Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Will Elune's blessing be enough? Public HD version: #nsfw #rule34 #warcraft #nightelf #orc #conception #InternalShot #ManyOrcs #SeedFormation #EggSiege

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

AI For The Poor, Human Intelligence For The Rich Western capitalists are selling AI to us as “the great equalizer”. But it is really not. What we are seeing is a new class system being built in real time. The rich will still pay for human teachers, human doctors, human consultants, human artists, and human care. Everyone else will be told that an AI version is good enough. When poor children are offered AI tutors instead of more teachers or working-class patients are pushed toward AI health tools instead of proper medical care, we should pay attention. AI may be useful, but it is also becoming a cheaper substitute for people who already have less. This is why African governments must be very careful about the AI policies they adopt. We cannot afford to copy and paste technology policies from the West without asking whose interests they serve. If we are not careful, AI will become another tool used to manage poverty instead of solving the systems that created it. Africans also need to be more critical of how AI is being introduced into education, healthcare, governance, welfare, and other public services. Who owns the technology? Who controls the data? Who profits from the contracts? Who is accountable when these systems fail? And most importantly, who is being asked to accept AI instead of real human care? Africa must not become a testing ground for Western-imposed systems that deepen inequality under the guise of innovation.

The Spearhead

69,926 次观看 • 1 个月前

This was not accidental. It was orchestrated. First, a Pakistani MP, elected on an Islamist support base, stands up in Parliament and tries to deflect from the undeniable fact. Pakistani men are vastly over-represented in grooming gangs and their victims were overwhelmingly working-class White girls. Then, the very Minister for Safeguarding Girls takes the floor. Instead of standing with victims, Jess Phillips claims that in her constituency it was Pakistanis who had been the “most fervent truth seekers.” An insult to survivors who fought alone for decades to be heard. And she didn’t stop there. Jess Phillips doubled down by deflecting again. This time from the racial motivation and the religious justification behind the industrial-scale gang rape of Britain’s children. This is how it works. One politician distracts. Another distorts. Together, they prepare the ground to rewrite history. If left unchallenged, their version will become the official record. The truth will be buried. The victims will once again be erased. And there will never be justice. _________ I have 3 questions I would like you to consider. 1. Do you believe the government would have voluntarily agreed to a National Inquiry without years of relentless sacrifice from survivors and campaigners who refused to be silenced? 2. Do you believe the Inquiry will actually hold public officials, police officers, and politicians accountable for enabling the industrial-scale gang rape of children? 3. Do you trust Shabana Mahmood MP and Jess Phillips to deliver justice? If your answer to these questions is No, then you already know why my work must continue. _________ I am Raja Miah. Seven years ago I began exposing how politicians protected the rape gangs. The truth can no longer be buried. The Pakistani rape gangs are real. Their victims number in the hundreds of thousands. And the cover up is still ongoing. Now the National Inquiry is about to begin. This is our one chance to stop another whitewash. But that will only happen if enough people know the truth and are willing to fight back. Despite the media blackout, Red Wall and the Rabble has grown to over 6,000 subscribers. I need your help to reach 10,000 before the inquiry begins. Every new subscriber makes it harder for them to bury this story. Every share makes it harder to dismiss the evidence. Every voice raised brings justice closer. 🔴 Subscribe for free or support the work for just 75p a week or £30 for the full year 👉 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another. – Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

146,122 次观看 • 10 个月前

The US National Security Strategy positions country for global thuggery — Sachs Jeffrey Sachs argues that President Trump’s 2025 National Security Strategy is an ominous blueprint not for stability but for global thuggery, a doctrine of coercion that dangerously mistakes bullying for sovereignty. Written in the language of overwhelming supremacy and naked Machiavellianism, it treats American dominance as a license to impose terms, asking not how nations can cooperate but how US leverage can be used to extract maximal concessions. It insists that agreements with dependent nations must result in sole-source contracts for American firms and efforts to “push out foreign companies.” In this framework, international law is dismissed as an encumbrance, and sovereignty is perversely redefined as “the freedom to coerce others”—a conception Sachs warns will “come back to haunt the United States.” This doctrine, he notes, is already being translated into brazen practice. The US seizure of a Venezuelan oil tanker on the high seas—an act “not remotely legal”—signals a turn toward open coercion. So too does the NSS’s “Trump Corollary,” which demands Latin America remain free of “hostile foreign incursion”—a move Sachs calls naïve and self-defeating. He frames it as a radical historical break: where the original 1823 Monroe Doctrine was a “doctrine of reciprocity” aimed at ending European colonialism, Trump’s version amounts to a license for US hegemony and brazen bullying, a claim of “American bullying rights in the Americas.” The damage now alarms even core allies, as evidenced by Denmark’s public fear of US coercion over Greenland, revealing a systemic crisis of confidence within the US-led order itself. For Sachs, the gravest failure is the omission of law, reciprocity, and decency. By rejecting global governance and bending institutions toward narrow advantage—effectively putting “the generals in charge of the economy” in a paranoid drive to exclude rivals—the strategy abandons the rules that protect power. He invokes Thucydides’ Athens to warn that “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must,” a hubris that leads to isolation. “American security will not be strengthened by acting like a bully,” he concludes. “It will be weakened—structurally, morally, and strategically.” True security, he insists, rests on persuasion, pluralism, and the recognition that sovereignty is strengthened, not diminished, through law.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

17,312 次观看 • 7 个月前

Judeo-Nazi anti-refugee activist Sheffi Paz posted this AI video her deranged friends made for her birthday. Paz has made it her life's mission to bring about the expulsion of all African refugees - most from Eritrea and Sudan - who were unfortunate enough to end up in the racist State of Israel. Until she manages the full removal of those she calls "infiltrators," she does everything she can to make their lives unlivable. A truly evil bitch from hell. In Israel, she's considered a totally legitimate public figure and is connected to many in the political elite, including Netanyahu and Ben Gvir. Background information on some details in the video: • "FCK BGZ" = "FUCK BAGATZ" - BAGATZ (the Israeli Supreme Court) is seen by Paz and many right-wingers as a "leftist" institution and the main obstacle to refugee expulsion. • "SSQ" = "Shapira Squad" is a gang of kids (some as young as 7) operating in South Tel Aviv. Members include children of African asylum seekers, migrant workers (mostly Philipino), Ethiopian-Israelis, as well as some Palestinians and lower-class Israelis. Gangs like this exist largely due to the systematic neglect and discrimination Paz herself promotes. • The song in the background is Israel's biggest hit of the past year (36M views for the most-watched version on YouTube): a feel-good religious anthem repeating, "And God, may He be blessed, always loves me, and I will always have it good. And I will have it better and better, better and better, better and better..." etc. • The final frame says: "Happy birthday, dear Sheffi! May all your dreams come true!" • An interesting side note: the word "mistanenim" ("infiltrators"), used by Paz and most Israelis to describe African asylum seekers, is the same term used in the 1950s to demonize Palestinian refugees who attempted to return to their homes in 1948 Palestine and were considered "terrorists" to be shot on sight.

B.M.

72,536 次观看 • 1 年前

IOTA is being born. 🐣 For almost a decade, the IOTA Foundation has been the mother of IOTA. It carried it, protected it, fed it, corrected it, rebuilt it when necessary, and kept it alive long enough to turn a technological intuition into real infrastructure. But no decentralized network is meant to live forever under its mother’s protection. A foundation is not the final form of a public DLT. It is the womb. The incubator. The structure that allows something immature to survive until it is ready to breathe on its own. And that moment is now approaching. With IOTA Rebased, Move at the base layer, staking, validators, real programmability, and now Starfish live on Mainnet through Protocol Version 24, IOTA is no longer a promise guarded by its mother. It is becoming an adult network. Not just a project. Not just a vision. Not just an architecture waiting for its moment. It is public infrastructure for the real world. 🌍 🔹 The IOTA Foundation is now entering its great year of delivery. One year, maybe a year and a half, in which it will have to consume part of its tokens, not as a sign of weakness, but as the final stage of separation. 🔹 Many will read this as bearish. To me, it is exactly the opposite. It is the umbilical cord being cut in front of everyone. 🔹 Because no truly neutral infrastructure can depend forever on a European foundation. Not Africa, not ASEAN, not America, and not any major global trade corridor will fully trust a public DLT if they perceive that one legal entity still holds too much power over it. That is the key. For IOTA to become bigger, the IF has to become smaller. For IOTA to become more neutral, the IF has to stop being the center. For IOTA to become global infrastructure, it has to stop looking like a network protected by its mother and start behaving like a network that belongs to the world. 🌍 During this phase, some validator nodes supported by IF-delegated tokens will disappear. And although some people will misread this, it is part of the natural process. Those nodes were scaffolding. They helped raise the initial structure, gave stability to the launch, and allowed the network to start walking. But the scaffolding is not the building. When the building is ready, the scaffolding comes down. First, only a few independent validators will enter. Then more. Then competition. And eventually, a real economic fight for validator positions inside a network that no longer depends on its mother’s initial protection. That is decentralization entering adulthood. 💎 The IOTA Foundation also has to become independent from IOTA. Its natural path should no longer be to act as the permanent treasury of the network, but to build real products on top of it. That is where TWIN comes in. TWIN can become the major enterprise, institutional and commercial layer built on IOTA. A SaaS layer for global trade, traceability, digital identity, compliance, digital product passports, logistics, customs, exporters, governments and supply chains. 🧬 The IF would then stop being the mother feeding the child and become something much healthier and much more powerful. 🔥 A customer of IOTA. 🔥 A builder on IOTA. 🔥 An operator using neutral infrastructure to deliver real products to the market. 🔥 That is the right model. Bitcoin does not need a foundation to feed it. It does not need a CEO. It does not need a treasury to keep it emotionally alive. Bitcoin simply exists and offers what it is. Scarcity, settlement, monetary resistance and neutrality. IOTA has to do the same in its own territory. Not only as money, but as digital trust infrastructure for trade, data, identity, real-world assets, machines, institutions and entire economies. 🔹 In 2027 or 2028, TWIN could spin out as an autonomous SaaS business, with recurring revenue, institutional clients and the ability to attract real capital rounds. 🔹 Not crypto grants. Not community funding. Real institutional capital. 🔹 If it proves traction, adoption and revenue, we could be talking about Series A or Series B rounds, each in the tens of millions of dollars. And major investors are already keeping one eye on this coming opportunity.👀👀👀👀👀💰💰💰💰💰 Meanwhile, IOTA would become freer and freer. 💎 Free from dependence on its foundation. 💎 Free from a central treasury. 💎 Free from institutions. 💎 Free from founders. 💎 Free from non-decentralized decisions. 💎 Free even from the need for someone to “save” it. A public network does not reach maturity when its mother protects it better, but when it no longer needs protection. That is why this moment is not bearish. It is brutally bullish. The child is ready to leave home. And when a decentralized network leaves home, it stops being a project and starts becoming infrastructure. Bitcoin needed one paper to decentralize money. IOTA has needed a decade to decentralize real-world trust. And maybe the market will take time to understand it, but the most bullish moment in IOTA’s history may be exactly this. Some will see a mother letting go of her child’s hand. Others will see a network finally being born as sovereign, neutral and free infrastructure. To the untrained eye, the truth may look bearish. To the wise, it will look exactly the opposite. Bullish in its purest form. 💎 Born to be decentralize! #IOTA #IF #Move #TWIN #ASEAN #AfCFTA

Salima

20,405 次观看 • 2 个月前

A TRUST FUND FOR EVERYONE: How to create a Monetary Commons that socialises money and funds a basic dividend without new taxes or debt [At a time Donald Trump, Big Tech and Wall Street deploy stablecoins to privatise the dollar, usurping the decentralising power of blockchain to enrich themselves at everyone else’s expense, here is an alternative use of blockchain that harnesses its decentralising powers to benefit everyone equally – to pay everyone a substantial, non-inflationary, basic dividend – without the need to tax or borrow. Read on and/or watch the video] Here is an idea that can make a real, urgently needed, difference to our awfully divided, exploitative societies. Imagine a trust fund for everyone paying a personal dividend to each. Now imagine a common, a public digital platform, let’s call it a Monetary Commons, that harnesses our collective capacity to create the money needed to fund this personal dividend for all. The idea of a personal or basic income is not new, of course. People have sung its praises for decades. But they were stifled. The majority doesn’t want to pay higher taxes, or the higher interest rates more public debt would bring, to deliver a personal payment to others, including to the already stinking rich. But what if it is now possible to pay a decent personal dividend without new taxes or new public debt. How? Not by magic or hocus pocus economics but by reclaiming from private bankers our society’s power to create money. Today, we have the digital tools to take back the power to create money, use that power to create a common trust fund, and pay each a personal dividend. These tools are here already. And if we do not use them for benefitting everyone, the bankers and Big Tech will use them to print more money for themselves. So, let’s get cracking! Let’s build a new Monetary Commons to pay a personal dividend to each! How would it work? Technically, it is ever so simple. You download an app, let’s call it Monetary Commons Pay (or MCPay). MCPay is provided by your central bank (the Fed in the US, the ECB in Europe, the Bank of England in Britain etc.). Essentially, the central bank has opened a digital account for you which you can use to receive and pay money, the way you use your normal bank account app. How is this MCPay app helpful? In three fabulous ways, which I shall present in ascending order of importance. First, because with MCPay you can send and receive money for free, avoiding the terrible, inexcusable, fees charged by private banks – even the ‘fuel fees’ of crypto. The second, even greater, benefit is that the money you keep in your MCPay grows at the central bank interest rate – which is always higher than the measly rate private banks pay for your savings. Free transactions and higher interest on your savings would be good enough reasons to have the MCPay app. But, the truly mesmerising, hugely exciting benefit is the third one: The new app makes it possible for the Central Bank to pay you, and everyone else, a substantial personal dividend. Pay attention to see where this money will come from, why it is not inflationary, why it requires no new taxes, no new debt and no magic: You have heard of how private banks create loans from thin air, right? How they can turn, on average, $3 of new deposits into a new $100 loan? [Yes, lest we forget, only 3% of the money in our advanced economies come from the central bank – the rest is conjured up by private banks.] But this works in reverse as well! If bankers turn $3 into $100, were you to transfer $3 from your normal bank to your MCPay, to take advantage of free transactions and the higher interest rate, you will have annulled your banker’s opportunity to create $100. In other words, as you transfer $3 from your bank to your new MCPay account, the total quantity of money in the economy would fall by, $100 minus $3, $97. Would this not be bad for the economy? It sure would be if nothing was done about it. But wait. Suppose the central bank were to create $97 for every $3 transferred to someone’s MCPay and credit that extra $97, equally, to everyone’s MCPay account. Bingo! Do you see now how a personal dividend was made possible without new taxes, new debt or potentially inflationary increases in the quantity of money? Now, please do not think that this a theoretical discussion. Yes, our governments, in the pockets of financiers as they are, are not interested in giving you the option of an MCPay app. But, with Donald Trump at the helm and his GENIUS Act on the statutes, they are busily handing over this incredible power to create money not to society, not to a Monetary Commons, but to Big Tech and Wall Street. How? By shunning the MCPay app that would benefit you, everyone, equally, and pushing instead for so-called stablecoins issued by privateers, mainly Big Tech and Wall Street, for their benefit. But how much money could we expect to receive as a personal dividend if we were to create a monetary commons? The answer is: a lot! The US Treasury recently predicted that around worth $6.6 trillion of US bank deposits will be transferred to stablecoins - the private version of MCPay from which you will benefit not at all. Yes, $6.6 trillion, that is more than six thousand billion dollars. If such a sum were to be transferred to the monetary commons, to our MCPay accounts, keeping the quantity of money in the US constant would require that the Fed credits $213 trillion to everyone’s MCPay accounts. That’s considerably more than $600 thousand for each woman, man and child resident in the US! And similarly in Britain, Europe, Japan etc. A sizeable trust fund for everyone. This is a remarkable opportunity for making a difference to our awfully divided societies. We must seize it. For the benefit of the many, not the few. Of course, the few – beginning with the bankers – will scream blue murder. They will do their utmost to stop this from happening. They will fearmonger like crazy, eager as they are to usurp the lion’s share of the money that society generates collectively. They will try to terrorise you with tales of calamities that will befall you if this Monetary Commons were to be created. They will prognosticate cataclysmic inflation – even though the whole point of the personal dividend is to keep the money supply constant. They will terrorise you with the prospect of new taxation and new public debt – even though they understand that there is no need for new taxes or new public debt to pay you a substantial personal dividend. To appeal to your social conscience, they will tell you that a Monetary Commons is Elon Musk’s and the libertarians’ way to dismantle social security – even though there is no reason to cut social security in any way to fund everyone’s personal dividend. They will bombard you with the spectre of Big Brother, likening the Monetary Commons to a Chinese Communist Party ploy to have the central bank follow your every transaction – even though they know that MCPay can easily be built on distributed ledger technology that guarantees privacy to each while preventing the authorities from manipulating the money supply without the public noticing. As they scream and shout and terrorise you, you will know: Bankers just hate the idea of going back to the role of intermediaries, of borrowing from Jack to lend to Jill. They are only interested in maintaining their monopoly over the money system – and to extend it now that digital money enhances society’s capacity to create even more new money, a capacity that they want to privatise when we should want to share equally. So, let us ignore the shrieks of the moneymen and let us use new tech to share better the benefits from our collective capacity to create money. Let’s make building a Monetary Commons our common goal. It won’t cure all of our deeply exploitative society’s ills. But it will go a long way to cure many and, perhaps more importantly, it will give the many a sense of their power. FOR MORE ON THE MONETARY COMMONS, VISIT Raphael Arar Hirad Sab DiEM25

Yanis Varoufakis

29,411 次观看 • 9 个月前

Chinese AI models are wiping billions off Big Tech right now. Google just lost $200 billion in a single day, and the model it needed to fight back still isn't ready. Gemini 3.5 Pro, Google's most powerful model, is months behind schedule. Alphabet stock dropped 4.4% that same day. The Deepseek moment is happening again, and the new model is FAR bigger. On the same day Google's delay leaked, a Beijing lab called Moonshot released Kimi K3. It is the largest open model ever built, with 2.8 trillion parameters. It took the number one spot on the Frontend Code Arena, a live coding leaderboard, passing Anthropic's best model. And Moonshot is giving it away for free on July 27. The genius part: Anyone with enough computers can download it and run a frontier level AI without paying a cent to a US company. A single task on Kimi K3 costs about 94 cents. The same work on some American models costs nearly double. So why would a company keep paying premium prices for a model it can now get for free? The entire US AI business is built on selling access to models that cost billions to train. If a free Chinese version does most of the same work, that pricing power starts to crack. And Kimi is close to the best. On one closely watched intelligence ranking it scored 57, just behind the top American models GPT-5.6 Sol and Fable 5, and ahead of Claude Opus 4.8. Bank of America told clients that Kimi proves Chinese labs can keep making big leaps even with limited chips. And the founder of Moonshot, Yang Zhilin, learned to build AI as a researcher INSIDE Google. Google literally wrote the 2017 paper that made all of these models possible. Now the people who studied its work are using it to destroy Google, and handing it out for free. What happens next: Kimi K3's weights go public on July 27. Google reports earnings on July 22, and everyone will be asking the same question about Gemini. If free models keep topping the charts, every valuation built on paid AI access has to be rewritten. What do you think?

Ricardo

43,210 次观看 • 4 天前

Let’s stop pretending William Ruto and his cabal are not protecting Kenya from cybercrime. They are protecting themselves from accountability. This so-called cybercrime amendment is not about curbing “pornography” or “religious extremism.” Those are the fig leaves they hide behind to cover their fear of a fearless generation. They saw a movement of young Kenyans who needed no funding, no tribal endorsements, no political parties just truth and a smartphone. A movement that can shut down cities, expose scandals, and shame corrupt leaders in real-time. That’s what this law is really about fear. The fear of truth. The fear of youth. The fear of justice. They dress their oppression in holy robes, pretending to protect morality, while they loot in the dark. They talk of decency while stealing from the poor. They preach about “protecting children” while bankrupting their future. And now, under this new law, you can be jailed for: Exposing corruption. Filming police brutality. Recording a public officer taking a bribe. Posting proof of how public land or parastatals are being sold. Because to them, the crime isn’t stealing from Kenyans it’s showing the evidence. This law is the digital version of dictatorship a modern gag to silence the young, the bold, and the awake. It protects the state from its citizens, instead of protecting citizens from the state. It is not a security tool; it’s a weapon against dissent. William Ruto’s administration knows that Gen Z has changed the game. They cannot buy them. They cannot intimidate them. So they’re trying to legislate their silence. But you cannot pass enough laws to kill the truth. You cannot hide behind religion when your hands drip with the sins of greed. This is not governance it’s paranoia in power. It’s a regime terrified of TikTokers, bloggers, and truth-tellers. A government that fears cameras more than criminals. They can ban apps, block platforms, and threaten prison but they will never stop the power of collective consciousness. To the youth of Kenya: they are not after your phones they’re after your freedom. They don’t fear your technology they fear your awakening. And no law, no threat, no intimidation can bury a generation that has already seen the light. This is not a cybercrime law. It’s a coward’s shield. And cowards don’t rule forever.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇

20,650 次观看 • 9 个月前

Whitney Webb on Peter Thiel's attempt to "rebrand Christianity": "[With] Peter Thiel's Antichrist stuff... there's an attempt... to rebrand Christianity in ways that are more compatible with Silicon Valley's deep involvement in the U.S. military, which slaughters civilians...." "[It's] an attempt... to develop a new form of a more violent Christianity..." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with The Last American Vagabond (The Last American Vagabond) posted to X on March 13, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So, to be honest, you know, I think like Peter Thiel's Antichrist stuff, there's an attempt there to rebrand Christianity in ways that are more compatible with Silicon Valley's deep involvement in the U.S. military, which slaughters civilians, and also the Israeli military, which slaughters civilians. "And there's sort of a way, an attempt there to develop a new form of a more violent Christianity, which, you know, most Christians I would think would be against. But it's, it— They're particularly marketing this not necessarily to the general American public, but a select number of people in Silicon Valley or up-and-coming people in the, in the tech technology scene that identify as Christians. "So, you know, Peter Thiel's Antichrist series, only certain people were invited to that. It was not a publicly broadcast thing. They're not trying to sway the public with that. That's kind of. They're, they're going after a niche group there. "And then you have Trae Stephens who's along, well he's an obvious spook, but he's a Thiel, a very Thiel-linked one, big Palantir guy. Before that was involved in U.S. Intelligence stuff in Afghanistan, but he co- founded Anduril with, with Palmer Lucky, which is doing a lot of this autonomous warfare stuff. "But beyond that he also created, well, his wife nominally created, but he clearly runs it with his wife, called ACTS 17 that's kind of this collective in Silicon Valley about trying to bring Christianity back to Silicon Valley and it's this particular brand of it. "So the religious Zionism thing I think is a little different if you're talking about what were once an extremist group in Judaism. But you know, obviously it's expanded, expanded since then. "But I definitely want to make it very clear that I don't think all Jews fall in this category even remotely. But there is, you know, this particular faction that's very obsessed with hastening the end times. But there's also a group of Christians that's very obsessed with that. "And, you know, I wrote about this back for Mint Press, I think in 2019. It's just sort of the history of how that developed on both sides and the idea that these groups have opportunistically used each other, and they don't necessarily like each other. "But they opportunistically use each other to, to try and hasten the same end times. But they think the end times will have different outcomes, obviously. "And actually the Christian version of that, the Christian Zionist–believed outcome of the end times, has been criticized as being deeply anti-Semitic, ironically enough. But it's basically for both ends. It's born out of this idea that God isn't acting quickly enough. And so we must do things, to hasten the, the end times, because we don't want to wait. To paraphrase the Schneerson song."

Sense Receptor

16,306 次观看 • 4 个月前

Thank-you Dominique of 7. The Danielle Smith video below, is a small start in trying to express the severe issues & lack of progress we continue to face in Alberta. Sadly, the beautiful, charming, charismatic woman we have elected & who's acting as Madame Premier, is really a master & pro. at talking out of both sides of her mouth. I've lost count. Give it a try? So far, we have observed exactly zero real consequences, zero real accountability & zero meaningful & effective changes, after witnessing the needless deaths and immeasurable suffering of many thousands of innocent Albertans. *RIP* Sheila Annette Lewis. The Real National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC) We now have a recently amended Public Health Act that's just as tyrannical as the previous version. A CMOH, who is just as tyrannical or possibly even worse than the evil Deena HINSHAW. In Alberta & on a (vaccinated) doctors certificate; -Cops can arrest you without warrant!!! -A doctor is authorized to perform any test, any physical examination, and hold you against your will for as long as deemed necessary. -Forcefully and without your consent, administer any treatment they deem necessary, while holding you against your will, and if that's not enough, they can also impose any other conditions they doctor deems necessary!!! We have a court decision & ruling by Justice Romaine that paves the way for even more lawfully backed & legally approved tyranny, the next time a fake pandemic is declared. But wait! What about the "New" Alberta Bill Of Rights? Even the main lawyer Mr. Jeffrey Rath writes this; "According to Justice Romaine, had Deena Hinshaw simply acted as the Dictator of Alberta and made all of her orders bankrupting businesses and driving suicides in the province of Alberta personally, without Kenney’s involvement, Justice Romaine would have found the Orders to be perfectly legal. Romaine J. states at paragraph 56 and 57 of her judgement:" Plus so much more! If you don't see the problems we continue to face, after carefully examining the contents and substance contained within this video of Danielle Smith & her in-depth statements, then I am convinced it's hopeless trying to get you to see the issue. NOTHING HAS REALLY BEEN ACCOMPLISHED For meaningful & lasting results, what should be achieved is this below; -Sec. 220 C.C.C. Criminal Negligence Causing Death. -Sec. 465 (1)(c) C.C.C. Conspiracy To Commit. -Section 180 (1) C.C.C. & Section 180 (2) C.C.C. Common Nuisance. Bob Blayone - "Dr Roger Hodkinson and Dr William Makis brought fire." William (MakisMD) spoke about the absolute failure of Danielle Smith, United Conservative (Government of Alberta), NDP, Alberta Health Services, of their crimes against humanity, crimes against Alberta men, women and children, death and injury via Covid-19 injections and Remdesivir, of the breakdown of public health, doctors who continue to be to ruled by a mafioso of College of Physicians and Surgeons, of the College’s ongoing persecutions of doctors like Dr Hodkinson, facing a College tribunal in a month. William reminded the audience (a few die hard Smith/UCP defenders); - Smith’s prior political promise to defend persecuted doctors like Hodkinson, Daniel Nagase and others from the College - College is a private entity not governed by government but given their power by government - Smith as Premier, at the stroke of a pen, has the authority to dissolve the College of Physicians and Surgeons as well as the College of Nurses and Pharmacists At the stroke of a pen (Smith or the next plugged in puppet) that authority removes the College’s unaccountable, unaudited, heavy handed, genocidal, pedophile protecting, unchecked power over doctors, nurses and pharmacists. One individual turned to me and said, “I wonder who is threatening Smith?” I replied, “Are you kidding?! Do you understand that at the end of the day we’re living in a time of war here, where at its core there’s an agenda to depopulate the earth? Do you not think that there might not be a lot of collaboration in that?” William spoke about in the event of another World Health Organization “global pandemic”, as it stands today in Alberta, in accordance with the Canada wide precedent setting Ingram/Romaine ruling, in the Alberta Public Health Act as it stands today, in the worse than Deena Hinshaw latest UCP appointed Alberta Chief Medical Officer of Health in Mark Joffe, the “run, don’t walk to get your next covid booster” doctor, as it stands today on the WHO’s declaration of a pandemic, the Chief Medical Officer of Health, an unelected, unhinged bureaucrat, will hold absolute unchecked power in Alberta. Including authority to force vaccinated Albertans.

LIVMOR®

14,158 次观看 • 1 年前

🇮🇱🇮🇷 Washington under pressure, or the delicate art of "preventive" warfare For decades, one of the most discreet and well-oiled constants of US foreign policy has not been the defense of democracy or stability in the Middle East, but a much more prosaic exercise: explaining to US presidents why bombing Iran would ultimately be an act of peace. According to John Kiriakou, a former CIA officer, this pressure from Israel has never let up. Republicans, Democrats, doves, hawks: all have been given the same briefing, complete with graphs, disaster scenarios, and deadlines "before it's too late." A bipartisan foreign policy... like a consensus on lukewarm coffee at the Pentagon. Officially, Washington has been repeating for twenty years that Iran "must never acquire nuclear weapons." A position hammered home by every administration, from George W. Bush to Barack Obama, then recycled in the form of shorter tweets under Donald Trump. All of this is supported by IAEA reports, regularly brandished like school report cards: "still some gray areas, but nothing provable." Enough to talk about diplomacy, not enough to calm the supporters of the red button. Kiriakou's version is more blunt: Israel reportedly issued an unprecedented ultimatum: either you strike the Iranian facilities, or we will go further. Diplomatic translation: "do it with your bombs, or we will do it with weapons that everyone pretends to ignore." At this point, deterrence becomes a form of existential blackmail, but always in the name of regional stability, of course. The US authorities, for their part, have always spoken of "all options on the table." This is an official phrase that has been recycled by the State Department for decades, which in practice means: we don't know what to do, but we are holding on to the table firmly. Presidents come and go, but the table remains. And underneath it, attack plans pile up like files that have never been filed away. The irony is this: Washington officially explains that it wants to avoid escalation, while being called upon to bomb to prevent a more serious escalation. A circular logic worthy of an absurd strategy manual: bomb to save peace, threaten to avoid war, strike to prevent the use of the bomb. Orwell would have loved it, and so would the Pentagon. In the end, the US-Iranian relationship resembles less diplomacy than an endless soap opera, where each season promises "the last crisis before the final resolution." And while official statements speak of restraint, dialogue, and red lines, the public discovers that the real red line is above all the one that separates the American decision... from the Israeli strategic agenda. One thing is certain: if war has not yet broken out, it is not for lack of trying. It's just that, in this region, even peace requires advance notice of bombing.

Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆

11,638 次观看 • 6 个月前

"George Knapp and I provided that list (of 46 videos) to Congress." ~JC What's it Gonna Take to Wake the Masses? Full segment with Biden, Obama and Trump comments. Trump: "They wanna find out about the UFOs, and anything having to do with UFO or related material. And we're gonna be releasing a lot of things from...that we have. And I think some of it's gonna be very interesting to people." ~ Peter Doocy in Studio: "Many historic developments in a story that I've been working on for five years, but our next guest has been working on for much longer. So, let's start here. My interest was piqued when Barack Obama said this in 2021." Obama on The Late Show with James Corden: "When it comes to aliens, there are some things I just can't tell you, on air." ~ Doocy in Studio: "I was so curious about that, so I asked the only man I knew, at the time, who could possibly help." ~ Doocy: "President Obama says that there is footage and records of objects in the skies, these Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon. And he says, we don't know exactly what they are. What do you think that it is?" Biden: "I would ask him again. Thank you." (A pathetic response that I called out at the time. Maybe I have BDS? 😵‍💫 ) ~ Doocy in Studio: "Not very helpful, Joe! I haven't had a chance to ask Barack Obama, and it had been eating at me. And then, he said something else." ~ Brian Tyler Cohen (BTC): "Are aliens real?" Obama: "Uh, they're real, but I haven't seen 'em, and they're not being kept in, uh... What is it?" BTC: "Area 51?" Obama: "Area 51." ~ Doocy in Studio: "If the last President couldn't help us with answers about aliens, maybe this one could. Spoiler alert, he did." ~ Doocy on Air Force One: "Barack Obama said that aliens are real. Have you seen any evidence of non-human visitors to Earth?" Trump: "Well he gave classified information, he's not supposed to be doing that. You know." Doocy: "So aliens are real?" Trump: "Well I don't know if they're real or not, I can tell you he gave classified information." ~ Doocy: "Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell is an investigative journalist and the co-host of the 'Weaponized' podcast. He knows more about this than anybody. And the new movie about him, 'Sleeping Dog' and UFO disclosure, is excellent, I watched it yesterday. "Jeremy, there are 46 videos that Congress wants the Pentagon to declassify. The Pentagon missed the deadline to do it. But, will these 46 videos be convincing enough to have Americans saying, 'I have no doubts aliens have visited Earth'"? Corbell: "You know, I think that these are data points. I think these 46 videos are really important. I think the American public should be able to see them, and so does Congress. They specifically identified these 46 videos because they know that these videos exist. They are designated UAP by our own military and intelligence services. I have been exposed to a number of these. In fact, George Knapp and I provided that list to Congress. We've actually released some of those videos. So, the American public is ready for this. "Now what it's gonna tell us, what the end result is gonna be? It's another data set of footage the American public can look at. But here is what I know for a fact, Peter: There are machines, there are craft of unknown origin that fly with impunity in our restricted airspace, and our government has been assessing this as a national threat for decades. The jig is up. People now know: UAP are real. "But what are UAP? Who are flying these machines. Who made these machines that can outpace, outmaneuver and outperform our greatest war fighters? That's the question." Doocy: "And so, you were just talking about this. We've got video that we can put up on the screen. One of the videos that your sources helped you guys get out of a government vault." (Important detail: Corbell and Knapp have sources. Their source, or sources, somehow acquired that video (and others), Corbell and Knapp obtained it from said source(s), and then released it.) Doocy: "It is a UAP over Syria in 2021 flying at an impossible speed, demonstrating instantaneous acceleration. This is the video. A lot of people will look at this and say, 'Well, it could be China, it could be Russia, it could be somebody else.' But when you see this and the other videos - some of the 45 other videos that you have seen - what do you think?" Corbell: "Yeah, look, we do not have the capability, unfortunately, for instantaneous motion. The idea of inertial effect and what would happen, this is baffling to the intelligence community." (Here's where I push back. This is from November of 2025 on "Weaponized," where the head of the AAWSAP UFO program (2008-2010), James Lacatski, was interviewed. Corbell: "We hear about all these people on military bases seeing triangles, and you're doing this study, AAWSAP to try to figure out the physics of how to do that. Do you think it's already been achieved by the U.S. government, or it hasn't, and that's why AAWSAP had a lot of value." Lacatski: "It hasn't been achieved to its full extent." (How far did they get? To 80% of the full extent of what alleged NHI craft can do? 90%? Was the ability to accelerate instantaneously achieved? We don't know. Commander Will Miler (Ret.) has said that he had a friend who worked at Area 51 and that friend suggested that we have craft that can do, "Mach 9 and then suddenly make a right-angle turn.") ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ~~~ Corbell: "What George and I put out, it is their analysis that this is demonstrating, this craft, which is not aerodynamic. When you look at this video, it instantaneously shoots off to the right, once the Reaper drone got a weapons-grade lock on it. So its ability to maneuver is far beyond anything that China, Russia or the U.S. has." (When I look at UAP videos, I try to see them through the eyes of an open-minded skeptic. I have several coworkers who fit that bill and I show them videos when they're released to get their take. I think the 2021 video from Syria (I'll link to a more complete version of it in the replies) is important because it appears to be demonstrating instantaneous acceleration. But when I showed that video to those coworkers of mine, they were not impressed. It's not clear or close enough. If the rest of the 46 videos are like that, I don't see it jolting the masses awake (which we really need) about the seriousness of this topic. Then again, maybe so many videos being declassified may do the trick? Also, WHO in our government has labeled those objects in the videos as UAP? That's important to know. Was it just the guys from the UAP Task Force?) Corbell: "Look, this is a known secret on the inside. It's an open secret that UAP are real and that they're able to evade, sometimes detection, but absolutely our weaponry. And it's an issue because they are oftentimes loitering over sensitive, critical infrastructure within the United States. This is not me saying this. This has been admitted by our own administration and government. I think we're closer than ever. The intent is to bring the truth forward to the American public. We are closer than ever, and it's just gotta be done now." Doocy: "And my last question, we have two minutes left in the show: You've reported that some of these UFO files, for generations. have been kept secret even from sitting presidents. Who would have the power in this country to decide, if not the President, that the American people don't have a right to know about something so important, like UFOs?" Corbell: "Right. This is game-changing, and it's nature itself. It's not something that should be held back. And presidents have admitted that they have been held out from that information. Very famously, President Clinton talked about that. Not the first time, he said, a president has been lied to." Related Bill Clinton Clip: "If the U.S. Air Force did recover alien bodies, they didn't tell me about it, either, and I wanna know." ~Clinton ~ Corbell: "Well now the pressure is on. Congress is asking for these 46 videos, and if we've ever had an administration and a president that sees the public interest and would enact upon that for the people, it would be this sitting president. So I'm very encouraged at this moment, we have an opportunity." (I'll be encouraged if Trump actually signs an Executive Order calling for the declassification of UFO videos and records.) Corbell: "None of these have really been announcements. It's an opportunity now for the American public to understand the UFO presence is real and that it's been going on a long time, and it has been of national security concern." Doocy: "And we have less than a minute left in the show, but we asked our audience if they had questions for you, and Lena sent one in. She wants to know, 'Are they" - presumably aliens - "walking around right now and we don't know it?" Corbell: "Yeah, so, if we don't get past the first question, we don't get past the first acknowledgement, we're never gonna know the interaction that whoever these pilots are of these craft of unknown origin, that they believe do not originate here on Earth. If we don't get past that first question, we're never gonna be able to answer that question (laughs)." Doocy: "Well, we've been trying to make this happen for a long time. Jeremy, thank you so much for being here. This is a story that we will keep asking about at the highest levels of government. So thank you." Corbell: "Yeah, I encourage people to watch the film, 'Sleeping Dog' that's coming out, because it does dive into investigative journalism on this, [and] how much progress we've made." Doocy: "And we will watch. That's all we got. I'm Peter Doocy in Washington. See you next time."

Joe Murgia

11,486 次观看 • 2 个月前

//The Wire//1700Z November 21, 2024// //PRIORITY// //BLUF: RUSSIA LAUNCHES POSSIBLE ICBM IN UKRAINE IN LIKELY RETALIATORY STRIKE FOR UKRAINE’S PRIOR ATACMS TARGETING.// -----BEGIN TEARLINE----- -International Events- Europe: Overnight Russia conducted a possible ICBM (or MRBM) attack in the Ukrainian district of Dnipropetrovsk. The exact target of the strike is unknown (nor likely matters much) as multiple munitions were observed to be striking the area from many miles away, possibly indicating the use of Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicles (MIRVs). As such, it’s very likely that this strike was more about sending a message rather than its targeting effectiveness in the battlespace. The exact missile used remains unconfirmed, however the payload of each warhead was obviously a conventional munition or an inert training warhead. -----END TEARLINE----- Analyst Comments: Some sources (mostly of Ukrainian origin) claim Russia launched an RS-26 RUBEZH ICBM from Astrakhan, which in the absence of any quasi-reliable information is just as good a theory as any. Other theories suggest it may have been a new experimental Medium-Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM) so as to have an increased payload capacity. Various unnamed “western sources” have claimed that Russia did not launch an ICBM, and that the strike was carried out by some other experimental weapons platform. If confirmed to be an ICBM strike, this would mark the first use of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles in combat. Considering this potential, and this new development being outside the scope of normalcy, American officials might do well to change their perspective and re-examine their decisions. It doesn’t make it right, or even moral. But if Russia is willing to use an ICBM in Ukraine, even a conventional one, perhaps a reexamining of the situation might be worthwhile. Generally speaking, when a man uses an ICBM one might be inclined to think he is rather serious. Right now, bureaucrats in Washington are surely reading reports written by some junior analyst, and scoffing at the attack being conducted with conventional (or even training) warheads…completely oblivious to the fact that if this was an ICBM (or even some new MRBM), and one that that had been outfitted with its standard payload, they might not be alive to read that report in the first place. Speaking more strategically from a prepared citizen perspective, much can be learned from the first non-training use of an ICBM launch. We now have a wealth of data to consider, and the early-warning indicators that this launch was about to take place. Multiple indicators were present, and observable by the public, over the past 24 hours. Though at the time, none were definitive proof of what was about to happen. American strategic radio traffic on the High Frequency Global Communications System (HFGCS) increased significantly in the hours before the launch, with many radio messages being sent yesterday evening. Seeing as absolutely zero E-4B NIGHTWATCH or E-6 MERCURY aircraft were observed on flight tracking websites…this absence was probably a clue. HFGCS radio chatter usually involves these aircraft, so no aircraft showing up on flight tracking sites could indicates that aircraft were indeed airborne…but flying with their transponders turned off as they would do in a time of war. These airframes are critical components of America’s strategic force, with the main mission of coordinating communications in the event of a nuclear war. On the other side of the wire, Russian strategic aircraft were also observed to be making slightly abnormal flights. Again, not enough out of the ordinary to be worthy of mention on their own, but in hindsight Russia’s version of their “doomsday” planes were absolutely conducting operations in support of this launch. All of this points to the challenges of predicting major world events. Cleary, the U.S. government does not respect or value their own citizens enough to even address this potential ICBM launch. In classic Pentagon fashion, all information that has come from the American perspective has come in the form of “unnamed western sources”, continuing the Pentagon’s habit of not addressing the American people directly so as to maintain deniability and avoid culpability. Whether an actual RS-26 was used or not is irrelevant; a Medium-Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM) would generate the same level of concern among American taxpayers. Considering all factors, Russia could indeed have warned the United States directly before the launch, and even if Russia did not, the United States had hours (and probably several days) of warning. The issue is not that the U.S. government somehow got caught unaware of a large missile launch, this most certainly did not happen. Either by Russia directly telling them about the launch, or NORAD detecting it themselves, the United States was well aware of the missile long before it ever lifted off. The issue is that the U.S. government didn’t tell the American people about it, or issue any sort of heightened civil defense-style warning. Even though American intelligence collection sensors without question knew the missile would be impacting in Ukraine very shortly after launch, ignoring the magnitude of this goes beyond the pale of what should be considered normal in any society. Taking the position of “well, we knew it was going to hit Ukraine so we didn’t bother informing the American people so as to avoid undue panic” sounds a lot like “we’re ignoring the ICBM launch because our own actions provoked this, so we want to cover it up”. At minimum, the government that is dragging the American people towards a very hot global war owes their citizens some level of explanation. So far, the information exchange process to alleviate the concerns of American taxpayers has not entirely been a priority among nearly all politicians. Russia potentially launches a nuclear-capable missile with multiple re-entry vehicles…and multiple members of Congress have spent the morning reaffirming their support for Israel on social media. Seeing as extremely long range missiles have the potential to impact all life on Earth, a press conference to clarify details of the incident in Ukraine would be greatly appreciated. Perhaps to include some fancy charts and poster sized images printed out at Office Depot to show some sort of half-hearted effort. If the U.S. government wants to alleviate the concerns of the American people, that would be a great first step. Rumors from unnamed sources speaking on conditions of anonymity will not cut it anymore. Similarly, pretending that the American people are crazy for being concerned about this is gaslighting of the highest order that will no longer be acceptable among the populace. Currently, the American stance has largely just been to ignore it, highlighting what has already been known for decades. When something serious happens around the world, or even within the homeland, the American people are largely on their own. The Russian Federation is very, very unlikely to resort to the use of nuclear weapons, for a variety of reasons. However, thinking more broadly, if Putin was indeed willing to use nuclear weapons to achieve victory in Ukraine…how exactly would he convey that to the United States? What measures would be taken to express the seriousness of his intentions? And most importantly, would it look any different from what Putin has already done? Analyst: S2A1 //END REPORT//

S2 Underground

22,474 次观看 • 1 年前

Irish government and Immigrant Council of Ireland (NGO) ARABIC video telling people how to vote. I strongly suggest people read ALL the following: There are several more of these videos in different languages. My feeling is that if I go to a different country and need someone to explain to me how to vote in my own language (because I don't speak the native one) then I shouldn't be allowed a vote in that country 🤔. It seems to me you can't be integrated enough to have an active civic say in that case. On the run up to locals elections Emma Lane Spollen of the Ukraine Civil Society Forum (HOW is that eveb a thing in Ireland?), said 50,000 Ukrainians had the right to be first time voters in local elections. She was not includng asylum seekers from elsewhere signed up by NGOs. Many NGOs in Ireland ACTIVELY spent weeks going into migrant centres to sit down with residents to register them to vote. This was also being funded by the EU as well as tax payer funded. We should actually stop referring to them as non-governmental organisations. They're anything BUT. They're paid to undermine the process of democracy and to push back against the public who are, in the main, unhappy about uncontrolled mass immigration, transgender ideology levelled at children and lots of other agendas. Parasites is a much better term. Why so? Often the very things they claim to be against [e.g. racism] are the very things that they need to exist to justify their funding. Hence why they push the notion that Irish people are racist. The Immigrant Council of Ireland has a poster up in my daughter' school which I intend to do a video on as soon as I can. Suffice to say I'm not happy as I feel it targets white Irish children and plays on their vulnerable little minds. Nick Henderson, CEO of The Immigrant Council of Ireland is paid €79,000 a year. Up from €55,000 when I checked two years ago. I wonder why such an increase, eh? As we know, several billions are paid to parasite quango NGOs every year. Tax payers money is used to produce these videos and line the pockets of those who are rewarded with your money for going AGAINST you. Nick Henderson, as it happens, has regularly spoken up on behalf of completely undocumented male migrants (87% entered illegally by destroying passports) and has denounced anyone who thinks ANY of them could present a risk to our national security/people (both Irish/migrants). He particularly seemed to find it offensive that people may think some of these men may present a risk to children. However, Henderson wrote a letter to the then Children's Minister (Roderic O Gorman at the time) expressing great concern for children in City West IPAS who were queuing up for showers (in a communal shower area) unsupervised by guardians. His worry was these children were queuing with male adult asylum seekers unrelated to those children. Which seems wise. BUT he didn't apply that logic when talking about Irish people's concerns for THEIR children. I ask you, if you think there may be some pedophiles in migrant centres, then why wouldn't you think they'd behave like pedophiles when outside in the community? Beside out schools? Playgrounds? Hmm. The IRC also wrote to the health minister Steohen Donnelly during l○ckd○wns requesting that when asylum seekers and refugees arrived at our ports, the two week hotel quarantine fee be paid by the tax payer. Remember, anyone else coming in (Irish people) had to pay for two weeks of hotel fees themselves. No matter what their circumstances. If they tried to leave or refused to stay they were arrested and charged. I will add the English version of this video into the comment. Please note these were made not for the last round of elections, hut for the one before. So this kind of thing isn't new. As we know Patrick McGreal posted yesterday that a court in Meath allegedly found that people who were not "resident" in Ireland cannot. And yet...they were bussed into polling stations.

Susanne Delaney

69,456 次观看 • 1 年前

BRAVO! to Dr. Mark Trozzi for being one of the few Health Freedom MDs with the guts to openly call the Covid jabs what they are: bioweapons. "This genetic bioweapon is really a biological bull in a china shop... we know 28 mechanisms by which it causes cancer alone... [and the jabs are] permanently genetically modifying and damaging the genetic code of [humanity]." This clip of Trozzi (Dr Mark Trozzi MD), a veteran E.R. physician with 25 years of experience, as well as a human rights activist, is taken from an interview with Dr. Joe Sansone (Dr. Joseph Sansone (JosephSansone.com)) posted to Rumble on December 11, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "This genetic bioweapon is really a biological bull in a china shop. I mean it does so many damage. And I mean, I've given lectures. We were together last January, I gave a lecture in Florida on the mechanisms of injury. And the reality is you can't keep up. I mean, we know 28 mechanisms by which it causes cancer alone. "But you know, and this is, I mean it was shocking from the moment we looked at the ingredients before anyone was injected. Shocking enough to like basically set down my entire life's work to try to stop it. That's not because I'm super courage. It's, that's how serious this is. But you genetically, they're genetically modifying people, claiming they're giving them a vaccine and then genetically modifying them so that they will produce a variety of poisons. Mostly the spike protein of the man-made design, SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is the most toxic part of it. "And normally, nobody's body would be producing it. And then they're producing this, this random splay of protein junk which can trigger autoimmune diseases in every direction. And so, but then what's worse is, you know, they claimed that what was in it was modified messenger RNA, modified both so that it would screw up and create all these random proteins as well as spike protein, but modified so that it would persist and nobody knew how long. "In other words, oh, so my body is going to start producing foreign proteins and identifying itself as a foreigner to be attacked by my own immune system. But for how long? Well, nobody knows because this is completely experimental, this new N1 methyl pseudouridinated version of messenger RNA. "But as you know, and as Dr. Speicher, Dr. McKernan and others have revealed through repeated analysis around the world, 30% of the genetic material in there is DNA and it includes plasmid DNA and it includes, in the case of Pfizer, completely covered up that it could even possibly be there. And the fraud they committed to the FDA and the public health agency, european agency, et cetera, that they put in these genetic sequences which were derived from the simian virus, not the virus, but some specific genetic sequences which we've known since 1990 research. "These are genetic hacking tools. When you put foreign DNA with something like a pegylated nanoparticle into a human cell or any mammal cell, and if you deliver as well these little SV40 promoter enhancer sequences... I mean, and this is pre-existing research, that will cause the DNA to be moved into the nucleus and cause it to be incorporated. "So you're permanently genetically modifying and damaging the genetic code of the humans. And we have evidence of this now, Joseph. Some of the most shocking evidence. And I think what you've pointed out is really important. This is not just an attack on the people health that are alive right now. This is attack on our possibility to produce viable offspring and have the continuation of the human race. "We now have tests on male sperm cells where the sperm cells contain in their DNA the genetic code of the spike protein. So men's sperm has been genetically modified so they will pass this toxic genetic flaw into their children if they're able to reproduce. Every sperm cell, we don't know, we don't know how many, but many. We have evidence that 30% of a woman's eggs die shortly following the injections as a result of these injections. Assault on the ovaries where they're particularly drawn to go and deposit the genetic code. "We have cancers that have now been taken out of people. And when you look at the DNA in the cells of the cancer, that DNA has been modified by these injections. So you're looking at permanent genetic modification of human beings without their consent based on a lie that they're getting a safe and effective vaccine for a disease claiming there's no treatment for which there was good treatments. And the whole thing from the virus through the bioweapon death shot were brought to you by the same people. And we're talking about people like Fauci, Gates, Tedros, Daszak, etc."

Sense Receptor

19,495 次观看 • 7 个月前

$sthUSD Is Live: Yield Becomes Native at Tharwa Today we open the next chapter of Tharwa. $sthUSD, our yield-bearing stablecoin layer, is now live and ready for the public. For years, stablecoins have been a $250B+ market, but nearly all of that capital has sat idle. Holders earned nothing while issuers pocketed the yield. sthUSD changes that. It makes yield a native property of money itself, flowing directly into your wallet from a portfolio of real-world assets. What is $sthUSD? sthUSD is the staked version of thUSD. It is built on an ERC-4626-inspired design, reconfigured specifically for Tharwa with a new instant-withdraw class and optimizations that make it more efficient. At launch, entry and exit fees are set at zero to encourage adoption. The mechanics are simple: • Mint $thUSD • Stake it into the $sthUSD contract • Receive $sthUSD and watch your balance grow automatically No farming gimmicks, no manual claims, no hidden risks. Withdrawals are instant. Where the Yield Comes From The yield behind sthUSD is real and transparent. It comes from the same diversified portfolio that backs thUSD: sukuk, UAE real estate, gold, and capped exposure to commodities. As these assets generate income, returns are routed through the protocol treasury and distributed proportionally to sthUSD holders. Rewards are time-weighted, vested automatically, and visible on-chain. This is not emission-driven yield. It is powered by cash flows from real-world assets, optimized through Tharwa’s portfolio design and risk framework. Why sthUSD Matters sthUSD completes the foundation of Tharwa’s ecosystem. thUSD provides stability. sthUSD turns it into a currency that compounds by default. Together, they make Tharwa function like an on-chain hedge fund: stable by design, yield-bearing by nature. That opens the door to much bigger things. sthUSD can become the backbone collateral for DeFi integrations, a reserve asset for DAOs, or a passive income instrument for institutions. It is designed to be simple for retail, yet robust enough for treasuries and fund allocators. The speculation is not whether sthUSD will matter, it is how far it spreads once DeFi realizes what it unlocks. What’s Next Launching sthUSD is not the end, it is the start of a much larger system. Coming up: • Expansion of static yield bonds through ERC-1155 vaults • Integration of sthUSD into DeFi liquidity pools and lending protocols • OTC marketplace for secondary liquidity • Production-grade AI assistant for rebalancing • Development of segregated sukuk vaults for faith-aligned yields sthUSD is the product that transforms thUSD from a stable placeholder into an income-generating unit of account. If stablecoins were the backbone of DeFi until now, sthUSD is what makes that backbone yield-bearing and alive. Stake Now:

Tharwa

54,757 次观看 • 11 个月前

A video-text summary of my argument that we now live in the age of TECHNOFEUDALISM (in 16', 2000 words): Wherever we turn, we witness the triumph of capital. Capital has prevailed everywhere: in warehouses, factories, offices, universities, public hospitals, the media – in space but also in the microcosm of genetic engineering. So, how do I dare claim that capitalism has been killed? By whom? The deliciously ironic answer is that capitalism was killed by its own hand… by capital! If I am right, the issue is not what AI will do to us in the future but what has already happened: Capital became so dominant that it mutated into a variant so toxic that, like a stupid virus, it killed off its host, capitalism, replacing it with something far, far worse. This new mutant capital, that killed capitalism, lives in the proverbial cloud – so, let us call it cloud capital. What is cloud capital? What makes it so different? Cloud capital, of course, does not really live up in the cloud. It lives down on Earth, comprising networked machines, server farms, cell towers, software, AI-driven algorithms – and of course it lives on our oceans’ floors where untold miles of optic fibre cables rest. Unlike traditional capital, from fishing rods to the steam-engines of the Industrial Revolution to today’s modern industrial robots that are produced means of production, cloud capital does not produce anything – it comprises machines manufactured so as to modify human behaviour. That’s what Amazon’s Alexa or Google’s Assistant or Apple’s Siri is: It is a produced means of behavioural modification. It is a machine, a piece of capital, which we train to train us to train it to determine that which we want. And, once we want it, the same networked machine sells it to us, directly, bypassing markets. As if that were not enough, the same machinery succeeds in making us sustain the enormous behavioural modification machine network to which it belongs with our free voluntary labour. We are sustaining it as we post reviews, rate products, upload videos, rants, photos - we help reproduce cloud capital without getting a penny for our labour. In essence, it has turned us into its cloud serfs! Meanwhile, in the factories and the warehouses, where waged proletarians work under increasingly precarious conditions, the same algorithms that modify our behaviour and sell products to us directly – those algorithms are deployed, usually by digital devices tied to the workers’ wrists, to make proletarians, workers in the warehouses, in the factories work faster, to direct and to monitor them in real time. I started by saying that wherever we turn, we stumble on the triumph of capital. But it is cloud capital that is the real winner. It is amazing how it performs, at once, five roles that used to be beyond capital’s capacities: Cloud capital grabs our attention. It manufactures our desires. It sells to us, directly, outside any traditional markets, that which is going to satiate the desires it made us have. It drives proletarian labour inside the workplaces. And it elicits massive free labour from us, its cloud-serfs. Is it surprising that the owners of this cloud capital – let’s call them cloudalists – have a hitherto undreamt power to extract? To extract gargantuan surplus value from proletarians; untold quantities of free labour from almost everyone; and mind-numbing cloud rents from vassal capitalists – from sellers? Is it a wonder that they are vastly more powerful than Henry Ford or Rupert Murdoch could ever be? “Hang on”, I hear you say. “Is Jeff Bezos really different to Henry Ford? Aren’t they all a species of monopoly capitalists? Monopolists?” No, is not a monopolistic capitalist enterprise. The moment you enter you have exited capitalism altogether! Sure enough, the place is teaming with buyers and sellers. So, yes, it is an enormous trading platform but, no, a market it certainly is not! One man called Jeff owns everything. But he is much, much more than a mere monopolist. Jeff doesn’t own the factories that produce the stuff sold on his platform by traditional capitalists who have to use it to ply their trade. What he does own is more important: Jeff owns the algorithm that decides which products you see and which you don’t – the very algorithm that you have trained to know you perfectly so that it matches youwith a seller, whom it also knows perfectly well, with a view to maximising the probability that every such match, transaction, will generate, for Jeff, the highest rent that Jeff can charge the seller for what you buy: up to 40% of what you pay is pocketed by Jeff, the cloudalist! The mind rebels at the enormity but also the radical novelty of this kind of exploitation: The same algorithm that we help train in real time to know us inside out - that same algorithm both modifies our preferences and administers the selection and delivery of commodities that will satisfy these preferences. If you and I were to type “electric bicycles” or “binoculars” while in you and I would get totally different recommendations. In a traditional market or shopping mall it would be as if you and I were walking next to each other, our eyes trained in the same direction, the same shop window, but we were to see different things depending on what Jeff’s algorithm wants each one of us to see. Everyone navigating around – except Jeff Bezos of course – everyone in is wandering around in algorithmically constructed isolation as if in a Panopticon where, unable to see each other, we only see Jeff’s all-seeing algorithm or, more accurately, only what his algorithm allows us to see with a view to maximising his cloud rent – which is, of course, today’s version of the ground rent that the feudal lords used to extract from their vassals and their peasants. This is not capitalism. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to technofeudalism! How did cloud capital kill capitalism? How did it rise up? Who paid for it? Capitalism, lest we forget, had two pillars: markets and profit. Of course, markets and profit remain ubiquitous. Nevertheless, cloud capital has evicted both markets and profit from the centre of our socioeconomic system, pushing them out to its margins, and replacing them: Markets, the medium of capitalism, have been replaced by cloud fiefs – digital trading platforms like or Alibaba which, as we saw, look like, but are not, markets. And Profit? The fuel of capitalism? Well, that has been replaced by its feudal predecessor: rent. But, specifically, a new form of rent, a cloud rent that must be paid for access to those cloud fiefs or digital platforms. But how did cloud capital emerge?It began life in the late 1990s when the original Internet, which was a Commons – it functioned as a capitalism-free-zone – that original Internet, Internet 1.0 if you want, was privatised by the emergent Big Tech. Who paid for the trillions it cost to manufacture and to accumulate cloud capital so quickly in the hands of so very few cloudalists? The startling answer is: The G7 countries’ central banks, mostly! How did that happen? Well, by accident, or – to be more precise – by… crisis! After the financial sector collapse of 2008, our central bankers printed up to $35 trillion to bail out the bankers at a time when the governments were subjecting our peoples to harsh austerity. Capitalists were clever enough to foresee that the many would be too impecunious to buy their stuff. So, instead of investing, they took the central bank money to the stock exchange and the bond markets, where they bought shares, bonds – along with yachts, art, bitcoin, NFTs any ‘asset’ they could lay their hands on. The only capitalists who actually invested in capital were Big Tech owners. For example, 9 out of every 10 dollars that went into creating Facebook came from these central bank monies! That’s how cloud capital was financed and how the cloudalists became our new ruling class. As a result, real power today resides not with the owners of machinery, buildings, railway and phone networks, industrial robots. These old-fashioned, terrestrial capitalists continue to extract surplus value from waged labour, but they are no longer in charge, as they used to be. They have become vassals in relation to the owners of cloud capital, of the cloudalists. As for the rest of us, we have returned to our former status as serfs, contributing to the wealth and power of the new ruling class with our unpaid labour — in addition to the waged labour we perform, when we get the chance to do it. But surely, someone will say, this is still capitalism, isn’t it? So, you are still unconvinced? I know, it is hard to part with the term, with the word, capitalism. It is not just liberals who think of capitalism like fish think of the water they swim in – as natural. Socialists too need to feel that our purpose in life, the reason we landed on this Earth, is to overthrow capitalism. The news that I bring that capital beat us to it, and now we have something worse in capitalism’s place, that news is hard to accept. Indeed, it is mostly my fellow-travelling leftist friends who try to dissuade me – to convince me that, yes, cloud capital may be important but “this is still capitalism mate”. Let’s call it rentier capitalism or monopoly capitalism, they suggest. But that simply will not do! Cloud rent is not like ground rent, because it requires massive investment in new tech. And it is not monopoly rent either, because Bezos and Zuckerberg, instead of monopolising markets to sell their manufactures (like Ford and Eddison did), Bezos and Zuckerberg have replaced markets and have no interest in manufacturing anything (unlike Henry Ford and Thomas Eddison). How about surveillance capitalism? Again, no, it won’t do. Cloudalists do not simply use algorithms to brain wash us on behalf of advertisers in an otherwise capitalist setting. No, cloud capital reproduces itself through our free-labour, it directly exploits waged labour, and it squeezes cloud rents from vassal capitalists in trading platforms that are not markets. This is not capitalism folks! Any kind of capitalism. But what about the observation that technofeudalism is parasitic on the capitalist sector within it? Yes, it is true. Were the conventional capitalists to die out, cloudalists would perish, unable to skim off cloud rents from the manufacturers. So what? After capitalism overthrew feudalism, capitalists were also parasitic on landowners, in the sense that, without private land producing food, capitalism would wither. Similarly, now: While the traditional capitalist sector feeds technofeudalism, it is cloud capital and cloud rent that dominate. Does it matter whether we call it technofeudalism or some form of capitalism? At this point, it is important to recall Marx’s maxim that the point is not to interpret but to change the world. So, does it matter if this is still capitalism or whether we call it technofeudalism? I think it does. Recognising that our world has become technofeudal helps us grasp the enormity of what it will take to organise the victims of exorbitant power, the exploited who, now, include not only waged labourers but also the hordes of cloud serfs who are reproducing the very cloud capital that keeps them in a state of deepening precarity. The concept of technofeudalism drives home the point that organising auto-workers and nurses, while still essential, is insufficient. It elucidates what it will take to organise the movements against the fossil fuel cartel when our means of communication are run on cloud capital primed to poison public opinion. It explains how the shift to electric cars caused German deindustrialisation, as profits due to precision mechanical engineering are being replaced by rents extracted by owners of the cloud capital keeping tabs on the drivers’ routes and in-cabin habits. Elon Musk’s decision to buy Twitter suddenly makes a lot more sense. Twitter for Musk is an interface between his mechanical capital stock at Tesla and SpaceX and cloud capital. The New Cold War between the USA and China, especially after the war in Ukraine, is explained as the repercussion of an underlying clash between two technofeudalisms, one whose cloud rents are denominated in dollars the other in yuan. Isn’t it mindboggling? It took mind-bending scientific breakthroughs, fantastical neural networks, and imagination-defying AI programs to accomplish what? To create a world where, while privatisation and private equity asset-strip all physical wealth around us, cloud capital goes about the business of asset-stripping our brains. To own our minds individually, we must own cloud capital collectively. Once we have reclaimed our minds, we can put them collectively to work out a way to create a new cloud capital commons. It will be damned hard. But it’s the only way we can turn our cloud-based artefacts from a produced means of behaviour modification to a produced means of human collaboration and emancipation. Cloud serfs, cloud proles and cloud vassals of the world, unite! We have nothing to lose but our mind-cloud chains! US Edition: UK Edition: Greek Edition:

Yanis Varoufakis

1,816,294 次观看 • 2 年前