正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Woke Right anti-capitalist "Distributist Dave" Greene explains why he's ultimately a monarchist, but like the other Woke Right monarchists, they can never actually describe how a good king will be identified or kept good. Like the Woke Left, they just want "not that!"

33,435 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

President Dr RollerGator MVIP PhD 的头像
President Dr RollerGator MVIP PhD1 年前

ALL HAIL THE NEW KING

Benjamin Franklin 的头像
Benjamin Franklin1 年前

Based king who tortures and kills leftists and communists and dissidents. We can get the based king again if Iran will just do a regime change. MIGA.

VisibleTrouble 的头像
VisibleTrouble1 年前

He wants the King as velvet glove (Features) to disguise the tyrannical/totalitarian nature of the iron fist (Properties). Because Sargon only sees features, he'll nod along. Not joking, James Properties vs Features is key. Features: red, body, ground effects,antenna, cowling,etc

Josh Watts 的头像
Josh Watts1 年前

Said for years woke liberals are monarchists. Heres another

Wrestles with D-g 的头像
Wrestles with D-g1 年前

Even Marcus Aurelius couldn’t pick a good heir

Pet Rock 的头像
Pet Rock1 年前

Absolute monarchy with a perfectly righteous king is actually the best form of government

Luis Gonzalez 的头像
Luis Gonzalez1 年前

This is why I want you to sit down with Greene (and others like him): pose these questions to him. Make him answer and if he can’t, he discredits himself.

Galactic Opossum 的头像
Galactic Opossum1 年前

Just when I thought the term "woke right" couldn't get any dumber, here we are.

Theatromania 的头像
Theatromania1 年前

@PSA_Sitch James you are a leftist

相关视频

Jordan Peterson explained the Woke Right ("Alt Right") back in 2018. It's not new, but two things are. 1) It's making a concerted bid for power in mainstream conservative spaces now and significantly succeed after years of infiltration 2) We know what makes them "Alt" is Woke. There's an interesting additional point here that's very important. Peterson is talking about how the Left tried to label him "Alt Right" as a polarizing smear. The Woke Left could do that because it can draw a distinction between itself and the reaction it created so long as there's distinction in the names. They could make it seem like there was a sprawling Alt Right that's really evil and scary and only the Woke Left can resist it. Peterson was having to defy this at considerable effort, and much of the Left didn't buy it anyway. This is the dialectic. The term "Woke Right" throws a monkey wrench into this dialectical program and breaks the machine. The (Woke) Left can post up and do the dialectic against any name for it except "Woke Right." The reason is that the term "Woke Right" is derivative to Woke, so you cannot think of the Woke Right without also thinking of the Woke Left, which is the referent. What makes the Woke Right bad is being almost just like the Woke Left. "Woke," not Left or Right, becomes the problem, short-circuiting the dialectic and neutering the Left on this dimension of their united front tactics. It therefore puts the problem squarely where it belongs: on Woke. This frees people up to consider Left and Right (better: liberal and conservative) outside of the polarizing game of radical extremes. It was this factor that ultimately sold me completely on the term "Woke Right" not just as accurate and good but as genius. H/t (clip and argument) Entropyrian, who is a great follow.

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

47,160 次观看 • 1 年前