Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Wish it was someone else controlling it 👉👈 Daddy Dave #sissy #sissyslave #chastity #sissychastity #forcedfem #sissification #ForcedFeminization #chastityslave #feminization

LucieLuluzz's profile picture

LucieLuluzz 💕

5,205 subscribers

10,933 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#sissy#sissyslave#chastity#sissychastity#forcedfem#sissification#ForcedFeminization#chastityslave#feminization
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Last one I promise!! #sissy #sissyslut #sissyslave #sissybimbo #sissyboy #sissygirl #gaysissy #sissification #bimbo #bimbofication #feminization #sissychastity #chastity #mtf #forcedfem #sissycaptions #sissyhypno #crossdressing #humiliation #boytogirl #forcedfeminization #gay
0:44

Sensitive content

Last one I promise!! #sissy #sissyslut #sissyslave #sissybimbo #sissyboy #sissygirl #gaysissy #sissification #bimbo #bimbofication #feminization #sissychastity #chastity #mtf #forcedfem #sissycaptions #sissyhypno #crossdressing #humiliation #boytogirl #forcedfeminization #gay

Gwen Evelyn 💋

81,251 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"i was being a bit harsh, maybe, with the adrenaline inside the car. it's true that we've had our moments with kimi in the past, and i hope this calms down a little bit going ahead i wish it was with someone else, and i really like kimi also as a person"
0:43

"i was being a bit harsh, maybe, with the adrenaline inside the car. it's true that we've had our moments with kimi in the past, and i hope this calms down a little bit going ahead i wish it was with someone else, and i really like kimi also as a person"

clara

122,321 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Having this is a flex! When I grew up I was inspired by my elders cuboard because it was full of their own preserves!! I wish I was encouraged to keep that going, I wish I had the knowledge of the benefits. Commercial canning and grocery stores saved time but that time was turned around and used at a job working for someone else to buy more canned foods full of harmful chemicals. Again, her pantry is a flex and new goals. #Inspirenaire
2:03

Having this is a flex! When I grew up I was inspired by my elders cuboard because it was full of their own preserves!! I wish I was encouraged to keep that going, I wish I had the knowledge of the benefits. Commercial canning and grocery stores saved time but that time was turned around and used at a job working for someone else to buy more canned foods full of harmful chemicals. Again, her pantry is a flex and new goals. #Inspirenaire

!Nspirenaire⚠️

12,159 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

Dave Allen shares why he didn't celebrate his brutal KO over Johnny Fisher: "Johnny Fisher is my mate, I do like him. He's someone I really... I admire him, to be honest. He's a really nice fella... but it wouldn't have mattered if it was Johnny Fischer or someone else I didn't like. I would never celebrate. On the way to the ring I could see his old man and his mum and his brothers and sisters, so when he goes down face first... his mum and dad are watching and if it was the other way around, I wouldn't want someone running around celebrating. I'm not even a celebratory guy anyway, really. I've not really celebrated since. I had a Diet Coke after the fight."
1:37

Dave Allen shares why he didn't celebrate his brutal KO over Johnny Fisher: "Johnny Fisher is my mate, I do like him. He's someone I really... I admire him, to be honest. He's a really nice fella... but it wouldn't have mattered if it was Johnny Fischer or someone else I didn't like. I would never celebrate. On the way to the ring I could see his old man and his mum and his brothers and sisters, so when he goes down face first... his mum and dad are watching and if it was the other way around, I wouldn't want someone running around celebrating. I'm not even a celebratory guy anyway, really. I've not really celebrated since. I had a Diet Coke after the fight."

Ariel Helwani

321,014 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Lue Elizondo speaks publicly about Amy Eskridge for the first time “Regarding Amy Eskridge. I had the privilege of meeting her back in Huntsville, Alabama back in 2019. Her and her father had been working on a project. Apparently that involved anti-gravitics. She did provide me and a couple of my colleagues a briefing on it, I am not an anti-gravitics expert. I really don't know what to say about it, whether it was legitimate or not. She did complain that she was on a quote target list. I don't know if it was the same target list that I myself and folks like Dave Grusch were on or if it was someone something else, but she did reveal that to us and she did say that she was fearful for her life.”
3:07

Lue Elizondo speaks publicly about Amy Eskridge for the first time “Regarding Amy Eskridge. I had the privilege of meeting her back in Huntsville, Alabama back in 2019. Her and her father had been working on a project. Apparently that involved anti-gravitics. She did provide me and a couple of my colleagues a briefing on it, I am not an anti-gravitics expert. I really don't know what to say about it, whether it was legitimate or not. She did complain that she was on a quote target list. I don't know if it was the same target list that I myself and folks like Dave Grusch were on or if it was someone something else, but she did reveal that to us and she did say that she was fearful for her life.”

Red Panda Koala

115,999 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Dave Ramsey was asked a simple hypothetical. Would you take a billion dollars at 0% interest for 10 years? He said no. Not because the math was bad. Because he does not borrow money. Period. No exceptions. And that is the problem. There is a difference between bad debt and good debt. Bad debt costs you money. Good debt makes you money. A loan covered by tenants is not a liability. It is a wealth building machine that someone else is paying off for you. Refusing all debt does not protect you. It just keeps you from building anything. The question is never whether to use debt. The question is whether the debt is covered.
1:48

Dave Ramsey was asked a simple hypothetical. Would you take a billion dollars at 0% interest for 10 years? He said no. Not because the math was bad. Because he does not borrow money. Period. No exceptions. And that is the problem. There is a difference between bad debt and good debt. Bad debt costs you money. Good debt makes you money. A loan covered by tenants is not a liability. It is a wealth building machine that someone else is paying off for you. Refusing all debt does not protect you. It just keeps you from building anything. The question is never whether to use debt. The question is whether the debt is covered.

Ken McElroy

19,697 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

D: Get a grip on yourself. Welcome, Mr. Kadir. Go back to your wife Kadir bey otherwise, I'm the one who ends up being misunderstood and subjected to nasty rumors. K:My marriage isn't real. DI'm sorry? K:With Leyla, there is no room in my heart for Leyla. D:So your heart is full then. Are you in love with someone else? K:Yes D:Someone you can't forget, someone you probably won't be able to forget even if years pass, I suppose. K:Yes D:Then why aren't you with her, Kadir bey? K:The situation I'm currently in doesn't allow it. D:I don't know, Mr. Kadir. I just wish you had the courage to claim your love before it was too late for everything. Thank you for the explanation, but it really wasn't necessary. #MuhtemelAşk #DefKad
2:53

D: Get a grip on yourself. Welcome, Mr. Kadir. Go back to your wife Kadir bey otherwise, I'm the one who ends up being misunderstood and subjected to nasty rumors. K:My marriage isn't real. DI'm sorry? K:With Leyla, there is no room in my heart for Leyla. D:So your heart is full then. Are you in love with someone else? K:Yes D:Someone you can't forget, someone you probably won't be able to forget even if years pass, I suppose. K:Yes D:Then why aren't you with her, Kadir bey? K:The situation I'm currently in doesn't allow it. D:I don't know, Mr. Kadir. I just wish you had the courage to claim your love before it was too late for everything. Thank you for the explanation, but it really wasn't necessary. #MuhtemelAşk #DefKad

𝖀𝖓𝖐𝖓𝖔𝖜𝖓

10,669 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

These are the stories about the police you don’t hear about in America In 2024 an autistic man called 911 and told the operator he wanted someone to wish him a birthday Multiple Boston police officers later showed up at the autistic man’s door with a cupcake and candles to wish him a Happy Birthday. The officers even sang him Happy Birthday and asked if there was anything else he needed These stories are important because liberals want you to hate the police and everything they do. But police do good things for people every single day, but because it doesn’t cause outrage, the media doesn’t care
2:39

These are the stories about the police you don’t hear about in America In 2024 an autistic man called 911 and told the operator he wanted someone to wish him a birthday Multiple Boston police officers later showed up at the autistic man’s door with a cupcake and candles to wish him a Happy Birthday. The officers even sang him Happy Birthday and asked if there was anything else he needed These stories are important because liberals want you to hate the police and everything they do. But police do good things for people every single day, but because it doesn’t cause outrage, the media doesn’t care

Wall Street Apes

45,499 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

I keep going more niche with reverse engineered web-based versions of games 👉 👈 6 months ago I tried to reverse engineer Urban Terror Urban Terror was kind of a Counter-Strike style mod on top of the Quake 3 Arena engine, I think Erwin got me to play this during COVID Because it runs on Quake 3's engine like RTCW and Q3 itself, I thought I could just use ioquake3 and WASM to run it on web, then add a multiplayer server and it'd just work... But no it didn't, I got stuck 6 months ago, it was buggy and wouldn't work, I kept trying and kinda got it to load but not really play Today I tried it again with Opus 5.5 and again, I couldn't get it to work, giving up I did a last try with Fable 5.1 on high effort and it after awhile it did figure out the issue! "The engine's struct was 4 bytes longer than what UT's bytecode expects, everything after that point (the entity count and the entity list) was read 4 bytes off" It rewrote the bytecode and made it work! So now we have another game preserved, running 100% the web via WASM, with a multiplayer server tied to it, so you can play with your friends 😊 Every model that comes out makes a bit more things possible and you can just keep trying old things that didn't work before I see lots of people mod modern games now too which looks very cool too Here I'm playing it with Marc Köhlbrugge a few minutes ago! Anyway you can play it with everyone else at now :D
2:02

I keep going more niche with reverse engineered web-based versions of games 👉 👈 6 months ago I tried to reverse engineer Urban Terror Urban Terror was kind of a Counter-Strike style mod on top of the Quake 3 Arena engine, I think Erwin got me to play this during COVID Because it runs on Quake 3's engine like RTCW and Q3 itself, I thought I could just use ioquake3 and WASM to run it on web, then add a multiplayer server and it'd just work... But no it didn't, I got stuck 6 months ago, it was buggy and wouldn't work, I kept trying and kinda got it to load but not really play Today I tried it again with Opus 5.5 and again, I couldn't get it to work, giving up I did a last try with Fable 5.1 on high effort and it after awhile it did figure out the issue! "The engine's struct was 4 bytes longer than what UT's bytecode expects, everything after that point (the entity count and the entity list) was read 4 bytes off" It rewrote the bytecode and made it work! So now we have another game preserved, running 100% the web via WASM, with a multiplayer server tied to it, so you can play with your friends 😊 Every model that comes out makes a bit more things possible and you can just keep trying old things that didn't work before I see lots of people mod modern games now too which looks very cool too Here I'm playing it with Marc Köhlbrugge a few minutes ago! Anyway you can play it with everyone else at now :D

@levelsio

111,563 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

The hypocrisy of this clip is insane. "Hate women and hate people succeeding" This has nothing to do with gender. Idk why gender is being brought up. And I guess people are going to ignore what emz said and pretend like she did nothing wrong. These people have the numbers and can easily get away with this stuff. It sickens me. IT REALLY sucks that I have to make these posts to show the truth. Fadel (aka Gamescage) defending Emzberry despite the violeny posts she made about kirk and "joking" about him. Joking about stuff like this is messed up. We dont see eye to eye on trans stuff and people instantly turn around. I also want to be clear: Harassing someone is different than speaking up for what's right. If you are harassing emz, it will not make this any better and will make our message mean nothing. Also, I'm not a political person - anything close from that was my opinion on trans surgeries. Everything else I wish to stay away from - I'm mostly not aware of politics and I wish to keep it that way. Keep violence and politics out of video games!!
1:03

The hypocrisy of this clip is insane. "Hate women and hate people succeeding" This has nothing to do with gender. Idk why gender is being brought up. And I guess people are going to ignore what emz said and pretend like she did nothing wrong. These people have the numbers and can easily get away with this stuff. It sickens me. IT REALLY sucks that I have to make these posts to show the truth. Fadel (aka Gamescage) defending Emzberry despite the violeny posts she made about kirk and "joking" about him. Joking about stuff like this is messed up. We dont see eye to eye on trans stuff and people instantly turn around. I also want to be clear: Harassing someone is different than speaking up for what's right. If you are harassing emz, it will not make this any better and will make our message mean nothing. Also, I'm not a political person - anything close from that was my opinion on trans surgeries. Everything else I wish to stay away from - I'm mostly not aware of politics and I wish to keep it that way. Keep violence and politics out of video games!!

Miia ♥

46,481 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jennifer Lopez says that her divorce from Ben Affleck was ultimately the best thing that ever happened to her. Jennifer Lopez: When I got divorced this last time, it was the best thing that ever happened to me because it really made me journey into... I mean, I had a religious coach, I had a therapist, a couples therapist, an individual therapist. I had a, you know, a coach to understand addiction. Like, I had everything. I was like, "I'm going to fucking figure this shit out if it kills me." And it really got to the point where I go, "Oh, that... it's the core. It's the core of the thing is you. It's nobody else." And when I did that, now I'm able to sit here in such a more self-assured, kind of self-aware way... and know who I am and just really appreciate that person and feel really comfortable and good in being myself all the good parts and all of the kind of complicated things. Howard Stern: But you haven't had that with someone. Jennifer Lopez: [Sighs] Glimpses. Howard Stern: Glimpses. Yeah, yeah. I wish that for you.
1:12

Jennifer Lopez says that her divorce from Ben Affleck was ultimately the best thing that ever happened to her. Jennifer Lopez: When I got divorced this last time, it was the best thing that ever happened to me because it really made me journey into... I mean, I had a religious coach, I had a therapist, a couples therapist, an individual therapist. I had a, you know, a coach to understand addiction. Like, I had everything. I was like, "I'm going to fucking figure this shit out if it kills me." And it really got to the point where I go, "Oh, that... it's the core. It's the core of the thing is you. It's nobody else." And when I did that, now I'm able to sit here in such a more self-assured, kind of self-aware way... and know who I am and just really appreciate that person and feel really comfortable and good in being myself all the good parts and all of the kind of complicated things. Howard Stern: But you haven't had that with someone. Jennifer Lopez: [Sighs] Glimpses. Howard Stern: Glimpses. Yeah, yeah. I wish that for you.

Nuga

1,091,935 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Housework isn't work. Right? 🤨 Tell that to the British women who were getting paid sick leave for it in 1780. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 Across England, working women had a problem. If they got sick, there was no help coming. ❌ No government. ❌ No employer. ❌ No safety net. So they built their own. 💪 They called them Female Friendly Societies. English and British women pooling their pennies every week into a common fund. 🪙 So that if one of them fell, the others would catch her. 🤝 But here is what made them extraordinary. 👇 The men's societies said: if you can't do your job, you get paid. Simple enough. The women's societies went further. ✍️ Their rules said: housework is work. 🏠 Childcare is work. 👶 If you are too sick to clean, to cook, to care for your children... You get paid. 🪙 Nearly two hundred years before anyone else thought to say it. 😮 Written down by women who had never been to university. Who had no legal training. Who had no political power. Who simply looked at their lives and said: this is work. And we deserve to be protected when we cannot do it. 💪 Nobody told them to. Nobody gave them permission. 🚫 British women just did it. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Town by town. Village by village. Across England. The world didn't pay them for doing it. So they paid each other for losing it. Every penny from their own pockets. Nobody else was going to. 🪙 Our history is the same. Nobody else is coming to save it. So we do it ourselves. Together. 🤝 Be part of us 👉 👈🙏 Be Proud Of Us. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇨🇮🇬🇧
2:04

Housework isn't work. Right? 🤨 Tell that to the British women who were getting paid sick leave for it in 1780. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 Across England, working women had a problem. If they got sick, there was no help coming. ❌ No government. ❌ No employer. ❌ No safety net. So they built their own. 💪 They called them Female Friendly Societies. English and British women pooling their pennies every week into a common fund. 🪙 So that if one of them fell, the others would catch her. 🤝 But here is what made them extraordinary. 👇 The men's societies said: if you can't do your job, you get paid. Simple enough. The women's societies went further. ✍️ Their rules said: housework is work. 🏠 Childcare is work. 👶 If you are too sick to clean, to cook, to care for your children... You get paid. 🪙 Nearly two hundred years before anyone else thought to say it. 😮 Written down by women who had never been to university. Who had no legal training. Who had no political power. Who simply looked at their lives and said: this is work. And we deserve to be protected when we cannot do it. 💪 Nobody told them to. Nobody gave them permission. 🚫 British women just did it. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Town by town. Village by village. Across England. The world didn't pay them for doing it. So they paid each other for losing it. Every penny from their own pockets. Nobody else was going to. 🪙 Our history is the same. Nobody else is coming to save it. So we do it ourselves. Together. 🤝 Be part of us 👉 👈🙏 Be Proud Of Us. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇨🇮🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

30,823 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧 3,500 years ago a Welsh goldsmith beat a single ingot of gold... Thin enough to wrap around the shoulders of a child. In 1833 quarry workmen broke it into pieces. It took the British Museum 120 years to put it back together. In October 1833, a team of workmen dug into a Bronze Age burial mound at Bryn yr Ellyllon, Mold, Flintshire, looking for stone for a wall. They broke into the cist. They found a small skeleton. And beside the bones, beaten flat against the stone, a sheet of gold. 564 grams of it. About 75% pure. Hammered thin. Worked in concentric bands of beaten pattern across the surface. Shaped to wrap around the shoulders of someone small. 🏛️ The workmen had no idea what they had. They split the gold between themselves and took it home. Pieces were sold off, melted down, used as keepsakes. A vicar wrote it up in The Cambrian. Decades later a museum officer began the work of finding the fragments and buying them back. The reassembly took until 1953. 120 years from the day it was broken open. The British Museum's conservators pieced it back together against a leather backing, one fragment at a time, until the cape was whole. It is the finest prehistoric goldwork ever found in Britain. Worked by a Welsh hand. For a child the village had set apart. In a country where the gold for it was mined, the bronze for the tools came from Cornwall, and the people who walked the hill knew the shape of every slope. 🇬🇧 You were told the finest prehistoric goldwork was continental. It was Welsh. And it is still in the British Museum. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ They preserved the child in gold. Help us preserve their story. 👇🙏 👉 👈 Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧
1:38

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧 3,500 years ago a Welsh goldsmith beat a single ingot of gold... Thin enough to wrap around the shoulders of a child. In 1833 quarry workmen broke it into pieces. It took the British Museum 120 years to put it back together. In October 1833, a team of workmen dug into a Bronze Age burial mound at Bryn yr Ellyllon, Mold, Flintshire, looking for stone for a wall. They broke into the cist. They found a small skeleton. And beside the bones, beaten flat against the stone, a sheet of gold. 564 grams of it. About 75% pure. Hammered thin. Worked in concentric bands of beaten pattern across the surface. Shaped to wrap around the shoulders of someone small. 🏛️ The workmen had no idea what they had. They split the gold between themselves and took it home. Pieces were sold off, melted down, used as keepsakes. A vicar wrote it up in The Cambrian. Decades later a museum officer began the work of finding the fragments and buying them back. The reassembly took until 1953. 120 years from the day it was broken open. The British Museum's conservators pieced it back together against a leather backing, one fragment at a time, until the cape was whole. It is the finest prehistoric goldwork ever found in Britain. Worked by a Welsh hand. For a child the village had set apart. In a country where the gold for it was mined, the bronze for the tools came from Cornwall, and the people who walked the hill knew the shape of every slope. 🇬🇧 You were told the finest prehistoric goldwork was continental. It was Welsh. And it is still in the British Museum. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ They preserved the child in gold. Help us preserve their story. 👇🙏 👉 👈 Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

71,397 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨Spoiler a passage from the novel FIRE where Lom talks with her Fai 🚨 🌪️: Fai, did kaphrao make you eat a wasp hive? Why is the view so sour? 🔥I'm just furious. I asked her a nice question, but she doesn't answer. She's pretending to be mysterious. 🌪️: You like her, don't you?If you're going to fight like this every day, when are you even planning to confess? 🔥: I think it's too late kaphrao definitely has someone. Today, her friend casually mentioned the man she's in love with. 🌪️: Oh, so our troubled girl came home with a broken heart. 🔥: It's not funny, Lom. I really wanted to change. I wanted to follow your advice and the advice of other sisters. But if it's too late, then changing for her sake is pointless. Fai was still angry and couldn't calm down. Jam.She needed to know how important this name was to Kaphrao. If a friend mentioned him and Kaphrao got so nervous, it means it's something serious. 🌪️: I never told you to change for someone else by losing yourself. But if you get better and the relationship doesn't work out anyway, you'll still benefit. You will become the best version of yourself. And who knows, maybe someone else will notice it. 🔥: I don't care about someone else. It doesn't matter how many people like me. It's just annoying. 🌪️: But you care about the Kaphrao? 🔥: If I didn't care, I wouldn't be so mad. 🌪️: Well, finally this day has come! The most obnoxious girl in the family has finally fallen in love. I have to tell P'Din and P'Nam immediately. They must hear this shocking news. 🔥: As you wish, P'Lom. But help me think of something. If there is already someone in the heart of Kaphrao. 🌪️: So you're going to give up, Fai? 🔥: People like me don't know the word surrender. I'll get into her heart and stay. There, until she forgets about this man.… #srchafreen‌ #namneungnoey #4elements
0:39

🚨Spoiler a passage from the novel FIRE where Lom talks with her Fai 🚨 🌪️: Fai, did kaphrao make you eat a wasp hive? Why is the view so sour? 🔥I'm just furious. I asked her a nice question, but she doesn't answer. She's pretending to be mysterious. 🌪️: You like her, don't you?If you're going to fight like this every day, when are you even planning to confess? 🔥: I think it's too late kaphrao definitely has someone. Today, her friend casually mentioned the man she's in love with. 🌪️: Oh, so our troubled girl came home with a broken heart. 🔥: It's not funny, Lom. I really wanted to change. I wanted to follow your advice and the advice of other sisters. But if it's too late, then changing for her sake is pointless. Fai was still angry and couldn't calm down. Jam.She needed to know how important this name was to Kaphrao. If a friend mentioned him and Kaphrao got so nervous, it means it's something serious. 🌪️: I never told you to change for someone else by losing yourself. But if you get better and the relationship doesn't work out anyway, you'll still benefit. You will become the best version of yourself. And who knows, maybe someone else will notice it. 🔥: I don't care about someone else. It doesn't matter how many people like me. It's just annoying. 🌪️: But you care about the Kaphrao? 🔥: If I didn't care, I wouldn't be so mad. 🌪️: Well, finally this day has come! The most obnoxious girl in the family has finally fallen in love. I have to tell P'Din and P'Nam immediately. They must hear this shocking news. 🔥: As you wish, P'Lom. But help me think of something. If there is already someone in the heart of Kaphrao. 🌪️: So you're going to give up, Fai? 🔥: People like me don't know the word surrender. I'll get into her heart and stay. There, until she forgets about this man.… #srchafreen‌ #namneungnoey #4elements

FreenBecky33 🇫🇷

48,540 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 THIS IS HAPPENING TOMORROW 🚨 While most Australians are busy, Parliament is preparing to rush through a split bill in a single day. Only 2–3% was removed. The most dangerous part remains ministerial powers to designate “hate groups.” Once the government defines “hate,” belief becomes a liability. Faith. Biology. Family. Speech. This doesn’t end with extremists. History shows it targets Christians and dissenters first. The next 24 hours matter. That’s why the Turning Point team and Joel Jammal built a mass-email tool overnight so YOU can act before the vote. 👉 Use the tool - link: It takes less than 60 seconds. Don’t assume someone else will do it. Don’t assume this is over. This is about who decides what Australians are allowed to believe and say. Act now. Share this. Use the tool.
2:38

🚨 THIS IS HAPPENING TOMORROW 🚨 While most Australians are busy, Parliament is preparing to rush through a split bill in a single day. Only 2–3% was removed. The most dangerous part remains ministerial powers to designate “hate groups.” Once the government defines “hate,” belief becomes a liability. Faith. Biology. Family. Speech. This doesn’t end with extremists. History shows it targets Christians and dissenters first. The next 24 hours matter. That’s why the Turning Point team and Joel Jammal built a mass-email tool overnight so YOU can act before the vote. 👉 Use the tool - link: It takes less than 60 seconds. Don’t assume someone else will do it. Don’t assume this is over. This is about who decides what Australians are allowed to believe and say. Act now. Share this. Use the tool.

George Mamalis

22,227 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

let’s start where this actually lives, not where you want it to live. with the math. the last three weeks of dynamite: 👉 765k 👉 730k 👉 654k that is not a ramp. that is not momentum. that is not “heating up” into a conversion window. that is a decline into it. you are looking at a -111k drop in two weeks, roughly 14–15% contraction from the high to the low, at the exact point where a traditional ppv cycle should be stabilizing or expanding. instead, you have compression. average those three weeks and you land at roughly ~716k linear viewers. that is your real, observable, measurable audience. not hypothetical reach not cumulative impressions not social engagement proxies actual people sitting down and watching the show in the time slot that matters for conversion. i’ve already laid out in detail what the max numbers actually represent and how simulcast behavior works, so i’m not going to re-litigate all of that here. but it matters enough to say again clearly: max is not a second audience at scale. it is a distribution extension that splits the same audience. it does not double your reach. it does not materially expand your funnel. it shifts a portion of existing behavior from one pipe to another. the short version is already established: 👉 max is not additive at scale 👉 max is a split of the same audience 👉 max realistically contributes ~50k–150k, ~75k center so your total reachable audience on a good night is: 👉 ~790k–800k all-in that’s the funnel. that’s the ceiling. that’s the number you are working from. that’s the universe that can possibly convert into a paid transaction. not hypothetical not inflated not “what if” that is the real audience number. now take the number dave is floating: 👉 ~143k ppv buys run the only equation that matters: 👉 143k ÷ 800k = ~17.9% conversion stop there for a second Dave Meltzer is unironically asserting that nearly 1 out of every 5 viewers is converting into a $40–$50 transaction in 2026 in a market with: – no centralized ppv infrastructure – subscription-first behavior – widespread piracy – fragmented pricing (domestic, max discount, vpn international) – a declining weekly audience trend that is the claim. not “strong performance.” not “better than expected.” not “up year over year.” the claim is nearly 1 in 5 viewers converting into a $40–$50 transaction in 2026. this is where the conversation should end, because that number does not exist anywhere in modern media behavior. it doesn’t exist in boxing. it doesn’t exist in ufc. it doesn’t exist in any scaled transactional model operating in the current environment. and more importantly, it didn’t exist consistently even when the infrastructure supporting it was intact. again, this is the part people either don’t understand or choose to ignore: ppv is not just a pricing model. it is an infrastructure model. and that infrastructure is gone. for decades, the backbone of ppv was inDemand. that system wasn’t just pushing content out to cable homes. it was aggregating buys, standardizing reporting, and creating a reconciliation layer that allowed promoters, distributors, and networks to operate off the same dataset. if you were serious about this business, you could triangulate numbers. you could get within a narrow band of reality because the pipes were real and the accounting was shared. that system shut down in 2025. 👉 143k ppv buys is not an aggressive take 👉 it is not an optimistic take 👉 it is a structurally impossible take because we know what real conversion looks like. we do not need to guess. it has been modeled across combat sports, boxing, ufc, and multiple transactional platforms. the ranges are stable: 👉 1–3% → normal 👉 3–5% → strong 👉 5%+ → elite and rare, reserved for events with massive cultural heat and crossover appeal those ranges were established when the infrastructure was intact, pricing was more controlled, piracy was less frictionless, and distribution was more centralized. today, every one of those conditions is worse. pricing is fragmented. you have $49.99 standard, $39.99 through max, international pricing accessible through vpn, and a piracy environment where high-quality streams are available instantly. that is a high-friction, high-leakage system. so conversion should compress, not expand. now apply real-world conversion to your real audience: 👉 800k × 2% = 16k buys 👉 800k × 3% = 24k buys 👉 800k × 5% = 40k buys that’s your range. 👉 ~15k–35k realistic 👉 ~20k–30k as the most defensible center 👉 ~40k reasonable given the strength of the headliners now invert the math, because this is where the claim completely collapses. if you want to justify 143k buys at even a healthy 3% conversion rate, you need roughly 4.7 million engaged viewers. so the question becomes extremely simple: where are the other four million people? 👉they are not on linear television. 👉they are not on max. 👉they are not showing up in any digital engagement metrics that correlate with that level of demand. 👉they are not visible anywhere in the ecosystem that would need to exist to support that level of conversion. 👉👉👉👉👉 they do not exist. and this is before you even account for the trend line moving the wrong way. you are not converting off a growing base. you are converting off a shrinking one. you are not building urgency. you are losing reach. that matters, because conversion does not happen in a vacuum. it happens on top of momentum, visibility, and audience expansion. when those inputs are declining, conversion does not spike to historic highs. it compresses further. the biggest fights in the world are no longer relying on ppv as their primary distribution model. they are moving to platforms that guarantee reach and revenue up front. the most recent example should end this conversation for anyone actually paying attention: netflix just locked tyson fury vs anthony joshua for a major global fight this august. that is one of the biggest possible matchups in boxing. in any previous era, that is a premium ppv event with massive buy expectations, heavy marketing, and a full transactional rollout. instead, it is going to a subscription platform. why? because the economics are better. the reach is global. the friction is lower. the platform values engagement at scale over one-off purchases. that is where the industry is. so when you are being asked to believe that a weekly wrestling property with a ~700k linear audience, declining into its ppv window, is somehow generating six-figure transactional buys inside a subscription platform in 2026, you are not just being asked to accept a number. dave is asking you to ignore the direction of the entire market. and that’s before you even bring in platform behavior. max is not a live sports-first platform. it does not behave like one. when max has something it cares about, it promotes it aggressively. homepage rails. push notifications. press releases. talent integration. cross-platform amplification. you do not see that here. and that absence is not accidental. platforms surface what they want you to see. they amplify what drives engagement and revenue. if ppv at scale were happening inside that ecosystem, it would be visible. it would be part of the narrative. it would be monetized loudly. it isn’t. and that’s before you even factor in the other variables i’ve broken down in detail before: 👉 i’ve already debunked why the max numbers people are throwing around don’t make sense 👉 i’ve already explained what the linear number actually represents and what it doesn’t 👉 i’ve already mapped the media rights landscape in 2026, including how these properties are being evaluated ahead of the paramount–wbd merger the wsj reports could close as early as july so when you’re being told by dave that a property with a ~700k weekly audience trending downward into a ppv window is generating six-figure transactional buys at premium pricing inside a subscription platform in 2026, you’re not being given data. you’re being given a number that does not reconcile with anything else in the system. that’s math. stop it - 45
1:00

let’s start where this actually lives, not where you want it to live. with the math. the last three weeks of dynamite: 👉 765k 👉 730k 👉 654k that is not a ramp. that is not momentum. that is not “heating up” into a conversion window. that is a decline into it. you are looking at a -111k drop in two weeks, roughly 14–15% contraction from the high to the low, at the exact point where a traditional ppv cycle should be stabilizing or expanding. instead, you have compression. average those three weeks and you land at roughly ~716k linear viewers. that is your real, observable, measurable audience. not hypothetical reach not cumulative impressions not social engagement proxies actual people sitting down and watching the show in the time slot that matters for conversion. i’ve already laid out in detail what the max numbers actually represent and how simulcast behavior works, so i’m not going to re-litigate all of that here. but it matters enough to say again clearly: max is not a second audience at scale. it is a distribution extension that splits the same audience. it does not double your reach. it does not materially expand your funnel. it shifts a portion of existing behavior from one pipe to another. the short version is already established: 👉 max is not additive at scale 👉 max is a split of the same audience 👉 max realistically contributes ~50k–150k, ~75k center so your total reachable audience on a good night is: 👉 ~790k–800k all-in that’s the funnel. that’s the ceiling. that’s the number you are working from. that’s the universe that can possibly convert into a paid transaction. not hypothetical not inflated not “what if” that is the real audience number. now take the number dave is floating: 👉 ~143k ppv buys run the only equation that matters: 👉 143k ÷ 800k = ~17.9% conversion stop there for a second Dave Meltzer is unironically asserting that nearly 1 out of every 5 viewers is converting into a $40–$50 transaction in 2026 in a market with: – no centralized ppv infrastructure – subscription-first behavior – widespread piracy – fragmented pricing (domestic, max discount, vpn international) – a declining weekly audience trend that is the claim. not “strong performance.” not “better than expected.” not “up year over year.” the claim is nearly 1 in 5 viewers converting into a $40–$50 transaction in 2026. this is where the conversation should end, because that number does not exist anywhere in modern media behavior. it doesn’t exist in boxing. it doesn’t exist in ufc. it doesn’t exist in any scaled transactional model operating in the current environment. and more importantly, it didn’t exist consistently even when the infrastructure supporting it was intact. again, this is the part people either don’t understand or choose to ignore: ppv is not just a pricing model. it is an infrastructure model. and that infrastructure is gone. for decades, the backbone of ppv was inDemand. that system wasn’t just pushing content out to cable homes. it was aggregating buys, standardizing reporting, and creating a reconciliation layer that allowed promoters, distributors, and networks to operate off the same dataset. if you were serious about this business, you could triangulate numbers. you could get within a narrow band of reality because the pipes were real and the accounting was shared. that system shut down in 2025. 👉 143k ppv buys is not an aggressive take 👉 it is not an optimistic take 👉 it is a structurally impossible take because we know what real conversion looks like. we do not need to guess. it has been modeled across combat sports, boxing, ufc, and multiple transactional platforms. the ranges are stable: 👉 1–3% → normal 👉 3–5% → strong 👉 5%+ → elite and rare, reserved for events with massive cultural heat and crossover appeal those ranges were established when the infrastructure was intact, pricing was more controlled, piracy was less frictionless, and distribution was more centralized. today, every one of those conditions is worse. pricing is fragmented. you have $49.99 standard, $39.99 through max, international pricing accessible through vpn, and a piracy environment where high-quality streams are available instantly. that is a high-friction, high-leakage system. so conversion should compress, not expand. now apply real-world conversion to your real audience: 👉 800k × 2% = 16k buys 👉 800k × 3% = 24k buys 👉 800k × 5% = 40k buys that’s your range. 👉 ~15k–35k realistic 👉 ~20k–30k as the most defensible center 👉 ~40k reasonable given the strength of the headliners now invert the math, because this is where the claim completely collapses. if you want to justify 143k buys at even a healthy 3% conversion rate, you need roughly 4.7 million engaged viewers. so the question becomes extremely simple: where are the other four million people? 👉they are not on linear television. 👉they are not on max. 👉they are not showing up in any digital engagement metrics that correlate with that level of demand. 👉they are not visible anywhere in the ecosystem that would need to exist to support that level of conversion. 👉👉👉👉👉 they do not exist. and this is before you even account for the trend line moving the wrong way. you are not converting off a growing base. you are converting off a shrinking one. you are not building urgency. you are losing reach. that matters, because conversion does not happen in a vacuum. it happens on top of momentum, visibility, and audience expansion. when those inputs are declining, conversion does not spike to historic highs. it compresses further. the biggest fights in the world are no longer relying on ppv as their primary distribution model. they are moving to platforms that guarantee reach and revenue up front. the most recent example should end this conversation for anyone actually paying attention: netflix just locked tyson fury vs anthony joshua for a major global fight this august. that is one of the biggest possible matchups in boxing. in any previous era, that is a premium ppv event with massive buy expectations, heavy marketing, and a full transactional rollout. instead, it is going to a subscription platform. why? because the economics are better. the reach is global. the friction is lower. the platform values engagement at scale over one-off purchases. that is where the industry is. so when you are being asked to believe that a weekly wrestling property with a ~700k linear audience, declining into its ppv window, is somehow generating six-figure transactional buys inside a subscription platform in 2026, you are not just being asked to accept a number. dave is asking you to ignore the direction of the entire market. and that’s before you even bring in platform behavior. max is not a live sports-first platform. it does not behave like one. when max has something it cares about, it promotes it aggressively. homepage rails. push notifications. press releases. talent integration. cross-platform amplification. you do not see that here. and that absence is not accidental. platforms surface what they want you to see. they amplify what drives engagement and revenue. if ppv at scale were happening inside that ecosystem, it would be visible. it would be part of the narrative. it would be monetized loudly. it isn’t. and that’s before you even factor in the other variables i’ve broken down in detail before: 👉 i’ve already debunked why the max numbers people are throwing around don’t make sense 👉 i’ve already explained what the linear number actually represents and what it doesn’t 👉 i’ve already mapped the media rights landscape in 2026, including how these properties are being evaluated ahead of the paramount–wbd merger the wsj reports could close as early as july so when you’re being told by dave that a property with a ~700k weekly audience trending downward into a ppv window is generating six-figure transactional buys at premium pricing inside a subscription platform in 2026, you’re not being given data. you’re being given a number that does not reconcile with anything else in the system. that’s math. stop it - 45

Nick LoPiccolo

20,695 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten