. This was four and a half years ago. It was a huge mistake. The general decided to go through the field instead of the road and highway," he said I know Ukrainian roads are far from perfect but calling E40 highway (Kyiv-Chernihiv) “swamp” is a bit too much… Kyiv, Brovary direction, March 2022

Cloooud |🇺🇦

422,325 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This was a flash point that the far-left has been fomenting for years. They wanted another George Floyd, and it looks like they think this dipsht is the one. All this is basically over a suspect obstructing the roadway, breaking the law, and creating a confrontation. If he wasn't in the roadway, there wouldn't have been any confrontation. Now Minnesota is likely going to be attacked by far-left extremists. Pray for the men and women of DHS and all of the innocent Americans that will be caught in the fray.
1:27

This was a flash point that the far-left has been fomenting for years. They wanted another George Floyd, and it looks like they think this dipsht is the one. All this is basically over a suspect obstructing the roadway, breaking the law, and creating a confrontation. If he wasn't in the roadway, there wouldn't have been any confrontation. Now Minnesota is likely going to be attacked by far-left extremists. Pray for the men and women of DHS and all of the innocent Americans that will be caught in the fray.

Gunther Eagleman™

25,905 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Last week, I shared my concerns about Graham Platner serving in the Senate after he mocked a Purple Heart recipient. This week, I find out that he was using social messaging app, Kik, to sext with women. Back in 2024, I told Shawn Ryan about the dangers of platforms like Kik and how sexual predators were using it to prey on children so they can extort and blackmail the most innocent. I’ve hunted down these predators for years and Kik is one of the leading platforms that they use. It’s unsettling and disturbing that a potential U.S. Senator would use one of these apps that is known to be a playground for fraudsters and blackmailers. Just imagine how Russia, China or Iran could extort and blackmail a U.S. Senator like Platner? The Democrat Party should take a long look in the mirror and do a better job of finding their gimmick candidates. Someone with the judgement of Platner should be nowhere near an elected office.
1:37

Last week, I shared my concerns about Graham Platner serving in the Senate after he mocked a Purple Heart recipient. This week, I find out that he was using social messaging app, Kik, to sext with women. Back in 2024, I told Shawn Ryan about the dangers of platforms like Kik and how sexual predators were using it to prey on children so they can extort and blackmail the most innocent. I’ve hunted down these predators for years and Kik is one of the leading platforms that they use. It’s unsettling and disturbing that a potential U.S. Senator would use one of these apps that is known to be a playground for fraudsters and blackmailers. Just imagine how Russia, China or Iran could extort and blackmail a U.S. Senator like Platner? The Democrat Party should take a long look in the mirror and do a better job of finding their gimmick candidates. Someone with the judgement of Platner should be nowhere near an elected office.

Jared Hudson

142,621 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️
2:34

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Trung Phan

1,652,628 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

James McAvoy says he was nearly cast in Harry Potter as Tom Riddle but turned down a £40,000 retainer "I was nearly in Harry Potter. I can probably say this one" "This the very first movie, I think it was, and it was, um, it was... was it Tom Riddle? In the first one, right, in the very first one, but he's like in it for like a scene." "It was a flashback or something like that." "They had, I seem to remember it was right at the beginning of my career, I auditioned for it, and I think they wanted to put me on a retainer." "They offered me something like, it was crazy, I'd hardly done any work, and me and I think maybe 10 other actors or something like that." "They wanted to put us on a retainer so that they could hold us and keep us to choose later who it would be. It was a really strange thing." "They offered quite a lot of money for me at that time. It was a ton of money, it was like £40,000 or something like that. And I'd done very little work, and I wouldn't be able to do any work for about seven months, I think it was." "And I said to my agent, what do you think? And Ruth Young, who's been my agent since, well, for what is it, 24 years at least, 25 maybe, she was like, absolutely not, don't do that." "And she was like, we're going to go and do something else and I ended up doing the play that I got booed off, got booed by homophobic gentlemen, 'Out in the Open'" "I did that instead, and got paid, I think, £275 a week. But it was part of the making of me, and I actually got an acting workout, it was actually learning and doing all that."
1:30

James McAvoy says he was nearly cast in Harry Potter as Tom Riddle but turned down a £40,000 retainer "I was nearly in Harry Potter. I can probably say this one" "This the very first movie, I think it was, and it was, um, it was... was it Tom Riddle? In the first one, right, in the very first one, but he's like in it for like a scene." "It was a flashback or something like that." "They had, I seem to remember it was right at the beginning of my career, I auditioned for it, and I think they wanted to put me on a retainer." "They offered me something like, it was crazy, I'd hardly done any work, and me and I think maybe 10 other actors or something like that." "They wanted to put us on a retainer so that they could hold us and keep us to choose later who it would be. It was a really strange thing." "They offered quite a lot of money for me at that time. It was a ton of money, it was like £40,000 or something like that. And I'd done very little work, and I wouldn't be able to do any work for about seven months, I think it was." "And I said to my agent, what do you think? And Ruth Young, who's been my agent since, well, for what is it, 24 years at least, 25 maybe, she was like, absolutely not, don't do that." "And she was like, we're going to go and do something else and I ended up doing the play that I got booed off, got booed by homophobic gentlemen, 'Out in the Open'" "I did that instead, and got paid, I think, £275 a week. But it was part of the making of me, and I actually got an acting workout, it was actually learning and doing all that."

crest.

16,805 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”
2:35

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,739 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

CNN was just forced to read on air why the Georgia prosecutor dropped the entire election case against President Trump. And their viewers are not going to like what they heard...especially the part where he said: “contesting an election is not unlawful.” A direct hit to the narrative they have been peddling for years. “He is saying that they are not going to move forward with this case.” “And he summarized it in part by saying that he made this decision by examining the case file, examining what the jury had been presented, and also considerations of the law.” “You know, he says that, you know, contesting an election is not unlawful. But, you know, and that is part of the reasons for why he decided not to move forward with the charges at this point.”
0:48

CNN was just forced to read on air why the Georgia prosecutor dropped the entire election case against President Trump. And their viewers are not going to like what they heard...especially the part where he said: “contesting an election is not unlawful.” A direct hit to the narrative they have been peddling for years. “He is saying that they are not going to move forward with this case.” “And he summarized it in part by saying that he made this decision by examining the case file, examining what the jury had been presented, and also considerations of the law.” “You know, he says that, you know, contesting an election is not unlawful. But, you know, and that is part of the reasons for why he decided not to move forward with the charges at this point.”

Overton

1,057,581 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Mikel Arteta says even if he gives the players a break from each other then they would just meet up anyway: “That's the theory, and I wish we could be in Dubai. So, if we have one or two days, I guarantee you that we were in Dubai for a few days, even if it was for a few days, because everybody was dying for it. “But then you get very surprised because sometimes, when I give them the day off, and you think that they don't want to see each other, no? Then I find out that Eight players or ten were having dinner in somebody's house. They spent the whole afternoon together… “And that's the beauty of it, the fact that they want to be together because they feel like being together is the best thing that they can do. And that was the case this week as well in a lot of cases.”
0:54

Mikel Arteta says even if he gives the players a break from each other then they would just meet up anyway: “That's the theory, and I wish we could be in Dubai. So, if we have one or two days, I guarantee you that we were in Dubai for a few days, even if it was for a few days, because everybody was dying for it. “But then you get very surprised because sometimes, when I give them the day off, and you think that they don't want to see each other, no? Then I find out that Eight players or ten were having dinner in somebody's house. They spent the whole afternoon together… “And that's the beauty of it, the fact that they want to be together because they feel like being together is the best thing that they can do. And that was the case this week as well in a lot of cases.”

Connor Humm

414,986 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

On the invasion in Cueta: THEY ALWAYS TELL YOU Today this film that has lived in my head for over 30 years comes to life in front of my eyes. 'The March' is a 1990 film shaped after 'Camp of the Saints' - A group of several thousand Africans migrate westward across northern Africa and sail across the Strait of Gibraltar to Europe. Their message is: "We are poor because you are rich." Why do I remember it? I was a child when I saw it. But some of the images were haunting in a way I cannot describe. For over 30 years - THIRTY YEARS - I have thought of this scene...the migrants slowly moving into quaint British towns, peering through windows at unsuspecting families, invading homes, demanding what those fat, rich Westerners have. When I tell you not a week goes by where I haven't thought of it, I mean it. Not. One. Week. Watching those Muslim men pouring into Cueta brought it to mind, although I had no idea what it was called. The magic of modern AI led me back to it and I have chills watching this again. Listen to the tv host as he says, "It's a publicly stated attempt to come into our streets, our homes, and shame us into helping them. Or, as they say...WATCH US DIE." They always tell you what their intentions are. They always tell you what they're going to do. And look at the studio audience in this film. Completely white. Is there anywhere in the UK you can see that anymore? From 1990 to today...that's how long it took to bring the magic of the movies to life. But it's here now. Yes, they always tell you. In 1990 I would have been 15 years old. 15yo me was hardly conservative. Still, this scene in particular stuck with me and has been locked away in my brain since that moment. Frankly, it's almost a relief to spill it out onto the page finally. I think this flag planted in 15yo me because that little girl was way more intuitive then I've ever given her credit for. 15yo me knew there was something ominous in the presentation, and she filed it away for a time when she wasn't completely submerged in a socialist household. 15yo me saw something dastardly, a warning. I couldn't articulate that at the time. I probably even felt an affinity for the migrants at the time. And yet, this scene has never left me. Today, I understand. Today I finally see. This was a projection...an announcement. 36 years... These globalists are patient. They don't mind moving slowly. They've been executing the reality of this film for that long, and now they have arrived. A full scale invasion, much like the premise of this film. They always tell you. We need to recognize the long game, and understand that the incremental changes are not to be ignored. They are part of the plan. It may be too late for Spain, for Europe. They did not heed the warnings given by the globalist elites themselves. They are overwhelmed and disarmed. America: I believe the Lord tattooed my heart with that movie and this scene for this very day - for me to tell you - THIS IS US. WE ARE NEXT. The invasion is coming and it will look exactly as they planned and exactly as they told us. We have already experienced a bit of this during Biden, but that was a fraction of what is to come. Heed these warnings. It is time to close ranks and protect what is ours. They have already announced themselves. We can no longer be so foolish as to believe they didn't really mean it. They always tell you.
1:03

On the invasion in Cueta: THEY ALWAYS TELL YOU Today this film that has lived in my head for over 30 years comes to life in front of my eyes. 'The March' is a 1990 film shaped after 'Camp of the Saints' - A group of several thousand Africans migrate westward across northern Africa and sail across the Strait of Gibraltar to Europe. Their message is: "We are poor because you are rich." Why do I remember it? I was a child when I saw it. But some of the images were haunting in a way I cannot describe. For over 30 years - THIRTY YEARS - I have thought of this scene...the migrants slowly moving into quaint British towns, peering through windows at unsuspecting families, invading homes, demanding what those fat, rich Westerners have. When I tell you not a week goes by where I haven't thought of it, I mean it. Not. One. Week. Watching those Muslim men pouring into Cueta brought it to mind, although I had no idea what it was called. The magic of modern AI led me back to it and I have chills watching this again. Listen to the tv host as he says, "It's a publicly stated attempt to come into our streets, our homes, and shame us into helping them. Or, as they say...WATCH US DIE." They always tell you what their intentions are. They always tell you what they're going to do. And look at the studio audience in this film. Completely white. Is there anywhere in the UK you can see that anymore? From 1990 to today...that's how long it took to bring the magic of the movies to life. But it's here now. Yes, they always tell you. In 1990 I would have been 15 years old. 15yo me was hardly conservative. Still, this scene in particular stuck with me and has been locked away in my brain since that moment. Frankly, it's almost a relief to spill it out onto the page finally. I think this flag planted in 15yo me because that little girl was way more intuitive then I've ever given her credit for. 15yo me knew there was something ominous in the presentation, and she filed it away for a time when she wasn't completely submerged in a socialist household. 15yo me saw something dastardly, a warning. I couldn't articulate that at the time. I probably even felt an affinity for the migrants at the time. And yet, this scene has never left me. Today, I understand. Today I finally see. This was a projection...an announcement. 36 years... These globalists are patient. They don't mind moving slowly. They've been executing the reality of this film for that long, and now they have arrived. A full scale invasion, much like the premise of this film. They always tell you. We need to recognize the long game, and understand that the incremental changes are not to be ignored. They are part of the plan. It may be too late for Spain, for Europe. They did not heed the warnings given by the globalist elites themselves. They are overwhelmed and disarmed. America: I believe the Lord tattooed my heart with that movie and this scene for this very day - for me to tell you - THIS IS US. WE ARE NEXT. The invasion is coming and it will look exactly as they planned and exactly as they told us. We have already experienced a bit of this during Biden, but that was a fraction of what is to come. Heed these warnings. It is time to close ranks and protect what is ours. They have already announced themselves. We can no longer be so foolish as to believe they didn't really mean it. They always tell you.

Kira

18,928 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce