正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

With the #Panthers winning their second consecutive #StanleyCup last night, should they be considered a dynasty? If not, what constitutes a dynasty in sports?

21,000 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Ross Tucker 的头像
Ross Tucker1 年前

3 titles in 5 or 6 years with same core of players

DRich 的头像
DRich1 年前

For me; a dynasty must have 3 titles in a 5,6,7 year span. 4 titles in a 10-12 year span. Etc. Recent dynasties. KC (20-now) and NE (01-04) (14-18) are the most recent NFL ones. In NBA: GSW (15-22), LeBron (11-20), (Lakers 00-02), (08-10). Spurs (03-07) but argue (99-13)

Steven Rosso 的头像
Steven Rosso1 年前

No way. You can’t be a dynasty with only two titles

Jeff 的头像
Jeff1 年前

3+ titles in 5 years.

Rakka Suripa & Sukaruhakkā 的头像
Rakka Suripa & Sukaruhakkā1 年前

If you win three championships with the same core in under a decade

Otis Criblecoblis 的头像
Otis Criblecoblis1 年前

Were the 80's Celtics a dynasty? They won three championships. The Lakers won five. How can a team be dynastic during a period when another team was better?

Paul Luebeck 😃 🤡 😷 👽 的头像
Paul Luebeck 😃 🤡 😷 👽1 年前

3 in a row. 4 out of 5...

STEVE 的头像
STEVE1 年前

Over a decade....most # of championships....so 70 s Steelers, 80s San Francisco, 90s Dallas I think....

david 的头像
david1 年前

3 outta 5 in 7ish years

Andrew Butts 的头像
Andrew Butts1 年前

Nfl requires 3, hockey is harder to win so even if you wanted to say more forgiving it would have to ba much longer window of being a top cup favourite/deep playoff team than 3 years

相关视频