Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

William O’Neil (1933–2023) explains how the general market creates major tops long before most investors realize what’s happening. In this classic lesson, O’Neil analyzes more than 10 leading stocks simultaneously, showing how market leaders often begin breaking down before the broader market peaks. Featured names include: $NASDAQ $AAPL $NFLX...

31,242 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 SOMETHING VERY STRANGE IS HAPPENING The stock market keeps pushing to new all-time highs. But nobody is paying attention to what’s actually happening. Semiconductor stocks are now worth $13.4T. That’s 19.7% of the entire S&P 500. 4x growth in just five years. And all of that growth depends on one trade: AI. Numbers do not lie: - AI chips generate 50% of all semiconductor revenue - They represent less than 0.2% of total chip shipments - A small group of companies is carrying the entire market Nvidia. Broadcom. TSMC. The same companies every major institution already owns. Here’s how the bubble feeds itself: - Big players fund each other - Partnerships create paper revenue - Money circulates inside the same system We have seen this before: 2000: - A few tech companies carried the entire market - Massive valuations - Narratives driving everything Then reality hit. The S&P 500 collapsed 50%. Now we’re watching the same cycle again. Less than 0.2% of chip volumes are now holding up trillions in market value. And one cut in AI spending is all it takes to break the entire market. Remember, I’ve predicted all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the exact Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 three years ago and the top at $126,000 in October. If you missed those calls, don’t worry. I’ll call the next one too. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

Alex Mason 👁△

228,378 views • 2 months ago

🚨 WARNING: TOMORROW WILL BE THE WORST DAY OF 2026!! JPMorgan will dump $165 BILLION in U.S. stocks right after the market opens. If you think this is a "drop in the ocean" and it won’t affect the markets... YOU ARE COMPLETELY WRONG. Every time JP Morgan sells stocks, the S&P 500 drops 10–20%. And this isn't just about the stock market. It's about liquidity. It's about investor sentiment. And it's about a market that isn't prepared for what's coming. Let me explain: JPMorgan isn't some retail trader taking profits. It's one of the largest and most influential financial institutions on the planet. When they move capital at scale, markets pay attention. And history shows that large institutional selling rarely happens in a vacuum. It usually signals something bigger. A shift in risk appetite. A change in liquidity conditions. Or growing concerns beneath the surface that most investors haven't recognized yet. Now here's the part almost nobody talks about. The direct impact isn't limited to the stocks being sold. Because when a major institution dumps billions of dollars worth of equities, it affects sentiment across the entire market. Selling creates more selling. Liquidity gets thinner. Volatility increases. And risk assets everywhere start to feel the pressure. That's why this isn't just an S&P 500 story. The S&P 500 is the first domino. But the effects will spread into AI stocks. International equities. Commodities. Credit markets. And even digital assets. Today, people are positioned for stability. They're positioned for higher prices. They're positioned for the rally to continue. Which means they're vulnerable if liquidity suddenly moves in the opposite direction. THIS IS THE WARNING. Not because one institution is selling. But because markets often underestimate what large-scale institutional selling can trigger. The risk isn't the transaction itself. The risk is how everyone else reacts to it. Markets aren't pricing that possibility today. But eventually, they will. I've spent more than a decade studying macro and market cycles. I've called some of the biggest market tops and bottoms of the past 10+ years. And I'll call the next market crash in 2026 before the crowd sees it coming. Follow and turn notifications on. I'll post my next market call here first.

0xNobler

375,881 views • 2 months ago

🚨 WARNING: THE WORST DAY OF 2026 IS TOMORROW. JPMorgan is preparing to dump $165,000,000,000 into the market right at open. Thinking this won’t move the market? You’re in for the rudest awakening of your life. Every time JP Morgan sells stocks, the S&P 500 drops 10–20%. And this isn't just about the stock market. It's about liquidity. It's about investor sentiment. And it's about a market that isn't prepared for what's coming. Let me explain: JPMorgan isn't some retail trader taking profits. It's one of the largest and most influential financial institutions on the planet. When they move capital at scale, markets pay attention. And history shows that large institutional selling rarely happens in a vacuum. It usually signals something bigger. A shift in risk appetite. A change in liquidity conditions. Or growing concerns beneath the surface that most investors haven't recognized yet. Now here's the part almost nobody talks about. The direct impact isn't limited to the stocks being sold. Because when a major institution dumps billions of dollars worth of equities, it affects sentiment across the entire market. Selling creates more selling. Liquidity gets thinner. Volatility increases. And risk assets everywhere start to feel the pressure. That's why this isn't just an S&P 500 story. The S&P 500 is the first domino. But the effects will spread into AI stocks. International equities. Commodities. Credit markets. And even digital assets. Today, people are positioned for stability. They're positioned for higher prices. They're positioned for the rally to continue. Which means they're vulnerable if liquidity suddenly moves in the opposite direction. THIS IS THE WARNING. Not because one institution is selling. But because markets often underestimate what large-scale institutional selling can trigger. The risk isn't the transaction itself. The risk is how everyone else reacts to it. Markets aren't pricing that possibility today. But eventually, they will. I've spent more than a decade studying macro and market cycles. I've called some of the biggest market tops and bottoms of the past 10+ years. And I'll call the next market crash in 2026 before the crowd sees it coming. Follow and turn notifications on. I'll post my next market call here first.

WhaleTwits

340,862 views • 2 months ago

Breadth is overrated. If you're trading the absolute best, leading stocks in the market, why does it matter what the thousands of other random stocks are doing? In bull markets, the best stocks can make monster moves for weeks/months on end while breadth inches lower and lower. And in bear markets (when breadth is bad), what good does it do to know where market breadth is if you're still going to only be trading the best of the best stocks based on the merit of the setups/stocks? It's just noise... Breadth was falling off a cliff in December 2024 as Quantum Computing stocks made some of the biggest speculative moves of this decade. Breadth diverged against the indexes and leading stocks for nearly 2 full years from mid-1998 to 2000, one of the best periods to trade of ALL TIME. Pundits and bears in the media would constantly harp on about how breadth was hitting 12-month lows while indexes continued going higher. Even Dan Zanger in Sept 1999 (a month before the NASDAQ exploded 50% higher in 2 months) expressed worry about the Accumulation/Distribution being "far more pronounced to the downside today than was 1929 and similar to 1987." However, he was right to say that "This in no way implies a crash, but does imply a high level of risk." And guess what he did? He deferred to setups on the leading stocks, and made one of the best audited performances of all time. “I at times wonder why I even look at breadth…it’s not needed if you just follow the process of the main strategy, it’ll do everything for you.” - Oliver Kell "If you throw every breadth indicator anyone's ever spoken about out the window, you're not gonna have any issues in my opinion." - Oliver Kell "I don’t look much at breadth, no, because some of the biggest winners...they’re gonna work anyways, some of the strongest sectors, they’re gonna work even if the breadth is low. Like usually what happens after market corrections is the first bounce, the breadth is insane like everything goes up, and for every leg higher (this is what we saw also this spring/summer) the breadth kinda deteriorates and deteriorates and fewer and fewer stocks and sectors going up. But our job is not to trade all of the stocks and sectors, our job is to trade the strongest stocks and sectors, so I don’t care what the breadth is. Or I do care, at some point it matters obviously, but you can just see doing your scanning which stocks are going up or not...breadth can also be very misleading..." - Kristjan Kullamägi 🇺🇦 If you're trading the top 10-50 stocks in the market, breadth most of the time IMO just adds noise to your process and takes attention away from more important things.

Charlie M

32,209 views • 1 year ago

Qullamaggie on the Importance of Leading Stocks “And like people post setups all the time on my stream. People post setups all the time, and this is the hard part — identifying a really good setup versus something that’s random and mediocre. Because that’s gonna also reflect on your results. If you trade the random setups, your results are gonna be random too. You want to find the outlier stocks. You want to see if it has relative strength. The best time to trade this breakout method is after a pullback in the markets. You want to see the stocks that held up the most — the ones that had big moves previously and held up the most. And if you master this setup, if you trade this setup coming out of a small correction, like say a 5-10 or 15% correction in the overall indices, that’s almost like free money for this type of setup. Because if you can identify the stocks that held up the most during the correction — that maybe went down initially but then stopped going down as the correction went on, and actually started building higher lows — that’s telling you something. If you have a stock that’s gone up a lot, and then it stops going down when the market goes down, you know the stock is trying to tell you something. And that’s what leading stocks do. Like every bull market, this is obviously the case. I’m gonna talk more about it later. You obviously need an up-trending or sideways market to trade this method. You have leading stocks — the stocks that go up the most and are the most liquid. And those are really the stocks you want to trade. They’re mostly mid and large caps, but even a small cap can be a leading stock. Those are really the stocks that don’t go down when the market goes down. It’s like you try to push a tennis ball underwater — it just pops back up. And those are the type of stocks you want to find when trading this method.”

Lone

14,473 views • 3 months ago

How did I handle the recent pullback in U.S. stocks? Did I sell the top? 🙅🏻‍♂️ No. Did I hedge perfectly before the market turned? 🙅🏻‍♂️ No. Did I rush to short the market? 🙅🏻‍♂️ No. In my June 7 JLA Weekly Reports, right after the market had pulled back sharply, I wrote: “This pullback looks more like mean reversion after a strong advance, rather than a confirmed major top, crash, or bear market.” Not because I had a crystal ball 🔮 But because the evidence at the time did not support a broad market breakdown. $QQQ had pulled back hard. Semiconductors and AI hardware names were under pressure. Many extended stocks saw sharp profit-taking. But the bigger picture was still intact. $RSP was not collapsing. Market breadth had not broken down aggressively. The Net High / Low Ratio was still holding up. The QQQ weekly chart still looked like a normal pullback after a strong advance. So my base case was clear: This was more likely a reset than the start of a crash. 🔄 A few days later, the market found a low after a 6-day pullback and repaired most of the damage, moving back close to new highs. But the real lesson is not “I was right.” The real lesson is this: When the market pulls back sharply, you need a framework to separate a normal reset from a true character change. That is also why I did not rush to short the market. Shorting a pullback inside a strong uptrend is extremely difficult. When your focus is on the short side, you can easily miss the bigger opportunity: Preparing for the next group of leaders. Even worse, you may lose your winning positions during the process — and when the market recovers, you are forced to buy them back at higher prices. Most traders never do. Because human nature makes it very difficult to sell low and buy back higher. Your mind says: “I’ll wait for another pullback.” Your ego says: “I don’t want to chase.” And your finger simply cannot press the buy button. That is how traders lose their best positions and miss the next group of leaders. 🎯 In strong markets, sharp pullbacks are not always bearish. Sometimes they are necessary. They shake out weak hands, reset sentiment, and reveal where institutional demand still exists. That is why, after a market reset, I focus on the stocks that repair first. Those are often the names with real relative strength — and the ones most likely to lead the next move higher. This is exactly the process I share inside JLA (JLawStock Academy) : 💡How to read the market in real time. 💡How to define the most likely scenario. 💡How to know what would confirm or invalidate it. 💡How to identify real leadership after a reset. 💡How to spot the opportunity before it becomes obvious. The goal is not to be perfect. The goal is to think clearly when the market becomes noisy. 🧠 That is what separates a real trading process from hindsight commentary. And that is what I want JLA members to learn: Not just what I think about the market — but how to think through the market. If you want to learn more about JLA, visit:

J Law

14,900 views • 2 months ago

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING VERY UNUSUAL IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW Treasury yields just surged from 3.9% to 4.3% in MINUTES. Then it happened again. And again. THREE TIMES IN A ROW. The U.S. bond market is collapsing in real time. And that’s not random... Someone is dumping MASSIVE amounts of U.S. Treasuries onto the market. And here’s what matters: When bonds get dumped, yields explode higher. That’s how the bond market works. Which means whoever sold didn’t care about getting the best price. They wanted OUT immediately. That’s the signal. And most people don’t understand how serious that is. The Treasury market is the foundation of the entire financial system. It’s where central banks park reserves. It’s where foreign governments store capital. It’s where the largest institutions on earth hide liquidity. Retail does NOT move the 2yr yield like this. Not even close. This was institutional size. The kind of size that forces the market to react. And that creates one question: Who is exiting? A foreign government reducing exposure. A forced liquidation. A systemic event behind the scenes. One thing is certain: This was NOT normal. And markets always reveal the truth before headlines do. That’s why this week matters. Because when bonds move first… Everything else follows. → Stocks → Currencies → Risk assets → Bitcoin and crypto All of it. The market is sending a message. And ignoring it will be expensive. Watch closely. The next major move is already starting. Follow and turn notifications on before it's too late. You do NOT want to miss what happens next.

0xNobler

49,889 views • 4 months ago