正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Will there be justice for Alisa Hackett? Newly-released video shows an Arkansas State trooper punching 18-year-old Alisa Hackett in the face during a traffic stop earlier this month, after forcing her to the ground on the side of a highway. Trooper Moisses Arellano said she was resisting arrest, after...

39,163 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Holy crap can we say Excessive Force? 😱 It was late at night on Highway 18 near Manila, Arkansas, when trooper Moisses Arellano clocked 18-year-old Alisa Hackett driving 71 mph in a 60-mph zone. When he approached the car, he noticed her emergency lights were on, her plate was covered, she wasn't wearing a seatbelt, and an open bottle sat on the passenger seat. Initially the trooper was just going to give her a citation, but then he learned that Hackett had been pulled over just days prior and let go with a verbal warning for similar infractions. Deciding that leniency was no longer an option, the trooper informed her she was under arrest. As Arellano reached for her wrist to handcuff her, she began turning around, questioning why she was being arrested, and pulling her arms away. Claiming she was actively resisting, officer Arellano took her down to the asphalt. According to his report, once she was on the ground, she refused repeated commands to roll over onto her stomach. To gain compliance, the trooper delivered a closed-fist strike directly to the left side of her face. The resulting dashcam footage triggered immediate outrage, leading high-profile civil rights attorneys Ben Crump and Luther Sutter to file a federal civil rights lawsuit (Case No. 3:26-cv-00230 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas). Brought under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, the complaint targets Trooper Arellano in his individual capacity, alleging two distinct constitutional violations: —Fourth Amendment (Excessive Force): Arguing that punching a non-violent, unarmed teenager who posed no immediate threat was a disproportionate, punitive measure when lesser options were available. —First Amendment (Retaliation): Arguing that the physical escalation was a direct punishment for Hackett's verbal objections and refusal to remain submissive, which constitute protected speech. The lawsuit also challenges the defense of qualified immunity, asserting that no reasonable officer could believe a closed-fist punch to the face is a lawful response to a teenager pulling her arm away. Where do you draw the line—was this a necessary takedown of a resisting suspect, or a clear-cut case of excessive force?

AmyLouWho

17,263 次观看 • 1 个月前