正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

With pharmaceutically engineered, synthetic mRNA and Spike protein found in the human heart, how can potential long term damage be ignored? Why no BIG PHARMA or HHS agency investigation? How can more mRNA products (boosters, mRESVIA, mFLUSIVA) be allowed on the market? Courtesy Pompa Podcast. McCullough Foundation

40,368 次观看 • 8 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

"It Was Clear From The Beginning, The Illness Of COVID Was Actually All About The Vaccine...A Needle Into Every Arm." Dr Peter McCullough, MD The Vaccine Did Not Save Millions Of Lives...The Shots Contain A Killer Protein That Cannot Be Turned Off...It Was Not Safe By Design. The predominant COVID-19 vaccine platforms include messenger RNA (mRNA) Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax & Zifi Vax – mRNA & viral vector vaccines involve the bodily synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein as the foundation of the immune response. Regardless of the vaccine platform used, circulating SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein is the detrimental agent through which COVID-19 vaccines cause biological harm. Here Is The 'How & Why' Of The Spike Protein Mechanism That Leads To Harm & Death: Spike protein initiates the breakdown & internalization of ACE2 receptors, which disrupts the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) & lead to increased inflammation, vasoconstriction & thrombosis. Further, Spike protein stimulates platelets & inflicts damage to the endothelium, which leads to arterial & venous thrombosis. Immune cells that have absorbed the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) subsequently reintroduce them into the bloodstream with a higher number of exosomes carrying microRNAs & Spike protein, resulting in drastic inflammation. Long term immune surveillance is compromised by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines due to IRF7, IRF9, p53 & BRCA suppression. There is a causal link between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination & myocarditis, neurodegenerative disease, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impeded DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. Moreover, a recent study found that repeated COVID-19 vaccination with mRNA-based vaccines leads to the production of abnormally high concentrations of IgG4 antibodies. These antibodies fail to neutralize Spike protein, which has been shown to circulate for at least 28 days, cause immune suppression & promote the development of autoimmune diseases including myocarditis. 👇Fatal COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis👇 👇Cardiac Arrest After COVID-19 Vaccination👇 👇DNA Fragments In Pfizer & Moderna Vaccines👇 Speaker: Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation

Valerie Anne Smith

67,928 次观看 • 1 年前

New Research Deep Dive: The "Shedding" Conversation Just Got More Serious A new in-vitro study (using human cells in a lab) on the Pfizer mRNA vaccine has revealed critical findings that can no longer be ignored. Let's break it down. The researchers confirmed two major things: 1️⃣ Spike Protein Production: The cells successfully took up the mRNA and began producing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, displaying it on their surface. This was expected. 2️⃣ Spike Protein "Shedding" via Exosomes: Here's the crucial part. The cells didn't just keep the spike protein to themselves. They packaged it into exosomes—tiny extracellular vesicles cells use to communicate—and excreted them into the environment. Why does this matter? This provides a potential mechanistic blueprint for how spike protein could travel systemically throughout the body after vaccination. These spike-laden exosomes can enter the bloodstream and, theoretically, deliver their cargo to distant organs and other cells. But the most alarming part? The authors note a profound lack of safety data. They explicitly state: We have no scientific studies to determine if this exosome-mediated spread of spike protein is toxic to other human cells. Even more concerning, they observed "pathological changes" and toxicity within the cells producing the spike. And these weren't weak cells—they were robust, immortalized embryonic kidney cells, chosen for their resilience. If these cells showed adverse effects, what is the impact on our more delicate primary cells? The authors themselves caution that proper toxicology studies on normal human cell lines are urgently needed... and are currently unavailable. This isn't conspiracy theory. This is cell biology. The conversation must evolve from if spike protein can travel, to what are the systemic consequences when it does. The call for rigorous, independent safety science has never been louder.

Camus

48,219 次观看 • 9 个月前

The Swiss study showed that 1/35 people who received an mRNA covid booster had "Vaccine associated myocardial injury" aka "heart damage" So I asked GROK, how many people would have heart damage if 2.56 Billion people had Boosters? ◻️73.1 Million People According to the WHO, 32% of the World has had at least 1 x "Booster" dose (3 x doses). That's "around" 2.56 Billion people. We know that most had Moderna or Pfizer mRNA technology, but not all of them. So how close to 73.1 Million people do you think we are? (GROK AI) "based on this study, approximately 73.1 million people worldwide might have experienced heart damage after receiving a third dose of the mRNA vaccine." Context by GROK with fact check included: "If the Swiss study indicated that 1 out of every 35 people who received a third dose of the mRNA COVID vaccine experienced heart damage, and if 2.56 billion people have received a third dose, then we can estimate the number of people with heart damage as follows: Fraction with heart damage: 1/35 Total number of people with third dose: 2.56 billion Therefore, based on this study, approximately 73.1 million people worldwide might have experienced heart damage after receiving a third dose of the mRNA vaccine. Important Notes: This calculation assumes the rate of heart damage found in the Swiss study applies universally across all demographics and conditions, which might not be accurate due to various factors like population differences, health conditions, etc. The study's findings should be interpreted with caution. Several sources mentioned in the context indicate that the heart damage detected was often mild, transient, and not necessarily indicative of long-term damage or myocarditis. The significance of these findings has been debated, with some suggesting the actual clinical impact might be less severe or significant than the raw numbers suggest." End quote

Humanspective

249,846 次观看 • 1 年前