Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 WOAH: Senator Mullin RIPS INTO Democrat Colleagues for being "Anti-Science" During Second RFK Jr. Hearing "I DON'T GET IT, GUYS! AREN'T WE SUPPOSED TO QUESTION SCIENCE?" "If he were Biden's pick, you'd LOVE that he's questioning the science! You would probably support his positions 100%, but because he's...

66,334 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Kaizen
Kaizenvor 1 Jahr

There's no such thing as "the science" Science is a discourse that should be questioned and tested until the hypotheses and theories are either proven or disproven.

Profilbild von Rock Paper Sizzle
Rock Paper Sizzlevor 2 Jahren

💪If you're seeing this, it must mean you support Trump. 👏 Let us help you show it. ✅ Classic, Tough, Real American Gear Here:

Profilbild von Stop Socialist Tyranny
Stop Socialist Tyrannyvor 1 Jahr

Love Senator Mullin calling out Democrat hypocrisy on science Great to see RFK Jr getting a hearing, hope he exposes the truth on vaccine safety MAGA candidates like Trump and RFK Jr are the only ones brave enough to question the narrative

Profilbild von SANDSKI🇺🇸🇵🇱
SANDSKI🇺🇸🇵🇱vor 1 Jahr

Not questioning science is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Science is not 100%. Never has been.

Profilbild von 4lteredBeast.eth
4lteredBeast.ethvor 1 Jahr

There's a big difference between "questioning the data/study" vs "questioning science". Science is a method of observing, hypothesising, testing, analysing data, revising and repeating. Questioning past observations is a part of science. If you are referring to questioning past observations or data, say that. But stop calling it "questioning science". You're confusing some into thinking that they are qualified to question actual scientific methodologies, because "we should be able to question science". If you want to question past observations/data, go and do "the science" aka do a real study to prove that it's wrong. Then publish your study and wait to see what your peers have to say. And trust me, they will have a lot to say. That's actually specifically how this works. If you can't even define what you're questioning, how are we ever going to be able to actually discuss anything in a civil and honest manner.

Profilbild von Rob W ⏳️ 🇨🇦🇺🇸
Rob W ⏳️ 🇨🇦🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

Questioning science is how you do science. You don't believe in science, you believe in religion. You question science.

Profilbild von Wisdom all knowing
Wisdom all knowingvor 1 Jahr

Senator Hassan received huge pay out from big pharma an extreme actress crying & ranting minimizing @ trying to humiliate RFK Confirm 💗 @RobertKennedyJr to bring transparency & 🛑 medical tyranny! MAHA

Profilbild von Rudy Mut
Rudy Mutvor 1 Jahr

@KissMyCarol The only families that I know that don't have autism are unvaccinated.

Profilbild von Chad Lykins
Chad Lykinsvor 1 Jahr

👏👏👏

Profilbild von 🅿🅴🅿🅴🐸🦧🅺🅾🅽🅶(🪈,🪈)
🅿🅴🅿🅴🐸🦧🅺🅾🅽🅶(🪈,🪈)vor 1 Jahr

Thank God for people like him and @RobertKennedyJr who won’t sacrifice something as objectively good as reason and the scientific method just to win power thru manipulative rhetoric.

Ähnliche Videos

BREAKING IN WASHINGTON: Dr. Fauci tells Congress he had to contradict President Trump on the podium because he felt it was his responsibility to tell the American people the truth, to tell them about what science actually said. He was responding to a leading question by Democratic Congressman Jared Moskowitz (Jared Moskowitz). WATCH Question: Dr. Fauci, you talked about how we live in partisan times. A lot of misinformation and colleagues on this body said you should be charged and found guilty. Of course, the only one that's happened to is your former boss. But the question I have is when you saw a lot of that disinformation, whether it was we can use a disinfectant to do like a cleaning or do light in the body, or that China is working super hard, President Xi's got it contained. All of this stuff that was being put out, were you concerned? What was your feeling at that time working in the administration, seeing that come from the podium? Answer: Well, I was very frustrated by that. It was very clear I was put in a very difficult position that I didn't like of having to contradict publicly the president of the United States. I took no great pleasure in that, but I felt it was my responsibility to preserve. Question: He must have thought you did a great job. He gave you a commendation right before he left. Answer: Well, I felt it was my responsibility, you know, as to preserve my own personal integrity and my major responsibility to the American public to tell them the truth. And if I could just take this opportunity. When I was saying that if you attack me, you attack science, I didn't mean that I am science. What I meant was that when the data show that hydroxychloroquine does not work and there are people saying, oh, it does, I'll give it to people, and we know it can be hurtful to them, then when you're attacking what I'm saying, that the science shows it doesn't work and the science shows that bleach doesn't work, that when you attack that you really are attacking science because science has shown that it doesn't work. That's what I meant when you attack me, you're attacking science. Response: Thank you, doctor. Thank you, mister chairman. I yield back, time's expired. Now recognize Mister Jordan from...

Simon Ateba

2,818,632 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The CDC Doesn't Want You to Hear This Conversation Between Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson TUCKER: Is your average Amish teenager happier than your average conventional American teenager on Instagram? ROGAN: Well, they certainly have less instances of autism, which is really fascinating. It's very, very fascinating. CARLSON: The Amish have less autism? ROGAN: Yeah, there's almost none. TUCKER: Well, I'm not surprised. ROGAN: It's extremely rare. TUCKER: Why do we think that is? ROGAN: I wonder. I really do. TUCKER: Well, I can think of a couple — Yeah, I don't want to go Bobby Kennedy on you. ROGAN: But that's the problem. If you go Bobby Kennedy, they'll come for you. But the question is why? TUCKER: Look, and I don't know the answer, but... ROGAN: How is that not in the debate? How is that not in the conversation? TUCKER: Well, it's not only not in the conversation, you're punished for adding it to the conversation. And so, like... ROGAN: We are dancing around anti-vax conspiracy theories right now. TUCKER: Why be on the defensive? It's like, if you purport to represent science, and you're mad about a question. ROGAN: And you're ignoring data. TUCKER: Yeah, but even in the absence of data, science is a process. Yes. It's not a result. It's a way of doing things. And at the core of science is asking questions, including unlikely questions. That's what science is. And if you don't allow that, then you may be doing something, but what you're not doing is science. We can say that conclusively. So, for people to wrap themselves in the mantle of science and attack you for asking a question, they're frauds.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

13,620,181 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren