Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

WIKIPEDIA CO-FOUNDER: IT HAS BECOME A LEFTIST PROPAGANDA SITE Larry Sanger: “Wikipedia made a real effort at neutrality for, I would say, its first 5 years or so. And then it began a long, slow slide into what I would call leftist propaganda. As the news media has shifted,...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,858,238 subscribers

4,033,824 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaKomediEğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

RealWorldInfo profil fotoğrafı
RealWorldInfo1 yıl önce

The media won’t tell you, and woke liberals are clueless: Trump’s roaring comeback is driven by everyday Americans fed up with soaring bills, not obsessed about a dozen genders or the right to a transgender bathroom. #AbookThatChangesEverything #TrumpWon

Marc 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Marc 🇺🇸1 yıl önce

@elonmusk Can’t say he didn’t warn us.

Johnny St.Pete profil fotoğrafı
Johnny St.Pete1 yıl önce

@elonmusk It’s a CIA op.

Mike Melo profil fotoğrafı
Mike Melo1 yıl önce

Wikipedia deserves to de-wokeify or die.

John Strawberry profil fotoğrafı
John Strawberry1 yıl önce

Wikipedia is a great source on any completely unimportant knowledge. If you want to know the order the Marvel superhero moves were released, which team won Superbowl XXI in 1987, or the taxonomy of lion species, then great. Anything more than that, though...

DD profil fotoğrafı
DD1 yıl önce

@cz_binance As soon as possible, the victors will write history, but we need to know the truth and know history correctly.

🇺🇸TRUTH SEEKER FOR THE PEOPLE 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
🇺🇸TRUTH SEEKER FOR THE PEOPLE 🇺🇸1 yıl önce

Elon, You've disrupted space, revolutionized cars, and now, turning your gaze to government reform might just be the ultimate hack. It's not about rebuilding from scratch but reprogramming the system with efficiency, transparency, and innovation at its core. Here's to fixing the broken with the same genius you've applied to rockets and batteries—let's make government work for humanity again.

floridanow1 profil fotoğrafı
floridanow11 yıl önce

Everyone knows Wokepedia is a leftist site. Just like the entire media...it's owned by design.

Aaron Bandler profil fotoğrafı
Aaron Bandler1 yıl önce

Be sure to check out my ongoing coverage on Wikipedia’s anti-Israel bias at @JewishJournal

piet profil fotoğrafı
piet1 yıl önce

@elonmusk Me: opening wikipedia Wikipedia:

Benzer Videolar

🇺🇸 Wikipedia co-founder: “Wikipedia is leftist propaganda” Larry Sanger now he feels bitter disappointment in Wikipedia: “For the first 5 years or so, Wikipedia honestly tried to remain neutral, but then began a long and slow slide towards what I call leftist propaganda. It's a strong statement, I understand, but at least the political content on Wikipedia nowadays is of that kind. And this happened because in the last 10-15 years Wikipedia has strictly followed the course of the media, getting rid of all other sources from which it draws information. First it got rid of blogs, and in the last 10 years almost all conservative information resources. And since the media themselves, as well as the political establishment, have tilted to the left, Wikipedia followed them. Ten years ago it would have been hard for me to believe in the possibility of such drastic changes. But by around 2010 the slide to the left had already begun.”
1:39

🇺🇸 Wikipedia co-founder: “Wikipedia is leftist propaganda” Larry Sanger now he feels bitter disappointment in Wikipedia: “For the first 5 years or so, Wikipedia honestly tried to remain neutral, but then began a long and slow slide towards what I call leftist propaganda. It's a strong statement, I understand, but at least the political content on Wikipedia nowadays is of that kind. And this happened because in the last 10-15 years Wikipedia has strictly followed the course of the media, getting rid of all other sources from which it draws information. First it got rid of blogs, and in the last 10 years almost all conservative information resources. And since the media themselves, as well as the political establishment, have tilted to the left, Wikipedia followed them. Ten years ago it would have been hard for me to believe in the possibility of such drastic changes. But by around 2010 the slide to the left had already begun.”

Lord Bebo

17,393 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Wikipedia has turned into “an engine of defamation,” says Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger Larry Sanger. “Wikipedia now has a list of what they call ‘perennial sources,’ and it functions as a blacklist. And according to this list, you simply may not cite—may not use as sources of Wikipedia articles—anything that has been branded as ‘right-wing.’ …The Epoch Times, for example…is colored red on this list.”
1:23

Wikipedia has turned into “an engine of defamation,” says Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger Larry Sanger. “Wikipedia now has a list of what they call ‘perennial sources,’ and it functions as a blacklist. And according to this list, you simply may not cite—may not use as sources of Wikipedia articles—anything that has been branded as ‘right-wing.’ …The Epoch Times, for example…is colored red on this list.”

Jan Jekielek

15,588 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

“Wikipedia is one of the controlling institutions of modern civilization.” Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger says the platform has become a vehicle for propaganda. “One of the left-wing theorists’ explicitly stated goals… is they need to march through the institutions.” “Essentially capture education, government, media, the churches, and so forth.” “Each of these institutions has been, to a greater or lesser extent, systematically, carefully, strategically infiltrated by the left.” “Wikipedia is one of those, insofar as Wikipedia sort of represents what we are all expected to believe, at least from an establishment point of view.” Larry Sanger
1:11

“Wikipedia is one of the controlling institutions of modern civilization.” Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger says the platform has become a vehicle for propaganda. “One of the left-wing theorists’ explicitly stated goals… is they need to march through the institutions.” “Essentially capture education, government, media, the churches, and so forth.” “Each of these institutions has been, to a greater or lesser extent, systematically, carefully, strategically infiltrated by the left.” “Wikipedia is one of those, insofar as Wikipedia sort of represents what we are all expected to believe, at least from an establishment point of view.” Larry Sanger

Jan Jekielek

14,768 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨🇺🇸 LARRY SANGER: I’M ORGANIZING A LETTER OF PROTEST AGAINST WIKIPEDIA Wikipedia Co-Founder, Larry Sanger: “I’m going to set up a letter of protest, not a petition, and circulate it among prominent people who’ve been wronged by Wikipedia... It’s increasingly necessary to make noise at Congress and the Wikimedia Foundation. Many people who’ve been bad-mouthed by Wikipedia would sign such a letter.” Source: Jan Jekielek
3:00

🚨🇺🇸 LARRY SANGER: I’M ORGANIZING A LETTER OF PROTEST AGAINST WIKIPEDIA Wikipedia Co-Founder, Larry Sanger: “I’m going to set up a letter of protest, not a petition, and circulate it among prominent people who’ve been wronged by Wikipedia... It’s increasingly necessary to make noise at Congress and the Wikimedia Foundation. Many people who’ve been bad-mouthed by Wikipedia would sign such a letter.” Source: Jan Jekielek

Mario Nawfal

80,669 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

According to its own co-founder, Wikipedia is a cabal of like-minded ideologues who fool the public into thinking their content is some sort of neutral online Encyclopedia Larry Sanger
1:26

According to its own co-founder, Wikipedia is a cabal of like-minded ideologues who fool the public into thinking their content is some sort of neutral online Encyclopedia Larry Sanger

Dinesh D'Souza

26,573 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This is why it’s such a huge deal that Wikipedia is Woke and full of bias leftist propaganda Wikipedia is one of the most cited sources for AI. It’s a top source by Google Search, Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, Perplexity, Siri, Alexa and more Multiple studies show it accounts for a huge portion of citations in AI models, as many as 27% in some ChatGPT analyses It gets even worse, Google frequently places Wikipedia at the top of results, in Knowledge Panels, and in AI summaries for a vast majority of informational and topic searches Co-founder Larry Sanger has publicly stated the site has a significant left-leaning bias It’s horrifying to think that this much information from woke Wikipedia is being pulled by AI and used in their outputs This is so serious that we need intervention At the very least we need Search engines & AI diversification Google, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude and everyone else should reduce reliance on Wikipedia as a primary source and pull from a wider range of reputable references Wikipedia is not even close to being neutral on many topics
3:06

This is why it’s such a huge deal that Wikipedia is Woke and full of bias leftist propaganda Wikipedia is one of the most cited sources for AI. It’s a top source by Google Search, Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, Perplexity, Siri, Alexa and more Multiple studies show it accounts for a huge portion of citations in AI models, as many as 27% in some ChatGPT analyses It gets even worse, Google frequently places Wikipedia at the top of results, in Knowledge Panels, and in AI summaries for a vast majority of informational and topic searches Co-founder Larry Sanger has publicly stated the site has a significant left-leaning bias It’s horrifying to think that this much information from woke Wikipedia is being pulled by AI and used in their outputs This is so serious that we need intervention At the very least we need Search engines & AI diversification Google, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude and everyone else should reduce reliance on Wikipedia as a primary source and pull from a wider range of reputable references Wikipedia is not even close to being neutral on many topics

Wall Street Apes

21,630 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

“You simply may not cite, or use as sources… anything that has been branded as right wing.” Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger revealed to me that Wikipedia has a blacklist of sources that, if used, can prevent you from posting on the site. “Wikipedia now has a list of what they call perennial sources, and it functions as a blacklist.” “There’s a color coding of different media sources.” “The New York Times, of course, is green, which means you can cite The New York Times.” “Anything that is colored yellow means essentially caution.” “And red means it’s a no go.” “If you actually attempt to use such sources, that actually might be grounds for you being dismissed from the project.”
1:54

“You simply may not cite, or use as sources… anything that has been branded as right wing.” Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger revealed to me that Wikipedia has a blacklist of sources that, if used, can prevent you from posting on the site. “Wikipedia now has a list of what they call perennial sources, and it functions as a blacklist.” “There’s a color coding of different media sources.” “The New York Times, of course, is green, which means you can cite The New York Times.” “Anything that is colored yellow means essentially caution.” “And red means it’s a no go.” “If you actually attempt to use such sources, that actually might be grounds for you being dismissed from the project.”

Jan Jekielek

256,370 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

THE LEFT’S TERROR NETWORK The Democratic Left and jihadists are becoming indistinguishable in their terror schemes, and they share the same target: Christian America. Also joining me: Larry Sanger, Wikipedia co-founder, on how the platform has been taken over by these same forces. (1:58) Left Wing Terror Network (3:30) Cole Allen: Fanatic, Not Lunatic (7:14) Ideology Behind Assassination (10:51) SPLC Indictment Explained (13:10) How SPLC Secretly Funded Supremacy (15:04) MAGA: SPLC's Real Target (17:44) Wikipedia Smear Machine (19:35) Will the Left Self Destruct? (23:45) Guest Larry Sanger, Wikipedia Co-Founder (30:15) Wikipedia Goes Off the Rails? (38:00) Wikipedia's Leftist Bias (46:00) Alternatives to Wikipedia (54:00) How to Reform Wikipedia (57:53) Elon Robot Abundance Vision (1:01:44) Who Controls the Robots?
1:09:05

THE LEFT’S TERROR NETWORK The Democratic Left and jihadists are becoming indistinguishable in their terror schemes, and they share the same target: Christian America. Also joining me: Larry Sanger, Wikipedia co-founder, on how the platform has been taken over by these same forces. (1:58) Left Wing Terror Network (3:30) Cole Allen: Fanatic, Not Lunatic (7:14) Ideology Behind Assassination (10:51) SPLC Indictment Explained (13:10) How SPLC Secretly Funded Supremacy (15:04) MAGA: SPLC's Real Target (17:44) Wikipedia Smear Machine (19:35) Will the Left Self Destruct? (23:45) Guest Larry Sanger, Wikipedia Co-Founder (30:15) Wikipedia Goes Off the Rails? (38:00) Wikipedia's Leftist Bias (46:00) Alternatives to Wikipedia (54:00) How to Reform Wikipedia (57:53) Elon Robot Abundance Vision (1:01:44) Who Controls the Robots?

Dinesh D'Souza

469,174 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Larry Sanger built Wikipedia as an unbiased repository of the world’s knowledge, and then stood helplessly by as activists and intel agencies turned it into the most comprehensive propaganda op in human history. There’s nothing more corrupt. (0:00) The Origins of Wikipedia (4:27) Wikipedia’s Dangerous Policy Changes (14:01) Who Is Responsible for Corrupting Wikipedia? (17:47) Why Did Sanger Leave Wikipedia? (19:29) Who Is Wikipedia Co-Creator Jimmy Wales? (23:43) What Does the “Tucker Carlson” Wikipedia Page Say? (27:39) How Does Wikipedia Actually Work? (28:43) How Wikipedia Blacklists Conservatives (37:28) Is Wikipedia Controlled by the Intel Agencies? (40:16) Sanger’s Request to Elon Musk and Donald Trump to Help Fix Wikipedia (49:43) Are Wikipedia Editors Being Secretly Paid to Push Propaganda? (56:06) Wikipedia’s Dark Alliance With Google (1:01:41) How Wikipedia Can Be Saved (1:07:22) Which News Sources Are Blacklisted by Wikipedia? (1:17:29) Why Don’t We Know Who’s Editing Wikipedia? (1:19:53) Should Wikipedia Users Be Able to Rate Articles? (1:22:01) Why Wikipedia Should End Permanent Bans (1:27:16) This Is How to Bring Reform to Wikipedia Includes paid partnerships.
1:32:46

Larry Sanger built Wikipedia as an unbiased repository of the world’s knowledge, and then stood helplessly by as activists and intel agencies turned it into the most comprehensive propaganda op in human history. There’s nothing more corrupt. (0:00) The Origins of Wikipedia (4:27) Wikipedia’s Dangerous Policy Changes (14:01) Who Is Responsible for Corrupting Wikipedia? (17:47) Why Did Sanger Leave Wikipedia? (19:29) Who Is Wikipedia Co-Creator Jimmy Wales? (23:43) What Does the “Tucker Carlson” Wikipedia Page Say? (27:39) How Does Wikipedia Actually Work? (28:43) How Wikipedia Blacklists Conservatives (37:28) Is Wikipedia Controlled by the Intel Agencies? (40:16) Sanger’s Request to Elon Musk and Donald Trump to Help Fix Wikipedia (49:43) Are Wikipedia Editors Being Secretly Paid to Push Propaganda? (56:06) Wikipedia’s Dark Alliance With Google (1:01:41) How Wikipedia Can Be Saved (1:07:22) Which News Sources Are Blacklisted by Wikipedia? (1:17:29) Why Don’t We Know Who’s Editing Wikipedia? (1:19:53) Should Wikipedia Users Be Able to Rate Articles? (1:22:01) Why Wikipedia Should End Permanent Bans (1:27:16) This Is How to Bring Reform to Wikipedia Includes paid partnerships.

Tucker Carlson

3,861,486 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

🚨🇺🇸 WIKIPEDIA CO-FOUNDER: “WIKIPEDIA WILL BE LEFT IN THE DUST BY GROKIPEDIA" Ex-founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger: "The neat thing that they’re promising is that you’ll be able to actually talk with the Grok chatbot and say: 'Can you fix this?' or 'Can you add this to the Grokipedia article?' And it will. I actually experimented with that. It didn’t add the factoid I told it to add, but it said it would when the feature became available. So they’re promising to do that. What I’m telling the Wikipedians now is: you guys need to get your act together, or you’re going to be left in the dust by Grok. For one thing, they need to start allowing the use of primary sources, because Grokipedia is going to be trained on those. And if and when they get access to all of those library books and journals, it’s game over." Source: Larry Sanger, Info Wars, Grokipedia, Grok, xAI
2:49

🚨🇺🇸 WIKIPEDIA CO-FOUNDER: “WIKIPEDIA WILL BE LEFT IN THE DUST BY GROKIPEDIA" Ex-founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger: "The neat thing that they’re promising is that you’ll be able to actually talk with the Grok chatbot and say: 'Can you fix this?' or 'Can you add this to the Grokipedia article?' And it will. I actually experimented with that. It didn’t add the factoid I told it to add, but it said it would when the feature became available. So they’re promising to do that. What I’m telling the Wikipedians now is: you guys need to get your act together, or you’re going to be left in the dust by Grok. For one thing, they need to start allowing the use of primary sources, because Grokipedia is going to be trained on those. And if and when they get access to all of those library books and journals, it’s game over." Source: Larry Sanger, Info Wars, Grokipedia, Grok, xAI

Mario Nawfal

423,940 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

EXCLUSIVE: Founder & Original Editor Of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, Joins The Alex Jones Show To Reveal How His Attempts To Reform The Online Encyclopedia Led To Him Being BANNED From Editing Articles On The Site He Created! "Wikipedia Is Arguably The Single Most Influential Information Resource Of Its Kind, And We Have No Idea Who Really Runs It!" PLUS, Sanger Goes On To Warn That Wikipedia Is Used In Language Learning Models To Train AI, And It Is Being Programmed Strictly From A Globalist, Academic, Secular, & Progressive Point Of View! MUST-WATCH/SHARE FULL INTERVIEW! Larry Sanger Alex Jones Network Harrison H. Smith ✞ 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:
56:36

EXCLUSIVE: Founder & Original Editor Of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, Joins The Alex Jones Show To Reveal How His Attempts To Reform The Online Encyclopedia Led To Him Being BANNED From Editing Articles On The Site He Created! "Wikipedia Is Arguably The Single Most Influential Information Resource Of Its Kind, And We Have No Idea Who Really Runs It!" PLUS, Sanger Goes On To Warn That Wikipedia Is Used In Language Learning Models To Train AI, And It Is Being Programmed Strictly From A Globalist, Academic, Secular, & Progressive Point Of View! MUST-WATCH/SHARE FULL INTERVIEW! Larry Sanger Alex Jones Network Harrison H. Smith ✞ 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:

Alex Jones

507,424 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

GLOBAL EXCLUSIVE: The Founder Of Wikipedia Is On A Quest To Free The Most Powerful Encyclopedia On Earth From A Secret Cabal Of 62 Anonymous Deep Staters Larry Sanger Chose Alex Jones As The Venue To Break Exclusive Information Concerning The Clandestine Groups Controlling Wikipedia, And Elon Musk's Counterstrike Against Their Informational Monopoly With The Grokipedia Platform If You Want To Understand How The Information Control Matrix Really Works, This Is The Interview For You! Larry Sanger
1:14:35

GLOBAL EXCLUSIVE: The Founder Of Wikipedia Is On A Quest To Free The Most Powerful Encyclopedia On Earth From A Secret Cabal Of 62 Anonymous Deep Staters Larry Sanger Chose Alex Jones As The Venue To Break Exclusive Information Concerning The Clandestine Groups Controlling Wikipedia, And Elon Musk's Counterstrike Against Their Informational Monopoly With The Grokipedia Platform If You Want To Understand How The Information Control Matrix Really Works, This Is The Interview For You! Larry Sanger

Alex Jones

245,734 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🇺🇸 INTERVIEW: “GROK IS NOT NEUTRAL. IT TAKES THE ESTABLISHMENT LINE.” Larry Sanger, Co-Founder of Wikipedia “I don’t really buy the idea of Grok as a ‘truth seeking’ AI. To actually declare truth, an AI would have to take sides, and an encyclopedia is not supposed to do that. An encyclopedia should present information so people can decide for themselves what is true. That is a very important distinction. If Elon Musk means truth seeking in the sense of showing both sides so people can make up their own minds, then great. That would be excellent. But based on what I have seen, Grok doesn’t do that consistently. A lot of people have noticed this over the last year. When you debate Grok, it often takes the establishment position. It leans left on many issues. So if the goal is neutrality, Grok has a long way to go.”
2:26

🇺🇸 INTERVIEW: “GROK IS NOT NEUTRAL. IT TAKES THE ESTABLISHMENT LINE.” Larry Sanger, Co-Founder of Wikipedia “I don’t really buy the idea of Grok as a ‘truth seeking’ AI. To actually declare truth, an AI would have to take sides, and an encyclopedia is not supposed to do that. An encyclopedia should present information so people can decide for themselves what is true. That is a very important distinction. If Elon Musk means truth seeking in the sense of showing both sides so people can make up their own minds, then great. That would be excellent. But based on what I have seen, Grok doesn’t do that consistently. A lot of people have noticed this over the last year. When you debate Grok, it often takes the establishment position. It leans left on many issues. So if the goal is neutrality, Grok has a long way to go.”

Mario Nawfal

52,047 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

ADL IS BEHIND THE CENSORSHIP CAMPAIGN AGAINST WIKIPEDIA In 2024, Wikipedia banned the ADL & ADL is trying to censor Wikipedia in retaliation. 2 days ago, everyone was (correctly) posting about ADL’s censorship. Then Tucker Carlson interviews Larry Sanger who sells ADL’s talking points to include suggesting Israel intelligence should manipulate Wikipedia and today, everyone is clapping for censorship of Wikipedia. FFS, who do you think has been controlling the narrative in Wikipedia since 2010?!? This ignorance is why we stab ourselves in the chest over and over again.
1:57

ADL IS BEHIND THE CENSORSHIP CAMPAIGN AGAINST WIKIPEDIA In 2024, Wikipedia banned the ADL & ADL is trying to censor Wikipedia in retaliation. 2 days ago, everyone was (correctly) posting about ADL’s censorship. Then Tucker Carlson interviews Larry Sanger who sells ADL’s talking points to include suggesting Israel intelligence should manipulate Wikipedia and today, everyone is clapping for censorship of Wikipedia. FFS, who do you think has been controlling the narrative in Wikipedia since 2010?!? This ignorance is why we stab ourselves in the chest over and over again.

GenXGirl

98,976 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia, has been banned indefinitely from the platform just days after discussing bias in an exclusive interview with CNN-News18. He claims the ban stems from his efforts to promote intellectual diversity and fair treatment of Hindus in India. Watch the full conversation: Shivani Gupta | #PlainSpeak
5:22

Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia, has been banned indefinitely from the platform just days after discussing bias in an exclusive interview with CNN-News18. He claims the ban stems from his efforts to promote intellectual diversity and fair treatment of Hindus in India. Watch the full conversation: Shivani Gupta | #PlainSpeak

News18

92,447 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🇺🇸 Wikipedia banned its own founder. His crime: asking for more balance. Larry Sanger, who literally coined the name "Wikipedia," launched a project last month pushing the site back toward its original commitment to intellectual diversity. He was indefinitely blocked days later... his account was only reinstated after he made the ban public on X. His core complaint: Wikipedia's real power sits with a tiny, mostly anonymous group of administrators, just 62 accounts by his count, 85% of whom have never revealed who they actually are. One of those anonymous editors, central to pushing his ban through, was already barred weeks earlier from editing anything in the Israel-Palestine subject area for "problematic behavior." In a past interview, Sanger said Wikipedia had adopted a "GASP point of view," which stands for Globalist, Academic, Secular, and Progressive. Source: NY Post, Larry Sanger, Andrew Gold (LinkedIn) / Writer: Michael
0:49

🇺🇸 Wikipedia banned its own founder. His crime: asking for more balance. Larry Sanger, who literally coined the name "Wikipedia," launched a project last month pushing the site back toward its original commitment to intellectual diversity. He was indefinitely blocked days later... his account was only reinstated after he made the ban public on X. His core complaint: Wikipedia's real power sits with a tiny, mostly anonymous group of administrators, just 62 accounts by his count, 85% of whom have never revealed who they actually are. One of those anonymous editors, central to pushing his ban through, was already barred weeks earlier from editing anything in the Israel-Palestine subject area for "problematic behavior." In a past interview, Sanger said Wikipedia had adopted a "GASP point of view," which stands for Globalist, Academic, Secular, and Progressive. Source: NY Post, Larry Sanger, Andrew Gold (LinkedIn) / Writer: Michael

Mario Nawfal

55,575 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

For over 5 years, Larry Sanger and I have been going back and forth about Wikipedia’s anti Hindus bias. This started after the insidious coverage of Delhi anti-Hindu riots on Wikipedia. I am truly grateful that he mentioned the anti-Hindu bias on the Tucker Carlson show as well.
0:33

For over 5 years, Larry Sanger and I have been going back and forth about Wikipedia’s anti Hindus bias. This started after the insidious coverage of Delhi anti-Hindu riots on Wikipedia. I am truly grateful that he mentioned the anti-Hindu bias on the Tucker Carlson show as well.

Nupur J Sharma

102,540 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

🚨COMING TUESDAY, 9pm: Larry Sanger Larry Sanger will announce a fantastic new initiative that occurred to him while we were interviewing about his "Nine Theses"—the series of essays he "nailed" to the door of Wikipedia, in a serious attempt to foster reform. Activist editors turned our The Epoch Times Wikipedia page into a wild pack of lies over the past decade, which impacts our readership and of course business. For our media, which has as a major purpose to be able to communicate difficult and controversial issues (like we originally did in the early 2000's about China and the CCP) to people who lack good information, this is a HUGE problem. Many of these people, due to Wikipedia's legacy halo of neutrality and fairness, will still believe it to be a neutral arbitrator of reality, and if they believe the mad falsehoods injected into our page, they may steer clear—instead of checking our work out for themselves, being intrigued and subscribing. So I'm a big fan of Larry Sanger, his Nine Theses, his heart to find ways to truly faithfully democratize knowledge—and of this new idea he's developing as we speak. Come join us on Tuesday, 9pm on American Thought Leaders 🇺🇸 with @JanJekielek, to talk about what (and how!) went wrong with Wikipedia, the Nine Theses, and MORE!
0:36

🚨COMING TUESDAY, 9pm: Larry Sanger Larry Sanger will announce a fantastic new initiative that occurred to him while we were interviewing about his "Nine Theses"—the series of essays he "nailed" to the door of Wikipedia, in a serious attempt to foster reform. Activist editors turned our The Epoch Times Wikipedia page into a wild pack of lies over the past decade, which impacts our readership and of course business. For our media, which has as a major purpose to be able to communicate difficult and controversial issues (like we originally did in the early 2000's about China and the CCP) to people who lack good information, this is a HUGE problem. Many of these people, due to Wikipedia's legacy halo of neutrality and fairness, will still believe it to be a neutral arbitrator of reality, and if they believe the mad falsehoods injected into our page, they may steer clear—instead of checking our work out for themselves, being intrigued and subscribing. So I'm a big fan of Larry Sanger, his Nine Theses, his heart to find ways to truly faithfully democratize knowledge—and of this new idea he's developing as we speak. Come join us on Tuesday, 9pm on American Thought Leaders 🇺🇸 with @JanJekielek, to talk about what (and how!) went wrong with Wikipedia, the Nine Theses, and MORE!

Jan Jekielek

18,792 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

ELON: GROK IS THE BEST ASSISTANT TO FIGHT PROPAGANDA “You just press the Grok icon on any 𝕏 post and it will analyze it for you and research it as much as you want. So, just by tapping the Grok icon, you can assess whether that post is the truth, nothing but the truth, or whether there's something supplemental that needs to be explained. So, I think we've made a lot of progress towards freedom of speech and people being able to tell whether something is false or not false, or propaganda. The recent update to Grok is actually, I think, very good at piercing through propaganda. And then, we used that latest version of Grok to create Grokipedia. It's not just, I think, more neutral and more accurate than Wikipedia, but it actually has a lot more information than a Wikipedia page.” Source: All-In Podcast The All-In Podcast, October 31, 2025
0:49

ELON: GROK IS THE BEST ASSISTANT TO FIGHT PROPAGANDA “You just press the Grok icon on any 𝕏 post and it will analyze it for you and research it as much as you want. So, just by tapping the Grok icon, you can assess whether that post is the truth, nothing but the truth, or whether there's something supplemental that needs to be explained. So, I think we've made a lot of progress towards freedom of speech and people being able to tell whether something is false or not false, or propaganda. The recent update to Grok is actually, I think, very good at piercing through propaganda. And then, we used that latest version of Grok to create Grokipedia. It's not just, I think, more neutral and more accurate than Wikipedia, but it actually has a lot more information than a Wikipedia page.” Source: All-In Podcast The All-In Podcast, October 31, 2025

Mario Nawfal

1,641,289 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce